Back
NM_000314.8:c.418_430del
p.Leu140AsnfsTer3 · PTEN
0%
complete
Final classification
Likely Pathogenic
PVS1PM2
PTEN
c.418_430del
p.Leu140AsnfsTer3
This variant

The PTEN c.418_430del (p.Leu140AsnfsTer3; p.L140Nfs*3) variant has not been observed in somatic cancers in COSMIC and has not been reported in ClinVar.

Transcript
NM_000314.8
HGVS · transcript:coding
NM_000314.8:c.418_430del
GRCh38
chr10:87933175 TATTACATCGGGGC>T
GRCh37
chr10:89692932 TATTACATCGGGGC>T
Richards et.al., 2015 - Combining rules v3.2.0 criteria-combination framework: matched Rule20 (1 Pathogenic.Very Strong + 1 Pathogenic.Supporting) with applied criteria: PVS1 very strong, PM2 supporting; maps to Likely Pathogenic.
Classification rationale
PVS1PM2 Likely Pathogenic
PTEN c.418_430del

The PTEN c.418_430del (p.Leu140AsnfsTer3; p.L140Nfs*3) variant has not been observed in somatic cancers in COSMIC and has not been reported in ClinVar.1 This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, which supports PM2 at supporting strength under the PTEN Expert Panel threshold for rarity.2 This deletion causes a frameshift with premature termination after codon 140, and under the PTEN-specific PVS1 decision tree the premature stop is 5' to p.D375 (c.1121), supporting a loss-of-function effect.3 SpliceAI predicts possible splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.28, but this alone does not meet the PTEN Expert Panel requirement for concordant computational evidence for PP3 or BP4.4

PVS1 + PM2 Likely Pathogenic
3 cspec ↗pvs1_gene_contextpvs1_variant_assessmentvcep_p_v_s_1___d_e_c_i_s_i_o_n_t_r_e_e___p_t_e_n
LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
Gene diagram · NM_000314.8 · variants mapped to exon structure
PTEN NM_000314.8
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
Applied criteria · 2 applied · 16 assessed
MetEvidence satisfies this criterion.
Not metEvaluated against available evidence; threshold not reached.
Not assessedApplies in principle, but no evidence was found to evaluate it.
N/ADoesn't apply to this variant type.
Applied · 2
Strength Supporting Moderate Strong Very strong
PVS1 very strong Pathogenic
This variant is a frameshift deletion predicted to cause p.(Leu140AsnfsTer3) [p.(L140Nfs*3)]. Under the PTEN-specific PVS1 decision tree, a nonsense or frameshift variant at or 5' to p.D375 (c.1121) in biologically relevant transcript NM_000314.8 meets PVS1 at very strong strength; c.418_430del is well 5' to this threshold and is consistent with a loss-of-function effect in PTEN.
NM_000314.8:c.418_430del causes NP_000305.3:p.(Leu140AsnfsTer3) / p.(L140Nfs*3).PTEN loss of function is an established disease mechanism in the PTEN Expert Panel framework.PTEN PVS1 decision tree assigns PVS1 to frameshift variants at or 5' to p.D375 (c.1121).
PM2 supporting Pathogenic
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and absent from gnomAD v4.1. This observed allele frequency of 0 is below the PTEN Expert Panel PM2_Supporting threshold of <0.00001 (0.001%), with no subpopulation evidence exceeding the <0.00002 (0.002%) requirement, so PM2_Supporting is met.
Absent from gnomAD v2.1.Absent from gnomAD v4.1.PTEN PM2 is applied at supporting strength when allele frequency is <0.00001 and subpopulation frequency is <0.00002.
Assessed · not applied · 4 not met · 12 not assessed
Pathogenic
PS2 No confirmed de novo occurrence in an affected individual was identified, so PS2 is not assessed.
PS3 No well-established functional study specific to this deletion was identified.
PS4 No proband count, specificity score, or case-control enrichment data were identified for this variant, so PS4 is not assessed.
PM1 PM1 is specified for variants affecting PTEN catalytic motifs at residues 90-94, 123-130, or 166-168.
PM4 PM4 is specified for in-frame insertions or deletions affecting a catalytic motif or for stop-loss variants causing protein extension.
PM6 No assumed de novo occurrence in a patient with PTEN-related disease and no family history was identified, so PM6 is not assessed.
PP1 No segregation data were identified for this variant, so PP1 is not assessed.
PP3 SpliceAI predicts a possible splice effect with a maximum delta score of 0.28, but the PTEN Expert Panel requires concordant splicing prediction evidence for PP3 and this variant is already established as a truncating frameshift under PVS1.
Benign
BA1 This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, so the observed allele frequency of 0 is below the PTEN Expert Panel BA1 threshold of >0.00056 (0.056%).
BS1 This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, so the observed allele frequency of 0 is below both the PTEN Expert Panel BS1 supporting range of 0.0000043 to 0.000043 and strong range of 0.000043 to 0.00056.
BS2 No observation of this variant in the homozygous state in a healthy or PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome-unaffected individual was identified, so BS2 is not assessed.
BS3 No well-established functional study showing no damaging effect for this deletion was identified.
BS4 No lack-of-segregation data were identified for this variant, so BS4 is not assessed.
BP2 No phase data showing this variant in trans with a pathogenic PTEN variant, or repeated cis/phase-unknown observations with different pathogenic PTEN variants, were identified.
BP4 SpliceAI predicts a possible splice effect with a maximum delta score of 0.28, which is above the benign SpliceAI range of 0 to 0.2 specified by the PTEN Expert Panel, and no concordant benign splicing evidence was identified.
BP5 No alternate highly penetrant molecular explanation with clearly non-overlapping PTEN-related clinical features was identified, so BP5 is not assessed.
N/A · 10 PS1 · PM3 · PM5 · PP2 · PP4 · PP5 · BP1 · BP3 · BP6 · BP7
Research & evidence
Population frequency · supports pathogenic
gnomAD v4.1 screenshot
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1 screenshot
gnomAD v2.1
v4.1
Absent from gnomAD v4.1.
v2.1
Absent from gnomAD v2.1.
Allele frequency by ancestry
three datasets · side by side
gnomAD v4.1
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
gnomAD v2.1
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
ClinVar screenshot
ClinVar
This variant is absent from ClinVar.
SpliceAI screenshot
In silico
SpliceAI predicts possible splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.28).
Functional / OncoKB screenshot
Functional Likely Oncogenic
OncoKB classifies this variant as Likely Oncogenic; biological effect: Likely Loss-of-function.
OncoKB ↗
COSMIC screenshot
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots screenshot
Cancer hotspots
Somatic evidence Not in COSMIC / hotspots
COSMIC
This variant lies in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).
Hotspots
This variant lies in a statistically significant hotspot.
Sources & reference links
8Sources
CSpec VCEP
ClinVar
gnomAD v2.1
gnomAD v4.1
SpliceAI
OncoKB
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots