CDKN2A c.183G>A, p.Glu61=
NM_000077.5:c.183G>A
Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS)
This synonymous CDKN2A variant (c.183G>A, p.Glu61=) is absent from population databases (PM2) and computational and splicing predictors show no impact (BP4, BP7). No other evidence supports pathogenicity or benign classification. With one Moderate pathogenic and two Supporting benign criteria, the variant remains a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
ACMG/AMP Criteria Applied
PM2
BP4
BP7
Genetic Information
Gene & Transcript Details
Gene
CDKN2A
Transcript
NM_000077.5
MANE Select
Total Exons
3
Strand
Reverse (−)
Reference Sequence
NC_000009.11
Alternative Transcripts
| ID | Status | Details |
|---|---|---|
| NM_000077.3 | Alternative | 3 exons | Reverse |
| NM_000077.4 | RefSeq Select | 3 exons | Reverse |
Variant Details
HGVS Notation
NM_000077.5:c.183G>A
Protein Change
E61=
Location
Exon 2
(Exon 2 of 3)
5'Exon Structure (3 total)3'
Functional Consequence
Loss of Function
Related Variants
Variant interpretation based on transcript NM_000077.5
Genome Browser
Loading genome browser...
HGVS InputNM_000077:c.183G>A
Active Tracks
ConservationRefSeqClinVargnomAD
Navigation tips: Use mouse to drag and zoom. Click on features for details.
Clinical Data
Population Frequency
Global Frequency
0.0 in 100,000
Extremely Rare
Global: 0.0%
0%
0.05%
0.1%
1%
5%
10%+
ACMG Criteria Applied
PM2
This variant is not present in gnomAD (PM2 criteria applies).
Classification
Unknown
Publications (0)
No publication details.
Clinical Statement
Functional Impact
Functional Domain
Hotspot Status
Not a hotspot
Domain Summary
This variant is not located in a mutational hotspot or critical domain (0 mutations).
Related Variants in This Domain
Computational Analysis
Pathogenicity Predictions
Predictor Consensus
Mixed/VUS
PP3 Applied
No
Additional Predictors
Benign:
CADD: 0.28
VCEP Guidelines
Applied ACMG/AMP Criteria (VCEP Specific)
PVS1
PVS1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PVS1 is: "Null variant in a gene where loss of function (LoF) is a known mechanism of disease (e.g., nonsense, frameshift, canonical ±1 or 2 splice sites, initiation codon, single or multi-exon deletion in a LoF gene)". The evidence for this variant shows: it is a synonymous variant with no predicted impact on protein truncation. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because the variant is not a null variant.
PS1
PS1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS1 is: "Same amino acid change as a known pathogenic variant but different nucleotide change". The evidence for this variant shows: there is no amino acid change (E61=). Therefore, this criterion is not applied because the variant does not alter the amino acid.
PS2
PS2 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS2 is: "De novo (both maternity and paternity confirmed) in a patient with the disease and no family history". The evidence for this variant shows: no information on de novo status or parental testing. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because de novo status is not confirmed.
PS3
PS3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS3 is: "Well-established functional studies supportive of a damaging effect on the gene or gene product". The evidence for this variant shows: no functional studies have been performed. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because functional data are lacking.
PS4
PS4 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS4 is: "Prevalence in affected individuals significantly increased compared with controls". The evidence for this variant shows: no case-control or cohort data. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because prevalence in affected individuals is not established.
PM1
PM1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM1 is: "Located in a mutational hot spot or well-established functional domain without benign variation". The evidence for this variant shows: no indication it lies in a known hotspot or critical domain. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because the variant is not in a recognized hotspot or functional domain.
PM2
PM2 (Moderate)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM2 is: "Absent from controls (or at extremely low frequency if recessive)". The evidence for this variant shows: it is absent from population databases (gnomAD). Therefore, this criterion is applied at Moderate strength because the variant is not observed in controls.
PM3
PM3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM3 is: "Detected in trans with a pathogenic variant (for recessive disorders)". The evidence for this variant shows: no data on trans configuration with another variant. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because trans configuration data are missing.
PM4
PM4 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM4 is: "Protein length changes due to in-frame deletions/insertions or stop-loss variants". The evidence for this variant shows: it is a synonymous change with no alteration in protein length. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because there is no change in protein length.
PM5
PM5 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM5 is: "Novel missense change at an amino acid residue where a different pathogenic missense change has been seen". The evidence for this variant shows: it is not a missense change. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because the variant does not alter the amino acid.
PM6
PM6 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM6 is: "Assumed de novo, but without confirmation of paternity and maternity". The evidence for this variant shows: no assumption of de novo status or parental testing. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because de novo information is unavailable.
PP1
PP1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP1 is: "Co-segregation with disease in multiple affected family members". The evidence for this variant shows: no family segregation data. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because segregation information is lacking.
PP2
PP2 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP2 is: "Missense variant in a gene with a low rate of benign missense variation and where missense variants are a common mechanism of disease". The evidence for this variant shows: it is a synonymous variant. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because it is not a missense change.
PP3
PP3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP3 is: "Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect on the gene/gene product". The evidence for this variant shows: in silico tools predict no deleterious effect. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because computational evidence does not support a damaging impact.
PP4
PP4 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP4 is: "Patient's phenotype or family history highly specific for a disease with a single genetic etiology". The evidence for this variant shows: no phenotype or detailed clinical data provided. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because phenotype information is not available.
PP5
PP5 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP5 is: "Reputable source reports variant as pathogenic, but without accessible evidence". The evidence for this variant shows: no such reports in databases like ClinVar. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because no authoritative pathogenic assertion is available.
BA1
BA1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BA1 is: "Allele frequency is too high for the disorder (based on population data)". The evidence for this variant shows: it is absent from population databases. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because the allele frequency is not above threshold.
BS1
BS1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS1 is: "Allele frequency is greater than expected for the disorder". The evidence for this variant shows: it is absent from population databases. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because the allele frequency is not greater than expected.
BS2
BS2 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS2 is: "Observed in a healthy adult individual for a dominant (with full penetrance expected at an early age), X-linked or mitochondrial disorder with full penetrance expected at an early age". The evidence for this variant shows: no observations in healthy individuals. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because data on healthy observations are lacking.
BS3
BS3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS3 is: "Well-established functional studies show no damaging effect on protein function or splicing". The evidence for this variant shows: no functional studies available. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because functional validation is missing.
BS4
BS4 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS4 is: "Lack of segregation in affected family members". The evidence for this variant shows: no family segregation data. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because segregation analysis is not available.
BP1
BP1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP1 is: "Missense variant in a gene where only LoF causes disease". The evidence for this variant shows: it is a synonymous change. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because it is not a missense variant.
BP2
BP2 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP2 is: "Observed in trans with a pathogenic variant for dominant disorders or in cis with a pathogenic variant". The evidence for this variant shows: no co-occurrence data. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because phase information is not available.
BP3
BP3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP3 is: "In-frame deletions/insertions in a repetitive region without known function". The evidence for this variant shows: it is a single nucleotide change, not an indel. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because it is not an in-frame indel.
BP4
BP4 (Supporting)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP4 is: "Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on gene or gene product". The evidence for this variant shows: in silico predictors and SpliceAI predict no functional or splicing impact. Therefore, this criterion is applied at Supporting strength because computational tools consistently predict benign impact.
BP5
BP5 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP5 is: "Variant found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease". The evidence for this variant shows: no such case reports. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because no alternate molecular basis is documented.
BP6
BP6 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP6 is: "Reputable source reports variant as benign, but without accessible evidence". The evidence for this variant shows: no benign assertions in reputable sources. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because no benign assertion is available.
BP7
BP7 (Supporting)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP7 is: "Synonymous variant with no predicted impact on splicing". The evidence for this variant shows: it is synonymous and SpliceAI predicts minimal splicing impact. Therefore, this criterion is applied at Supporting strength because the variant is synonymous with no splicing impact.