BRCA1 c.5147A>G, p.Tyr1716Cys

NM_007294.4:c.5147A>G
Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS)
The only applicable criterion is PM2_Supporting (absent from population databases). No other pathogenic or benign criteria are met. With insufficient evidence to classify as pathogenic or benign, the variant remains a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS).
ACMG/AMP Criteria Applied
PM2

Genetic Information

Gene & Transcript Details
Gene
BRCA1
Transcript
NM_007294.4 MANE Select
Total Exons
23
Strand
Reverse (−)
Reference Sequence
NC_000017.10
Alternative Transcripts
IDStatusDetails
NM_007294.2 Alternative 23 exons | Reverse
NM_007294.3 RefSeq Select 23 exons | Reverse
Variant Details
HGVS Notation
NM_007294.4:c.5147A>G
Protein Change
Y1716C
Location
Exon 17 (Exon 17 of 23)
17
5'Exon Structure (23 total)3'
Functional Consequence
Loss of Function
Related Variants
ClinVar reports other pathogenic variants at position 1716: Y1716S
Variant interpretation based on transcript NM_007294.4

Genome Browser

UCSC Genome Browser hg19/GRCh37
Loading genome browser...
HGVS InputNM_007294:c.5147A>G
Active Tracks
ConservationRefSeqClinVargnomAD
Open in UCSC
Navigation tips: Use mouse to drag and zoom. Click on features for details.

Clinical Data

Population Frequency
Global Frequency
0.0 in 100,000
Extremely Rare
Global: 0.0%
0%
0.05%
0.1%
1%
5%
10%+
ACMG Criteria Applied
PM2
This variant is not present in gnomAD (PM2 criteria applies).
ClinVar 2025-06-23T09:15:53.513312
Classification
3 publications
Uncertain Significance (VUS)
Based on 4 submitter reviews in ClinVar
Submitter Breakdown
3 VUS
1 LB
Pathogenic
Likely Path.
VUS
Likely Benign
Benign
Publications (3)
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.
This missense variant replaces tyrosine with cysteine at codon 1716 of the BRCA1 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may have deleterious impact on protein structure and function. A functional study has reported that this variant does not impact BRCA1 function in a haploid cell proliferation assay (PMID: 30209399). This variant has been reported in at least one individual who underwent clinical BRCA1 screening (PMID: 16267036). This variant has not been identified in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
This sequence change replaces tyrosine, which is neutral and polar, with cysteine, which is neutral and slightly polar, at codon 1716 of the BRCA1 protein (p.Tyr1716Cys). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with BRCA1-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 142424). Invitae Evidence Modeling incorporating data from in vitro experimental studies (PMID: 30209399) indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt BRCA1 function with a negative predictive value of 95%. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change does not substantially affect BRCA1 function (PMID: 30209399). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Clinical Statement
This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (1 clinical laboratories) and as Uncertain significance (3 clinical laboratories).
COSMIC
COSMIC ID
Unknown
Recurrence
0 occurrences
PM1 Criteria
Not Applied
COSMIC Database Preview
COSMIC Preview
Expand
Accessing full COSMIC database details requires institutional login or subscription. External links may prompt for authentication.

Functional Impact

Functional Domain
Hotspot Status
Not a hotspot
Domain Summary

This variant is not located in a mutational hotspot or critical domain (0 mutations).

Related Variants in This Domain
ClinVar reports other pathogenic variants at position 1716: Y1716S
PM5 criterion applied.
Functional Studies & Therapeutic Relevance
Functional Summary
The BRCA1 Y1716C variant has not been functionally characterized.
Database Previews
OncoKB
OncoKB Preview
Expand
JAX-CKB
JAX-CKB Preview
Expand
Click on previews to view full database entries. External databases may require institutional access.

Computational Analysis

Pathogenicity Predictions
REVEL Score
0.73
0.73
Likely Benign0.0
Uncertain (Low)0.2
Uncertain (Med)0.5
Likely Pathogenic0.75
REVEL scores ≥ 0.75 are strong evidence (PP3)
Predictor Consensus
Unknown
PP3 Applied
No
SpliceAI Scores Window: ±500bp
Effect TypeScorePosition
-Acceptor Loss
0.0
11 bp
-Donor Loss
0.0
8 bp
+Acceptor Gain
0.06
72 bp
+Donor Gain
0.03
-5 bp
High impact (≥0.5)
Medium impact (0.2-0.49)
Low impact (<0.2)

VCEP Guidelines

Applied ACMG/AMP Criteria (VCEP Specific) VCEP Guidelines
PVS1
PVS1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PVS1 is: "Very Strong Null variant (nonsense, frameshift, splice site (donor/acceptor ±1,2), initiation codon, single or multi-exon deletion) in a gene where loss of function (LOF) is a known mechanism of disease." The evidence for this variant shows: it is a missense change (Y1716C), not a null variant. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PS1
PS1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS1 is: "Same amino acid change as a previously established pathogenic variant regardless of nucleotide change." The evidence for this variant shows: no previously established pathogenic variant results in p.Tyr1716Cys. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PS2
PS2 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS2 is: "De novo (both maternity and paternity confirmed) in a patient with the disease and no family history." The evidence for this variant shows: no de novo data available. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PS3
PS3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PS3 is: "Strong: Well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies supportive of a damaging effect." The evidence for this variant shows: no functional studies have been performed. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PS4
PS4 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PS4 is: "Strong: The prevalence of the variant in affected individuals is significantly increased compared to the prevalence in controls (OR ≥4, p≤0.05)." The evidence for this variant shows: no case-control data are available. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PM1
PM1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM1 is: "Located in a mutational hotspot and/or critical and well-established functional domain without benign variation." The evidence for this variant shows: while Y1716 is within the BRCT domain, there is insufficient evidence that this specific residue is a defined mutational hotspot. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PM2
PM2 (Supporting) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PM2 is: "Supporting: Absent from controls in an outbred population, from gnomAD v2.1 (non-cancer, exome only subset) and gnomAD v3.1 (non-cancer)." The evidence for this variant shows: not found in gnomAD. Therefore, this criterion is applied at Supporting strength because the variant is absent from large population databases.
PM3
PM3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PM3 is: "Apply for patient with phenotype consistent with BRCA1- or BRCA2-related Fanconi Anemia and co-occurrent variants in the same gene." The evidence for this variant shows: no Fanconi Anemia phenotype or co-occurring variant data. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PM4
PM4 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM4 is: "Protein length changes due to in-frame deletions/insertions in a non-repeat region or stop-loss variants." The evidence for this variant shows: it is a missense change, not a length-altering variant. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PM5
PM5 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM5 is: "Novel missense change at an amino acid residue where a different missense change determined to be pathogenic has been seen." The evidence for this variant shows: no other pathogenic missense variant at residue Tyr1716 is reported. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PM6
PM6 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM6 is: "Assumed de novo, but without confirmation of paternity and maternity." The evidence for this variant shows: no de novo data. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PP1
PP1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PP1 is: "Supporting: Co-segregation with disease in multiple affected family members (LR ≥2.08:1)." The evidence for this variant shows: no segregation data available. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PP2
PP2 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP2 is: "Missense variant in a gene with low rate of benign missense variation." The evidence for this variant shows: BRCA1 has known benign and pathogenic missense changes; the rate is not established as low. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PP3
PP3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PP3 is: "Supporting: Predicted impact via protein change (BayesDel no-AF ≥0.28) or splicing (SpliceAI ≥0.2)." The evidence for this variant shows: SpliceAI score 0.06 (no splicing impact) and BayesDel no-AF data unavailable. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PP4
PP4 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PP4 is: "Supporting: Combined clinical evidence towards pathogenicity based on multifactorial likelihood data (LR ≥2.08:1)." The evidence for this variant shows: no multifactorial clinical data. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PP5
PP5 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP5 is: "Reputable source reports variant as pathogenic/likely pathogenic without accessible evidence." The evidence for this variant shows: ClinVar submissions are conflicting (one likely benign, three VUS). Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BA1
BA1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BA1 is: "Stand Alone: Filter allele frequency above 0.1% in gnomAD non-cancer subsets." The evidence for this variant shows: allele frequency is 0%. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BS1
BS1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BS1 is: "Strong: Filter allele frequency above 0.01% in gnomAD non-cancer subsets." The evidence for this variant shows: allele frequency is 0%. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BS2
BS2 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BS2 is: "Strong: Observed in a healthy adult individual for a dominant disorder (Fanconi Anemia phenotype absent)." The evidence for this variant shows: no healthy individual data. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BS3
BS3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BS3 is: "Strong: Well-established functional studies show no damaging effect." The evidence for this variant shows: no functional studies available. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BS4
BS4 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BS4 is: "Strong: Lack of segregation in affected members (LR ≤0.05:1)." The evidence for this variant shows: no segregation data. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP1
BP1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BP1 is: "Strong: Missense variant outside a clinically important functional domain AND no splicing predicted." The evidence for this variant shows: it is inside the BRCT domain. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP2
BP2 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP2 is: "Observed in trans with a pathogenic variant for a dominant disorder." The evidence for this variant shows: no trans observations. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP3
BP3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP3 is: "In-frame deletions/insertions in a repetitive region without a known function." The evidence for this variant shows: it is a missense change. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP4
BP4 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BP4 is: "Supporting: Missense variant inside a clinically important functional domain AND no predicted impact via protein change (BayesDel no-AF ≤0.15) AND no splicing impact (SpliceAI ≤0.1)." The evidence for this variant shows: BayesDel no-AF data unavailable. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP5
BP5 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BP5 is: "Supporting: Co-occurrence with a pathogenic variant in another breast–ovarian cancer gene with no specific phenotype." The evidence for this variant shows: no co-occurrence data. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP6
BP6 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP6 is: "Reputable source reports variant as benign without accessible evidence." The evidence for this variant shows: ClinVar contains no consensus benign report. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP7
BP7 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BP7 is: "Supporting: Silent or intronic variant outside conserved splice sites with no splicing impact." The evidence for this variant shows: it is a missense change. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.