CBL c.1150T>A, p.Cys384Ser

NM_005188.3:c.1150T>A
COSM9363005

Classification Summary

Likely Pathogenic

The variant NM_005188.3:c.1150T>A (p.C384S) in CBL is classified as Likely Pathogenic based on three Moderate criteria (PM1, PM2, PM5) and one Supporting criterion (PP3).

Population Frequency
0.0 in 100,000
Rare
ClinVar Classification
Unknown
0 publications
REVEL Score
0.981
Likely Pathogenic
COSMIC Recurrence
2 occurrences
No Criteria Applied
Classification Evidence
Very Strong (PVS)
None applied
Strong (PS/BS)
None applied
Moderate (PM/BA)
PM1 PM2 PM5
Supporting (PP/BP)
PP3
Created: 2025-05-14T08:56:46.697038

Genetic Information

Gene & Transcript Details
Gene
CBL
Transcript
NM_005188.4 MANE Select
Total Exons
16
Strand
Forward (+)
Reference Sequence
NC_000011.9
Alternative Transcripts
ID Status Details
NM_005188.3 RefSeq Select 16 exons | Forward
NM_005188.2 Alternative 16 exons | Forward
Variant Details
HGVS Notation
NM_005188.3:c.1150T>A
Protein Change
C384S
Location
Exon 8 (Exon 8 of 16)
8
5' Exon Structure (16 total) 3'
Functional Consequence
Loss of Function
Related Variants
ClinVar reports other pathogenic variants at position 384: C384R
Alternate Identifiers
COSM9363005
Variant interpretation based on transcript NM_005188.4

Clinical Evidence

Population Frequency
Global Frequency
0.0 in 100,000
Extremely Rare
Global: 0.0%
0%
0.0005%
0.001%
0.01%
0.05%
1%+
ACMG Criteria Applied
PM2
This variant is not present in gnomAD (PM2 criteria applies).
ClinVar 2025-05-14T08:55:17.749303
Classification
Unknown
Publications
0 publications
Clinical Statement
COSMIC
COSMIC ID
COSM9363005
Recurrence
2 occurrences
PM1 Criteria
Not Applied
Accessing full COSMIC database details requires institutional login or subscription. External links may prompt for authentication.
Functional Domain
Hotspot Status
Hotspot
PM1
Mutation Count
8
Reported mutations in this domain
0 50 100+
Domain Summary

This variant is located in a mutational hotspot or critical domain (8 mutations).

PM1 criterion applied: Located in a mutational hot spot and/or critical and well-established functional domain.
Related Variants in This Domain
ClinVar reports other pathogenic variants at position 384: C384R
PM5 criterion applied: Novel missense change at an amino acid residue where a different missense change determined to be pathogenic has been seen before.

Functional Studies

Functional Impact
Summary
The CBL C384S variant has not been functionally characterized.

Computational Evidence

Pathogenicity Predictions
REVEL Score
0.981
0.981
Likely Benign 0.0
Uncertain (Low) 0.2
Uncertain (Med) 0.5
Likely Pathogenic 0.75
REVEL scores ≥ 0.75 are considered strong evidence of pathogenicity (PP3)
Predictor Consensus
Mixed/VUS
PP3 Applied
Yes
Additional Predictors
Pathogenic:
polyphen_prediction: probably_damaging mutationtaster: D metasvm: D metalr: D primateai: D
Benign:
CADD: 5.51
Neutral: Show all
SpliceAI Scores Window: ±500bp
Effect Type Score Position
- Acceptor Loss
0.0
-78 bp
- Donor Loss
0.0
131 bp
+ Acceptor Gain
0.0
256 bp
+ Donor Gain
0.0
-376 bp
High impact (≥0.5)
Medium impact (0.2-0.49)
Low impact (<0.2)

VCEP Guidelines

Applied ACMG/AMP Criteria
PVS1
PVS1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PVS1 is: "Null variant in a gene where loss of function (LoF) is a known mechanism of disease (e.g., nonsense, frameshift, canonical ±1 or 2 splice sites, initiation codon, single exon deletion in a LoF gene)". The evidence for this variant shows: NM_005188.3:c.1150T>A is a missense change resulting in p.C384S, not a predicted null variant. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because the variant type does not meet the PVS1 definition.
PS1
PS1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS1 is: "Same amino acid change as a known pathogenic variant but different nucleotide change". The evidence for this variant shows: p.C384S is not the same amino acid change as any previously established pathogenic variant at codon 384. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because there is no prior pathogenic variant with the identical amino acid substitution.
PS2
PS2 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS2 is: "De novo (both maternity and paternity confirmed) in a patient with the disease and no family history". The evidence for this variant shows: There is no available parental testing or de novo confirmation data. Therefore, this criterion is not applied due to lack of de novo confirmation.
PS3
PS3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS3 is: "Well-established functional studies supportive of a damaging effect on the gene or gene product". The evidence for this variant shows: No functional assays or studies have been performed for C384S. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because functional impact has not been experimentally demonstrated.
PS4
PS4 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS4 is: "Prevalence in affected individuals significantly increased compared with controls". The evidence for this variant shows: No case-control or cohort data demonstrating increased prevalence in affected individuals. Therefore, this criterion is not applied due to absence of statistical evidence.
PM1
PM1 (Moderate)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM1 is: "Located in a mutational hot spot or well-established functional domain without benign variation". The evidence for this variant shows: C384 resides in the RING finger domain of CBL, a critical functional region with known pathogenic missense changes and no benign variation reported. Therefore, this criterion is applied at Moderate strength because the variant affects a critical domain with established disease relevance.
PM2
PM2 (Moderate)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM2 is: "Absent from controls (or at extremely low frequency if recessive)". The evidence for this variant shows: NM_005188.3:c.1150T>A is not observed in population databases including gnomAD, ExAC, 1000 Genomes or ESP. Therefore, this criterion is applied at Moderate strength because the variant is absent from controls.
PM3
PM3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM3 is: "Detected in trans with a pathogenic variant (for recessive disorders)". The evidence for this variant shows: CBL-associated disease is autosomal dominant and no trans observations are relevant. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PM4
PM4 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM4 is: "Protein length changes due to in-frame deletions/insertions or stop-loss variants". The evidence for this variant shows: This is a single amino acid substitution without alteration of protein length. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PM5
PM5 (Moderate)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM5 is: "Novel missense change at an amino acid residue where a different pathogenic missense change has been seen". The evidence for this variant shows: A different missense change at C384 (e.g., p.C384R) has been previously reported as pathogenic. Therefore, this criterion is applied at Moderate strength because the residue has established pathogenic variation.
PM6
PM6 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM6 is: "Assumed de novo, but without confirmation of paternity and maternity". The evidence for this variant shows: No de novo assumption data is available. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PP1
PP1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP1 is: "Co-segregation with disease in multiple affected family members". The evidence for this variant shows: No family segregation data are available. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PP2
PP2 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP2 is: "Missense variant in a gene with a low rate of benign missense variation and where missense variants are a common mechanism of disease". The evidence for this variant shows: While CBL missense variants are disease-relevant, no formal gene-specific constraint metrics were applied. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PP3
PP3 (Supporting)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP3 is: "Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect on the gene or gene product (e.g., conservation, splicing impact)". The evidence for this variant shows: In silico tools including REVEL (0.98), PolyPhen-2, MetaLR, MetaSVM, and MutationTaster predict damaging impact. Therefore, this criterion is applied at Supporting strength because of concordant computational predictions.
PP4
PP4 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP4 is: "Patient's phenotype or family history highly specific for a disease with a single genetic etiology". The evidence for this variant shows: No detailed patient phenotype or clinical data were provided. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PP5
PP5 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP5 is: "Reputable source reports variant as pathogenic, but without accessible evidence". The evidence for this variant shows: Variant is not reported in ClinVar or other public databases. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BA1
BA1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BA1 is: "Allele frequency is too high for the disorder (based on population data)". The evidence for this variant shows: The variant is absent from population databases, not above any threshold. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BS1
BS1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS1 is: "Allele frequency is greater than expected for the disorder". The evidence for this variant shows: Allele frequency is 0% in gnomAD. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BS2
BS2 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS2 is: "Observed in healthy individuals with full penetrance expected at an early age". The evidence for this variant shows: No observations in healthy individuals. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BS3
BS3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS3 is: "Well-established functional studies show no damaging effect on protein function or splicing". The evidence for this variant shows: No functional studies have been performed. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BS4
BS4 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS4 is: "Lack of segregation in affected family members". The evidence for this variant shows: No segregation analyses are available. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP1
BP1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP1 is: "Missense variant in a gene where only LoF causes disease". The evidence for this variant shows: CBL disease mechanism includes missense variants. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP2
BP2 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP2 is: "Observed in trans with a pathogenic variant for dominant disorders or in cis with a pathogenic variant". The evidence for this variant shows: No such observations reported. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP3
BP3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP3 is: "In-frame deletions/insertions in a repetitive region without known function". The evidence for this variant shows: This is a missense change. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP4
BP4 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP4 is: "Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact". The evidence for this variant shows: Computational predictions are predominantly deleterious. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP5
BP5 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP5 is: "Variant found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease". The evidence for this variant shows: No such cases reported. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP6
BP6 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP6 is: "Reputable source reports variant as benign, but without accessible evidence". The evidence for this variant shows: No benign assertions exist. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP7
BP7 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP7 is: "Synonymous variant with no predicted impact on splicing". The evidence for this variant shows: This is a missense variant. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.