Genetic Information

Gene & Transcript Details

Gene
MET
Transcript
NM_001127500.3 MANE Select
Total Exons
Reference Sequence
NC_000007.13
Alternative Transcripts
IDStatusDetails
NM_001127500.2 Alternative 6710 nt | 203–4429
NM_001127500.3 Alternative 6876 nt | 397–4623
NM_001127500.1 Alternative 6695 nt | 188–4414

Variant Details

HGVS Notation
NM_001127500.3:c.2419-21G>C
Protein Change
?
Location
Exon 10 (Exon 10 of )
10
5'Exon Structure3'
Functional Consequence
Loss of Function
Alternate Identifiers

Clinical & Population Data

Population Frequency

gnomAD
Global Frequency
0.211 in 100,000
Extremely Rare
ACMG Criteria Applied None

ClinVar

Open
Classification
Likely Benign
1 publications
Clinical Statement

"This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (2 clinical laboratories)."

COSMIC Somatic Evidence

Open
COSMIC ID
COSN31986947
Recurrence
2 occurrences
PM1 Criteria
Not Applied
COSMIC Database Preview
COSMIC Preview
Accessing full COSMIC database details requires institutional login or subscription.

Functional Impact & Domains

Functional Domain

Hotspot Status
Not a hotspot
Domain Summary
This variant is not located in a mutational hotspot or critical domain.
Related Variants in This Domain
No evidence of other pathogenic variants at this position in gene MET.

Functional Studies & Therapeutic Relevance

Functional Summary

The MET 2419-21G>C variant has not been functionally characterized.

Database Previews
OncoKB
OncoKB Preview
JAX-CKB
JAX-CKB Preview

Click on previews to view full database entries. External databases may require institutional access.

Computational Analysis

Pathogenicity Predictions

SpliceAI
Predictor Consensus
Mixed/VUS
PP3 Applied
No
REVEL Score
0.0
Threshold: ≥0.75 = PP3 applied

SpliceAI Scores

Window: ±500bp
Effect Type Score Position
- Acceptor Loss (AL) 0.0 None bp
- Donor Loss (DL) 0.0 None bp
+ Acceptor Gain (AG) 0.0 None bp
+ Donor Gain (DG) 0.0 None bp
High impact (≥0.5) Medium impact (0.2-0.49) Low impact (<0.2)

VCEP Guidelines

Applied ACMG/AMP Criteria (VCEP Specific)

Filter Criteria:
PVS1

PVS1 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PVS1 is: 'Null variant in a gene where loss of function (LoF) is a known mechanism of disease (e.g., nonsense, frameshift, canonical ±1 or 2 splice sites, initiation codon, single or multi-exon deletion)'. The evidence for this variant shows: NM_001127500.3:c.2419-21G>C is an intronic variant at position -21 from the exon, not affecting canonical splice sites and not a null variant. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because the variant does not meet the rule requirements.

PS1

PS1 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS1 is: 'Same amino acid change as a previously established pathogenic variant regardless of nucleotide change'. The evidence for this variant shows: the protein change is unknown. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because the variant does not result in a known amino acid substitution matching a pathogenic variant.

PS2

PS2 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS2 is: 'De novo (both maternity and paternity confirmed) in a patient with the disease and no family history'. The evidence for this variant shows: there are no data on de novo occurrence. Therefore, this criterion is not applied due to lack of de novo evidence.

PS3

PS3 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS3 is: 'Well-established functional studies supportive of a damaging effect on the gene or gene product'. The evidence for this variant shows: no functional studies have been performed. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because functional impact has not been demonstrated.

PS4

PS4 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS4 is: 'Prevalence in affected individuals significantly increased compared with controls'. The evidence for this variant shows: no case–control or prevalence data in affected individuals. Therefore, this criterion is not applied due to absence of statistical association data.

PM1

PM1 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM1 is: 'Located in a mutational hot spot or well-established functional domain without benign variation'. The evidence for this variant shows: it is an intronic variant outside any characterized functional domain or mutational hotspot. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because the variant is not located in a known hotspot or functional domain.

PM2

PM2 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM2 is: 'Absent from controls (or at extremely low frequency if recessive)'. The evidence for this variant shows: present in gnomAD at MAF=0.211% (590/279,790 alleles) with homozygotes observed. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because the variant is not absent or extremely rare in population databases.

PM3

PM3 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM3 is: 'Detected in trans with a pathogenic variant (for recessive disorders)'. The evidence for this variant shows: no data on phasing with pathogenic variants. Therefore, this criterion is not applied due to lack of allelic configuration data.

PM4

PM4 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM4 is: 'Protein length changes due to in-frame deletions/insertions or stop-loss variants'. The evidence for this variant shows: the protein consequence is unknown and there is no evidence of in-frame indel or stop-loss. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because it does not alter protein length.

PM5

PM5 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM5 is: 'Novel missense change at an amino acid residue where a different pathogenic missense change has been seen'. The evidence for this variant shows: protein change is unknown and no known pathogenic missense at the same residue. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PM6

PM6 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM6 is: 'Assumed de novo, but without confirmation of paternity and maternity'. The evidence for this variant shows: no data on de novo occurrence. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PP1

PP1 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP1 is: 'Co-segregation with disease in multiple affected family members'. The evidence for this variant shows: no family segregation data available. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PP2

PP2 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP2 is: 'Missense variant in a gene with a low rate of benign missense variation and where missense variants are a common mechanism of disease'. The evidence for this variant shows: it is an intronic variant, not missense. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PP3

PP3 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP3 is: 'Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect on the gene/gene product (e.g., conservation, splicing impact)'. The evidence for this variant shows: in silico predictions are mixed—with a low CADD score (0.87) suggesting benign effect and inconclusive SpliceAI. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PP4

PP4 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP4 is: 'Patient's phenotype or family history highly specific for a disease with a single genetic etiology'. The evidence for this variant shows: no clinical phenotype or family history provided. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

PP5

PP5 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP5 is: 'Reputable source reports variant as pathogenic, but without accessible evidence'. The evidence for this variant shows: ClinVar reports likely benign, not pathogenic. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BA1

BA1 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BA1 is: 'Allele frequency is too high for the disorder (based on population data)'. The evidence for this variant shows: MAF is 0.211%, well below the 5% threshold. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BS1

BS1 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS1 is: 'Allele frequency is greater than expected for the disorder'. The evidence for this variant shows: MAF is 0.211% with unknown disorder prevalence. Therefore, this criterion is not applied due to insufficient frequency threshold data.

BS2

BS2 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS2 is: 'Observed in healthy individuals with full penetrance expected at an early age'. The evidence for this variant shows: two homozygotes are reported in gnomAD but health status is not documented. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BS3

BS3 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS3 is: 'Well-established functional studies show no damaging effect on protein function or splicing'. The evidence for this variant shows: no functional studies are available. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BS4

BS4 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS4 is: 'Lack of segregation in affected family members'. The evidence for this variant shows: no segregation data are available. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BP1

BP1 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP1 is: 'Missense variant in a gene where only LoF causes disease'. The evidence for this variant shows: it is intronic. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BP2

BP2 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP2 is: 'Observed in trans with a pathogenic variant for dominant disorders or in cis with a pathogenic variant'. The evidence for this variant shows: no data on allelic phase with other variants. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BP3

BP3 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP3 is: 'In-frame deletions/insertions in a repetitive region without known function'. The evidence for this variant shows: it is a single-nucleotide change, not an indel. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BP4

BP4 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP4 is: 'Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact'. The evidence for this variant shows: in silico results are mixed, with no consensus benign prediction. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BP5

BP5 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP5 is: 'Variant found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease'. The evidence for this variant shows: no case reports linking this variant to disease in the context of another molecular diagnosis. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.

BP6

BP6 (Supporting)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP6 is: 'Reputable source reports variant as benign, but without accessible evidence'. The evidence for this variant shows: ClinVar lists this variant as Likely benign by two clinical laboratories without accessible primary data. Therefore, this criterion is applied at Supporting strength because a reputable source reports benign status without available evidence.

BP7

BP7 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP7 is: 'Synonymous variant with no predicted impact on splicing'. The evidence for this variant shows: this is an intronic variant, not synonymous. Therefore, this criterion is not applied.