MSH2 c.67T>C, p.Phe23Leu

NM_000251.3:c.67T>C
Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS)
The variant NM_000251.3:c.67T>C (p.F23L) in MSH2 is classified as Likely Benign based on strong population frequency evidence (BS1) and supporting computational evidence (BP4), with no contrary pathogenic data.
ACMG/AMP Criteria Applied
BS1 BP4

Genetic Information

Gene & Transcript Details
Gene
MSH2
Transcript
NM_000251.3 MANE Select
Total Exons
16
Strand
Forward (+)
Reference Sequence
NC_000002.11
Alternative Transcripts
IDStatusDetails
NM_000251.2 RefSeq Select 16 exons | Forward
NM_000251.1 Alternative 16 exons | Forward
Variant Details
HGVS Notation
NM_000251.3:c.67T>C
Protein Change
F23L
Location
Exon 1 (Exon 1 of 16)
1
5'Exon Structure (16 total)3'
Functional Consequence
Loss of Function
Related Variants
No evidence of other pathogenic variants at position 23 in gene MSH2
Variant interpretation based on transcript NM_000251.3

Genome Browser

UCSC Genome Browser hg19/GRCh37
Loading genome browser...
HGVS InputNM_000251:c.67T>C
Active Tracks
ConservationRefSeqClinVargnomAD
Open in UCSC
Navigation tips: Use mouse to drag and zoom. Click on features for details.

Clinical Data

Population Frequency
Global Frequency
0.0559%
Common
Highest in Population
South Asian
0.481%
Common
Global: 0.0559%
South Asian: 0.481%
0%
0.05%
0.1%
1%
5%
10%+
Allele Information
Total: 252208Alt: 141Homozygotes: 2
ACMG Criteria Applied
PM2
This variant is present in gnomAD (MAF= 0.0559%, 141/252208 alleles, homozygotes = 2) and at a higher frequency in the South Asian population (MAF= 0.481%, 133/27674 alleles, homozygotes = 2). The variant is rare (MAF < 0.1%), supporting PM2 criterion application.
ClinVar 2026-04-08T16:07:27.792080
Classification
5 publications
Uncertain Significance (VUS)
Based on 13 submitter reviews in ClinVar
Submitter Breakdown
1 VUS
5 LB
7 B
Pathogenic
Likely Path.
VUS
Likely Benign
Benign
Publications (5)
Variant summary: MSH2 c.67T>C (p.Phe23Leu) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the DNA mismatch repair protein MutS-like, N-terminal domain of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00057 in 246202 control chromosomes, predominantly within the South Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database at a frequency of 0.0049, including 2 homozygotes. This frequency within South Asian control individuals is approximately 9-fold above the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in MSH2 causing Lynch Syndrome phenotype (0.00057), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of South Asian origin. The variant has been reported in a patient with gastrointestinal stromal cancer, but without evidence of causality. Four clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 and all classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign.
This variant is considered benign. This variant has been observed in trans with a known pathogenic variant in one or more individuals lacking clinical features consistent with gene-specific recessive disease. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 27363726].
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance.
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.
Clinical Statement
This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (7 clinical laboratories) and as Likely benign (5 clinical laboratories) and as Uncertain significance (1 clinical laboratories).
COSMIC
COSMIC ID
Unknown
Recurrence
0 occurrences
PM1 Criteria
Not Applied
COSMIC Database Preview
COSMIC Preview
Expand
Accessing full COSMIC database details requires institutional login or subscription. External links may prompt for authentication.

Functional Impact

Functional Domain
Hotspot Status
Not a hotspot
Domain Summary

This variant is not located in a mutational hotspot or critical domain (0 mutations).

Related Variants in This Domain
No evidence of other pathogenic variants at position 23 in gene MSH2
Functional Studies & Therapeutic Relevance
Functional Summary
The MSH2 F23L variant has not been functionally characterized.
Database Previews
OncoKB
OncoKB Preview
Expand
JAX-CKB
JAX-CKB Preview
Expand
Click on previews to view full database entries. External databases may require institutional access.

Computational Analysis

Pathogenicity Predictions
Predictor Consensus
Mixed/VUS
PP3 Applied
No
Additional Predictors
Pathogenic:
metalr: D
Benign:
CADD: 3.37polyphen_prediction: benignmetasvm: Tprimateai: T
Neutral: Show all
SpliceAI Scores Window: ±500bp
Effect TypeScorePosition
-Acceptor Loss
0.0
6 bp
-Donor Loss
0.01
-83 bp
+Acceptor Gain
0.0
-85 bp
+Donor Gain
0.0
32 bp
High impact (≥0.5)
Medium impact (0.2-0.49)
Low impact (<0.2)

VCEP Guidelines

Applied ACMG/AMP Criteria (VCEP Specific) VCEP Guidelines
PVS1
PVS1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PVS1 is: "Very Strong Nonsense/frameshift variant introducing Premature Termination Codon (PTC) ≤ codon 891 in MSH2...". The evidence for this variant shows: NM_000251.3:c.67T>C is a missense (F23L), not a null variant. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because the variant type does not meet the null variant requirement.
PS1
PS1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PS1 is: "Strong A predicted missense substitution that encodes the same amino acid change with a different underlying nucleotide change previously established by this VCEP as Pathogenic...". The evidence for this variant shows: there is no previously established pathogenic variant encoding F23L. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because no identical amino acid change is known to be pathogenic.
PS2
PS2 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PS2 is: "Very Strong ≥4 de novo points; Strong 2–3 de novo points; Moderate 1 de novo point; Supporting 0.5 de novo points.". The evidence for this variant shows: no de novo data are available. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because there is no de novo evidence.
PS3
PS3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PS3 is: "Strong Calibrated functional assays with functional odds for Pathogenicity >18.7...". The evidence for this variant shows: no functional studies have been performed. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because functional assay data are lacking.
PS4
PS4 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS4 is: "The prevalence of variant in affected individuals is significantly increased compared to controls.". The evidence for this variant shows: no case-control or case series data. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because no case-control data are available.
PM1
PM1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM1 is: "Located in a mutational hotspot and/or critical and well-established functional domain without benign variation.". The evidence for this variant shows: codon 23 is not a recognized hotspot or critical domain per VCEP. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because the location is not a defined hotspot.
PM2
PM2 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PM2 is: "Supporting Absent/extremely rare (<1 in 50,000 alleles) in gnomAD v4 dataset.". The evidence for this variant shows: gnomAD MAF=0.0559% (1 in ~1,789), which exceeds 1/50,000. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because the allele frequency is above the VCEP threshold.
PM3
PM3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PM3 is: "Very Strong ≥4 points; Strong ≥2 and <4 points; Moderate ≥1 and <2 points; Supporting=0.5 points for recessive trans evidence.". The evidence for this variant shows: no trans observations with a pathogenic variant. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because there is no recessive trans evidence.
PM4
PM4 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM4 is: "Protein length changes due to in-frame deletions/insertions or stop-loss variants.". The evidence for this variant shows: F23L is a missense substitution without length change. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because there is no protein length alteration.
PM5
PM5 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PM5 is: "Moderate Missense change at an amino acid residue where a different missense change was classified by this VCEP as Pathogenic...". The evidence for this variant shows: no other missense at residue 23 has been classified as pathogenic. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because there is no precedent pathogenic missense at F23.
PM6
PM6 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PM6 is: "Supporting 0.5 de novo points.". The evidence for this variant shows: no de novo information. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because de novo status is unconfirmed.
PP1
PP1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PP1 is: "Strong/Moderate/Supporting co-segregation with disease based on Bayes LR.". The evidence for this variant shows: no family segregation data. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because segregation data are absent.
PP2
PP2 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP2 is: "Missense variant in a gene with low rate of benign missense variation and where missense is a common mechanism of disease.". The evidence for this variant shows: MSH2 has a number of pathogenic missense and benign missense variants. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because the gene context does not meet PP2.
PP3
PP3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PP3 is: "Moderate Missense variant with HCI prior probability >0.81 or predicted splice defect with SpliceAI ≥0.2.". The evidence for this variant shows: SpliceAI score=0.01, and HCI prior not >0.81; computational predictions are predominantly benign. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because computational data do not support pathogenicity.
PP4
PP4 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for PP4 is: "Supporting if 1 CRC/Endometrial MSI-H tumor with loss of MMR protein expression consistent with variant location.". The evidence for this variant shows: no tumor phenotype data. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because no clinical tumor data are available.
PP5
PP5 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP5 is: "Reputable source reports variant as pathogenic without available evidence.". The evidence for this variant shows: ClinVar submissions are conflicting (Benign, Likely Benign, VUS). Therefore, this criterion is not applied because there is no single reputable pathogenic assertion.
BA1
BA1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BA1 is: "Stand Alone GnomAD v4 Grpmax filtering allele frequency ≥0.001 (0.1%) and variant excluded as founder pathogenic.". The evidence for this variant shows: MAF=0.0559% (<0.1%). Therefore, this criterion is not applied because the allele frequency does not meet the BA1 threshold.
BS1
BS1 (Strong)
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BS1 is: "Strong GnomAD v4 Grpmax filtering allele frequency ≥0.0001 and <0.001 (0.01–0.1%), excluding founder pathogenic variants.". The evidence for this variant shows: MAF=0.0559% (0.000559), which lies between 0.0001 and 0.001. Therefore, this criterion is applied at Strong strength because the allele frequency falls within the VCEP-defined benign range.
BS2
BS2 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BS2 is: "Strong Co-occurrence in trans with a known pathogenic sequence variant in the same gene in a patient without CMMRD.". The evidence for this variant shows: no co-occurrence data. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because co-occurrence evidence is lacking.
BS3
BS3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BS3 is: "Strong Calibrated functional assays with functional odds for Pathogenicity ≤0.05 or synonymous/intronic with no mRNA aberration.". The evidence for this variant shows: no functional assays. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because no functional data are available.
BS4
BS4 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BS4 is: "Strong Lack of co-segregation with disease in pedigree(s) with a combined Bayes LR <0.05.". The evidence for this variant shows: no segregation studies. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because no familial non-segregation data are available.
BP1
BP1 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP1 is: "Missense variant in a gene for which primarily truncating variants cause disease, suggesting missense is less likely pathogenic.". The evidence for this variant shows: MSH2 has known pathogenic missense variants. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because missense is an established mechanism in MSH2.
BP2
BP2 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP2 is: "Observed in trans with a pathogenic variant for dominant disorder or in cis with another pathogenic variant.". The evidence for this variant shows: no phase or co-occurrence data. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because there is no cis/trans observation.
BP3
BP3 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP3 is: "In-frame deletions/insertions in repetitive regions without known function.". The evidence for this variant shows: this is a missense substitution. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because it is not an in-frame indel.
BP4
BP4 (Supporting)
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BP4 is: "Supporting Missense variant with HCI-prior probability of pathogenicity <0.11 or SpliceAI ≤0.1.". The evidence for this variant shows: SpliceAI predicts no impact (score=0.01) and multiple in silico tools predict benign. Therefore, this criterion is applied at Supporting strength because computational data support no impact.
BP5
BP5 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BP5 is: "Strong '≥4 tumors with MSS/no MMR loss' or analogous tumor data inconsistent with variant impact.". The evidence for this variant shows: no tumor characterization. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because no tumor phenotype data are available.
BP6
BP6 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP6 is: "Reputable source reports variant as benign without available evidence.". The evidence for this variant shows: ClinVar submissions are conflicting. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because there is no single reputable benign assertion.
BP7
BP7 (Not Applied) Strength Modified
According to VCEP guidelines, the rule for BP7 is: "Supporting synonymous or intronic variant at or beyond -21/+7 with no splicing impact.". The evidence for this variant shows: NM_000251.3:c.67T>C is a missense change. Therefore, this criterion is not applied because it is not synonymous or intronic.