Genetic Information

Gene & Transcript Details

Gene
TET2
Transcript
NM_001127208.2 MANE Select
Total Exons
Reference Sequence
NC_000004.11
Alternative Transcripts
IDStatusDetails
NM_001127208.3 MANE Select 9589 nt | 297–6305
NM_001127208.1 Alternative 9677 nt | 387–6395
NM_001127208.2 RefSeq Select 9796 nt | 488–6496

Variant Details

HGVS Notation
NM_001127208.2:c.3731T>G
Protein Change
L1244R
Location
Exon 6 (Exon 6 of )
6
5'Exon Structure3'
Functional Consequence
Loss of Function
Alternate Identifiers

Clinical & Population Data

Population Frequency

gnomAD
Global Frequency
0.0 in 100,000
Extremely Rare
ACMG Criteria Applied PM2
This variant is absent or extremely rare in population databases (PM2 criteria applies).

ClinVar

Open
Classification
Unknown
0 publications
Clinical Statement

""

COSMIC Somatic Evidence

Open
COSMIC ID
Recurrence
0 occurrences
PM1 Criteria
Not Applied
COSMIC Database Preview
COSMIC Preview
Accessing full COSMIC database details requires institutional login or subscription.

Functional Impact & Domains

Functional Domain

Hotspot Status
Not a hotspot
Domain Summary
This variant is not located in a mutational hotspot or critical domain.
Related Variants in This Domain
No evidence of other pathogenic variants at this position in gene TET2.

Functional Studies & Therapeutic Relevance

Functional Summary

The TET2 L1244R variant has not been functionally characterized.

Database Previews
OncoKB
OncoKB Preview
JAX-CKB
JAX-CKB Preview

Click on previews to view full database entries. External databases may require institutional access.

Computational Analysis

Pathogenicity Predictions

SpliceAI
Predictor Consensus
Mixed/VUS
PP3 Applied
No
REVEL Score
0.707
Threshold: ≥0.75 = PP3 applied

SpliceAI Scores

Window: ±500bp
Effect Type Score Position
- Acceptor Loss (AL) 0.0 11 bp
- Donor Loss (DL) 0.0 72 bp
+ Acceptor Gain (AG) 0.01 -27 bp
+ Donor Gain (DG) 0.0 54 bp
High impact (≥0.5) Medium impact (0.2-0.49) Low impact (<0.2)

VCEP Guidelines

Applied ACMG/AMP Criteria (VCEP Specific)

Filter Criteria:
PVS1

PVS1 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PVS1 is: Null variant (nonsense, frameshift, canonical ±1 or 2 splice sites, initiation codon, single or multi-exon deletion) in a gene where loss of function (LoF) is a known mechanism of disease. The evidence for this variant shows: c.3731T>G results in a missense change (L1244R), not a null variant. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PS1

PS1 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS1 is: Same amino acid change as a previously established pathogenic variant regardless of nucleotide change. The evidence for this variant shows: No previously established pathogenic variant resulting in p.L1244R has been reported. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PS2

PS2 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS2 is: De novo (both maternity and paternity confirmed) in a patient with the disease and no family history. The evidence for this variant shows: No parental testing or de novo status data available. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PS3

PS3 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS3 is: Well-established functional studies supportive of a damaging effect on the gene or gene product. The evidence for this variant shows: No functional studies have been performed for L1244R. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PS4

PS4 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS4 is: Prevalence in affected individuals significantly increased compared with controls. The evidence for this variant shows: No case-control or cohort data available. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PM1

PM1 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM1 is: Located in a mutational hotspot or well-established functional domain without benign variation. The evidence for this variant shows: No data indicating that residue L1244 lies within a known hotspot or critical functional domain. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PM2

PM2 (Moderate)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM2 is: Absent from controls (or at extremely low frequency if recessive). The evidence for this variant shows: c.3731T>G is absent from population databases including gnomAD (MAF = 0%). Therefore, this criterion is applied at Moderate strength.

PM3

PM3 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM3 is: Detected in trans with a pathogenic variant for recessive disorders. The evidence for this variant shows: TET2‐related disease is dominant and no trans data exist. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PM4

PM4 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM4 is: Protein length changes due to in-frame deletions/insertions or stop-loss variants. The evidence for this variant shows: L1244R is a missense change with no protein length alteration. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PM5

PM5 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM5 is: Novel missense change at an amino acid residue where a different pathogenic missense change has been seen. The evidence for this variant shows: No other pathogenic missense changes reported at residue L1244. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PM6

PM6 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM6 is: Assumed de novo, but without confirmation of paternity and maternity. The evidence for this variant shows: No de novo assumption data. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PP1

PP1 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP1 is: Co-segregation with disease in multiple affected family members. The evidence for this variant shows: No segregation data available. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PP2

PP2 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP2 is: Missense variant in a gene with a low rate of benign variation and where missense variants are a common mechanism of disease. The evidence for this variant shows: TET2 disease mechanism is loss of function rather than missense. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PP3

PP3 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP3 is: Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect on the gene/gene product. The evidence for this variant shows: In silico predictions are mixed (REVEL 0.71 suggests possible impact, but CADD 4.32 is low and SpliceAI 0.01 indicates no splicing effect), overall not concordant for deleterious. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PP4

PP4 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP4 is: Patient’s phenotype or family history is highly specific for a disease with a single genetic etiology. The evidence for this variant shows: No clinical phenotype data provided. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PP5

PP5 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP5 is: Reputable source reports variant as pathogenic, but without accessible evidence. The evidence for this variant shows: No such reports exist. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BA1

BA1 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BA1 is: Allele frequency is too high for the disorder. The evidence for this variant shows: Absent from population databases. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BS1

BS1 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS1 is: Allele frequency is greater than expected for the disorder. The evidence for this variant shows: Absent from population databases. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BS2

BS2 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS2 is: Observed in healthy individuals for a dominant disorder with full penetrance expected at an early age. The evidence for this variant shows: No observations in healthy individuals. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BS3

BS3 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS3 is: Well-established functional studies show no damaging effect on protein function or splicing. The evidence for this variant shows: No functional assays performed. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BS4

BS4 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS4 is: Lack of segregation in affected family members. The evidence for this variant shows: No segregation data. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BP1

BP1 (Supporting)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP1 is: Missense variant in a gene where only loss of function causes disease. The evidence for this variant shows: TET2 disease mechanism is established as haploinsufficiency/LoF, and L1244R is a missense change. Therefore, this criterion is applied at Supporting strength.

BP2

BP2 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP2 is: Observed in trans with a pathogenic variant for a dominant disorder or in cis with a pathogenic variant. The evidence for this variant shows: No such observations. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BP3

BP3 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP3 is: In-frame deletions/insertions in a repetitive region without known function. The evidence for this variant shows: L1244R is a missense substitution. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BP4

BP4 (Supporting)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP4 is: Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on gene or gene product. The evidence for this variant shows: CADD score is low (4.32), SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (0.01), and overall computational predictions are not concordant for damaging effect. Therefore, this criterion is applied at Supporting strength.

BP5

BP5 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP5 is: Variant found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease. The evidence for this variant shows: No such case reports. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BP6

BP6 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP6 is: Reputable source reports variant as benign, but without accessible evidence. The evidence for this variant shows: No such reports. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BP7

BP7 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP7 is: Synonymous variant with no predicted impact on splicing. The evidence for this variant shows: L1244R is a missense variant. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.