Analysis in progress
Initialising…
0%
complete
This report is still being assembled — sections appear as each stage finishes. It isn't final yet.
MDM2
Final classification
VUS
MDM2 c.1270G>A · p.Glu424Lys
MDM2

NM_002392.5:c.1270G>A (p.Glu424Lys) is absent from gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada population cohorts (PM2).

Gene
MDM2
Transcript
NM_002392.5
HGVS · transcript:coding
NM_002392.5:c.1270G>A
Consequence
N/A
GRCh38
chr12:68839625 G>A
GRCh37
chr12:69233405 G>A
Basis gene-specific framework lacked a usable explicit final combination framework, so generic ACMG/AMP 2015 final-combination rules were applied as fallback; applied criteria: PM2 moderate, BP4 supporting benign; combination = 1 moderate + 1 supporting benign, which maps to VUS.
gene-specific framework lacked a usable explicit final combination framework, so generic ACMG/AMP 2015 final-combination rules were applied as fallback; applied criteria: PM2 moderate, BP4 supporting benign; combination = 1 moderate + 1 supporting benign, which maps to VUS.
Classification rationale
PM2 BP4 VUS
MDM2 c.1270G>A

NM_002392.5:c.1270G>A (p.Glu424Lys) is absent from gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada population cohorts (PM2).1 Multiple in silico predictors (REVEL 0.08, BayesDel -0.32377, SpliceAI max delta 0.00) consistently suggest no damaging effect on the MDM2 gene product (BP4).2 No ClinVar entries, published functional studies, case-control data, or segregation data are available for this variant. One moderate pathogenic criterion (PM2) and one supporting benign criterion (BP4) are met, resulting in a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) under the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 classification framework (PMID:25741868).3

PM2 + BP4 VUS
2 revelbayesdelspliceai ↗
3 generic_acmg_combination_rules
Gene diagram · NM_002392.5 · variants mapped to exon structure
MDM2 NM_002392.5
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
Applied criteria · 2 applied · 20 assessed
Applied · 2
Strength Supporting Moderate Strong Very strong
PM2 moderate Pathogenic
NM_002392.5:c.1270G>A is absent from gnomAD v2.1 (exomes), gnomAD v4.1 (exomes/genomes), and gnomAD-Canada v1.0 (HostSeq genomes). Population frequency is 0.00%, well below the PM2 threshold of 0.1% for a gene without an expert panel framework.
gnomAD v2.1: absent (AC=nullAN=nullAF=null)
BP4 supporting Benign
Multiple independent lines of computational evidence suggest no significant impact on the MDM2 gene product. REVEL score is 0.08 (well below the 0.5 threshold for pathogenic prediction), BayesDel additive score is -0.32377 (predicting benign), and SpliceAI predicts no splicing alteration (max delta score = 0.00). Three independent in silico predictors consistently indicate a neutral effect.
REVEL score: 0.08 — predicts benign (<0.5 threshold)BayesDel additive score: -0.32377 — predicts benign (negative score)SpliceAI max delta: 0.00 — no predicted splice alteration
Assessed · not applied
Pathogenic
PS1 No pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant at the same amino acid residue (NP_002383.2:p.Glu424) has been identified in ClinVar.
PS2 No de novo observation with confirmed paternity and maternity has been reported for NM_002392.5:c.1270G>A.
PS3 No well-established functional studies demonstrating a damaging effect have been identified for NM_002392.5:c.1270G>A.
PS4 No case-control or cohort studies comparing variant prevalence in affected vs.
PM1 Residue p.Glu424 is not located in a statistically significant mutational hotspot as assessed by CancerHotspots.org.
PM6 No assumed de novo observation (without confirmed paternity and maternity) has been reported for NM_002392.5:c.1270G>A.
PP1 No co-segregation data are available for NM_002392.5:c.1270G>A.
PP2 PP2 requires a gene with a low rate of benign missense variation and where missense variants are a common mechanism of disease.
PP3 Multiple lines of in silico computational evidence do not support a deleterious effect.
PP4 No patient phenotype or clinical history data are available for this variant.
PP5 PP5 is not a recognized criterion in the standard ACMG/AMP 2015 classification framework (Richards et al., PMID:25741868).
Benign
BA1 NM_002392.5:c.1270G>A is absent from all gnomAD population cohorts.
BS1 NM_002392.5:c.1270G>A is absent from all gnomAD population cohorts.
BS2 No data are available regarding observation of NM_002392.5:c.1270G>A in healthy adult individuals.
BS3 No well-established functional studies demonstrating no deleterious effect have been identified for NM_002392.5:c.1270G>A.
BS4 No data are available regarding lack of co-segregation with disease for NM_002392.5:c.1270G>A.
BP1 BP1 requires a missense variant in a gene for which primarily truncating variants are known to cause disease.
BP2 No data are available regarding observation of NM_002392.5:c.1270G>A in trans with a known pathogenic variant for a fully penetrant dominant disorder, or in cis with a known pathogenic variant.
BP5 No data are available regarding observation of NM_002392.5:c.1270G>A in a case with an alternative molecular basis for disease.
BP6 NM_002392.5:c.1270G>A is absent from ClinVar.
N/A · 3 PVS1 · PM5 · BP7
Research & evidence
Population frequency
gnomAD v4.1 screenshot
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1 screenshot
gnomAD v2.1
v4.1
Absent from gnomAD v4.1.
v2.1
Absent from gnomAD v2.1.
🇨🇦 CA
Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.
Allele frequency by ancestry
three datasets · side by side
gnomAD v4.1
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
gnomAD v2.1
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
gnomAD Canada 🇨🇦
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
ClinVar screenshot
ClinVar
This variant is absent from ClinVar.
SpliceAI screenshot
In silico
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00). REVEL score = 0.08. BayesDel score = -0.32377.
Functional / OncoKB screenshot
Functional Unknown Oncogenic Effect
OncoKB did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant; gene-level curated context is available for reviewer follow-up. MDM2, a ubiquitin ligase and p53 inhibitor, is amplified in a diverse range of cancers including well-differentiated liposarcomas.
OncoKB ↗
COSMIC screenshot
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots screenshot
Cancer hotspots
Somatic evidence Not in COSMIC / hotspots
COSMIC
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).
Hotspots
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.
Sources & reference links
8Sources
ClinVar
gnomAD v2.1
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD-Canada
SpliceAI
OncoKB
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots