Analysis in progress
Initialising…
0%
complete
This report is still being assembled — sections appear as each stage finishes. It isn't final yet.
CTNNB1
Final classification
VUS
CTNNB1 c.1149G>T · p.Trp383Cys
CTNNB1

The CTNNB1 c.1149G>T (p.Trp383Cys) variant has been observed in somatic cancers 12 times in COSMIC and has also been reported in ClinVar, although ClinVar submission-level classification details were not available from the retrieved record.

Gene
CTNNB1
Transcript
NM_001904.4
HGVS · transcript:coding
NM_001904.4:c.1149G>T
Consequence
N/A
GRCh38
chr3:41233408 G>T
GRCh37
chr3:41274899 G>T
Basis gene-specific framework lacked a usable explicit final combination framework, so generic ACMG/AMP 2015 final-combination rules were applied as fallback; applied criteria: PM2 supporting; combination = 1 supporting, which maps to VUS.
gene-specific framework lacked a usable explicit final combination framework, so generic ACMG/AMP 2015 final-combination rules were applied as fallback; applied criteria: PM2 supporting; combination = 1 supporting, which maps to VUS.
Classification rationale
PM2 VUS
CTNNB1 c.1149G>T

The CTNNB1 c.1149G>T (p.Trp383Cys) variant has been observed in somatic cancers 12 times in COSMIC and has also been reported in ClinVar, although ClinVar submission-level classification details were not available from the retrieved record.1 This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada, placing its observed population frequency at 0, below the 0.1% rarity threshold used for PM2.2 In a published functional study of CTNNB1 armadillo repeat 5 and 6 substitutions, residue W383 was identified as recurrently mutated in cancer, and substitutions in this region were associated with reduced APC binding and increased downstream beta-catenin signaling, but direct functional testing of p.Trp383Cys was not established from the retrieved evidence.3 Computational findings are concerning for a missense effect, with REVEL 0.642 and BayesDel 0.287483, while SpliceAI predicts no meaningful splice effect with a maximum delta score of 0.02.4

PM2 VUS
Gene diagram · NM_001904.4 · variants mapped to exon structure
CTNNB1 NM_001904.4
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
Applied criteria · 1 applied · 19 assessed
Applied · 1
Strength Supporting Moderate Strong Very strong
PM2 supporting Pathogenic
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada, so the observed population frequency is 0 and is below the 0.1% PM2 threshold.
Absent from gnomAD v2.1Absent from gnomAD v4.1Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0
Assessed · not applied
Pathogenic
PS1 No evidence was identified showing that this nucleotide change creates the same amino acid change as a previously established pathogenic variant.
PS2 No confirmed de novo occurrence data were identified for this variant.
PS3 A published study showed that CTNNB1 substitutions in armadillo repeats 5 and 6 can reduce APC binding and increase downstream signaling, but direct well-established functional testing of p.Trp383Cys was not established from the retrieved evidence.
PS4 This variant has been observed in somatic cancers and has a ClinVar record, but no germline case-control enrichment or statistically increased prevalence in affected individuals was identified.
PM1 Residue W383 lies in a recurrently mutated CTNNB1 cancer region, but the available evidence does not establish a germline disease-specific mutational hotspot or critical benign-variation-depleted region suitable for applying PM1 with confidence.
PM6 No assumed de novo occurrence data were identified for this variant.
PP1 No segregation data were identified for this variant.
PP2 No gene-specific evidence framework was available to support applying PP2 for this CTNNB1 missense variant.
PP3 Computational results are concerning for a missense effect, with REVEL 0.642 and BayesDel 0.287483, while SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a max delta score of 0.02; however, without a gene-specific computational rule or clearly prespecified threshold for this case, these data were not used alone to apply PP3.
PP4 No phenotype data were provided to assess whether the clinical presentation is highly specific for a CTNNB1-related disorder.
Benign
BA1 This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada, so the observed population frequency is 0 and is far below the 1% BA1 threshold.
BS1 This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada, so the observed population frequency is 0 and does not exceed the 0.3% BS1 threshold.
BS2 No evidence was identified showing this variant in healthy adult individuals in a context sufficient to apply BS2.
BS3 Available functional literature does not show a normal or benign effect for this variant.
BS4 No data were identified showing lack of segregation with disease.
BP1 BP1 was not applied because no gene-specific framework was available to determine whether this CTNNB1 missense change should be treated as a low-prior-probability missense mechanism.
BP2 No phase data with another variant were identified.
BP4 Benign computational evidence was not identified.
BP5 No alternative molecular explanation was identified to support BP5.
N/A · 8 PVS1 · PM3 · PM4 · PM5 · PP5 · BP3 · BP6 · BP7
Research & evidence
Population frequency
gnomAD v4.1 screenshot
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1 screenshot
gnomAD v2.1
v4.1
Absent from gnomAD v4.1.
v2.1
Absent from gnomAD v2.1.
🇨🇦 CA
Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.
Allele frequency by ancestry
three datasets · side by side
gnomAD v4.1
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
gnomAD v2.1
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
gnomAD Canada 🇨🇦
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
ClinVar screenshot
ClinVar
This variant has been reported in ClinVar but submission details could not be extracted. (ClinVarID = 4539790)
SpliceAI screenshot
In silico
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.02). REVEL score = 0.642. BayesDel score = 0.287483.
Functional / OncoKB screenshot
Functional Likely Oncogenic
OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Likely Gain-of-function; curated oncogenicity label: Likely Oncogenic.
OncoKB ↗
COSMIC screenshot
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots screenshot
Cancer hotspots
Somatic evidence Not in COSMIC / hotspots
COSMIC
This variant lies in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV62692553, n = 12 times).
Hotspots
This variant lies in a statistically significant hotspot.
Sources & reference links
8Sources
ClinVar
gnomAD v2.1
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD-Canada
SpliceAI
OncoKB
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots
Triaged references · 6 PMIDs not cited in assessment
15579438 ↗ CTNNB1 mutations and overexpression of Wnt/beta-catenin target genes in WT1-mutant Wilms' tumors. CLINVAR
31857074 ↗ Oncogenic Mutations in Armadillo Repeats 5 and 6 of β-Catenin Reduce Binding to APC, Increasing Signaling and Transcription of Target Genes. CLINVAR
35101336 ↗ Standards for the classification of pathogenicity of somatic variants in cancer (oncogenicity): Joint recommendations of Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen), Cancer Genomics Consortium (CGC), and Variant Interpretation for Cancer Consortium (VICC). CLINVAR
22918138 ↗ Opportunities and challenges associated with clinical diagnostic genome sequencing: a report of the Association for Molecular Pathology. CLINVAR
34131312 ↗ Chromosomal microarray analysis, including constitutional and neoplastic disease applications, 2021 revision: a technical standard of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). CLINVAR
23619274 ↗ American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics technical standards and guidelines: microarray analysis for chromosome abnormalities in neoplastic disorders. CLINVAR