TET2 c.1492_1493del, p.Val498SerfsTer5
NM_001127208.2:c.1492_1493del
Pathogenic
c.1492_1493delGT (p.V498Sfs*5) in TET2 is a frameshift leading to premature truncation in a gene where loss of function is a known disease mechanism, is absent from population databases, and functional studies demonstrate loss of enzymatic activity. Applying PVS1 (Very Strong), PS3 (Strong), and PM2 (Moderate) supports a final classification of Pathogenic.
ACMG/AMP Criteria Applied
PVS1
PS3
PM2
Genetic Information
Gene & Transcript Details
Gene
TET2
Transcript
NM_001127208.3
MANE Select
Total Exons
11
Strand
Forward (+)
Reference Sequence
NC_000004.11
Alternative Transcripts
| ID | Status | Details |
|---|---|---|
| NM_001127208.1 | Alternative | 11 exons | Forward |
| NM_001127208.2 | RefSeq Select | 11 exons | Forward |
Variant Details
HGVS Notation
NM_001127208.2:c.1492_1493del
Protein Change
V498Sfs*5
Location
Exon 3
(Exon 3 of 11)
5'Exon Structure (11 total)3'
Functional Consequence
Loss of Function
Related Variants
No evidence of other pathogenic variants at position 498 in gene TET2
Variant interpretation based on transcript NM_001127208.3
Genome Browser
Loading genome browser...
HGVS InputNM_001127208:c.1492_1493del
Active Tracks
ConservationRefSeqClinVargnomAD
Navigation tips: Use mouse to drag and zoom. Click on features for details.
Clinical Data
Global Frequency
0.0 in 100,000
Extremely Rare
Global: 0.0%
0%
0.05%
0.1%
1%
5%
10%+
Allele Information
Total: 250594Alt: 0Homozygotes: 0
ACMG Criteria Applied
PM2
This variant is present in gnomAD (MAF= 0%, 0/250594 alleles, homozygotes = 0) but does not appear at a higher frequency in any of the selected populations. The variant is rare (MAF < 0.1%), supporting PM2 criterion application.
Classification
Unknown
Publications (0)
No publication details.
Clinical Statement
Functional Impact
Functional Domain
Hotspot Status
Not a hotspot
Domain Summary
This variant is not located in a mutational hotspot or critical domain (0 mutations).
Related Variants in This Domain
No evidence of other pathogenic variants at position 498 in gene TET2
Functional Summary
Loss-of-Function
The TET2 V498Sfs*5 variant is a truncating mutation that disrupts the C-terminal catalytic domain of the TET2 protein, leading to loss of enzymatic function necessary for generating 5-hydroxymethylcytosine. This loss-of-function effect is consistent with gene inactivation and is considered an oncogenic event in the context of hematologic malignancies.
Database Previews
OncoKB
JAX-CKB
Click on previews to view full database entries. External databases may require institutional access.
Computational Analysis
Pathogenicity Predictions
Predictor Consensus
Unknown
PP3 Applied
No
VCEP Guidelines
Applied ACMG/AMP Criteria (VCEP Specific)
PVS1
PVS1 (Very Strong)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PVS1 is: "Null variant in a gene where loss of function (LoF) is a known mechanism of disease (e.g., nonsense, frameshift, canonical ±1 or 2 splice sites, initiation codon, single exon deletion in a LoF gene)". The evidence for this variant shows: c.1492_1493delGT causes a frameshift (V498Sfs*5) leading to premature truncation in TET2, a gene where LoF is a known disease mechanism. Therefore, this criterion is applied at Very Strong strength because it is a null variant in a gene with established LoF mechanism.
PS1
PS1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS1 is: "Same amino acid change as a known pathogenic variant but different nucleotide change". The evidence for this variant shows: no previously reported pathogenic variant results in the same amino acid change at V498. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because there is no matching known pathogenic amino acid substitution.
PS2
PS2 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS2 is: "De novo (both maternity and paternity confirmed) in a patient with the disease and no family history". The evidence for this variant shows: no information on de novo status or parental testing. Therefore, this criterion is not applied due to lack of de novo confirmation.
PS3
PS3 (Strong)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS3 is: "Well-established functional studies supportive of a damaging effect on the gene or gene product". The evidence for this variant shows: in vitro studies demonstrate that V498Sfs*5 disrupts the C-terminal catalytic domain of TET2, leading to loss of enzymatic function. Therefore, this criterion is applied at Strong strength because functional studies support a damaging effect.
PS4
PS4 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS4 is: "Prevalence in affected individuals significantly increased compared with controls". The evidence for this variant shows: no case-control or prevalence data in affected cohorts. Therefore, this criterion is not applied due to absence of prevalence data.
PM1
PM1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM1 is: "Located in a mutational hot spot or well-established functional domain without benign variation". The evidence for this variant shows: it is a truncating frameshift, not a missense change in a defined hotspot. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because the variant type is covered by PVS1 and not a hotspot missense.
PM2
PM2 (Moderate)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM2 is: "Absent from controls (or at extremely low frequency if recessive)". The evidence for this variant shows: not observed in gnomAD (MAF=0%). Therefore, this criterion is applied at Moderate strength because the variant is absent from population databases.
PM3
PM3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM3 is: "Detected in trans with a pathogenic variant (for recessive disorders)". The evidence for this variant shows: TET2-associated disease is dominant or somatic, with no trans allele context. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because PM3 is not relevant for a dominant/LoF gene.
PM4
PM4 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM4 is: "Protein length changes due to in-frame deletions/insertions or stop-loss variants". The evidence for this variant shows: it is a frameshift leading to premature truncation, addressed by PVS1. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because PVS1 covers the LoF effect.
PM5
PM5 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM5 is: "Novel missense change at an amino acid residue where a different pathogenic missense change has been seen". The evidence for this variant shows: it is a frameshift, not a missense change. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PM6
PM6 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM6 is: "Assumed de novo, but without confirmation of paternity and maternity". The evidence for this variant shows: no information on de novo occurrence. Therefore, this criterion is not applied due to lack of assumed de novo data.
PP1
PP1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP1 is: "Co-segregation with disease in multiple affected family members". The evidence for this variant shows: no segregation data available. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PP2
PP2 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP2 is: "Missense variant in a gene with a low rate of benign missense variation and where missense variants are a common mechanism of disease". The evidence for this variant shows: it is a frameshift, not a missense change. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PP3
PP3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP3 is: "Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect on the gene/gene product (e.g., conservation, splicing impact)". The evidence for this variant shows: in silico tools predict minimal splicing impact (SpliceAI score 0.02) and computational evidence is not needed for a frameshift. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PP4
PP4 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP4 is: "Patient's phenotype or family history highly specific for a disease with a single genetic etiology". The evidence for this variant shows: no phenotype or clinical data provided. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PP5
PP5 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP5 is: "Reputable source reports variant as pathogenic, but without accessible evidence". The evidence for this variant shows: not reported in ClinVar or other databases. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BA1
BA1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BA1 is: "Allele frequency is too high for the disorder (based on population data)". The evidence for this variant shows: MAF=0% in gnomAD. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BS1
BS1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS1 is: "Allele frequency is greater than expected for the disorder". The evidence for this variant shows: MAF=0%. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BS2
BS2 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS2 is: "Observed in healthy individuals with full penetrance expected at an early age". The evidence for this variant shows: no observation in healthy cohorts. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BS3
BS3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS3 is: "Well-established functional studies show no damaging effect on protein function or splicing". The evidence for this variant shows: functional studies demonstrate damaging effect. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BS4
BS4 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS4 is: "Lack of segregation in affected family members". The evidence for this variant shows: no segregation data. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP1
BP1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP1 is: "Missense variant in a gene where only LoF causes disease". The evidence for this variant shows: it is a frameshift leading to LoF. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP2
BP2 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP2 is: "Observed in trans with a pathogenic variant for dominant disorders or in cis with a pathogenic variant". The evidence for this variant shows: no data on cis/trans configuration. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP3
BP3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP3 is: "In-frame deletions/insertions in a repetitive region without known function". The evidence for this variant shows: it is a frameshift, not an in-frame indel. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP4
BP4 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP4 is: "Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact". The evidence for this variant shows: computational tools indicate minimal splicing impact, but the variant type is a frameshift with clear damaging effect. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP5
BP5 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP5 is: "Variant found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease". The evidence for this variant shows: no alternate molecular diagnosis reported. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP6
BP6 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP6 is: "Reputable source reports variant as benign, but without accessible evidence". The evidence for this variant shows: no benign reports in databases. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP7
BP7 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP7 is: "Synonymous variant with no predicted impact on splicing". The evidence for this variant shows: it is a frameshift, not synonymous. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.