Back
NM_000237.3:c.1385T>C
p.Phe462Ser · LPL
ACMG/AMP
0%
complete
Final classification
VUS
PM2PP3
LPL
c.1385T>C
p.Phe462Ser
This variant

The LPL c.1385T>C (p.Phe462Ser; p.F462S) variant has been reported in ClinVar as uncertain significance by two clinical laboratories.

Transcript
NM_000237.3
HGVS · transcript:coding
NM_000237.3:c.1385T>C
GRCh38
chr8:19962177 T>C
GRCh37
chr8:19819688 T>C
gene-specific framework lacked a usable explicit final combination framework, so generic ACMG/AMP 2015 final-combination rules were applied as fallback; applied criteria: PM2 moderate, PP3 supporting; combination = 1 moderate + 1 supporting, which maps to VUS.
Classification rationale
PM2PP3 VUS
LPL c.1385T>C

The LPL c.1385T>C (p.Phe462Ser; p.F462S) variant has been reported in ClinVar as uncertain significance by two clinical laboratories.1 This variant is rare in population databases, with allele frequencies of 0.00080% in gnomAD v2.1 (2/251272) and 0.00037% in gnomAD v4.1 (6/1613776), which are both below the 0.1% PM2 threshold.2 Computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, with REVEL 0.735 and BayesDel 0.304545, while SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.04.3

PM2 + PP3 VUS
LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
Gene diagram · NM_000237.3 · variants mapped to exon structure
LPL NM_000237.3
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
Applied criteria · 2 applied · 20 assessed
MetEvidence satisfies this criterion.
Not metEvaluated against available evidence; threshold not reached.
Not assessedApplies in principle, but no evidence was found to evaluate it.
N/ADoesn't apply to this variant type.
Applied · 2
Strength Supporting Moderate Strong Very strong
PM2 moderate review Pathogenic
This variant is rare in population databases. In gnomAD v2.1 the allele frequency is 0.00080% (2/251272), and in gnomAD v4.1 the allele frequency is 0.00037% (6/1613776), both below the 0.1% PM2 threshold.
gnomAD v2.1 AF 7.9595e-06 (2/251272)gnomAD v4.1 AF 3.71799e-06 (6/1613776)
PP3 supporting review Pathogenic
Multiple computational predictors support a deleterious effect. REVEL is 0.735 and BayesDel is 0.304545, both consistent with a damaging missense effect, while SpliceAI shows no significant splice impact with a max delta score of 0.04. Overall, the in silico evidence supports pathogenicity at a supporting level.
REVEL 0.735BayesDel 0.304545SpliceAI max delta score 0.04
Assessed · not applied · 4 not met · 16 not assessed
Pathogenic
PS1 No evidence was identified that another nucleotide change produces the same amino acid substitution with an established pathogenic classification, so PS1 cannot be applied from the available data.
PS2 No confirmed de novo occurrence was identified.
PS3 No well-established functional study of this exact variant was identified showing a damaging effect on lipoprotein lipase function, so PS3 is not applied.
PS4 The available data do not show a statistically increased prevalence of this variant in affected individuals compared with controls, so PS4 cannot be applied.
PM1 This variant has not been shown to lie in a statistically significant hotspot or other well-established critical functional region without benign variation, so PM1 is not met.
PM3 No evidence was identified that this variant was observed in trans with a pathogenic variant in an affected individual, so PM3 cannot be assessed from the available data.
PM5 No evidence was identified for a different pathogenic missense change at codon 462, so PM5 cannot be applied from the available data.
PM6 No assumed de novo occurrence without confirmed parentage was identified, so PM6 is not applied.
PP1 No segregation data were identified showing that this variant tracks with LPL-related disease in a family, so PP1 cannot be applied.
PP2 Available evidence does not establish a gene-specific pattern that would support applying PP2 to this missense variant.
PP4 No case-specific phenotype information was provided that is sufficiently specific for an LPL-related disorder, so PP4 cannot be assessed.
Benign
BA1 This variant is not common enough for BA1.
BS1 This variant does not reach the BS1 threshold.
BS2 Available population data do not show well-established benign observations in healthy adults that would support BS2 for this variant.
BS3 No well-established functional study was identified showing normal or near-normal function for this exact variant, so BS3 is not applied.
BS4 No non-segregation data were identified showing that this variant fails to track with disease in a family, so BS4 cannot be applied.
BP1 Available evidence does not establish a gene-specific pattern to support BP1 for this missense variant.
BP2 No phase information or accompanying variant data were identified to assess BP2.
BP4 Available computational evidence does not support a benign effect.
BP5 No alternate molecular explanation was identified that would make this variant an incidental finding, so BP5 cannot be assessed from the available data.
N/A · 6 PVS1 · PM4 · PP5 · BP3 · BP6 · BP7
Research & evidence
Population frequency
gnomAD v4.1 screenshot
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1 screenshot
gnomAD v2.1
v4.1
This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 3.71799e-06; MAF= 0.00037%, 6/1613776 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the Admixed American population (AF= 1.66683e-05; MAF= 0.00167%, 1/59994 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 7.9e-07.
v2.1
This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 7.9595e-06; MAF= 0.00080%, 2/251272 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the East Asian population (AF= 5.43656e-05; MAF= 0.00544%, 1/18394 alleles, homozygotes = 0).
Allele frequency by ancestry
three datasets · side by side
gnomAD v4.1
0.00037% · 6 / 1,613,776
0 hom · FAF 7.9e-05%
Admixed American
1 / 59,994
0.0017%
South Asian
1 / 91,082
0.0011%
European (non-Finnish)
4 / 1,179,830
0.00034%
+ 7 not observed (Remaining individuals, European (Finnish), Amish, East Asian, Middle Eastern, Ashkenazi Jewish, African/African American)
gnomAD v2.1
0.0008% · 2 / 251,272
0 hom
East Asian
1 / 18,394
0.0054%
South Asian
1 / 30,614
0.0033%
+ 6 not observed (African/African American, Admixed American, Ashkenazi Jewish, European (Finnish), European (non-Finnish), Remaining individuals)
ClinVar screenshot
ClinVar
This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (2 clinical laboratories).
SpliceAI screenshot
In silico
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.04). REVEL score = 0.735. BayesDel score = 0.304545.
Functional No data
No calibrated functional assay or RNA evidence was identified for this variant.
OncoKB ↗
COSMIC screenshot
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots screenshot
Cancer hotspots
Somatic evidence Not in COSMIC / hotspots
COSMIC
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).
Hotspots
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.
Sources & reference links
7Sources
ClinVar
gnomAD v2.1
gnomAD v4.1
SpliceAI
OncoKB
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots