LYFE Sciences · Project HERA
Variant Interpretation · Classification Report
Variant classification summary
NM_002661.5:c.1993C>T
PLCG2
· NP_002652.2:p.(Arg665Trp)
· NM_002661.5
GRCh37: chr16:81946260 C>T
·
GRCh38: chr16:81912655 C>T
Gene:
PLCG2
Transcript:
NM_002661.5
Final call
Likely Pathogenic
PS3 strong
PM2 supporting
PP3 supporting
Variant details
Gene
PLCG2
Transcript
NM_002661.5
Protein
NP_002652.2:p.(Arg665Trp)
gnomAD AF
1.2399994048002858e-06 (v4.1)
ClinVar
Uncertain significance
OncoKB
Oncogenic
Classification rationale
Interpretation summary
Generated evidence synthesis
1
PS3 strong: independent cellular assays showed enhanced PLCG2 signaling and a hypermorphic effect.
2
PM2 supporting: gnomAD v4.1 grpmax FAF is 2.8e-07 with zero homozygotes.
3
PP3 supporting: REVEL 0.746 exceeds the generic missense threshold of 0.644.
Final determination:
Under the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 fallback, one strong pathogenic criterion plus two supporting pathogenic criteria yields Likely Pathogenic.
Criteria assessment
ACMG/AMP criteria review
Criteria shown when status is available
All criteria require review: For research and educational purposes only.
| Criterion | Status | Rationale | Evidence used |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | N/A | Not applicable: PVS1 requires a null variant (nonsense, frameshift, canonical splice, start-loss or stop-loss), and this is a missense variant. |
pvs1_generic_framework
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
| PS1 | Not met | Not met: p.Arg665Trp was reported as a somatically acquired CLL-resistance mutation, not as a previously established pathogenic variant. |
PMID:24869598
PMID:25972157
|
| PS2 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no documented germline proband-parent testing or confirmed maternity and paternity establishes a de novo variant in an affected patient. |
PMID:24869598
PMID:25972157
|
| PS3 | Met | Met, strong: independent cellular assays showed enhanced calcium, IP3, ERK/AKT, and BTK-independent signaling for PLCG2 p.Arg665Trp. |
PMID:24869598
PMID:25972157
|
| PS4 | Not assessed | Not assessed: variant-specific studies report somatic relapse cases but provide no comparable affected-versus-control counts or OR with a 95% confidence interval. |
PMID:24869598
PMID:25972157
gnomad_v4
|
| PM1 | Not assessed | Not assessed: Cancer Hotspots found no PLCG2 R665 hotspot, and no authoritative critical-domain or benign-variation assessment covers residue 665. |
hotspots
cosmic
|
| PM2 | Met | Met at supporting strength: gnomAD v4.1 grpmax FAF is 2.8e-07, below the 0.0001 PM2 threshold, with zero homozygotes. |
gnomad_v2
gnomad_v4
|
| PM3 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no affected germline proband, second pathogenic allele, or parental/offspring phase testing is documented for NM_002661.5:c.1993C>T. |
|
| PM4 | N/A | Not applicable: PM4 requires a protein-length change, and this is a missense variant. |
pvs1_generic_framework
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
| PM5 | Not assessed | Not assessed: the available evidence reports p.Arg665Trp itself but identifies no different missense variant at Arg665 determined to be pathogenic. |
PMID:24869598
PMID:25972157
pm5_candidates
|
| PM6 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no affected-patient and assumed-germline de novo observation is documented, and parental genotype information is unavailable. |
PMID:24869598
PMID:25972157
|
| PP1 | Not assessed | Not assessed: zero informative affected relatives or meioses are documented to demonstrate cosegregation of the variant with disease. |
|
| PP2 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no gene-level benign-missense rate and no validated evidence that missense variants are a common PLCG2 disease mechanism are supplied. |
|
| PP3 | Met | Met at supporting: REVEL 0.746 exceeds the generic PP3 supporting threshold of 0.644 for this missense variant. |
revel
|
| PP4 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no patient phenotype or family history is provided that is highly specific for a single-gene disease caused by this variant. |
PMID:24869598
PMID:25972157
clinvar
|
| PP5 | Not met | Not met: ClinVar records one single-submitter uncertain-significance assertion and no exact-variant expert-panel pathogenic or likely pathogenic classification. |
clinvar
oncokb
|
| BA1 | Not met | Not met: gnomAD v4.1 grpmax FAF is 2.8e-07, far below the 0.05 BA1 threshold. |
gnomad_v4
gnomad_v2
|
| BS1 | Not met | Not met: gnomAD v4.1 grpmax FAF is 2.8e-07, far below the generic 0.01 BS1 threshold. |
gnomad_v4
|
| BS2 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no healthy-adult germline observation is documented, and the available R665W reports describe somatic cancer relapse samples. |
PMID:24869598
PMID:25972157
|
| BS3 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no validated functional study shows that PLCG2 p.Arg665Trp has no damaging effect on protein function or splicing. |
PMID:24869598
PMID:25972157
|
| BS4 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no affected relatives are documented with reliable genotype results showing absence of the variant. |
|
| BP1 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no gene-wide evidence shows that PLCG2 disease is caused primarily by truncating variants. |
|
| BP2 | Not assessed | Not assessed: no phase-resolved germline observation shows this variant in trans or cis with a pathogenic variant under the BP2 conditions. |
|
| BP3 | N/A | Not applicable: BP3 requires an in-frame indel in a repeat region, and this is a missense variant. |
pvs1_generic_framework
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
| BP4 | Not met | Not met: REVEL 0.746 is above the generic BP4 supporting cutoff of 0.29 for this missense variant. |
revel
|
| BP5 | Not met | Not met: a relapse patient had R665W with BTK C481S, but the somatic resistance report does not establish an alternate molecular basis for the queried germline disease. |
PMID:24869598
PMID:25972157
|
| BP6 | Not met | Not met: ClinVar has no exact-variant expert-panel benign or likely benign classification, only a single-submitter uncertain-significance assertion. |
clinvar
oncokb
|
| BP7 | N/A | Not applicable: BP7 requires a synonymous variant, and this is a missense variant. |
generic_acmg_combination_rules
|
Disclaimer:
The content and results provided by LYFE Sciences are for research and educational purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional medical judgment, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any clinical decisions.