PTEN c.209+6T>G, p.?

NM_000314.8:c.209+6T>G
Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS)
This intronic variant at +6 in PTEN meets only three supporting pathogenic criteria (PM2, PP3, PP5) without additional evidence, resulting in classification as a Variant of Uncertain Significance due to insufficient evidence for pathogenic or benign assertion.
ACMG/AMP Criteria Applied
PM2 PP3 PP5

Genetic Information

Gene & Transcript Details
Gene
PTEN
Transcript
NM_000314.8 MANE Select
Total Exons
9
Strand
Forward (+)
Reference Sequence
NC_000010.10
Alternative Transcripts
IDStatusDetails
NM_000314.7 RefSeq Select 9 exons | Forward
NM_000314.5 Alternative 9 exons | Forward
NM_000314.4 Alternative 9 exons | Forward
NM_000314.3 Alternative 9 exons | Forward
NM_000314.6 Alternative 9 exons | Forward
Variant Details
HGVS Notation
NM_000314.8:c.209+6T>G
Protein Change
?
Location
Exon 3 (Exon 3 of 9)
3
5'Exon Structure (9 total)3'
Functional Consequence
Loss of Function
Related Variants
Variant interpretation based on transcript NM_000314.8

Genome Browser

UCSC Genome Browser hg19/GRCh37
Loading genome browser...
HGVS InputNM_000314:c.209+6T>G
Active Tracks
ConservationRefSeqClinVargnomAD
Open in UCSC
Navigation tips: Use mouse to drag and zoom. Click on features for details.

Clinical Data

Population Frequency
Global Frequency
0.0 in 100,000
Extremely Rare
Global: 0.0%
0%
0.05%
0.1%
1%
5%
10%+
ACMG Criteria Applied
PM2
This variant is not present in gnomAD (PM2 criteria applies).
ClinVar 2026-02-12T13:40:24.365304
Classification
1 publications
Pathogenic
Based on 1 submitter review in ClinVar
Submitter Breakdown
1 Path
Pathogenic
Likely Path.
VUS
Likely Benign
Benign
Publications (1)
Variants that disrupt the consensus splice site are a relatively common cause of aberrant splicing (PMID: 17576681, 9536098). Studies have shown that this variant results in skipping of exon 3, but is expected to preserve the integrity of the reading-frame (Invitae). For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic. This variant disrupts a region of the PTEN protein in which other variant(s) (p.Tyr68His) have been determined to be pathogenic (PMID: 9467011, 9600246, 19457929, 20926450, 25288137, 25669429, 25722288). This suggests that this is a clinically significant region of the protein, and that variants that disrupt it are likely to be disease-causing. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 468674). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with PTEN-related conditions. This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This sequence change falls in intron 3 of the PTEN gene. It does not directly change the encoded amino acid sequence of the PTEN protein. RNA analysis indicates that this variant induces altered splicing and likely results in a shortened protein product.
Clinical Statement
This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (1 clinical laboratories).
COSMIC
COSMIC ID
Unknown
Recurrence
0 occurrences
PM1 Criteria
Not Applied
COSMIC Database Preview
COSMIC Preview
Expand
Accessing full COSMIC database details requires institutional login or subscription. External links may prompt for authentication.

Functional Impact

Functional Domain
Hotspot Status
Not a hotspot
Domain Summary

This variant is not located in a mutational hotspot or critical domain (0 mutations).

Related Variants in This Domain
Functional Studies & Therapeutic Relevance
Functional Summary
The variant PTEN 209+6T>G has not been functionally characterized.
Database Previews
OncoKB
OncoKB Preview
Expand
JAX-CKB
JAX-CKB Preview
Expand
Click on previews to view full database entries. External databases may require institutional access.

Computational Analysis

Pathogenicity Predictions
Predictor Consensus
Mixed/VUS
PP3 Applied
No
Additional Predictors
Benign:
CADD: 3.24
SpliceAI Scores Window: ±500bp
Effect TypeScorePosition
-Acceptor Loss
0.77
-50 bp
-Donor Loss
0.85
-6 bp
+Acceptor Gain
0.0
-6 bp
+Donor Gain
0.0
14 bp
High impact (≥0.5)
Medium impact (0.2-0.49)
Low impact (<0.2)

VCEP Guidelines

Applied ACMG/AMP Criteria (VCEP Specific) VCEP Guidelines
PVS1
PVS1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PVS1 is: "Null Variant (nonsense, fs, start codon, splicing +1/2, startgain, single or multi-exon deletion) in a gene where LOF is a known mechanism of disease". The evidence for this variant shows: it is intronic at position +6, outside of the canonical +1/+2 splice sites. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because the variant does not occur at a canonical splice site and does not meet PVS1 requirements.
PS1
PS1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS1 is: "Same amino acid change as a previously established pathogenic variant regardless of nucleotide change OR different variant at same nucleotide position as a pathogenic splicing variant, where in silico models predict impact equal to or greater than the known pathogenic variant". The evidence for this variant shows: no amino acid change is predicted and no previously established pathogenic variant at this transcript position. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PS2
PS2 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS2 is: "De novo (both maternity and paternity confirmed) in a patient with the disease and no family history". The evidence for this variant shows: no de novo occurrence data are available. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PS3
PS3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PS3 is: "Well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies supportive of a damaging effect on the gene or gene product. RNA, mini-gene, or other assay shows impact on splicing". The evidence for this variant shows: no functional studies have been performed. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PS4
PS4 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS4 is: "The prevalence of the variant in affected individuals is significantly increased compared with the prevalence in controls". The evidence for this variant shows: no case series or segregation data are available. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PM1
PM1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PM1 is: "Located in a mutational hot spot and/or critical and well-established functional domain. Defined to include residues in catalytic motifs: 90-94, 123-130, 166-168". The evidence for this variant shows: it is intronic at +6, not within a defined functional domain. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PM2
PM2 (Supporting) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PM2 is: "Absent in population Databases present at <0.00001 (0.001%) allele frequency in gnomAD". The evidence for this variant shows: it is absent from gnomAD and other large population databases. Therefore, this criterion is applied at Supporting strength.
PM3
PM3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM3 is: "For recessive disorders, detected in trans with a pathogenic variant". The evidence for this variant shows: no observations in trans with a known pathogenic PTEN variant. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PM4
PM4 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PM4 is: "Protein length changes due to in-frame deletions/insertions in a non-repeat region or stop-loss variants". The evidence for this variant shows: it is intronic and does not alter protein length. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PM5
PM5 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PM5 is: "Missense change at an amino acid residue where a different missense change determined to be pathogenic has been seen before". The evidence for this variant shows: it is intronic and does not result in an amino acid change. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PM6
PM6 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM6 is: "Assumed de novo, but without confirmation of paternity and maternity". The evidence for this variant shows: no de novo information is available. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PP1
PP1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PP1 is: "Co-segregation with disease in multiple affected family members". The evidence for this variant shows: no segregation data. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PP2
PP2 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP2 is: "Missense variant in a gene that has a low rate of benign missense variation and where missense variants are a common mechanism of disease". The evidence for this variant shows: it is intronic, not a missense variant. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PP3
PP3 (Supporting)
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PP3 is: "Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect on the gene or gene product". The evidence for this variant shows: SpliceAI predicts a donor loss with score 0.85, supporting a splicing impact. Therefore, this criterion is applied at Supporting strength.
PP4
PP4 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP4 is: "Patient’s phenotype or family history is highly specific for a disease with a single genetic etiology". The evidence for this variant shows: no phenotype or family history data are provided. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
PP5
PP5 (Supporting)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP5 is: "Reputable source reports variant as pathogenic but evidence not available to the laboratory for independent evaluation". The evidence for this variant shows: ClinVar lists this variant as Pathogenic from one clinical laboratory without publicly available evidence. Therefore, this criterion is applied at Supporting strength.
BA1
BA1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BA1 is: "gnomAD Filtering allele frequency >0.00056 (0.056%)". The evidence for this variant shows: allele frequency is 0% in gnomAD. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BS1
BS1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BS1 is: "gnomAD Filtering allele frequency from 0.000043 up to 0.00056". The evidence for this variant shows: allele frequency is 0%. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BS2
BS2 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BS2 is: "Observed in the homozygous state in a healthy or PHTS-unaffected individual". The evidence for this variant shows: no homozygous observations reported. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BS3
BS3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BS3 is: "Well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies shows no damaging effect on protein function". The evidence for this variant shows: no functional assays have been performed. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BS4
BS4 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BS4 is: "Lack of segregation in affected members of two or more families". The evidence for this variant shows: no segregation data. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP1
BP1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP1 is: "Missense variant in a gene for which primarily truncating variants cause disease". The evidence for this variant shows: it is intronic. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP2
BP2 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BP2 is: "Observed in trans with a pathogenic or likely pathogenic PTEN variant". The evidence for this variant shows: no such observations. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP3
BP3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP3 is: "In-frame deletions/insertions in a repetitive region without a known function". The evidence for this variant shows: it is intronic and not an in-frame indel. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP4
BP4 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BP4 is: "Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on gene or gene product". The evidence for this variant shows: SpliceAI predicts a significant splicing impact and other predictions are conflicting. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP5
BP5 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BP5 is: "Variant found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease". The evidence for this variant shows: no alternate molecular cause has been reported. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP6
BP6 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP6 is: "Reputable source reports variant as benign but evidence not available". The evidence for this variant shows: no reputable source reports it as benign. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.
BP7
BP7 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BP7 is: "A synonymous (silent) or intronic variant at or beyond +7/-21 for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact". The evidence for this variant shows: it is intronic at +6, within the splice region. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.