RECQL4 c.3127T>C, p.Leu1043=

NM_004260.4:c.3127T>C
COSMIC ID: COSN9974953
Likely Benign
This synonymous RECQL4 variant is extremely common in population databases (MAF >97%) with many homozygotes, has no predicted functional or splicing impact, and is reported as benign by reputable sources. Stand-alone BA1 plus additional strong and supporting benign criteria justify a final classification of Benign.
ACMG/AMP Criteria Applied
BA1 BS2 BP4 BP6 BP7

Genetic Information

Gene & Transcript Details
Gene
RECQL4
Transcript
NM_004260.4 MANE Select
Total Exons
21
Strand
Reverse (−)
Reference Sequence
NC_000008.10
Alternative Transcripts
IDStatusDetails
NM_004260.3 RefSeq Select 21 exons | Reverse
NM_004260.2 Alternative 21 exons | Reverse
NM_004260.1 Alternative 21 exons | Reverse
Variant Details
HGVS Notation
NM_004260.4:c.3127T>C
Protein Change
L1043=
Location
Exon 18 (Exon 18 of 21)
18
5'Exon Structure (21 total)3'
Functional Consequence
Loss of Function
Related Variants
Alternate Identifiers
COSN9974953
Variant interpretation based on transcript NM_004260.4

Genome Browser

UCSC Genome Browser hg19/GRCh37
Loading genome browser...
HGVS InputNM_004260:c.3127T>C
Active Tracks
ConservationRefSeqClinVargnomAD
Open in UCSC
Navigation tips: Use mouse to drag and zoom. Click on features for details.

Clinical Data

Population Frequency
Global Frequency
97.1%
Common
Highest in Population
Ashkenazi Jewish
100.0%
Common
Global: 97.1%
Ashkenazi Jewish: 100.0%
0%
0.05%
0.1%
1%
5%
10%+
Allele Information
Total: 278702Alt: 270678Homozygotes: 131972
ACMG Criteria Applied
BA1
This variant is present in gnomAD (MAF= 97.1%, 270678/278702 alleles, homozygotes = 131972) and at a higher frequency in the Ashkenazi Jewish population (MAF= 100.0%, 10262/10262 alleles, homozygotes = 5131). The variant is common (MAF > 1%), supporting BA1 criterion application.
ClinVar 2025-07-22T14:14:12.378910
Classification
Benign
Based on 5 submitter reviews in ClinVar
Submitter Breakdown
5 B
Pathogenic
Likely Path.
VUS
Likely Benign
Benign
Publications (0)
No publication details.
Clinical Statement
This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (5 clinical laboratories).
COSMIC
COSMIC ID
COSN9974953
Recurrence
7 occurrences
PM1 Criteria
Not Applied
COSMIC Database Preview
COSMIC Preview
Expand
Accessing full COSMIC database details requires institutional login or subscription. External links may prompt for authentication.

Functional Impact

Functional Domain
Hotspot Status
Not a hotspot
Domain Summary

This variant is not located in a mutational hotspot or critical domain (0 mutations).

Related Variants in This Domain
Functional Studies & Therapeutic Relevance
Functional Summary
The variant has not been functionally characterized.
Database Previews
OncoKB
OncoKB Preview
Expand
JAX-CKB
JAX-CKB Preview
Expand
Click on previews to view full database entries. External databases may require institutional access.

Computational Analysis

Pathogenicity Predictions
Predictor Consensus
Mixed/VUS
PP3 Applied
No
Additional Predictors
Benign:
CADD: 0.06
SpliceAI Scores Window: ±500bp
Effect TypeScorePosition
-Acceptor Loss
0.02
-54 bp
-Donor Loss
0.01
72 bp
+Acceptor Gain
0.02
71 bp
+Donor Gain
0.0
-109 bp
High impact (≥0.5)
Medium impact (0.2-0.49)
Low impact (<0.2)

VCEP Guidelines

Applied ACMG/AMP Criteria (VCEP Specific)
PVS1
PVS1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PVS1 is: 'Null variant in a gene where loss of function (LoF) is a known mechanism of disease (e.g., nonsense, frameshift, canonical ±1 or 2 splice sites, initiation codon, single exon deletion in a LoF gene)'. The evidence for this variant shows: it is a synonymous change (L1043=) that does not alter the protein sequence or create a null allele. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because the variant does not meet the requirement for a null effect.
PS1
PS1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS1 is: 'Same amino acid change as a known pathogenic variant but different nucleotide change'. The evidence for this variant shows: it is synonymous (no amino acid change). Therefore, this criterion is not applied because there is no amino acid alteration.
PS2
PS2 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS2 is: 'De novo (both maternity and paternity confirmed) in a patient with the disease and no family history'. The evidence for this variant shows: no de novo or parental testing data are available. Therefore, this criterion is not applied due to lack of de novo evidence.
PS3
PS3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS3 is: 'Well-established functional studies supportive of a damaging effect on the gene or gene product'. The evidence for this variant shows: no functional studies have been performed. Therefore, this criterion is not applied due to absence of functional data.
PS4
PS4 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS4 is: 'Prevalence in affected individuals significantly increased compared with controls'. The evidence for this variant shows: no case-control or disease prevalence data are available. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because there is no evidence of increased prevalence in affected individuals.
PM1
PM1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM1 is: 'Located in a mutational hot spot or well-established functional domain without benign variation'. The evidence for this variant shows: the variant is synonymous and not located in a known functional domain. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PM2
PM2 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM2 is: 'Absent from controls (or at extremely low frequency if recessive)'. The evidence for this variant shows: it has a very high allele frequency (97.1% in gnomAD; 100% in Ashkenazi Jewish), thus it is not absent or at low frequency. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PM3
PM3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM3 is: 'Detected in trans with a pathogenic variant (for recessive disorders)'. The evidence for this variant shows: no trans configuration data with a pathogenic variant. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PM4
PM4 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM4 is: 'Protein length changes due to in-frame deletions/insertions or stop-loss variants'. The evidence for this variant shows: it is a synonymous single nucleotide change with no effect on protein length. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PM5
PM5 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM5 is: 'Novel missense change at an amino acid residue where a different pathogenic missense change has been seen'. The evidence for this variant shows: it is synonymous and not a missense change. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PM6
PM6 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM6 is: 'Assumed de novo, but without confirmation of paternity and maternity'. The evidence for this variant shows: no de novo or parental testing data. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PP1
PP1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP1 is: 'Co-segregation with disease in multiple affected family members'. The evidence for this variant shows: no segregation data are available. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PP2
PP2 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP2 is: 'Missense variant in a gene with a low rate of benign missense variation and where missense variants are a common mechanism of disease'. The evidence for this variant shows: it is synonymous, not missense. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PP3
PP3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP3 is: 'Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect on the gene/gene product (e.g., conservation, splicing impact)'. The evidence for this variant shows: in silico predictors and SpliceAI predict no impact. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because computational evidence does not support deleterious effect.
PP4
PP4 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP4 is: 'Patient's phenotype or family history highly specific for a disease with a single genetic etiology'. The evidence for this variant shows: no phenotype or family history data provided. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PP5
PP5 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP5 is: 'Reputable source reports variant as pathogenic, but without accessible evidence'. The evidence for this variant shows: no reputable source reports it as pathogenic. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BA1
BA1 (Stand Alone) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BA1 is: 'Allele frequency is too high for the disorder (based on population data)'. The evidence for this variant shows: MAF = 97.1% in gnomAD and 100% in Ashkenazi Jewish with many homozygotes. Therefore, this criterion is applied at Stand Alone strength because the allele frequency is incompatible with disease causation.
BS1
BS1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS1 is: 'Allele frequency is greater than expected for the disorder'. The evidence for this variant shows: allele frequency is indeed high, but BA1 (Stand Alone) is stronger. Therefore, BS1 is not applied because BA1 provides stronger stand-alone evidence.
BS2
BS2 (Strong)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS2 is: 'Observed in healthy individuals with full penetrance expected at an early age'. The evidence for this variant shows: thousands of homozygotes in gnomAD (including 5,131 in Ashkenazi Jewish) without disease association. Therefore, this criterion is applied at Strong strength because the variant is observed in healthy individuals.
BS3
BS3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS3 is: 'Well-established functional studies show no damaging effect on protein function or splicing'. The evidence for this variant shows: no functional studies have been performed. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BS4
BS4 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS4 is: 'Lack of segregation in affected family members'. The evidence for this variant shows: no family segregation data. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP1
BP1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP1 is: 'Missense variant in a gene where only LoF causes disease'. The evidence for this variant shows: it is synonymous. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP2
BP2 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP2 is: 'Observed in trans with a pathogenic variant for dominant disorders or in cis with a pathogenic variant'. The evidence for this variant shows: no cis/trans data with pathogenic variants. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP3
BP3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP3 is: 'In-frame deletions/insertions in a repetitive region without known function'. The evidence for this variant shows: it is a single nucleotide synonymous change. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP4
BP4 (Supporting)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP4 is: 'Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on gene or gene product'. The evidence for this variant shows: in silico predictors and SpliceAI predict no impact on splicing; CADD score 0.06. Therefore, this criterion is applied at Supporting strength because computational evidence supports benign effect.
BP5
BP5 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP5 is: 'Variant found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease'. The evidence for this variant shows: no case reports with alternate molecular diagnoses. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP6
BP6 (Supporting)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP6 is: 'Reputable source reports variant as benign, but without accessible evidence'. The evidence for this variant shows: ClinVar lists it as benign by five laboratories without primary evidence. Therefore, this criterion is applied at Supporting strength because a reputable source reports benign.
BP7
BP7 (Supporting)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP7 is: 'Synonymous variant with no predicted impact on splicing'. The evidence for this variant shows: SpliceAI score 0.02 indicating no splicing impact. Therefore, this criterion is applied at Supporting strength because it is a synonymous change with no splicing effect.