LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_004333.6:c.1790T>G
BRAF
· NP_004324.2:p.(Leu597Arg)
· NM_004333.6
GRCh37: chr7:140453145 A>C
·
GRCh38: chr7:140753345 A>C
Gene:
BRAF
Transcript:
NM_004333.6
Final call
VUS
PS3 moderate
PM1 moderate
PP3 supporting
Variant details
Gene
BRAF
Transcript
NM_004333.6
Protein
NP_004324.2:p.(Leu597Arg)
gnomAD AF
6.20073515916047e-07 (v4.1)
ClinVar
Pathogenic
OncoKB
Likely Oncogenic
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
PS3 Moderate: p.L597R increased phospho-MEK and phospho-ERK in two approved functional assay types.
2
PM1 Moderate: residue 597 lies within BRAF's VCEP-defined CR3 activation segment.
3
PP3 Supporting: REVEL 0.964 exceeds the BRAF VCEP threshold of 0.7.
Final determination:
Under the BRAF VCEP Version 2.3 framework, two moderate criteria plus only one supporting criterion satisfy no pathogenic rule, and no benign rule is met; the result is VUS.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | Not applicable: the VCEP explicitly excludes PVS1, and this variant is a missense p.(Leu597Arg) substitution rather than a listed null consequence. |
cspec
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| PS1 | Not assessed | Not assessed: exact L597R reports are available, but no previously established pathogenic comparator is documented under the VCEP rule. |
cspec
PMID:22798288
PMID:24933606
vcep_raf_alignment
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no documented de novo proband, confirmed maternity and paternity, or PS2 point evidence is available for NM_004333.6:c.1790T>G. |
cspec
|
| PS3 | Met | Met, Moderate: p.L597R increased both phospho-MEK and phospho-ERK in cells, representing two distinct VCEP-approved pathway assay types. |
cspec
vcep_svi_rasopathy_vcep_v2_approved_functional_studies
PMID:22798288
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no verified RASopathy case-control counts, OR/RR with confidence interval, or sufficient unrelated affected probands are available to assign VCEP PS4 points. |
cspec
PMID:22798288
PMID:24933606
PMID:26643848
PMID:22142829
|
| PM1 | Met | Met at Moderate: residue 597 lies within the VCEP-defined CR3 activation segment, amino acids 594-627. |
cspec
vcep_raf_alignment
|
| PM2 | Not met | Not met: gnomAD v4.1 contains 1 allele at AF 6.20×10^-7, so the VCEP's required complete absence from gnomAD is not satisfied. |
cspec
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM3 | N/A | Not applicable: the BRAF RASopathy VCEP explicitly designates PM3 as not applicable. |
cspec
|
| PM4 | N/A | Not applicable: p.(Leu597Arg) is a single missense substitution with no protein-length change, so it does not meet the PM4 consequence class. |
cspec
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| PM5 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no qualifying likely pathogenic alternate missense change at codon 597 is documented for the required PM5 comparison. |
cspec
pm5_candidates
PMID:26643848
vcep_raf_alignment
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no assumed-de novo observation, parental testing, phenotype documentation, or PM6 point assignment is available for NM_004333.6:c.1790T>G. |
cspec
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | Not assessed: zero informative meioses or affected-family segregation results are documented, below the VCEP minimum of 3 for supporting PP1. |
cspec
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | Not assessed: the required BRAF gnomAD missense z score is not available for comparison with the >3.09 threshold. |
cspec
|
| PP3 | Met | Met at Supporting: REVEL score 0.964 meets the BRAF VCEP missense threshold of ≥0.7. |
cspec
revel
|
| PP4 | N/A | Not applicable: the BRAF VCEP explicitly directs phenotype-specific evidence to PS4 rather than using PP4. |
cspec
|
| PP5 | N/A | Not applicable: the BRAF VCEP states that PP5 is not for use under this specification. |
cspec
|
| BA1 | Not met | Not met: gnomAD v4.1 total AF is 0.000062%, far below the VCEP's 0.05% BA1 threshold. |
cspec
gnomad_v4
|
| BS1 | Not met | Not met: gnomAD v4.1 total AF is 0.000062%, below the VCEP's 0.025% BS1 threshold. |
cspec
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | Not assessed: gnomAD reports 0 homozygotes but provides no phenotype, age, penetrance, or VCEP point assignment for healthy individuals. |
cspec
gnomad_v4
|
| BS3 | N/A | Not applicable: the BRAF VCEP explicitly marks BS3 not applicable, and p.L597R increased phospho-MEK and phospho-ERK. |
cspec
vcep_svi_rasopathy_vcep_v2_approved_functional_studies
PMID:22798288
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no affected relative lacking the variant and no informative meiosis are documented, while the VCEP requires one informative meiosis. |
cspec
|
| BP1 | N/A | Not applicable: p.Leu597Arg is missense, whereas the VCEP BP1 rule is limited to specified truncating variant types. |
cspec
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no documented same-gene alternative pathogenic variant, phase, or qualifying alternative-cause phenotype is available to award BP2 points. |
cspec
PMID:22798288
|
| BP3 | N/A | Not applicable: the VCEP marks BP3 not applicable, and p.(Leu597Arg) is a missense substitution rather than an in-frame repeat-region insertion or deletion. |
cspec
pvs1_variant_assessment
|
| BP4 | Not met | Not met: REVEL score 0.964 exceeds the BRAF VCEP BP4 missense threshold of ≤0.3. |
cspec
revel
|
| BP5 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no documented alternate causative variant or fully explanatory phenotype-inconsistent diagnosis is available to assign VCEP BP5 points. |
cspec
|
| BP6 | N/A | Not applicable: the BRAF VCEP states that BP6 is not for use under this specification. |
cspec
|
| BP7 | N/A | Not applicable: BP7 covers synonymous, noncanonical intronic, or non-coding variants, whereas this variant is missense p.(Leu597Arg). |
cspec
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.