Analysis in progress
Initialising…
0%
complete
This report is still being assembled — sections appear as each stage finishes. It isn't final yet.
NTRK1
Final classification
VUS
NTRK1 c.316G>A · p.Val106Met
NTRK1

NM_002529.3:c.316G>A (p.Val106Met) in NTRK1 was identified as a rare missense variant in exon 3 of the extracellular domain.

Gene
NTRK1
Transcript
NM_002529.3
HGVS · transcript:coding
NM_002529.3:c.316G>A
Consequence
N/A
GRCh38
chr1:156864756 G>A
GRCh37
chr1:156834548 G>A
Basis gene-specific framework lacked a usable explicit final combination framework, so generic ACMG/AMP 2015 final-combination rules were applied as fallback; applied criteria: PM2 moderate, BP4 supporting benign; combination = 1 moderate + 1 supporting benign, which maps to VUS.
gene-specific framework lacked a usable explicit final combination framework, so generic ACMG/AMP 2015 final-combination rules were applied as fallback; applied criteria: PM2 moderate, BP4 supporting benign; combination = 1 moderate + 1 supporting benign, which maps to VUS.
Classification rationale
PM2 BP4 VUS
NTRK1 c.316G>A

NM_002529.3:c.316G>A (p.Val106Met) in NTRK1 was identified as a rare missense variant in exon 3 of the extracellular domain. This variant is present at extremely low frequency in population databases: gnomAD v2.1 AF=0.00080% (2/251,148 alleles) and gnomAD v4.1 AF=0.00099% (16/1,613,972 alleles), with no homozygotes observed, meeting PM2 at moderate strength for an autosomal recessive disorder.1 Multiple lines of computational evidence predict no deleterious effect: REVEL score is 0.175 (below the pathogenic threshold of 0.5), BayesDel is -0.235671 (negative, predicting benign), and SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta 0.05), meeting BP4 at supporting benign level.2 This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (ClinVar ID 655441) by three clinical laboratories (2-star review status). No expert panel has reviewed this variant, and no submitter has asserted a pathogenic or benign classification.3 No variant-specific functional studies, segregation data, de novo reports, case-control data, or family studies were identified for NM_002529.3:c.316G>A. OncoKB reports 'Unknown Oncogenic Effect' with no reviewed variant-specific evidence. COSMIC reports one somatic occurrence (COSV100693989) without functional assay data.4 Applying the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 final classification combination rules (PMID:25741868), the met criteria are PM2 (moderate pathogenic) and BP4 (supporting benign). These criteria are contradictory and do not satisfy any pathogenic or likely pathogenic combination, nor any benign or likely benign combination. The variant is classified as Uncertain significance (VUS).5

PM2 + BP4 VUS
2 revelbayesdelspliceai ↗
5 generic_acmg_combination_rules
Gene diagram · NM_002529.3 · variants mapped to exon structure
NTRK1 NM_002529.3
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
Applied criteria · 2 applied · 21 assessed
Applied · 2
Strength Supporting Moderate Strong Very strong
PM2 moderate Pathogenic
This variant is present at extremely low frequency in population databases: gnomAD v2.1 AF=0.00080% (2/251,148 alleles), gnomAD v4.1 AF=0.00099% (16/1,613,972 alleles), both well below the 0.1% threshold for PM2. NTRK1-associated congenital insensitivity to pain with anhidrosis (CIPA) follows autosomal recessive inheritance, making PM2 applicable for variants at extremely low frequency in controls. No homozygotes have been observed.
gnomAD v2.1: 2/251148 alleles (AF=7.96e-060.00080%)
BP4 supporting Benign
Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on the gene product. REVEL score is 0.175 (below the 0.5 threshold, favoring benign), BayesDel score is -0.235671 (negative, predicting benign), and SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta score 0.05). All available in silico tools are concordant toward a benign interpretation.
REVEL: 0.175 (below 0.5 pathogenic thresholdbenign-leaning).BayesDel: -0.235671 (negative score
Assessed · not applied
Pathogenic
PS1 No evidence that a different nucleotide change at codon 106 resulting in the same missense change (p.Val106Met) has been previously established as pathogenic.
PS2 No de novo data available for this variant.
PS3 No variant-specific functional studies have been performed on p.Val106Met.
PS4 No case-control or cohort data demonstrate enrichment of this variant in affected individuals compared to controls.
PM1 Residue Val106 does not lie in a statistically significant mutational hotspot per cancerhotspots.org, and no domain-specific functional evidence in the case materials establishes that the extracellular region spanning codon 106 is a critical functional domain where missense variants are established as pathogenic.
PM5 No different missense variant at the same residue (Val106) has been established as pathogenic.
PM6 No de novo data with or without confirmed paternity available for this variant.
PP1 No segregation data available for this variant.
PP2 Insufficient data to evaluate.
PP3 Multiple in silico predictors suggest a benign effect rather than a deleterious one.
PP4 No patient phenotype or family history data specific to this variant were available in the case materials.
PP5 No reputable source has classified this variant as pathogenic.
Benign
BA1 Allele frequency is far below the BA1 threshold of 1%.
BS1 Allele frequency is below the BS1 threshold of 0.3%.
BS2 No evidence that this variant has been observed in a healthy adult individual in trans with a known pathogenic variant in NTRK1.
BS3 No well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies demonstrate that this variant has no deleterious effect.
BS4 No segregation data available to evaluate lack of cosegregation with disease.
BP1 BP1 applies when a missense variant occurs in a gene where primarily truncating variants cause disease.
BP2 No evidence of this variant observed in trans with a known pathogenic variant in NTRK1.
BP5 No evidence that this variant has been observed in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease.
BP6 No reputable source has classified this variant as benign.
N/A · 2 PVS1 · BP7
Research & evidence
Population frequency
gnomAD v4.1 screenshot
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1 screenshot
gnomAD v2.1
v4.1
This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 9.91343e-06; MAF= 0.00099%, 16/1613972 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the South Asian population (AF= 4.3928e-05; MAF= 0.00439%, 4/91058 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 1.426e-05.
v2.1
This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 7.96343e-06; MAF= 0.00080%, 2/251148 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the South Asian population (AF= 3.26947e-05; MAF= 0.00327%, 1/30586 alleles, homozygotes = 0).
🇨🇦 CA
Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.
Allele frequency by ancestry
three datasets · side by side
gnomAD v4.1
0.00099% · 16 / 1,613,972
0 hom · FAF 0.0014%
South Asian
4 / 91,058
0.0044%
Remaining individuals
2 / 62,478
0.0032%
Admixed American
1 / 59,996
0.0017%
African/African American
1 / 74,900
0.0013%
European (non-Finnish)
8 / 1,180,008
0.00068%
+ 5 not observed (European (Finnish), Amish, East Asian, Middle Eastern, Ashkenazi Jewish)
gnomAD v2.1
0.0008% · 2 / 251,148
0 hom
South Asian
1 / 30,586
0.0033%
Admixed American
1 / 34,536
0.0029%
+ 6 not observed (African/African American, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European (Finnish), European (non-Finnish), Remaining individuals)
gnomAD Canada 🇨🇦
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
ClinVar screenshot
ClinVar
This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (3 clinical laboratories). (ClinVarID = 655441)
SpliceAI screenshot
In silico
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.05). REVEL score = 0.175. BayesDel score = -0.235671.
Functional / OncoKB screenshot
Functional Unknown Oncogenic Effect
OncoKB did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant; gene-level curated context is available for reviewer follow-up. NTRK1, a receptor tyrosine kinase, is altered by gene fusions in various cancer types.
OncoKB ↗
COSMIC screenshot
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots screenshot
Cancer hotspots
Somatic evidence Not in COSMIC / hotspots
COSMIC
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV100693989, n = 1 times).
Hotspots
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.
Sources & reference links
8Sources
ClinVar
gnomAD v2.1
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD-Canada
SpliceAI
OncoKB
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots
Triaged references · 5 PMIDs not cited in assessment
23619275 ↗ ACMG position statement on prenatal/preconception expanded carrier screening. CLINVAR
20301726 ↗ NTRK1 Congenital Insensitivity to Pain with Anhidrosis. CLINVAR
23037933 ↗ Including the initial newborn screening bloodspot collection device serial number on birth certificates: basis and recommendations from the Secretary of Health and Human Services' Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children. CLINVAR
24022298 ↗ Offering prenatal diagnostic tests: European guidelines for clinical practice [corrected]. CLINVAR
31022120 ↗ ACOG Committee Opinion No. 778 Summary: Newborn Screening and the Role of the Obstetrician-Gynecologist. CLINVAR