Back
NM_000059.3:c.8149G>T
p.Ala2717Ser · BRCA2
0%
complete
Final classification
Benign
BA1BS3BP6
BRCA2
c.8149G>T
p.Ala2717Ser
This variant

The BRCA2 c.8149G>T (p.Ala2717Ser) variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign with expert panel review, and curated cancer resources did not identify it as a statistically significant hotspot while OncoKB describes it as likely neutral.

Transcript
NM_000059.3
HGVS · transcript:coding
NM_000059.3:c.8149G>T
GRCh38
chr13:32363351 G>T
GRCh37
chr13:32937488 G>T
ENIGMA BRCA1/BRCA2 Specification v1.2 Table 3 final-classification framework (official ClinGen CSPEC/VCEP criteria-combination rules).
Classification rationale
BA1BS3BP6 Benign
BRCA2 c.8149G>T

The BRCA2 c.8149G>T (p.Ala2717Ser) variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign with expert panel review, and curated cancer resources did not identify it as a statistically significant hotspot while OncoKB describes it as likely neutral.1 This variant is present in population databases at a frequency above the BRCA2 ENIGMA BA1 threshold, with grpmax filtering allele frequency 0.00162114 in gnomAD v2.1 and 0.00163682 in gnomAD v4.1, supporting a benign population interpretation.2 In curated BRCA2 functional studies, this variant showed protein function similar to benign control variants, and associated RNA data showed no aberrant splicing, supporting BS3_Strong.3 Computational evidence does not support a damaging interpretation under the BRCA2 ENIGMA rules: the BayesDel no-AF score is -0.0816274, REVEL is 0.535, and no SpliceAI score demonstrating splice impact was identified, so PP3 is not met and BP4 could not be fully applied.4

BA1 + BS3 + BP6 Benign
3 vcep_specifications_table9_v1_2_2024_11_18cspec ↗
4 bayesdelrevelspliceai ↗cspec ↗
LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
Gene diagram · NM_000059.3 · variants mapped to exon structure
BRCA2 NM_000059.3
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
Applied criteria · 3 applied · 15 assessed
MetEvidence satisfies this criterion.
Not metEvaluated against available evidence; threshold not reached.
Not assessedApplies in principle, but no evidence was found to evaluate it.
N/ADoesn't apply to this variant type.
Applied · 3
Strength Supporting Moderate Strong Very strong
BA1 stand-alone Benign
This variant exceeds the BRCA2 ENIGMA BA1 population threshold. The grpmax filtering allele frequency is 0.00162114 in gnomAD v2.1 and 0.00163682 in gnomAD v4.1, both above the BA1 threshold of 0.001 in non-founder populations.
gnomAD v2.1 grpmax FAF 0.00162114gnomAD v4.1 grpmax FAF 0.00163682ENIGMA BA1 threshold FAF >0.001
BS3 strong Benign
In the BRCA2 ENIGMA curated functional dataset, this variant was assigned BS3 Strong. Published calibrated functional studies showed protein function similar to benign control variants, and RNA data in the same curation entry showed no aberrant splicing.
ENIGMA Table 9 exact variant row: BS3 Strong for c.8149G>T p.(Ala2717Ser)
BP6 supporting Benign
Expert panel ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel, ClinGen classified as Benign.
BRCA2 ENIGMA criterion applicability tableClinVar expert panel classification
Assessed · not applied · 7 not met · 8 not assessed
Pathogenic
PS1 No evidence was identified that this variant produces the same amino-acid change or the same predicted splice effect as a previously classified pathogenic or likely pathogenic BRCA2 variant.
PS3 Published functional data curated by the BRCA2 ENIGMA expert framework showed protein function similar to benign control variants rather than a damaging effect, so PS3 is not met.
PS4 No case-control evidence was identified showing that this variant is significantly enriched in affected individuals, and the variant is also observed at a population frequency that is too high to support PS4.
PM2 This variant is not absent from population databases.
PM3 No evidence was identified showing this variant in trans with another BRCA2 variant in a patient with a phenotype consistent with BRCA2-related Fanconi anemia.
PP1 No quantitative co-segregation evidence was identified for this variant in affected relatives.
PP3 This missense variant lies in the BRCA2 DNA-binding region, but the available computational evidence does not meet the ENIGMA PP3 threshold.
PP4 No variant-specific clinical-history likelihood ratio meeting ENIGMA thresholds was identified for this variant, so PP4 was not assessed.
Benign
BS1 Population frequency evidence was captured under BA1.
BS2 No evidence was identified showing this variant in individuals without features of BRCA2-related Fanconi anemia under the ENIGMA point-based BS2 framework.
BS4 No quantitative lack-of-segregation evidence was identified for this variant in affected relatives.
BP1 This missense variant is located at codon 2717 within the BRCA2 DNA-binding region defined by ENIGMA as a clinically important functional domain (amino acids 2481-3186).
BP4 The BayesDel no-AF score is -0.0816274, which is consistent with the benign side of the BRCA2 ENIGMA threshold, but BP4 for a missense variant in a clinically important domain also requires SpliceAI less than or equal to 0.1.
BP5 No variant-specific clinical-history likelihood ratio in the benign direction was identified for this variant, so BP5 was not assessed.
BP7 RNA evidence curated for this variant reported no aberrant splicing, but the available materials did not provide a direct ENIGMA BP7 assignment for this missense variant.
N/A · 10 PVS1 · PS2 · PM1 · PM4 · PM5 · PM6 · PP2 · PP5 · BP2 · BP3
Research & evidence
Population frequency · supports benign
gnomAD v4.1 screenshot
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1 screenshot
gnomAD v2.1
v4.1
This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 0.00139272; MAF= 0.13927%, 2248/1614110 alleles, homozygotes = 2) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 0.00169915; MAF= 0.16992%, 2005/1180000 alleles, homozygotes = 2); grpmax FAF= 0.00163682.
v2.1
This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 0.00111433; MAF= 0.11143%, 315/282680 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the Remaining individuals population (AF= 0.00207814; MAF= 0.20781%, 15/7218 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 0.00162114.
Allele frequency by ancestry
three datasets · side by side
gnomAD v4.1
0.14% · 2248 / 1,614,110
2 hom · FAF 0.16%
European (non-Finnish)
2005 / 1,180,000
0.17%
2 hom
Admixed American
77 / 60,014
0.13%
Remaining individuals
67 / 62,508
0.11%
European (Finnish)
65 / 64,022
0.1%
African/African American
33 / 75,026
0.044%
Ashkenazi Jewish
1 / 29,604
0.0034%
+ 4 not observed (Amish, East Asian, Middle Eastern, South Asian)
gnomAD v2.1
0.11% · 315 / 282,680
0 hom · FAF 0.16%
Remaining individuals
15 / 7,218
0.21%
European (non-Finnish)
235 / 128,996
0.18%
European (Finnish)
25 / 25,124
0.1%
Admixed American
32 / 35,440
0.09%
African/African American
7 / 24,970
0.028%
Ashkenazi Jewish
1 / 10,364
0.0096%
+ 2 not observed (East Asian, South Asian)
ClinVar screenshot
ClinVar
This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (22 clinical laboratories) and as Likely benign (11 clinical laboratories) and as Uncertain significance (2 clinical laboratories) and as Likely Benign (1 clinical laboratory) and as Benign by ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel, ClinGen (expert panel). (ClinVarID = 41564)
SpliceAI screenshot
In silico
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.03). REVEL score = 0.535. BayesDel score = -0.0816274.
Functional / OncoKB screenshot
Functional Likely Neutral
OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Likely Neutral; curated oncogenicity label: Likely Neutral.
OncoKB ↗
COSMIC screenshot
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots screenshot
Cancer hotspots
Somatic evidence Not in COSMIC / hotspots
COSMIC
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV66460731, n = 3 times).
Hotspots
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.
Sources & reference links
8Sources
CSpec VCEP
ClinVar
gnomAD v2.1
gnomAD v4.1
SpliceAI
OncoKB
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots
Triaged references · 8 PMIDs not cited in assessment
18375895 ↗ Clinical classification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 DNA sequence variants: the value of cytokeratin profiles and evolutionary analysis--a report from the kConFab Investigators. ONCOKB
29394989 ↗ Assessment of the Clinical Relevance of BRCA2 Missense Variants by Functional and Computational Approaches. ONCOKB
11802209 ↗ Comprehensive analysis of 989 patients with breast or ovarian cancer provides BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation profiles and frequencies for the German population. CLINVAR
12955716 ↗ Analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in Spanish breast/ovarian cancer patients: a high proportion of mutations unique to Spain and evidence of founder effects. CLINVAR
19471317 ↗ Impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants on splicing: clues from an allelic imbalance study. CLINVAR
20104584 ↗ Characterization of BRCA1 and BRCA2 deleterious mutations and variants of unknown clinical significance in unilateral and bilateral breast cancer: the WECARE study. CLINVAR
21702907 ↗ A high-throughput protocol for mutation scanning of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. CLINVAR
28492532 ↗ Sherloc: a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG-AMP variant classification criteria. CLINVAR