Genetic Information

Gene & Transcript Details

Gene
EZH2
Transcript
NM_004456.4 MANE Select
Total Exons
Reference Sequence
NC_000007.13
Alternative Transcripts
IDStatusDetails
NM_004456.4 RefSeq Select 2723 nt | 194–2449
NM_004456.3 Alternative 2695 nt | 167–2422
NM_004456.5 MANE Select 2654 nt | 136–2391

Variant Details

HGVS Notation
NM_004456.4:c.930T>A
Protein Change
T310=
Location
Exon 9 (Exon 9 of )
9
5'Exon Structure3'
Functional Consequence
Loss of Function
Alternate Identifiers

Clinical & Population Data

Population Frequency

gnomAD
Global Frequency
0.0 in 100,000
Extremely Rare
ACMG Criteria Applied PM2
This variant is absent or extremely rare in population databases (PM2 criteria applies).

ClinVar

Open
Classification
Unknown
0 publications
Clinical Statement

""

COSMIC Somatic Evidence

Open
COSMIC ID
Recurrence
0 occurrences
PM1 Criteria
Not Applied
COSMIC Database Preview
COSMIC Preview
Accessing full COSMIC database details requires institutional login or subscription.

Functional Impact & Domains

Functional Domain

Hotspot Status
Not a hotspot
Domain Summary
This variant is not located in a mutational hotspot or critical domain.
Related Variants in This Domain
No evidence of other pathogenic variants at this position in gene EZH2.

Functional Studies & Therapeutic Relevance

Functional Summary

The variant has not been functionally characterized.

Database Previews
OncoKB
OncoKB Preview
JAX-CKB
JAX-CKB Preview

Click on previews to view full database entries. External databases may require institutional access.

Computational Analysis

Pathogenicity Predictions

SpliceAI
Predictor Consensus
Unknown
PP3 Applied
No
REVEL Score
0.0
Threshold: ≥0.75 = PP3 applied

SpliceAI Scores

Window: ±500bp
Effect Type Score Position
- Acceptor Loss (AL) 0.0 47 bp
- Donor Loss (DL) 0.0 -69 bp
+ Acceptor Gain (AG) 0.0 0 bp
+ Donor Gain (DG) 0.0 72 bp
High impact (≥0.5) Medium impact (0.2-0.49) Low impact (<0.2)

VCEP Guidelines

Applied ACMG/AMP Criteria (VCEP Specific)

Filter Criteria:
PVS1

PVS1 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PVS1 is: "Null variant in a gene where loss of function (LoF) is a known mechanism of disease (e.g., nonsense, frameshift, canonical ±1 or 2 splice sites, initiation codon, single exon deletion in a LoF gene)". The evidence for this variant shows: it is a synonymous change (c.930T>A, p.T310=) that does not introduce a stop codon, frameshift, or affect canonical splice sites. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength because the variant does not meet PVS1 conditions.

PS1

PS1 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS1 is: "Same amino acid change as a known pathogenic variant but different nucleotide change". The evidence for this variant shows: it is a synonymous variant causing no amino acid change, so there is no altered amino acid to compare to known pathogenic variants. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength.

PS2

PS2 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS2 is: "De novo (both maternity and paternity confirmed) in a patient with the disease and no family history". The evidence for this variant shows: there is no information regarding de novo occurrence or parental testing. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength.

PS3

PS3 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS3 is: "Well-established functional studies supportive of a damaging effect on the gene or gene product". The evidence for this variant shows: no functional studies have been performed for this variant. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength.

PS4

PS4 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PS4 is: "Prevalence in affected individuals significantly increased compared with controls". The evidence for this variant shows: there are no case-control or cohort data demonstrating increased prevalence in affected individuals. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength.

PM1

PM1 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM1 is: "Located in a mutational hot spot or well-established functional domain without benign variation". The evidence for this variant shows: the amino acid position T310 is not within a known mutational hot spot or functional domain of EZH2. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength.

PM2

PM2 (Moderate)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM2 is: "Absent from controls (or at extremely low frequency if recessive)". The evidence for this variant shows: it is not present in gnomAD or other population databases (MAF=0%). Therefore, this criterion is applied at Moderate strength because the variant is absent from controls.

PM3

PM3 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM3 is: "Detected in trans with a pathogenic variant (for recessive disorders)". The evidence for this variant shows: there is no information about trans configuration with another variant, and EZH2-related disorders are typically dominant. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength.

PM4

PM4 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM4 is: "Protein length changes due to in-frame deletions/insertions or stop-loss variants". The evidence for this variant shows: it is a synonymous change with no effect on protein length. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength.

PM5

PM5 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM5 is: "Novel missense change at an amino acid residue where a different pathogenic missense change has been seen". The evidence for this variant shows: it is synonymous and does not alter an amino acid residue. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength.

PM6

PM6 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PM6 is: "Assumed de novo, but without confirmation of paternity and maternity". The evidence for this variant shows: there is no information on de novo occurrence. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength.

PP1

PP1 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP1 is: "Co-segregation with disease in multiple affected family members". The evidence for this variant shows: no segregation data are available. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength.

PP2

PP2 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP2 is: "Missense variant in a gene with a low rate of benign missense variation and where missense variants are a common mechanism of disease". The evidence for this variant shows: it is synonymous, not missense. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength.

PP3

PP3 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP3 is: "Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect on the gene/gene product (e.g., conservation, splicing impact)". The evidence for this variant shows: computational tools (e.g., SpliceAI) predict no impact on splicing and no deleterious effect. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength.

PP4

PP4 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP4 is: "Patient's phenotype or family history highly specific for a disease with a single genetic etiology". The evidence for this variant shows: no phenotype or family history information is provided. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength.

PP5

PP5 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for PP5 is: "Reputable source reports variant as pathogenic, but without accessible evidence". The evidence for this variant shows: it is not reported in ClinVar or other reputable sources as pathogenic. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength.

BA1

BA1 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BA1 is: "Allele frequency is too high for the disorder (based on population data)". The evidence for this variant shows: allele frequency is 0% in controls, not high. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength.

BS1

BS1 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS1 is: "Allele frequency is greater than expected for the disorder". The evidence for this variant shows: allele frequency is 0%, not greater than expected. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength.

BS2

BS2 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS2 is: "Observed in healthy individuals with full penetrance expected at an early age". The evidence for this variant shows: no data on observation in healthy adults. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength.

BS3

BS3 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS3 is: "Well-established functional studies show no damaging effect on protein function or splicing". The evidence for this variant shows: no functional studies are available. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength.

BS4

BS4 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BS4 is: "Lack of segregation in affected family members". The evidence for this variant shows: segregation data are not provided. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength.

BP1

BP1 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP1 is: "Missense variant in a gene where only LoF causes disease". The evidence for this variant shows: it is synonymous, not missense. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength.

BP2

BP2 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP2 is: "Observed in trans with a pathogenic variant for dominant disorders or in cis with a pathogenic variant". The evidence for this variant shows: no phase or co-occurrence data are available. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength.

BP3

BP3 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP3 is: "In-frame deletions/insertions in a repetitive region without known function". The evidence for this variant shows: it is a single-nucleotide change, not an in-frame indel. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength.

BP4

BP4 (Supporting)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP4 is: "Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact". The evidence for this variant shows: SpliceAI predicts no impact on splicing (score 0) and in silico tools show no deleterious effect. Therefore, this criterion is applied at Supporting strength because computational evidence suggests no impact.

BP5

BP5 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP5 is: "Variant found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease". The evidence for this variant shows: no case reports with an alternate molecular basis. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength.

BP6

BP6 (Not Applied)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP6 is: "Reputable source reports variant as benign, but without accessible evidence". The evidence for this variant shows: not reported as benign in reputable sources. Therefore, this criterion is not applied at Not Applied strength.

BP7

BP7 (Supporting)

According to standard ACMG guidelines, the rule for BP7 is: "Synonymous variant with no predicted impact on splicing". The evidence for this variant shows: it is synonymous (p.T310=) with SpliceAI score 0 indicating no predicted splicing impact. Therefore, this criterion is applied at Supporting strength because it is a silent change with no splicing effect.