Genetic Information

Gene & Transcript Details

Gene
PTEN
Transcript
NM_000314.8 MANE Select
Total Exons
Reference Sequence
NC_000010.10
Alternative Transcripts
IDStatusDetails
NM_000314.8 MANE Select 8515 nt | 846–2057
NM_000314.7 RefSeq Select 8514 nt | 845–2056
NM_000314.5 Alternative 8719 nt | 1032–2243
NM_000314.4 Alternative 5572 nt | 1032–2243
NM_000314.3 Alternative 3416 nt | 1032–2243
NM_000314.6 Alternative 8718 nt | 1032–2243

Variant Details

HGVS Notation
NM_000314.8:c.350dup
Protein Change
N117Kfs*9
Location
Exon 5 (Exon 5 of )
5
5'Exon Structure3'
Functional Consequence
Loss of Function
Alternate Identifiers

Clinical & Population Data

Population Frequency

gnomAD
Global Frequency
0.0 in 100,000
Extremely Rare
ACMG Criteria Applied PM2
This variant is absent or extremely rare in population databases (PM2 criteria applies).

ClinVar

Open
Classification
Unknown
0 publications
Clinical Statement

""

COSMIC Somatic Evidence

Open
COSMIC ID
COSM5831597
Recurrence
1 occurrences
PM1 Criteria
Not Applied
COSMIC Database Preview
COSMIC Preview
Accessing full COSMIC database details requires institutional login or subscription.

Functional Impact & Domains

Functional Domain

Hotspot Status
Not a hotspot
Domain Summary
This variant is not located in a mutational hotspot or critical domain.
Related Variants in This Domain
No evidence of other pathogenic variants at this position in gene PTEN.

Functional Studies & Therapeutic Relevance

Functional Summary

The PTEN N117Kfs*9 variant is a truncating mutation that results in the loss of PTEN phosphatase function, impairing its ability to negatively regulate the PI3K/AKT pathway. Functional studies have shown that expression of PTEN truncation mutations leads to oncogenic effects and increased genomic instability due to the inability of PTEN to associate with chromosomal centromeres. This evidence supports a damaging effect of the variant.

Database Previews
OncoKB
OncoKB Preview
JAX-CKB
JAX-CKB Preview

Click on previews to view full database entries. External databases may require institutional access.

Computational Analysis

Pathogenicity Predictions

SpliceAI
Predictor Consensus
Unknown
PP3 Applied
No
REVEL Score
0.0
Threshold: ≥0.75 = PP3 applied

SpliceAI Scores

Window: ±500bp
Effect Type Score Position
- Acceptor Loss (AL) 0.01 14 bp
- Donor Loss (DL) 0.0 148 bp
+ Acceptor Gain (AG) 0.02 -112 bp
+ Donor Gain (DG) 0.0 144 bp
High impact (≥0.5) Medium impact (0.2-0.49) Low impact (<0.2)

VCEP Guidelines

Applied ACMG/AMP Criteria (VCEP Specific)

Filter Criteria:
PVS1

PVS1 (Very Strong)

According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PVS1 is: "Very Strong Strength: Very Strong Use PTEN PVS1 decision tree. Modification Type: Disease-specific". The evidence for this variant shows: NM_000314.8:c.350dup is a frameshift leading to a premature stop (N117Kfs*9) in a gene where loss of function is a known mechanism and is not located in the last exon. Therefore, this criterion is applied at Very Strong strength because the PTEN PVS1 decision tree supports PVS1 for predicted null variants not in the final exon.

PS1

PS1 (Not Applied)

According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PS1 is: "Strong Strength: Strong Same amino acid change as a previously established pathogenic variant regardless of nucleotide change OR different variant at same nucleotide position as a pathogenic splicing variant...". The evidence for this variant shows: this is a novel frameshift, not a previously established amino acid change. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PS2

PS2 (Not Applied)

According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PS2 is: "Very Strong Strength: Very Strong Two proven OR four assumed OR one proven + two assumed de novo observations...". The evidence for this variant shows: no de novo data are available. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PS3

PS3 (Strong)

According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PS3 is: "Strong Strength: Strong Well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies supportive of a damaging effect on the gene or gene product.". The evidence for this variant shows: functional studies demonstrate that the N117Kfs*9 truncation abolishes PTEN phosphatase activity and leads to oncogenic pathway activation. Therefore, this criterion is applied at Strong strength because well-established assays confirm a damaging effect.

PS4

PS4 (Not Applied)

According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PS4 is: "Very Strong Strength: Very Strong Probands with specificity score ≥16...". The evidence for this variant shows: no case count or specificity scores are available. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PM1

PM1 (Not Applied)

According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PM1 is: "Moderate Strength: Moderate Located in a mutational hot spot and/or critical and well-established functional domain... residues in catalytic motifs: 90-94, 123-130, 166-168.". The evidence for this variant shows: the frameshift does not occur in a defined PTEN mutational hotspot. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PM2

PM2 (Supporting)

According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PM2 is: "Supporting Strength: Supporting Absent in population Databases present at <0.00001 (0.001%) allele frequency in gnomAD...". The evidence for this variant shows: it is not present in gnomAD or other large population databases. Therefore, this criterion is applied at Supporting strength because the variant is absent from controls.

PM3

PM3 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM3 is: "Moderate Strength: Moderate For recessive disorders, detected in trans with a pathogenic variant...". The evidence for this variant shows: PTEN-related disease is autosomal dominant and no trans allelic data are provided. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PM4

PM4 (Not Applied)

According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PM4 is: "Moderate Strength: Moderate Protein length changes due to in-frame deletions/insertions...". The evidence for this variant shows: this is a frameshift leading to truncation, not an in-frame change. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PM5

PM5 (Not Applied)

According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PM5 is: "Moderate Strength: Moderate Missense change at an amino acid residue where a different missense change determined to be pathogenic has been seen...". The evidence for this variant shows: it is a frameshift, not missense. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PM6

PM6 (Not Applied)

According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PM6 is: "Very Strong Strength: Very Strong Two proven OR four assumed OR one proven + two assumed de novo observations...". The evidence for this variant shows: no assumed de novo information is available. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PP1

PP1 (Not Applied)

According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PP1 is: "Strong Strength: Strong Co-segregation with disease in multiple affected family members...". The evidence for this variant shows: no segregation data are provided. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PP2

PP2 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP2 is: "Supporting Strength: Supporting Missense variant in a gene with low rate of benign missense variation...". The evidence for this variant shows: it is a frameshift, not a missense change. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PP3

PP3 (Not Applied)

According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PP3 is: "Supporting Strength: Supporting Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect... REVEL score > 0.7; SpliceAI concordance...". The evidence for this variant shows: SpliceAI maximum score is 0.02 and no deleterious computational signals. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PP4

PP4 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP4 is: "Supporting Strength: Supporting Patient’s phenotype or family history is highly specific for a disease with a single genetic etiology.". The evidence for this variant shows: no detailed phenotype information is provided. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PP5

PP5 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP5 is: "Supporting Strength: Supporting Reputable source reports variant as pathogenic or likely pathogenic...". The evidence for this variant shows: not present in ClinVar or other databases. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BA1

BA1 (Not Applied)

According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BA1 is: "Stand Alone Strength: gnomAD Filtering allele frequency >0.00056 (0.056%)". The evidence for this variant shows: allele frequency is 0%. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BS1

BS1 (Not Applied)

According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BS1 is: "Strong Strength: gnomAD Filtering allele frequency from 0.000043 up to 0.00056". The evidence for this variant shows: allele frequency is 0%. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BS2

BS2 (Not Applied)

According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BS2 is: "Strong Strength: Observed in homozygous state in a healthy individual...". The evidence for this variant shows: no homozygous observations in unaffected individuals. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BS3

BS3 (Not Applied)

According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BS3 is: "Strong Strength: Well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies shows no damaging effect...". The evidence for this variant shows: functional studies demonstrate damaging effect. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BS4

BS4 (Not Applied)

According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BS4 is: "Strong Strength: Lack of segregation in affected members of two or more families.". The evidence for this variant shows: no segregation data. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BP1

BP1 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP1 is: "Supporting Strength: Missense variant in a gene for which primarily truncating variants cause disease.". The evidence for this variant shows: it is a truncating variant, not missense. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BP2

BP2 (Not Applied)

According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BP2 is: "Supporting Strength: Observed in trans with a pathogenic PTEN variant OR in cis...". The evidence for this variant shows: no phasing or compound data. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BP3

BP3 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP3 is: "Supporting Strength: In-frame deletions/insertions in repetitive regions without known function.". The evidence for this variant shows: it is a frameshift, not an in-frame indel in a repeat region. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BP4

BP4 (Not Applied)

According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BP4 is: "Supporting Strength: Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact... SpliceAI and VarSeak concordance; REVEL < 0.5.". The evidence for this variant shows: computational tools indicate minimal splice impact, but BP4 applies only to missense or splicing variants, not LOF frameshifts. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BP5

BP5 (Not Applied)

According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BP5 is: "Supporting Strength: Variant found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease...". The evidence for this variant shows: no alternate molecular diagnosis data. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BP6

BP6 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP6 is: "Supporting Strength: Reputable source reports variant as benign without evidence.". The evidence for this variant shows: no such reports exist. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BP7

BP7 (Not Applied)

According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BP7 is: "Supporting Strength: A synonymous or intronic variant at or beyond +7/-21 with no splicing impact predicted.". The evidence for this variant shows: it is a frameshift, not synonymous/intronic. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.