Back
NM_000249.4:c.290A>G
p.Tyr97Cys · MLH1
0%
complete
Final classification
Benign
BA1
MLH1
c.290A>G
p.Tyr97Cys
This variant

The MLH1 c.290A>G (p.Tyr97Cys) variant has been observed once in somatic cancers in COSMIC and has been reported in ClinVar with conflicting germline interpretations, including uncertain significance, likely benign, and benign submissions.

Transcript
NM_000249.4
HGVS · transcript:coding
NM_000249.4:c.290A>G
GRCh38
chr3:37001037 A>G
GRCh37
chr3:37042528 A>G
ClinGen InSiGHT Hereditary Colorectal Cancer/Polyposis Expert Panel Specifications to the ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines for MLH1 Version 2.0.0 v2.0.0 criteria-combination framework: matched Rule17 (1 Benign.Stand Alone) with applied criteria: BA1 stand-alone benign; maps to Benign.
Classification rationale
BA1 Benign
MLH1 c.290A>G

The MLH1 c.290A>G (p.Tyr97Cys) variant has been observed once in somatic cancers in COSMIC and has been reported in ClinVar with conflicting germline interpretations, including uncertain significance, likely benign, and benign submissions.1 This variant is present in gnomAD at a South Asian grpmax filtering allele frequency of 0.0015372 in v4.1, which is above the MLH1 VCEP BA1 threshold of 0.001; gnomAD v2.1 also shows elevated South Asian frequency with grpmax FAF 0.00153368.2 SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant with a maximum delta score of 0.01; REVEL is 0.603 and BayesDel is 0.230019, but no MLH1 VCEP HCI prior probability was identified to support PP3 or BP4 for this missense change.3

BA1 Benign
LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
Gene diagram · NM_000249.4 · variants mapped to exon structure
MLH1 NM_000249.4
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
Applied criteria · 1 applied · 16 assessed
MetEvidence satisfies this criterion.
Not metEvaluated against available evidence; threshold not reached.
Not assessedApplies in principle, but no evidence was found to evaluate it.
N/ADoesn't apply to this variant type.
Applied · 1
Strength Supporting Moderate Strong Very strong
BA1 stand-alone review Benign
This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 with a grpmax filtering allele frequency of 0.0015372 in the South Asian population, which is above the MLH1 VCEP BA1 threshold of 0.001. No founder pathogenic designation was identified in the available evidence.
gnomAD v4.1 joint grpmax FAF = 0.0015372Highest observed population = South Asian
Assessed · not applied · 9 not met · 7 not assessed
Pathogenic
PVS1 This variant is a missense change, p.(Tyr97Cys), and does not fall into the default MLH1 null-variant categories for PVS1.
PS1 No previously established MLH1 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant encoding the same Tyr97Cys amino acid change by a different nucleotide change was identified in the reviewed VCEP materials.
PS2 No de novo observation with the required parental confirmation and Lynch syndrome tumor context was identified for this variant.
PS3 No variant-specific calibrated functional assay result showing a damaging MLH1 effect was identified for this missense variant in the reviewed functional assay documentation or curated evidence sources.
PM2 This variant is not absent or extremely rare in gnomAD v4.1.
PM3 No evidence was identified that this variant occurs in trans with a pathogenic or likely pathogenic MLH1 variant in an individual meeting CMMRD-based scoring requirements.
PM5 No different MLH1 missense variant at Tyr97 established by this VCEP as pathogenic or likely pathogenic on the protein level was identified in the reviewed VCEP materials, so PM5 is not supported.
PP1 No segregation data were identified, so co-segregation with Lynch syndrome-associated disease could not be evaluated.
PP3 For MLH1 missense variants, PP3 requires an HCI prior probability of pathogenicity above 0.68.
PP4 No tumor microsatellite instability, mismatch repair immunohistochemistry, or MLH1 promoter methylation results were identified, so the Lynch syndrome tumor phenotype requirements for PP4 could not be evaluated.
Benign
BS1 The gnomAD v4.1 grpmax filtering allele frequency is 0.0015372, which is above the BS1 range of 0.0001 to less than 0.001 and instead falls into the BA1 range.
BS2 No confirmed in trans co-occurrence with a known pathogenic MLH1 variant in an appropriately phenotyped individual without evidence of CMMRD was identified.
BS3 No variant-specific functional study showing retained MLH1 function or normal RNA behavior was identified for this variant in the reviewed functional assay documentation or curated evidence sources.
BS4 No non-segregation data were identified, so lack of co-segregation with Lynch syndrome-associated disease could not be evaluated.
BP4 For MLH1 missense variants, BP4 requires an HCI prior probability of pathogenicity below 0.11.
BP5 No tumor evidence showing a molecular profile inconsistent with MLH1-related Lynch syndrome, such as MSS tumors, intact relevant MMR protein expression, or MLH1 methylation/BRAF findings, was identified.
N/A · 11 PS4 · PM1 · PM4 · PM6 · PP2 · PP5 · BP1 · BP2 · BP3 · BP6 · BP7
Research & evidence
Population frequency · supports benign
gnomAD v4.1 screenshot
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1 screenshot
gnomAD v2.1
v4.1
This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 0.000107785; MAF= 0.01078%, 173/1605044 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the South Asian population (AF= 0.00175975; MAF= 0.17598%, 160/90922 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 0.0015372.
v2.1
This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 0.000242661; MAF= 0.02427%, 61/251380 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the South Asian population (AF= 0.00192735; MAF= 0.19273%, 59/30612 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 0.00153368.
Allele frequency by ancestry
three datasets · side by side
gnomAD v4.1
0.011% · 173 / 1,605,044
0 hom · FAF 0.15%
South Asian
160 / 90,922
0.18%
Middle Eastern
1 / 6,060
0.017%
Remaining individuals
10 / 62,190
0.016%
European (non-Finnish)
2 / 1,171,952
0.00017%
+ 6 not observed (Admixed American, European (Finnish), Amish, East Asian, Ashkenazi Jewish, African/African American)
gnomAD v2.1
0.024% · 61 / 251,380
0 hom · FAF 0.15%
South Asian
59 / 30,612
0.19%
Remaining individuals
1 / 6,134
0.016%
European (non-Finnish)
1 / 113,674
0.00088%
+ 5 not observed (African/African American, Admixed American, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European (Finnish))
ClinVar screenshot
ClinVar
This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (4 clinical laboratories) and as Likely benign (3 clinical laboratories) and as Benign (2 clinical laboratories) and as likely benign (1 clinical laboratory).
SpliceAI screenshot
In silico
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.01). REVEL score = 0.603. BayesDel score = 0.230019.
Functional / OncoKB screenshot
Functional Unknown Oncogenic Effect
OncoKB did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant; gene-level curated context is available for reviewer follow-up. MLH1, a DNA mismatch repair protein, is recurrently altered by deletion and mutation in various cancer types.
OncoKB ↗
COSMIC screenshot
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots screenshot
Cancer hotspots
Somatic evidence Not in COSMIC / hotspots
COSMIC
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV51621158, n = 1 times).
Hotspots
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.
Sources & reference links
8Sources
CSpec VCEP
ClinVar
gnomAD v2.1
gnomAD v4.1
SpliceAI
OncoKB
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots