TSC2 c.5068+9G>A, p.?

NM_000548.5:c.5068+9G>A
Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS)
NM_000548.5:c.5068+9G>A in TSC2 is an intronic variant outside canonical splice sites, extremely rare in population databases (PM2), and predicted benign by computational tools (BP4). No functional, segregation, de novo, or case-control evidence supports pathogenicity or benign impact. Thus, the variant remains classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
ACMG/AMP Criteria Applied
PM2 BP4

Genetic Information

Gene & Transcript Details
Gene
TSC2
Transcript
NM_000548.5 MANE Select
Total Exons
42
Strand
Forward (+)
Reference Sequence
NC_000016.9
Alternative Transcripts
IDStatusDetails
NM_000548.2 Alternative 41 exons | Forward
NM_000548.3 Alternative 42 exons | Forward
NM_000548.4 Alternative 42 exons | Forward
Variant Details
HGVS Notation
NM_000548.5:c.5068+9G>A
Protein Change
?
Location
Exon 39 (Exon 39 of 42)
39
5'Exon Structure (42 total)3'
Functional Consequence
Loss of Function
Related Variants
Variant interpretation based on transcript NM_000548.5

Genome Browser

UCSC Genome Browser hg19/GRCh37
Loading genome browser...
HGVS InputNM_000548:c.5068+9G>A
Active Tracks
ConservationRefSeqClinVargnomAD
Open in UCSC
Navigation tips: Use mouse to drag and zoom. Click on features for details.

Clinical Data

Population Frequency
Global Frequency
0.0157%
Low Frequency
Highest in Population
African/African American
0.0526%
Common
Global: 0.0157%
African/African American: 0.0526%
0%
0.05%
0.1%
1%
5%
10%+
Allele Information
Total: 280916Alt: 44Homozygotes: 0
ACMG Criteria Applied
PM2
This variant is present in gnomAD (MAF= 0.0157%, 44/280916 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and at a higher frequency in the African/African American population (MAF= 0.0526%, 13/24736 alleles, homozygotes = 0). The variant is rare (MAF < 0.1%), supporting PM2 criterion application.
ClinVar 2026-03-16T10:20:25.174892
Classification
Uncertain Significance (VUS)
Based on 7 submitter reviews in ClinVar
Submitter Breakdown
1 VUS
3 LB
3 B
Pathogenic
Likely Path.
VUS
Likely Benign
Benign
Publications (0)
No publication details.
Clinical Statement
This variant has been reported in ClinVar as benign (1 clinical laboratories) and as Likely Benign (1 clinical laboratories) and as Benign (3 clinical laboratories) and as Likely benign (3 clinical laboratories) and as Uncertain significance (1 clinical laboratories).
COSMIC
COSMIC ID
Unknown
Recurrence
0 occurrences
PM1 Criteria
Not Applied
COSMIC Database Preview
COSMIC Preview
Expand
Accessing full COSMIC database details requires institutional login or subscription. External links may prompt for authentication.

Functional Impact

Functional Domain
Hotspot Status
Not a hotspot
Domain Summary

This variant is not located in a mutational hotspot or critical domain (0 mutations).

Related Variants in This Domain
Functional Studies & Therapeutic Relevance
Functional Summary
The TSC2 5068+9G>A variant has not been functionally characterized.
Database Previews
OncoKB
OncoKB Preview
Expand
JAX-CKB
JAX-CKB Preview
Expand
Click on previews to view full database entries. External databases may require institutional access.

Computational Analysis

Pathogenicity Predictions
Predictor Consensus
Mixed/VUS
PP3 Applied
No
Additional Predictors
Benign:
CADD: -0.46
SpliceAI Scores Window: ±500bp
Effect TypeScorePosition
-Acceptor Loss
0.01
289 bp
-Donor Loss
0.0
199 bp
+Acceptor Gain
0.01
89 bp
+Donor Gain
0.16
1 bp
High impact (≥0.5)
Medium impact (0.2-0.49)
Low impact (<0.2)

VCEP Guidelines

Applied ACMG/AMP Criteria (VCEP Specific)
PVS1
PVS1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PVS1 is: 'Null variant (nonsense, frameshift, canonical ±1 or 2 splice sites, initiation codon, single exon or multi-exon deletion) in a gene where loss of function is a known mechanism of disease'. The evidence for this variant shows: NM_000548.5:c.5068+9G>A is an intronic change outside the canonical splice sites and does not introduce a stop codon or frameshift. Therefore, this criterion is not applied as the variant does not meet PVS1 requirements.
PS1
PS1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS1 is: 'Same amino acid change as a known pathogenic variant regardless of nucleotide change'. The evidence for this variant shows: NM_000548.5:c.5068+9G>A does not alter an amino acid residue and no established pathogenic variant at the same residue exists. Therefore, PS1 is not applied.
PS2
PS2 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS2 is: 'De novo (both maternity and paternity confirmed) in a patient with the disease and no family history'. The evidence for this variant shows: no data on de novo occurrence or parental testing. Therefore, PS2 is not applied.
PS3
PS3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS3 is: 'Well-established functional studies supportive of a damaging effect on the gene or gene product'. The evidence for this variant shows: no functional assays have been performed for NM_000548.5:c.5068+9G>A. Therefore, PS3 is not applied.
PS4
PS4 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS4 is: 'Prevalence in affected individuals significantly increased compared with controls'. The evidence for this variant shows: no case-control or affected cohort data are available. Therefore, PS4 is not applied.
PM1
PM1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM1 is: 'Located in a mutational hot spot or well-established functional domain without benign variation'. The evidence for this variant shows: NM_000548.5:c.5068+9G>A lies outside known functional domains and hot spots. Therefore, PM1 is not applied.
PM2
PM2 (Moderate)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM2 is: 'Absent from controls (or at extremely low frequency if recessive)'. The evidence for this variant shows: observed at MAF=0.0157% in gnomAD, below thresholds for common variation. Therefore, PM2 is applied at Moderate strength because the variant is extremely rare in population databases.
PM3
PM3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM3 is: 'Detected in trans with a pathogenic variant for recessive disorders'. The evidence for this variant shows: TSC2-associated disease is autosomal dominant and no trans observations are reported. Therefore, PM3 is not applied.
PM4
PM4 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM4 is: 'Protein length changes due to in-frame deletions/insertions or stop-loss variants'. The evidence for this variant shows: NM_000548.5:c.5068+9G>A does not affect coding sequence length. Therefore, PM4 is not applied.
PM5
PM5 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM5 is: 'Novel missense change at an amino acid residue where a different pathogenic missense change has been seen'. The evidence for this variant shows: intronic location, not a missense change. Therefore, PM5 is not applied.
PM6
PM6 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM6 is: 'Assumed de novo, but without confirmation of paternity and maternity'. The evidence for this variant shows: no de novo transmission data. Therefore, PM6 is not applied.
PP1
PP1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP1 is: 'Co-segregation with disease in multiple affected family members'. The evidence for this variant shows: no segregation data available. Therefore, PP1 is not applied.
PP2
PP2 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP2 is: 'Missense variant in a gene with a low rate of benign missense variation and where missense variants are a common mechanism of disease'. The evidence for this variant shows: intronic location, not applicable. Therefore, PP2 is not applied.
PP3
PP3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP3 is: 'Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect on the gene or gene product'. The evidence for this variant shows: in silico algorithms predict no impact on splicing and CADD score suggests benign. Therefore, PP3 is not applied.
PP4
PP4 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP4 is: 'Patient’s phenotype or family history is highly specific for a disease with a single genetic etiology'. The evidence for this variant shows: no phenotype data provided. Therefore, PP4 is not applied.
PP5
PP5 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP5 is: 'Reputable source reports variant as pathogenic without accessible evidence'. The evidence for this variant shows: ClinVar submissions include benign and VUS designations, no pathogenic reports. Therefore, PP5 is not applied.
BA1
BA1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BA1 is: 'Allele frequency is too high for the disorder'. The evidence for this variant shows: MAF=0.0157%, well below BA1 threshold of 5%. Therefore, BA1 is not applied.
BS1
BS1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS1 is: 'Allele frequency is greater than expected for the disorder'. The evidence for this variant shows: MAF remains extremely low. Therefore, BS1 is not applied.
BS2
BS2 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS2 is: 'Observed in healthy adult individuals for a dominant disorder with full penetrance expected at an early age'. The evidence for this variant shows: no healthy adult phenotype data. Therefore, BS2 is not applied.
BS3
BS3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS3 is: 'Well-established functional studies show no damaging effect on protein function or splicing'. The evidence for this variant shows: no functional assays performed. Therefore, BS3 is not applied.
BS4
BS4 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS4 is: 'Lack of segregation in affected family members'. The evidence for this variant shows: no segregation data. Therefore, BS4 is not applied.
BP1
BP1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP1 is: 'Missense variant in a gene where only loss of function causes disease'. The evidence for this variant shows: intronic change. Therefore, BP1 is not applied.
BP2
BP2 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP2 is: 'Observed in trans with a pathogenic variant for dominant disorders or in cis with a pathogenic variant'. The evidence for this variant shows: no such observations. Therefore, BP2 is not applied.
BP3
BP3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP3 is: 'In-frame deletions/insertions in a repetitive region without known function'. The evidence for this variant shows: intronic SNV, not an indel. Therefore, BP3 is not applied.
BP4
BP4 (Supporting)
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP4 is: 'Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc.)'. The evidence for this variant shows: SpliceAI predicts no significant splicing impact (max score 0.16) and CADD score -0.46 indicates benign. Therefore, BP4 is applied at Supporting strength because computational tools predict no deleterious effect.
BP5
BP5 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP5 is: 'Variant found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease'. The evidence for this variant shows: no such case reports. Therefore, BP5 is not applied.
BP6
BP6 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP6 is: 'Reputable source reports variant as benign without accessible evidence'. The evidence for this variant shows: ClinVar assertions are publicly accessible. Therefore, BP6 is not applied.
BP7
BP7 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP7 is: 'Synonymous variant with no predicted impact on splicing'. The evidence for this variant shows: intronic location, not synonymous. Therefore, BP7 is not applied.