Back
NM_002524.4:c.112-8A>G
p.? · NRAS
0%
complete
Final classification
Likely Benign
BS1BP6
NRAS
c.112-8A>G
p.?
This variant

The NRAS c.112-8A>G (p.?) variant has been reported in ClinVar, where the aggregate classification is likely benign and expert panel review is present.

Transcript
NM_002524.4
HGVS · transcript:coding
NM_002524.4:c.112-8A>G
GRCh38
chr1:114713986 T>C
GRCh37
chr1:115256607 T>C
ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel Specifications to the ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines for NRAS Version 2.3.0 v2.3.0 criteria-combination framework: matched Rule20 (1 Benign.Strong) with applied criteria: BS1 strong, BP6 supporting benign; maps to Likely Benign.
Classification rationale
BS1BP6 Likely Benign
NRAS c.112-8A>G

The NRAS c.112-8A>G (p.?) variant has been reported in ClinVar, where the aggregate classification is likely benign and expert panel review is present.1 This variant is present in population databases, with gnomAD v2.1 total AF 0.02558% and grpmax FAF 0.03711%, and gnomAD v4.1 total AF 0.03946% and grpmax FAF 0.04727%, which is above the NRAS RASopathy BS1 threshold of 0.025% but below the BA1 threshold of 0.05%.2 SpliceAI predicts no significant splice effect for this variant, with a maximum delta score of 0.02, which does not support a deleterious splicing prediction.3

BS1 + BP6 Likely Benign
LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
Gene diagram · NM_002524.4 · variants mapped to exon structure
NRAS NM_002524.4
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
Applied criteria · 2 applied · 13 assessed
MetEvidence satisfies this criterion.
Not metEvaluated against available evidence; threshold not reached.
Not assessedApplies in principle, but no evidence was found to evaluate it.
N/ADoesn't apply to this variant type.
Applied · 2
Strength Supporting Moderate Strong Very strong
BS1 strong Benign
BS1 requires a gnomAD filtering allele frequency of at least 0.025%. The observed grpmax FAF is 0.03711% in gnomAD v2.1 and 0.04727% in gnomAD v4.1, both above the 0.025% threshold, so BS1 is met at strong strength.
gnomAD v2.1 grpmax FAF exceeds 0.025%gnomAD v4.1 grpmax FAF exceeds 0.025%
BP6 supporting Benign
Expert panel ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel classified as Likely benign.
RASopathy VCEP marks BP6 as not applicableClinVar expert panel classification
Assessed · not applied · 4 not met · 9 not assessed
Pathogenic
PS2 No confirmed de novo occurrence with maternity and paternity established was identified.
PS3 No approved functional or RNA assay result for this specific splice-region variant was identified.
PS4 This variant is present in population databases and no affected-case enrichment data were identified.
PM2 PM2_Supporting requires absence from gnomAD.
PM6 No assumed de novo report for this variant was identified.
PP1 No segregation data were identified for this variant.
PP3 For splice prediction, PP3 requires a predicted splicing outcome that matches the disease mechanism.
Benign
BA1 BA1 requires a gnomAD filtering allele frequency of at least 0.05%.
BS2 Although this variant is present in population databases, no phenotype-qualified healthy adult observations or point-based evidence meeting the RASopathy BS2 specification were identified.
BS4 No nonsegregation data were identified for this variant.
BP2 No evidence was identified that this variant occurs in cis or trans with another established pathogenic RASopathy variant or that the required point-based alternative-molecular-cause framework is satisfied.
BP5 No alternative molecular explanation for the phenotype in another gene, and no phenotype-based evidence against this variant, were identified.
BP7 This noncanonical intronic variant has a low SpliceAI maximum delta score of 0.02, which predicts no significant splice impact.
N/A · 13 PVS1 · PS1 · PM1 · PM3 · PM4 · PM5 · PP2 · PP4 · PP5 · BS3 · BP1 · BP3 · BP4
Research & evidence
Population frequency · supports benign
gnomAD v4.1 screenshot
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1 screenshot
gnomAD v2.1
v4.1
This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 0.000394632; MAF= 0.03946%, 529/1340490 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 0.000510694; MAF= 0.05107%, 499/977102 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 0.00047274.
v2.1
This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 0.000255817; MAF= 0.02558%, 71/277542 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 0.000487061; MAF= 0.04871%, 62/127294 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 0.00037107.
Allele frequency by ancestry
three datasets · side by side
gnomAD v4.1
0.039% · 529 / 1,340,490
0 hom · FAF 0.047%
European (non-Finnish)
499 / 977,102
0.051%
European (Finnish)
12 / 48,214
0.025%
Remaining individuals
12 / 48,538
0.025%
African/African American
6 / 66,904
0.009%
+ 6 not observed (Admixed American, Amish, East Asian, Middle Eastern, South Asian, Ashkenazi Jewish)
gnomAD v2.1
0.026% · 71 / 277,542
0 hom · FAF 0.037%
European (non-Finnish)
62 / 127,294
0.049%
European (Finnish)
5 / 24,796
0.02%
Remaining individuals
1 / 7,036
0.014%
African/African American
3 / 24,648
0.012%
+ 4 not observed (Admixed American, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, South Asian)
ClinVar screenshot
ClinVar
This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (4 clinical laboratories) and as Benign (2 clinical laboratories) and as Likely Benign (1 clinical laboratory) and as Uncertain significance (1 clinical laboratory) and as Likely Benign by ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel (expert panel).
SpliceAI screenshot
In silico
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.02).
Functional No data
No calibrated functional assay or RNA evidence was identified for this variant.
OncoKB ↗
COSMIC screenshot
COSMIC
Somatic evidence
COSMIC
This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).
Hotspots
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant cancer hotspot.
COSMIC ↗
Sources & reference links
7Sources
CSpec VCEP
ClinVar
gnomAD v2.1
gnomAD v4.1
SpliceAI
OncoKB
COSMIC