STAG2 c.3305T>C, p.Met1102Thr
NM_001042749.1:c.3305T>C
Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS)
This missense variant (M1102T) in STAG2 is absent from controls (PM2) and computationally predicted benign (BP4), with no other supportive or contradictory data; thus it remains a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
ACMG/AMP Criteria Applied
PM2
BP4
Genetic Information
Gene & Transcript Details
Gene
STAG2
Transcript
NM_001042749.2
Total Exons
35
Strand
Forward (+)
Reference Sequence
NC_000023.10
Alternative Transcripts
| ID | Status | Details |
|---|---|---|
| NM_001042749.1 | Alternative | 35 exons | Forward |
Variant Details
HGVS Notation
NM_001042749.1:c.3305T>C
Protein Change
M1102T
Location
Exon 31
(Exon 31 of 35)
5'Exon Structure (35 total)3'
Functional Consequence
Loss of Function
Related Variants
No evidence of other pathogenic variants at position 1102 in gene STAG2
Variant interpretation based on transcript NM_001042749.2
Genome Browser
Loading genome browser...
HGVS InputNM_001042749:c.3305T>C
Active Tracks
ConservationRefSeqClinVargnomAD
Navigation tips: Use mouse to drag and zoom. Click on features for details.
Clinical Data
Population Frequency
Global Frequency
0.0 in 100,000
Extremely Rare
Global: 0.0%
0%
0.05%
0.1%
1%
5%
10%+
ACMG Criteria Applied
PM2
This variant is not present in gnomAD (PM2 criteria applies).
Classification
Unknown
Publications (0)
No publication details.
Clinical Statement
Functional Impact
Functional Domain
Hotspot Status
Not a hotspot
Domain Summary
This variant is not located in a mutational hotspot or critical domain (0 mutations).
Related Variants in This Domain
No evidence of other pathogenic variants at position 1102 in gene STAG2
Functional Summary
The STAG2 M1102T variant has not been functionally characterized, and its biological significance remains unknown.
Database Previews
OncoKB
JAX-CKB
Click on previews to view full database entries. External databases may require institutional access.
Computational Analysis
Pathogenicity Predictions
REVEL Score
0.181
0.181
Likely Benign0.0
Uncertain (Low)0.2
Uncertain (Med)0.5
Likely Pathogenic0.75
REVEL scores ≥ 0.75 are strong evidence (PP3)
Predictor Consensus
Mixed/VUS
PP3 Applied
No
Additional Predictors
Benign:
CADD: 2.72polyphen_prediction: benignmetasvm: Tmetalr: Tprimateai: T
Neutral: Show all
VCEP Guidelines
Applied ACMG/AMP Criteria (VCEP Specific)
PVS1
PVS1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PVS1 is: "Null variant (nonsense, frameshift, canonical ±1 or 2 splice sites, initiation codon, single exon deletion) in a gene where LoF is a known mechanism of disease." The evidence for this variant shows: c.3305T>C is a missense variant (M1102T), not a null variant. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because the variant type does not meet the rule.
PS1
PS1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS1 is: "Same amino acid change as a previously established pathogenic variant regardless of nucleotide change." The evidence for this variant shows: M1102T has not been previously reported as pathogenic. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because there is no known pathogenic variant at this residue.
PS2
PS2 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS2 is: "De novo (both maternity and paternity confirmed) in a patient with the disease and no family history." The evidence for this variant shows: no information on de novo status or parental testing. Therefore, this criterion is not applied due to absence of de novo confirmation.
PS3
PS3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS3 is: "Well-established functional studies supportive of a damaging effect on the gene or gene product." The evidence for this variant shows: no functional studies have been performed. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because functional data are lacking.
PS4
PS4 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS4 is: "Prevalence in affected individuals significantly increased compared with controls." The evidence for this variant shows: no case-control or cohort data are available. Therefore, this criterion is not applied due to lack of case prevalence data.
PM1
PM1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM1 is: "Located in a mutational hot spot or well-established functional domain without benign variation." The evidence for this variant shows: no evidence that M1102 lies in a known hotspot or critical domain. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PM2
PM2 (Moderate)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM2 is: "Absent from controls (or at extremely low frequency if recessive)." The evidence for this variant shows: M1102T is not present in population databases (gnomAD MAF = 0%). Therefore, this criterion is applied at Moderate strength because the variant is absent from controls.
PM3
PM3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM3 is: "Detected in trans with a pathogenic variant for recessive disorders." The evidence for this variant shows: STAG2 is not a recessive gene and no trans‐phase data exist. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PM4
PM4 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM4 is: "Protein length changes due to in‐frame deletions/insertions or stop‐loss variants." The evidence for this variant shows: M1102T is a missense change, not an in‐frame indel or stop‐loss. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PM5
PM5 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM5 is: "Novel missense change at an amino acid residue where a different pathogenic missense change has been seen." The evidence for this variant shows: no other pathogenic missense variants reported at residue 1102. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PM6
PM6 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM6 is: "Assumed de novo, but without confirmation of paternity and maternity." The evidence for this variant shows: no de novo or parental data. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PP1
PP1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP1 is: "Co‐segregation with disease in multiple affected family members." The evidence for this variant shows: no family segregation data. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PP2
PP2 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP2 is: "Missense variant in a gene with a low rate of benign missense variation and where missense variants are a common mechanism of disease." The evidence for this variant shows: insufficient evidence that STAG2 missense is a common disease mechanism. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PP3
PP3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP3 is: "Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect." The evidence for this variant shows: in silico predictors (CADD, PolyPhen, REVEL 0.18, SpliceAI 0.01) suggest benign impact. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PP4
PP4 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP4 is: "Patient’s phenotype is highly specific for a disease with a single genetic etiology." The evidence for this variant shows: no phenotype information provided. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PP5
PP5 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP5 is: "Reputable source reports variant as pathogenic without accessible evidence." The evidence for this variant shows: no such reports. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BA1
BA1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BA1 is: "Allele frequency is too high for the disorder (>5%)." The evidence for this variant shows: MAF = 0%. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BS1
BS1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS1 is: "Allele frequency is greater than expected for disorder." The evidence for this variant shows: absent from controls. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BS2
BS2 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS2 is: "Observed in a healthy adult individual for a dominant or X‐linked disorder with full penetrance expected early." The evidence for this variant shows: no data on healthy adult observations. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BS3
BS3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS3 is: "Well‐established functional studies show no damaging effect." The evidence for this variant shows: no functional assays performed. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BS4
BS4 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS4 is: "Lack of segregation in affected family members." The evidence for this variant shows: no segregation data. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP1
BP1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP1 is: "Missense variant in a gene where only loss‐of‐function causes disease." The evidence for this variant shows: insufficient data to confirm that STAG2 disease mechanism is exclusively LoF. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP2
BP2 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP2 is: "Observed in trans with a pathogenic variant for dominant disorders or in cis with a pathogenic variant." The evidence for this variant shows: no compound or cis observations. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP3
BP3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP3 is: "In‐frame deletions/insertions in a repetitive region without known function." The evidence for this variant shows: M1102T is not an indel. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP4
BP4 (Supporting)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP4 is: "Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on gene or gene product." The evidence for this variant shows: in silico predictors (CADD, PolyPhen, REVEL 0.18, SpliceAI 0.01) indicate benign impact. Therefore, this criterion is applied at Supporting strength because computational evidence is benign.
BP5
BP5 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP5 is: "Variant found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease." The evidence for this variant shows: no clinical case data. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP6
BP6 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP6 is: "Reputable source reports variant as benign without accessible evidence." The evidence for this variant shows: no such reports. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP7
BP7 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP7 is: "Synonymous variant with no predicted impact on splicing." The evidence for this variant shows: it is missense, not synonymous. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.