Starting
Initialising…
0%
NRAS
Final classification
Benign
NRAS c.159G>A · p.Leu53=
NRAS

The NRAS c.159G>A (p.Leu53=) variant has not been observed in somatic cancers in COSMIC and is reported in ClinVar as Benign by the ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel.

Gene
NRAS
Transcript
NM_002524.4
HGVS · transcript:coding
NM_002524.4:c.159G>A
Consequence
N/A
GRCh38
chr1:114713931 C>T
GRCh37
chr1:115256552 C>T
Basis ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel Specifications to the ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines for NRAS Version 2.3.0 v2.3.0 criteria-combination framework: matched Rule17 (1 Benign.Stand Alone) with applied criteria: BA1 stand-alone benign, BS1 strong, BP6 supporting benign, BP7 supporting; maps to Benign.
ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel Specifications to the ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines for NRAS Version 2.3.0 v2.3.0 criteria-combination framework: matched Rule17 (1 Benign.Stand Alone) with applied criteria: BA1 stand-alone benign, BS1 strong, BP6 supporting benign, BP7 supporting; maps to Benign.
Classification rationale
BA1BS1BP6BP7 Benign
NRAS c.159G>A

The NRAS c.159G>A (p.Leu53=) variant has not been observed in somatic cancers in COSMIC and is reported in ClinVar as Benign by the ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel.1 This variant is present in gnomAD, with the highest observed East Asian allele frequency of 0.12545% in v2.1 and 0.06181% in v4.1, which are above the NRAS RASopathy BA1 threshold of 0.05% and BS1 threshold of 0.025%.2 SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this synonymous variant, with a maximum delta score of 0.04, supporting no expected RNA effect.3

BA1 + BS1 + BP6 + BP7 Benign
Gene diagram · NM_002524.4 · variants mapped to exon structure
NRAS NM_002524.4
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
Applied criteria · 4 met · select any tile
Met
Not met
Not assessed
N/A
Strength very strong supporting
Pathogenic evidence
PVS
PS
PM
PP
Benign evidence
BA
BS
BP
Rationale
Select a criterion.
Sources
Evidence used
    Gaps remaining
      Rule
      Research & evidence
      Population frequency · supports benign
      gnomAD v4.1 screenshot
      gnomAD v4.1
      gnomAD v2.1 screenshot
      gnomAD v2.1
      v4.1
      This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 1.77303e-05; MAF= 0.00177%, 27/1522820 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the East Asian population (AF= 0.000618111; MAF= 0.06181%, 24/38828 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 0.0004261.
      v2.1
      This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 8.85545e-05; MAF= 0.00886%, 25/282312 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the East Asian population (AF= 0.00125452; MAF= 0.12545%, 25/19928 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 0.00090025.
      Allele frequency by ancestry
      three datasets · side by side
      gnomAD v4.1
      0.0018% · 27 / 1,522,820
      0 hom · FAF 0.043%
      East Asian
      24 / 38,828
      0.062%
      Remaining individuals
      2 / 56,734
      0.0035%
      European (non-Finnish)
      1 / 1,122,562
      8.9e-05%
      + 7 not observed (Admixed American, European (Finnish), Amish, Middle Eastern, South Asian, Ashkenazi Jewish, African/African American)
      gnomAD v2.1
      0.0089% · 25 / 282,312
      0 hom · FAF 0.09%
      East Asian
      25 / 19,928
      0.13%
      + 7 not observed (African/African American, Admixed American, Ashkenazi Jewish, European (Finnish), European (non-Finnish), Remaining individuals, South Asian)
      ClinVar screenshot
      ClinVar
      This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (3 clinical laboratories) and as Benign (3 clinical laboratories) and as Benign by ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel (expert panel). (ClinVarID = 164807)
      SpliceAI screenshot
      In silico
      SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.04).
      Functional / OncoKB screenshot
      Functional Unknown Oncogenic Effect
      OncoKB identified curated literature and non-variant-specific oncogenicity context for review; listed oncogenicity label: Unknown Oncogenic Effect.
      OncoKB ↗
      COSMIC screenshot
      COSMIC
      Cancer hotspots screenshot
      Cancer hotspots
      Somatic evidence Not in COSMIC / hotspots
      COSMIC
      This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).
      Hotspots
      This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.
      Sources & reference links
      8Sources
      CSpec VCEP
      ClinVar
      gnomAD v2.1
      gnomAD v4.1
      SpliceAI
      OncoKB
      COSMIC
      Cancer hotspots
      Triaged references · 2 PMIDs not cited in assessment
      24033266 ↗ A systematic approach to assessing the clinical significance of genetic variants. CLINVAR
      28492532 ↗ Sherloc: a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG-AMP variant classification criteria. CLINVAR