Back
NM_001127208.2:c.4164_4167del
p.Met1388IlefsTer59 · TET2
ACMG/AMP
0%
complete
Final classification
Likely Pathogenic
PVS1PM2
TET2
c.4164_4167del
p.Met1388IlefsTer59
This variant

The TET2 c.4164_4167del (p.Met1388IlefsTer59; p.M1388Ifs*59) variant has not been reported in ClinVar.

Transcript
NM_001127208.2
HGVS · transcript:coding
NM_001127208.2:c.4164_4167del
GRCh38
chr4:105269728 TGCAG>T
GRCh37
chr4:106190885 TGCAG>T
gene-specific framework lacked a usable explicit final combination framework, so generic ACMG/AMP 2015 final-combination rules were applied as fallback; applied criteria: PVS1 very strong, PM2 moderate; combination = 1 very strong + 1 moderate, which maps to Likely Pathogenic.
Classification rationale
PVS1PM2 Likely Pathogenic
TET2 c.4164_4167del

The TET2 c.4164_4167del (p.Met1388IlefsTer59; p.M1388Ifs*59) variant has not been reported in ClinVar.1 This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, placing it below the 0.1% rarity threshold used for PM2 in non-VCEP review.2 Published TET2 studies identified through curated review show that leukemia-associated TET2 alterations impair 5-hydroxymethylcytosine generation, and structural work supports the functional importance of the C-terminal catalytic region, which is consistent with loss of function as a disease-relevant mechanism for truncating variants.3 SpliceAI predicts no significant additional splice effect for this deletion, with a maximum delta score of 0.00; REVEL and BayesDel are not available for this variant type.4

PVS1 + PM2 Likely Pathogenic
LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
Gene diagram · NM_001127208.2 · variants mapped to exon structure
TET2 NM_001127208.2
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
Applied criteria · 2 applied · 17 assessed
MetEvidence satisfies this criterion.
Not metEvaluated against available evidence; threshold not reached.
Not assessedApplies in principle, but no evidence was found to evaluate it.
N/ADoesn't apply to this variant type.
Applied · 2
Strength Supporting Moderate Strong Very strong
PVS1 very strong review Pathogenic
This variant is a frameshift deletion predicted to cause p.(Met1388IlefsTer59) and truncate the protein well before the normal C-terminus. Germline loss of function is supported as a disease-relevant mechanism for TET2, and the generic ClinGen SVI PVS1 framework supports applying PVS1 for this type of truncating variant.
Frameshift consequence p.(Met1388IlefsTer59)Generic PVS1 scaffold recommends default PVS1 for frameshift variants once LoF mechanism is establishedTET2 germline loss-of-function mechanism supported in gene context review
PM2 moderate review Pathogenic
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, which is below the non-VCEP PM2 threshold of 0.1% population frequency and supports rarity in reference populations.
Absent from gnomAD v2.1Absent from gnomAD v4.1
Assessed · not applied · 2 not met · 15 not assessed
Pathogenic
PS2 No confirmed de novo data were identified for this variant, so PS2 cannot be assessed.
PS3 Published TET2 functional studies were identified, but the retrieved evidence does not show a direct functional assay of this exact deletion.
PS4 No exact-variant case enrichment or case-control data were identified for this variant, so PS4 cannot be applied.
PM1 Available evidence does not establish that this variant lies in a confirmed mutational hotspot or a sufficiently defined critical region without benign variation, so PM1 is not assessed.
PM3 No data were identified showing this variant in trans with another pathogenic variant, so PM3 cannot be assessed.
PM6 No assumed de novo report was identified for this variant, so PM6 cannot be assessed.
PP1 No segregation data were identified for this variant, so PP1 cannot be assessed.
PP4 No phenotype information specific enough for PP4 was identified, so this criterion cannot be assessed.
PP5 No qualifying reputable-source pathogenic classification was identified for this exact variant, so PP5 is not assessed.
Benign
BA1 This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, so its population frequency is below the 1% BA1 threshold and BA1 is not met.
BS1 This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, so its population frequency is below the 0.3% BS1 threshold and BS1 is not met.
BS2 No evidence was identified showing this variant in healthy adult individuals in a manner suitable for BS2, so the criterion is not assessed.
BS3 Available evidence does not show well-established functional studies demonstrating a normal effect for this exact deletion, so BS3 cannot be applied.
BS4 No non-segregation data were identified for this variant, so BS4 cannot be assessed.
BP2 No data were identified showing this variant in cis with a pathogenic variant or in trans in a manner supporting BP2, so the criterion is not assessed.
BP5 No alternate molecular explanation for a specific phenotype was identified, so BP5 cannot be assessed.
BP6 No qualifying reputable-source benign classification was identified for this exact variant, so BP6 is not assessed.
N/A · 9 PS1 · PM4 · PM5 · PP2 · PP3 · BP1 · BP3 · BP4 · BP7
Research & evidence
Population frequency · supports pathogenic
gnomAD v4.1 screenshot
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1 screenshot
gnomAD v2.1
v4.1
Absent from gnomAD v4.1.
v2.1
Absent from gnomAD v2.1.
Allele frequency by ancestry
three datasets · side by side
gnomAD v4.1
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
gnomAD v2.1
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
ClinVar screenshot
ClinVar
This variant is absent from ClinVar.
SpliceAI screenshot
In silico
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00).
Functional / OncoKB screenshot
Functional Likely Oncogenic
OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Likely Loss-of-function; curated oncogenicity label: Likely Oncogenic.
OncoKB ↗
COSMIC screenshot
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots screenshot
Cancer hotspots
Somatic evidence Not in COSMIC / hotspots
COSMIC
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).
Hotspots
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.
Sources & reference links
7Sources
ClinVar
gnomAD v2.1
gnomAD v4.1
SpliceAI
OncoKB
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots