ASXL1 c.1934dupG, p.Gly646TrpfsTer12
NM_015338.5:c.1934dupG
COSM1411076
Population Frequency
0.0495%
Common
ClinVar Classification
Likely Pathogenic
2 publications
REVEL Score
N/A
Not Available
COSMIC Recurrence
746 occurrences
PM1 Criterion Applied
Classification Evidence
Detailed Information
Genetic Information
Gene & Transcript Details
Gene
ASXL1
Transcript
NM_015338.6
MANE Select
Total Exons
13
Strand
Forward (+)
Reference Sequence
NC_000020.10
Alternative Transcripts
ID | Status | Details |
---|---|---|
NM_015338.5 | RefSeq Select | 13 exons | Forward |
NM_015338.4 | Alternative | 13 exons | Forward |
NM_015338.3 | Alternative | 13 exons | Forward |
Variant Details
HGVS Notation
NM_015338.5:c.1934dupG
Protein Change
G646Wfs*12
Location
Exon 13
(Exon 13 of 13)
5'
Exon Structure (13 total)
3'
Functional Consequence
Loss of Function
Related Variants
No evidence of other pathogenic variants at position 646 in gene ASXL1
Alternate Identifiers
COSM1411076
Variant interpretation based on transcript NM_015338.6
Clinical Evidence
Global Frequency
0.0495%
Low Frequency
Highest in Population
Remaining individuals
0.0767%
Common
Global: 0.0495%
Remaining individuals: 0.0767%
0%
0.0005%
0.001%
0.01%
0.05%
1%+
Allele Information
Total: 244252
Alt: 121
Homozygotes: 0
ACMG Criteria Applied
PM2
This variant is common in the population (0.049500% MAF).
Classification
2 publications
Likely Pathogenic
Based on 13 submitter reviews in ClinVar
Submitter Breakdown
Pathogenic
Likely Pathogenic
VUS
Likely Benign
Benign
Publications
2 publications
Show publication details
Clinical Statement
This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (11 clinical laboratories) and as Likely pathogenic (2 clinical laboratories).
Functional Domain
Hotspot Status
Not a hotspot
Domain Summary
This variant is not located in a mutational hotspot or critical domain (0 mutations).
Related Variants in This Domain
No evidence of other pathogenic variants at position 646 in gene ASXL1
Functional Studies
Summary
The ASXL1 G646Wfs*12 variant is functionally characterized as likely oncogenic. It is located in the SRC1-binding domain of the ASXL1 protein and has been associated with primary myelofibrosis. Functional studies in murine models demonstrate that ASXL1 truncation mutations lead to dedifferentiation and myelodysplastic syndrome, supporting a damaging effect. Additionally, this variant is linked to worse survival outcomes in patients with primary myelofibrosis. There is no mention of other pathogenic variants at the same position or codon.
Computational Evidence
Pathogenicity Predictions
Predictor Consensus
Unknown
PP3 Applied
No
VCEP Guidelines
Applied ACMG/AMP Criteria
PVS1
PVS1 (Very Strong)
According to VCEP guidelines: 'Null variant in a gene where loss of function (LoF) is a known mechanism of disease.' The evidence for this variant shows: NM_015338.5:c.1934dupG is a truncating variant in ASXL1, where loss of function is associated with disease. Therefore, this criterion meets the requirements because it is a null variant in a gene where LoF is a known mechanism of disease.
PS3
PS3 (Strong)
According to VCEP guidelines: 'Well-established functional studies supportive of a damaging effect on the gene or gene product.' The evidence for this variant shows: Functional studies indicate that the ASXL1 G646Wfs*12 variant is likely oncogenic and associated with primary myelofibrosis, demonstrating a damaging effect. Therefore, this criterion meets the requirements because there are well-established functional studies supporting a damaging effect.
PM2
PM2 (Moderate)
According to VCEP guidelines: 'Absent from controls (or at extremely low frequency if recessive).' The evidence for this variant shows: The variant has a minor allele frequency of 0.0495% in gnomAD, indicating it is extremely rare. Therefore, this criterion meets the requirements because the variant is absent from controls at an extremely low frequency.
PP5
PP5 (Supporting)
According to VCEP guidelines: 'Reputable source reports variant as pathogenic, but without accessible evidence.' The evidence for this variant shows: The variant has been reported as Pathogenic by 11 clinical laboratories in ClinVar. Therefore, this criterion meets the requirements because there is a reputable source reporting the variant as pathogenic.