Back
LYFE SCIENCES
Project: HERA
NM_000546.6:c.293C>G
p.Pro98Arg  ·  TP53
Starting
Initialising…
0%
Legacy Engine
Processing…
Classification rationale
1

PM2_Supporting is met: NM_000546.6:c.293C>G (p.Pro98Arg) is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1 (0 alleles across all populations), satisfying the VCEP PM2_Supporting threshold of allele frequency <0.00003.

gnomad_v2 ↗ gnomad_v4 ↗ cspec ↗
2

PP3_Moderate is met: The VCEP PP3-BP4-codes.xlsx assigns PP3_moderate for c.293C>G. This variant has aGVGD Class C65 and BayesDel score 0.591769 (≥0.16), with no predicted splicing impact (SpliceAI max delta 0.00). REVEL score of 0.955 provides additional in silico support.

spliceai ↗ cspec ↗
3

PVS1 is not applicable: this is a missense variant; the TP53 VCEP reserves PVS1 for null variants (nonsense, frameshift, canonical splice, initiation codon, exon deletions).

cspec ↗
4

PS3 and BS3 are not met: the VCEP Functional-worksheet.xlsx assigns 'No evidence' for p.Pro98Arg. Kato class is 'Partially functional' and Giacomelli reports 'noLOF', which does not satisfy VCEP PS3 or BS3 criteria thresholds.

PMID:12826609 ↗ PMID:30224644 ↗
5

PM1 is not met: codon 98 is not among the VCEP-defined hotspot codons (175, 245, 248, 249, 273, 282), and the residue is not a statistically significant hotspot on cancerhotspots.org. PM5 is not met: no other Pro98 missense variant has a VCEP P/LP classification.

cspec ↗
6

PS1, PS2, PS4, PP1, PP4, BA1, BS1, BS2, BS3, BS4, BP4 are not met based on absence of qualifying evidence from ClinVar, gnomAD, published literature, and VCEP reference data.

clinvar ↗ gnomad_v2 ↗ gnomad_v4 ↗
7

PP5, BP1, BP2, BP5, BP6, PM6, PP2, and BP3 are not applicable under the TP53 VCEP v2.4.0 specifications. PS5 is not included in the VCEP criteria set. BP7 is not applicable as this is a missense variant.

cspec ↗
8

Tavtigian point tally: PM2_Supporting (+1) + PP3_Moderate (+2) = 3 points. Per TP53 VCEP v2.4.0 ranges: ≥10 Pathogenic, 6-9 Likely Pathogenic, -1 to 5 Uncertain Significance, -6 to -2 Likely Benign, ≤-7 Benign. Total of 3 points classifies this variant as Uncertain Significance (VUS).

cspec ↗
Applied criteria
Met
Not met
Not assessed
N/A
Very strong
Strong
Moderate
Supporting
Pathogenic evidence
PVS
PVS1
PS
PS1
PS2
PS3
PS4
PM
PM1
PM2
PM3
PM4
PM5
PM6
PP
PP1
PP2
PP3
PP4
PP5
Benign evidence
BA
BA1
BS
BS1
BS2
BS3
BS4
BP
BP1
BP2
BP3
BP4
BP5
BP6
BP7
PVS1
Rationale
Select a criterion to inspect its explanation.
Evidence used
Gaps remaining
Rule
Publications
Research and evidence
ClinVar evidence
02
ClinVar
This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (2 clinical laboratories). (ClinVarID = 1444043)
Functional evidence
03
Functional
OncoKB: Unknown Oncogenic Effect
OncoKB did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant; gene-level curated context is available for reviewer follow-up. TP53, a tumor suppressor in the DNA damage pathway, is the most frequently mutated gene in cancer.
In silico evidence
04
In silico
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00). REVEL score = 0.955. BayesDel score = 0.591769.
COSMIC evidence
05
COSMIC
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV113304063, n = 3 times).
Cancer hotspots evidence
06
Cancer hotspots Not found
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.