Back
LYFE SCIENCES
Project: HERA
NM_000059.4:c.8183T>C
p.Val2728Ala  ·  BRCA2
Starting
Initialising…
0%
Legacy Engine
Processing…
Classification rationale
1

NM_000059.4:c.8183T>C (p.Val2728Ala) is a missense variant in exon 18 of BRCA2, located within the DNA binding domain (aa 2481-3186).

2

This variant is present at extremely low frequency in population databases: gnomAD v2.1 (1/31,400 alleles, exclusively in genomes; exome not covered) and gnomAD v4.1 (4/1,614,072 alleles, grpmax FAF=1.746e-05). It is absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

gnomad_v2 ↗ gnomad_v4 ↗
3

In ClinVar (Variation ID 141399), this variant is classified as Uncertain Significance by seven clinical laboratories and Likely Benign by one laboratory (criteria provided, single submitter).

clinvar ↗
4

ENIGMA Specifications Table 9 assigns BS3_Strong based on a calibrated functional study (Richardson et al. 2021, PMID:33609447) demonstrating that V2728A exhibits HDR activity similar to benign control variants.

PMID:33609447 ↗
5

ENIGMA BP4_Supporting is met: the variant is inside the DNA binding domain with no predicted impact via protein change (BayesDel no-AF=0.103, ≤0.18) and no predicted splicing impact (SpliceAI max delta=0.01, ≤0.1).

spliceai ↗ cspec ↗
6

The clinical-history likelihood ratio from Li et al. 2020 (PMID:31853058) is LR=1.24 based on 1 proband, falling in the neutral zone and providing no evidence for PP4 or BP5.

PMID:31853058 ↗
7

No pathogenic comparator exists at residue Val2728 (c.8182G>A p.Val2728Ile is classified as benign by ENIGMA), so PS1 is not met. PVS1, PM5, and other null-variant criteria are not applicable to this missense substitution.

8

Applying ENIGMA Table 3 combination rules: BS3_Strong (1 Strong Benign) + BP4_Supporting (1 Supporting Benign) meets the likely benign rule [1 Strong (Benign) + 1 Supporting (Benign)]. The total benign evidence is one Strong and one Supporting criterion with no pathogenic criteria met.

cspec ↗
Applied criteria
Met
Not met
Not assessed
N/A
Very strong
Strong
Moderate
Supporting
Pathogenic evidence
PVS
PVS1
PS
PS1
PS2
PS3
PS4
PM
PM1
PM2
PM3
PM4
PM5
PM6
PP
PP1
PP2
PP3
PP4
PP5
Benign evidence
BA
BA1
BS
BS1
BS2
BS3
BS4
BP
BP1
BP2
BP3
BP4
BP5
BP6
BP7
PVS1
Rationale
Select a criterion to inspect its explanation.
Evidence used
Gaps remaining
Rule
Publications
Research and evidence
gnomAD v2.1 evidence
v2.1
gnomAD v4.1 evidence
v4.1
01
Population
gnomAD v2.1This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 3.18471e-05; MAF= 0.00318%, 1/31400 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the African/African American population (AF= 0.000114811; MAF= 0.01148%, 1/8710 alleles, homozygotes = 0).
gnomAD v4.1This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 2.4782e-06; MAF= 0.00025%, 4/1614072 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the African/African American population (AF= 5.33874e-05; MAF= 0.00534%, 4/74924 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 1.746e-05.
gnomAD CanadaAvailable
ClinVar evidence
02
ClinVar
This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (7 clinical laboratories) and as Uncertain Significance (1 clinical laboratory) and as Likely benign (1 clinical laboratory). (ClinVarID = 141399)
Functional evidence
03
Functional
OncoKB: Likely Neutral
OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Likely Neutral; curated oncogenicity label: Likely Neutral.
In silico evidence
04
In silico
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.01). REVEL score = 0.614. BayesDel score = 0.103001.
COSMIC evidence
05
COSMIC
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV105932213, n = 1 times).
Cancer hotspots evidence
06
Cancer hotspots Not found
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.