PTEN c.743_749del, p.Pro248LeufsTer6
NM_000314.8:c.743_749del
Population Frequency
0.0 in 100,000
Rare
ClinVar Classification
Unknown
0 publications
REVEL Score
N/A
Not Available
COSMIC Recurrence
0 occurrences
No Criteria Applied
Classification Evidence
Detailed Information
Genetic Information
Gene & Transcript Details
Gene
PTEN
Transcript
NM_000314.8
MANE Select
Total Exons
9
Strand
Forward (+)
Reference Sequence
NC_000010.10
Alternative Transcripts
ID | Status | Details |
---|---|---|
NM_000314.7 | RefSeq Select | 9 exons | Forward |
NM_000314.5 | Alternative | 9 exons | Forward |
NM_000314.4 | Alternative | 9 exons | Forward |
NM_000314.3 | Alternative | 9 exons | Forward |
NM_000314.6 | Alternative | 9 exons | Forward |
Variant Details
HGVS Notation
NM_000314.8:c.743_749del
Protein Change
P248Lfs*6
Location
Exon 7
(Exon 7 of 9)
5'
Exon Structure (9 total)
3'
Functional Consequence
Loss of Function
Related Variants
ClinVar reports other pathogenic variants at position 248: P248R
Variant interpretation based on transcript NM_000314.8
Clinical Evidence
Population Frequency
Global Frequency
0.0 in 100,000
Extremely Rare
Global: 0.0%
0%
0.0005%
0.001%
0.01%
0.05%
1%+
ACMG Criteria Applied
PM2
This variant is not present in gnomAD (PM2 criteria applies).
Classification
Unknown
Publications
0 publications
Clinical Statement
Functional Domain
Hotspot Status
Not a hotspot
Domain Summary
This variant is not located in a mutational hotspot or critical domain (0 mutations).
Related Variants in This Domain
ClinVar reports other pathogenic variants at position 248: P248R
PM5 criterion applied: Novel missense change at an amino acid residue where a different missense change determined to be pathogenic has been seen before.
Functional Studies
Summary
The PTEN P248Lfs*6 variant is a truncating mutation that results in the loss of PTEN phosphatase function, leading to an inability to negatively regulate PI3K/AKT pathway activity. Functional studies have shown that expression of PTEN truncation mutations in mouse embryonic fibroblasts is oncogenic and increases genome fragility due to impaired association with chromosomal centromeres. This evidence supports a damaging effect of the variant.
Computational Evidence
Pathogenicity Predictions
Predictor Consensus
Unknown
PP3 Applied
No
VCEP Guidelines
Applied ACMG/AMP Criteria
VCEP Guidelines
PVS1
PVS1 (Very Strong)
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PVS1 is: "Very Strong Strength: Very Strong Use PTEN PVS1 decision tree. Modification Type: Disease-specific". The evidence for this variant shows: it is a truncating frameshift variant (P248Lfs*6) in PTEN, a gene where loss-of-function is a known mechanism and the variant is not in the last exon. Therefore, this criterion is applied at Very Strong strength because it is a null variant in a gene with established LOF mechanism.
PS1
PS1 (Not Applied)
Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PS1 is: "Strong Strength: Same amino acid change as a previously established pathogenic variant regardless of nucleotide change OR different variant at same nucleotide position as a pathogenic splicing variant, where in silico models predict impact equal to or greater than the known pathogenic variant." The evidence for this variant shows: it is a frameshift variant, not the same amino acid change as any known pathogenic PTEN variant. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PS2
PS2 (Not Applied)
Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PS2 is: "Very Strong Strength: Two proven OR four assumed OR one proven + two assumed de novo observations in a patient with the disease and no family history." The evidence for this variant shows: no de novo data are available. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PS3
PS3 (Strong)
According to PTEN Pre-processing, the finding for PS3 is: "The PTEN P248Lfs*6 variant is a truncating mutation that results in the loss of PTEN phosphatase function, leading to an inability to negatively regulate PI3K/AKT pathway activity. Functional studies have shown that expression of PTEN truncation mutations in mouse embryonic fibroblasts is oncogenic and increases genome fragility due to impaired association with chromosomal centromeres. This evidence supports a damaging effect of the variant." The evidence for this variant matches this functional data. Therefore, this criterion is applied at Strong strength because well-established in vitro/in vivo studies support a damaging effect.
PS4
PS4 (Not Applied)
Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PS4 is: "Strong Strength: Probands with specificity score 4-15.5 OR the prevalence of the variant in affected individuals is significantly increased compared with controls." The evidence for this variant shows: no case-control or specificity score data are available. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PM1
PM1 (Not Applied)
Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PM1 is: "Moderate Strength: Located in a mutational hot spot and/or critical and well-established functional domain. Defined to include residues in catalytic motifs: 90-94, 123-130, 166-168." The evidence for this variant shows: residue 248 is not within any defined hotspot or critical catalytic motif. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PM2
PM2 (Supporting)
Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PM2 is: "Supporting Strength: Absent in population Databases present at <0.00001 allele frequency in gnomAD or another large sequenced population." The evidence for this variant shows: absent from gnomAD and other population databases. Therefore, this criterion is applied at Supporting strength because the variant is absent from controls.
PM3
PM3 (Not Applied)
Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PM3 is: "Moderate Strength: Detected in trans with a pathogenic variant for recessive disorders." The evidence for this variant shows: no data on observations in trans with another variant. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PM4
PM4 (Not Applied)
Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PM4 is: "Moderate Strength: Protein length changes due to in-frame deletions/insertions in a non-repeat region or stop-loss variants." The evidence for this variant shows: it is an out-of-frame frameshift, not an in-frame change. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PM5
PM5 (Not Applied)
Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PM5 is: "Moderate Strength: Missense change at an amino acid residue where a different missense change determined to be pathogenic has been seen before." The evidence for this variant shows: it is a frameshift, not a missense change. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PM6
PM6 (Not Applied)
Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PM6 is: "Very Strong Strength: Two proven OR four assumed OR one proven + two assumed de novo observations in a patient with the disease and no family history." The evidence for this variant shows: no de novo assumptions are available. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PP1
PP1 (Not Applied)
Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PP1 is: "Strong Strength: Co-segregation with disease in multiple affected family members, with ≥7 meioses observed across at least two families." The evidence for this variant shows: no segregation data are available. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PP2
PP2 (Not Applied)
Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP2 is: "Supporting Strength: Missense variant in a gene that has a low rate of benign missense variation and where missense variants are a common mechanism of disease." The evidence for this variant shows: it is a truncating frameshift, not a missense variant. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PP3
PP3 (Not Applied)
Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PP3 is: "Supporting Strength: Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect on the gene or gene product." The evidence for this variant shows: computational in silico predictions are insufficient to support pathogenicity (SpliceAI max score 0.06). Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PP4
PP4 (Not Applied)
Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP4 is: "Supporting Strength: Patient's phenotype or family history is highly specific for a disease with a single genetic etiology." The evidence for this variant shows: no patient phenotype data are provided. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PP5
PP5 (Not Applied)
Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP5 is: "Supporting Strength: Reputable source has reported the variant as pathogenic." The evidence for this variant shows: it is not reported in ClinVar or other reputable databases. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BA1
BA1 (Not Applied)
Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BA1 is: "Stand Alone Strength: gnomAD Filtering allele frequency >0.00056." The evidence for this variant shows: it is absent from population databases. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BS1
BS1 (Not Applied)
Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BS1 is: "Strong Strength: gnomAD Filtering allele frequency from 0.000043 up to 0.00056." The evidence for this variant shows: it is absent from population databases. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BS2
BS2 (Not Applied)
Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BS2 is: "Strong Strength: Observed in the homozygous state in a healthy or PHTS-unaffected individual." The evidence for this variant shows: no homozygous observations in healthy individuals. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BS3
BS3 (Not Applied)
Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BS3 is: "Strong Strength: Well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies show no damaging effect on protein function." The evidence for this variant shows: functional studies demonstrate a damaging, oncogenic effect. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BS4
BS4 (Not Applied)
Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BS4 is: "Strong Strength: Lack of segregation in affected members of two or more families." The evidence for this variant shows: no segregation data are available. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP1
BP1 (Not Applied)
Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP1 is: "Supporting Strength: Missense variant in a gene for which primarily loss-of-function variants are known to cause disease." The evidence for this variant shows: it is a loss-of-function frameshift variant. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP2
BP2 (Not Applied)
Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BP2 is: "Supporting Strength: Observed in trans with a pathogenic or likely pathogenic PTEN variant OR at least three observations in cis with different pathogenic PTEN variants." The evidence for this variant shows: no data on phase with other variants. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP3
BP3 (Not Applied)
Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP3 is: "Supporting Strength: In-frame deletions/insertions in a repetitive region without a known function." The evidence for this variant shows: it is an out-of-frame frameshift, not an in-frame indel. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP4
BP4 (Not Applied)
Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BP4 is: "Supporting Strength: Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on gene or gene product." The evidence for this variant shows: computational splicing tools predict minimal splicing impact, but the variant is a truncating frameshift, making computational splicing data irrelevant for benign classification. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP5
BP5 (Not Applied)
Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BP5 is: "Supporting Strength: Variant found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease." The evidence for this variant shows: no alternate molecular basis has been reported. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP6
BP6 (Not Applied)
Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP6 is: "Supporting Strength: Reputable source reports variant as benign." The evidence for this variant shows: no reputable source classification as benign exists. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP7
BP7 (Not Applied)
Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP7 is: "Supporting Strength: A synonymous or intronic variant at or beyond +7/-21 showing no predicted splicing impact." The evidence for this variant shows: it is a truncating coding variant, not synonymous or intronic. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.