Starting
Initialising…
0%
Legacy Engine
Processing…
Classification rationale
1

The BRAF c.736G>C (p.Ala246Pro) missense variant is absent from gnomAD population databases (PM2_Supporting).

gnomad_v2 ↗ gnomad_v4 ↗
2

The variant lies within exon 6, a critical functional domain defined by the ClinGen RASopathy VCEP v2.3.0 (PM1_Moderate).

cspec ↗
3

The variant has been observed in multiple unrelated probands with cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome, including the original CFC discovery cohort (Niihori et al. 2006), and is classified as Pathogenic by the ClinGen RASopathy VCEP in ClinVar with submissions from 9 clinical laboratories (PS4_Supporting).

clinvar ↗ PMID:16474404 ↗
4

A de novo occurrence was reported in a CFC proband with both parents negative, though without molecular confirmation of parentage (PM6_Supporting).

PMID:16474404 ↗
5

In silico predictions support a deleterious effect: REVEL score is 0.928, exceeding the VCEP threshold of 0.7 (PP3).

6

BRAF exhibits a high gnomAD missense z-score (>3.09), indicating constraint against missense variation, and missense variants are a common disease mechanism for RASopathies (PP2).

gnomad_v2 ↗
7

Functional studies by Wen et al. 2013 demonstrated that A246P increases Ras binding affinity relative to wild-type, consistent with a gain-of-function mechanism, though the assay is not in the VCEP-approved functional studies list (PS3 not assessed).

PMID:24409384 ↗
8

Under the ClinGen RASopathy VCEP v2.3.0 combination rules (Rule15: 1 moderate + ≥4 supporting → Likely Pathogenic), the variant meets PM1 (moderate) plus PM2_Supporting, PM6_Supporting, PS4_Supporting, PP2, and PP3 (5 supporting criteria), resulting in a classification of Likely Pathogenic.

cspec ↗
Applied criteria
Met
Not met
Not assessed
N/A
Very strong
Strong
Moderate
Supporting
Pathogenic evidence
PVS
PVS1
PS
PS1
PS2
PS3
PS4
PM
PM1
PM2
PM3
PM4
PM5
PM6
PP
PP1
PP2
PP3
PP4
PP5
Benign evidence
BA
BA1
BS
BS1
BS2
BS3
BS4
BP
BP1
BP2
BP3
BP4
BP5
BP6
BP7
PVS1
Rationale
Select a criterion to inspect its explanation.
Evidence used
Gaps remaining
Rule
Publications
Research and evidence
ClinVar evidence
02
ClinVar
This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (9 clinical laboratories) and as Pathogenic by ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel (expert panel). (ClinVarID = 13965)
Functional evidence
03
Functional
OncoKB: Likely Oncogenic
OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Gain-of-function; curated oncogenicity label: Likely Oncogenic.
In silico evidence
04
In silico
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.05). REVEL score = 0.928. BayesDel score = 0.460772.
COSMIC evidence
05
COSMIC
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).
Cancer hotspots evidence
06
Cancer hotspots Not found
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.