Genetic Information
Gene & Transcript Details
| ID | Status | Details |
|---|---|---|
| NM_001904.3 | Alternative | 3720 nt | 269–2614 |
| NM_001904.4 | MANE Select | 3661 nt | 215–2560 |
Variant Details
Clinical & Population Data
Population Frequency
gnomADClinVar
Open""
COSMIC Somatic Evidence
Open
Functional Impact & Domains
Functional Domain
Computational Analysis
Pathogenicity Predictions
SpliceAISpliceAI Scores
Window: ±500bp| Effect Type | Score | Position |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptor Loss (AL) | 0.0 | -100 bp |
| Donor Loss (DL) | 0.0 | -42 bp |
| Acceptor Gain (AG) | 0.0 | -136 bp |
| Donor Gain (DG) | 0.01 | 19 bp |
VCEP Guidelines
Applied ACMG/AMP Criteria (VCEP Specific)
PVS1 (Not Applied)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PVS1 is: "Null variant in a gene where loss of function (LoF) is a known mechanism of disease (e.g., nonsense, frameshift, canonical ±1 or 2 splice sites, initiation codon, single exon deletion in a LoF gene)". The evidence for this variant shows: it is a synonymous change (A689=), not a null variant. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength because the variant does not introduce a loss-of-function alteration.
PS1 (Not Applied)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS1 is: "Same amino acid change as a known pathogenic variant but different nucleotide change". The evidence for this variant shows: it is synonymous (no amino acid change), not matching any known pathogenic amino acid alteration. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength because there is no amino acid change.
PS2 (Not Applied)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS2 is: "De novo (both maternity and paternity confirmed) in a patient with the disease and no family history". The evidence for this variant shows: no information on de novo status or parental testing. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength because de novo status cannot be evaluated without parental data.
PS3 (Not Applied)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS3 is: "Well-established functional studies supportive of a damaging effect on the gene or gene product". The evidence for this variant shows: no functional studies have been performed. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength because there is no functional evidence.
PS4 (Not Applied)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS4 is: "Prevalence in affected individuals significantly increased compared with controls". The evidence for this variant shows: no case–control or affected individual data available. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength because prevalence data is lacking.
PM1 (Not Applied)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM1 is: "Located in a mutational hot spot or well-established functional domain without benign variation". The evidence for this variant shows: domain or hotspot context at A689 is not provided. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength because domain/hotspot information is missing.
PM2 (Moderate)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM2 is: "Absent from controls (or at extremely low frequency if recessive)". The evidence for this variant shows: not found in gnomAD or other population databases (MAF=0%). Therefore, this criterion is applied at Moderate strength because the variant is absent from population controls.
PM3 (Not Applied)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM3 is: "Detected in trans with a pathogenic variant (for recessive disorders)". The evidence for this variant shows: CTNNB1-associated conditions are typically dominant and no trans data exist. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength because it is not relevant to a dominant gene without trans observations.
PM4 (Not Applied)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM4 is: "Protein length changes due to in-frame deletions/insertions or stop-loss variants". The evidence for this variant shows: it is synonymous (no protein length change). Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength because there is no protein length alteration.
PM5 (Not Applied)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM5 is: "Novel missense change at an amino acid residue where a different pathogenic missense change has been seen". The evidence for this variant shows: it is synonymous, not missense. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength because there is no amino acid change.
PM6 (Not Applied)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM6 is: "Assumed de novo, but without confirmation of paternity and maternity". The evidence for this variant shows: no indication of de novo occurrence. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength because de novo status is neither reported nor assumed.
PP1 (Not Applied)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP1 is: "Co-segregation with disease in multiple affected family members". The evidence for this variant shows: no family segregation data. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength because segregation information is absent.
PP2 (Not Applied)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP2 is: "Missense variant in a gene with a low rate of benign missense variation and where missense variants are a common mechanism of disease". The evidence for this variant shows: it is synonymous, not missense. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength because it does not meet missense criteria.
PP3 (Not Applied)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP3 is: "Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect on the gene/gene product (e.g., conservation, splicing impact)". The evidence for this variant shows: in silico tools predict no impact and SpliceAI score is 0.01. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength because computational evidence does not support deleteriousness.
PP4 (Not Applied)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP4 is: "Patient's phenotype or family history highly specific for a disease with a single genetic etiology". The evidence for this variant shows: no phenotype or clinical data provided. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength because phenotype information is missing.
PP5 (Not Applied)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP5 is: "Reputable source reports variant as pathogenic, but without accessible evidence". The evidence for this variant shows: not reported in ClinVar or other sources. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength because no reputable reports exist.
BA1 (Not Applied)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BA1 is: "Allele frequency is too high for the disorder (based on population data)". The evidence for this variant shows: allele frequency is 0% in gnomAD. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength because the variant is not common.
BS1 (Not Applied)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS1 is: "Allele frequency is greater than expected for the disorder". The evidence for this variant shows: absent from controls. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength because frequency is not greater than expected.
BS2 (Not Applied)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS2 is: "Observed in healthy individuals with full penetrance expected at an early age". The evidence for this variant shows: no reports in healthy adult cohorts. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength because there is no evidence of observation in healthy individuals.
BS3 (Not Applied)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS3 is: "Well-established functional studies show no damaging effect on protein function or splicing". The evidence for this variant shows: no functional assays performed. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength because functional data are lacking.
BS4 (Not Applied)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS4 is: "Lack of segregation in affected family members". The evidence for this variant shows: no family segregation analysis. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength because segregation data are absent.
BP1 (Not Applied)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP1 is: "Missense variant in a gene where only LoF causes disease". The evidence for this variant shows: it is synonymous, not missense. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength because it does not meet missense criteria.
BP2 (Not Applied)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP2 is: "Observed in trans with a pathogenic variant for dominant disorders or in cis with a pathogenic variant". The evidence for this variant shows: no cis/trans observations with pathogenic variants. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength because such observations are not reported.
BP3 (Not Applied)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP3 is: "In-frame deletions/insertions in a repetitive region without known function". The evidence for this variant shows: it is a single-nucleotide synonymous change, not an in-frame indel. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength because it is not an in-frame indel.
BP4 (Supporting)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP4 is: "Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact". The evidence for this variant shows: SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (score 0.01) and CADD score is low (0.88). Therefore, this criterion is applied at Supporting strength because computational evidence supports a benign effect.
BP5 (Not Applied)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP5 is: "Variant found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease". The evidence for this variant shows: no case reports with alternate molecular diagnoses. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength because no such cases are documented.
BP6 (Not Applied)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP6 is: "Reputable source reports variant as benign, but without accessible evidence". The evidence for this variant shows: no such reports exist. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength because there are no reputable benign assertions.
BP7 (Supporting)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP7 is: "Synonymous variant with no predicted impact on splicing". The evidence for this variant shows: it is synonymous (A689=) and SpliceAI score is 0.01, indicating no splicing impact. Therefore, this criterion is applied at Supporting strength because the variant is synonymous with no predicted splicing effect.