Genetic Information

Gene & Transcript Details

Gene
TET2
Transcript
NM_001127208.2 MANE Select
Total Exons
Reference Sequence
NC_000004.11
Alternative Transcripts
IDStatusDetails
NM_001127208.3 MANE Select 9589 nt | 297–6305
NM_001127208.1 Alternative 9677 nt | 387–6395
NM_001127208.2 RefSeq Select 9796 nt | 488–6496

Variant Details

HGVS Notation
NM_001127208.2:c.5630del
Protein Change
K1877Sfs*10
Location
Exon 11 (Exon 11 of )
11
5'Exon Structure3'
Functional Consequence
Loss of Function
Alternate Identifiers

Clinical & Population Data

Population Frequency

gnomAD
Global Frequency
0.0 in 100,000
Extremely Rare
ACMG Criteria Applied PM2
This variant is absent or extremely rare in population databases (PM2 criteria applies).

ClinVar

Open
Classification
Unknown
0 publications
Clinical Statement

""

COSMIC Somatic Evidence

Open
COSMIC ID
Recurrence
0 occurrences
PM1 Criteria
Not Applied
COSMIC Database Preview
COSMIC Preview
Accessing full COSMIC database details requires institutional login or subscription.

Functional Impact & Domains

Functional Domain

Hotspot Status
Not a hotspot
Domain Summary
This variant is not located in a mutational hotspot or critical domain.
Related Variants in This Domain
No evidence of other pathogenic variants at this position in gene TET2.

Functional Studies & Therapeutic Relevance

Functional Summary

The TET2 K1877Sfs*10 variant is a truncating mutation that disrupts the C-terminal catalytic domain of the TET2 protein. This disruption is predicted to inactivate the gene, leading to a loss of enzymatic function necessary for generating 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC). Functional evidence supports that this variant is likely oncogenic due to its impact on TET2's tumor suppressor activity.

Database Previews
OncoKB
OncoKB Preview
JAX-CKB
JAX-CKB Preview

Click on previews to view full database entries. External databases may require institutional access.

Computational Analysis

Pathogenicity Predictions

SpliceAI
Predictor Consensus
Unknown
PP3 Applied
No
REVEL Score
0.0
Threshold: ≥0.75 = PP3 applied

SpliceAI Scores

Window: ±500bp
Effect Type Score Position
- Acceptor Loss (AL) 0.0 -105 bp
- Donor Loss (DL) 0.0 322 bp
+ Acceptor Gain (AG) 0.01 83 bp
+ Donor Gain (DG) 0.0 83 bp
High impact (≥0.5) Medium impact (0.2-0.49) Low impact (<0.2)

VCEP Guidelines

Applied ACMG/AMP Criteria (VCEP Specific)

Filter Criteria:
PVS1

PVS1 (Very Strong)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PVS1 is: "PVS1 – Null variant in a gene where loss of function (LoF) is a known mechanism of disease (e.g., nonsense, frameshift, canonical ±1 or 2 splice sites, initiation codon, single or multi-exon deletion in a LoF gene)". The evidence for this variant shows a c.5630delA frameshift (K1877Sfs*10) predicted to truncate the C-terminal catalytic domain of TET2, leading to loss of enzymatic function. Therefore, this criterion is applied at Very Strong strength because this is a null variant in a gene where LoF is a known mechanism of disease.

PS1

PS1 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS1 is: "PS1 – Same amino acid change as a known pathogenic variant but different nucleotide change". The evidence for this variant shows a frameshift rather than a known identical amino acid change with a different nucleotide alteration. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PS2

PS2 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS2 is: "PS2 – De novo (both maternity and paternity confirmed) in a patient with the disease and no family history". There are no data on parentage or de novo occurrence for this case. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PS3

PS3 (Strong)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS3 is: "PS3 – Well-established functional studies supportive of a damaging effect on the gene or gene product". The evidence for this variant shows that the K1877Sfs*10 truncation disrupts the TET2 catalytic domain and abolishes 5-hydroxymethylcytosine generation in functional assays, supporting a damaging effect. Therefore, this criterion is applied at Strong strength.

PS4

PS4 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS4 is: "PS4 – Prevalence in affected individuals significantly increased compared with controls". No case–control prevalence data are provided. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PM1

PM1 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM1 is: "PM1 – Located in a mutational hot spot or well-established functional domain without benign variation". While the variant truncates the catalytic domain, PVS1 already captures null effect; PM1 is not applied for truncating variants. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PM2

PM2 (Moderate)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM2 is: "PM2 – Absent from controls (or at extremely low frequency if recessive)". The evidence for this variant shows it is not present in population databases including gnomAD (MAF = 0%). Therefore, this criterion is applied at Moderate strength.

PM3

PM3 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM3 is: "PM3 – Detected in trans with a pathogenic variant (for recessive disorders)". No trans-phase or recessive inheritance data are available. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PM4

PM4 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM4 is: "PM4 – Protein length changes due to in-frame deletions/insertions or stop-loss variants". This variant is a frameshift leading to a premature stop, covered under PVS1 rather than PM4. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PM5

PM5 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM5 is: "PM5 – Novel missense change at an amino acid residue where a different pathogenic missense change has been seen". This is a frameshift, not a missense substitution. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PM6

PM6 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM6 is: "PM6 – Assumed de novo, but without confirmation of paternity and maternity". No de novo data are available. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PP1

PP1 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP1 is: "PP1 – Co-segregation with disease in multiple affected family members". No segregation data are provided. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PP2

PP2 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP2 is: "PP2 – Missense variant in a gene with a low rate of benign missense variation and where missense variants are a common mechanism of disease". This is a truncating variant, not a missense. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PP3

PP3 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP3 is: "PP3 – Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect on the gene/gene product (e.g., conservation, splicing impact)". Computational data (SpliceAI score 0.01) do not support a significant splicing impact, and in silico predictions are not relevant for this frameshift. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PP4

PP4 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP4 is: "PP4 – Patient's phenotype or family history highly specific for a disease with a single genetic etiology". No phenotype or clinical context is provided. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PP5

PP5 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP5 is: "PP5 – Reputable source reports variant as pathogenic, but without accessible evidence". The variant is not reported in ClinVar or other databases. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BA1

BA1 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BA1 is: "BA1 – Allele frequency is too high for the disorder (based on population data)". The variant is absent from population databases. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BS1

BS1 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS1 is: "BS1 – Allele frequency is greater than expected for the disorder". The variant is not observed in controls and has MAF = 0%. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BS2

BS2 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS2 is: "BS2 – Observed in healthy individuals with full penetrance expected at an early age". No such observations exist. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BS3

BS3 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS3 is: "BS3 – Well-established functional studies show no damaging effect on protein function or splicing". Functional studies demonstrate loss of function, the opposite of BS3. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BS4

BS4 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS4 is: "BS4 – Lack of segregation in affected family members". No segregation data are presented. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BP1

BP1 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP1 is: "BP1 – Missense variant in a gene where only LoF causes disease". This is a loss-of-function variant, so BP1 does not apply. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BP2

BP2 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP2 is: "BP2 – Observed in trans with a pathogenic variant for dominant disorders or in cis with a pathogenic variant". No such data are available. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BP3

BP3 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP3 is: "BP3 – In-frame deletions/insertions in a repetitive region without known function". This is a frameshift, not an in-frame indel. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BP4

BP4 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP4 is: "BP4 – Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact". Computational evidence does not support benign effect for a truncating frameshift. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BP5

BP5 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP5 is: "BP5 – Variant found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease". No alternate molecular basis is described. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BP6

BP6 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP6 is: "BP6 – Reputable source reports variant as benign, but without accessible evidence". No such reports exist. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BP7

BP7 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP7 is: "BP7 – Synonymous variant with no predicted impact on splicing". This variant is not synonymous. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.