Analysis in progress
Initialising…
0%
complete
This report is still being assembled — sections appear as each stage finishes. It isn't final yet.
CHEK2
Final classification
Likely Benign
CHEK2 c.542G>A · p.Arg181His
CHEK2

NM_007194.4:c.542G>A (p.Arg181His) in CHEK2 is present in gnomAD at low frequency (v2.1 AF=0.0127%, v4.1 AF=0.0053%) with one homozygote observed in the East Asian population.

Gene
CHEK2
Transcript
NM_007194.4
HGVS · transcript:coding
NM_007194.4:c.542G>A
Consequence
N/A
GRCh38
chr22:28725027 C>T
GRCh37
chr22:29121015 C>T
Basis Hereditary Breast, Ovarian and Pancreatic Cancer Specification v1.0.0 lacked a usable explicit final combination framework, so generic ACMG/AMP 2015 final-combination rules were applied as fallback; applied criteria: BS3 supporting, BP4 supporting, BP6 supporting; combination = 3 supporting benign, which maps to Likely Benign.
Hereditary Breast, Ovarian and Pancreatic Cancer Specification v1.0.0 lacked a usable explicit final combination framework, so generic ACMG/AMP 2015 final-combination rules were applied as fallback; applied criteria: BS3 supporting, BP4 supporting, BP6 supporting; combination = 3 supporting benign, which maps to Likely Benign.
Classification rationale
BS3BP4BP6 Likely Benign
CHEK2 c.542G>A

NM_007194.4:c.542G>A (p.Arg181His) in CHEK2 is present in gnomAD at low frequency (v2.1 AF=0.0127%, v4.1 AF=0.0053%) with one homozygote observed in the East Asian population.1 In a well-established cell-based functional assay (KAP1 phosphorylation in RPE1-CHEK2-KO cells), p.Arg181His was classified as NEUTRAL, retaining >50% of wild-type CHK2 kinase activity (Kleiblova et al. 2019).2 Multiple lines of in silico evidence suggest no damaging impact: SpliceAI predicts no splicing alteration (max delta=0.00), BayesDel score is in the benign range (-0.032), and REVEL is borderline (0.46).3 ClinVar aggregate classification is Likely benign from 10 clinical diagnostic laboratories, with an additional 8 labs reporting Uncertain significance (Variation ID 5598).4 The variant has been reported in 1/400 sporadic prostate cancer cases (Dong et al. 2003), 1/516 familial breast cancer patients (Dufault et al. 2004), and 2/1928 breast/ovarian cancer patients (Kleiblova et al. 2019) without statistically significant enrichment versus controls.5 No de novo observations, co-segregation data, or statistically significant case-control enrichment have been reported for this variant.

BS3 + BP4 + BP6 Likely Benign
Gene diagram · NM_007194.4 · variants mapped to exon structure
CHEK2 NM_007194.4
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
Applied criteria · 3 applied · 17 assessed
Applied · 3
Strength Supporting Moderate Strong Very strong
BS3 supporting Benign
BS3 is met at supporting level. Kleiblova et al. (PMID:31050813) performed a well-established cell-based functional assay quantifying CHK2-specific phosphorylation of endogenous KAP1 in human non-transformed RPE1-CHEK2-knock-out cells. The c.542G>A (p.Arg181His) variant was classified as NEUTRAL, retaining >50% of wild-type CHK2 kinase activity. This assay is considered well-validated — it reflects in vivo CHK2 behavior more accurately than in vitro kinase assays, resolves discrepancies seen in prior yeast-based and overexpression systems, and correctly stratified known pathogenic and benign controls. The neutral functional classification provides supporting evidence for a benign effect.
Kleiblova et al. (2019) KAP1 phosphorylation assay in RPE1-CHEK2-KO cells: p.Arg181His classified as NEUTRAL (>50% WT activity).
BP4 supporting Benign
BP4 is met at supporting level. Multiple lines of in silico evidence suggest no impact on gene product: SpliceAI predicts no splicing alteration (max delta = 0.00); BayesDel score is -0.032 (benign range, below zero); REVEL score is 0.46, which is borderline and does not reach the typical pathogenic threshold (~0.7). The convergence of SpliceAI and BayesDel on a benign prediction, with REVEL being non-contributory, satisfies BP4 at the supporting level.
SpliceAI max delta 0.00 (no splicing impact)BayesDel -0.032 (benign)REVEL 0.46 (borderline/non-contributory).
BP6 supporting Benign
BP6 is met at supporting level. The ClinVar aggregate classification for Variation ID 5598 is Likely benign, reported by 10 clinical diagnostic laboratories (9 as Likely benign, 1 as Benign). An additional 8 submissions classify it as Uncertain significance and 1 as likely benign. The plurality of clinical laboratories with assertion criteria favor a benign interpretation. No expert panel review has been performed.
ClinVar aggregate: 10 of 19 clinical labs with criteria classify as Likely benign/Benign (Variation ID 5598).
Assessed · not applied
Pathogenic
PS1 No different nucleotide change at codon 181 producing the same missense change (p.Arg181His) has been established as pathogenic.
PS2 No de novo observations have been reported for this variant in public databases or the literature.
PS3 PS3 requires well-established functional studies showing a damaging effect.
PS4 PS4 requires statistically significant enrichment of the variant in affected individuals versus controls.
PM1 PM1 requires location in a mutational hot spot or critical functional domain with absent or very low benign variation.
PM2 PM2 applies when a variant is absent from population databases.
PM6 PM6 requires a de novo observation with maternity and paternity confirmed.
PP1 PP1 requires co-segregation of the variant with disease in multiple affected family members.
PP2 PP2 requires a missense variant in a gene with a low rate of benign missense variation and where missense variants are a common mechanism of disease.
PP3 PP3 requires multiple lines of in silico evidence supporting a deleterious effect.
PP4 PP4 requires the patient's phenotype or family history to be highly specific for the gene.
PP5 PP5 requires a reputable source to have classified the variant as pathogenic.
Benign
BA1 BA1 requires allele frequency >1% in a population database.
BS1 BS1 requires allele frequency >0.3% in a population database.
BS2 BS2 requires observation in a healthy adult individual for a disorder with full penetrance expected at an early age.
BS4 BS4 requires lack of segregation of the variant with disease in affected family members.
BP5 BP5 requires the variant to be found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease.
N/A · 5 PVS1 · PM5 · BP1 · BP2 · BP7
Research & evidence
Population frequency · supports benign
gnomAD v4.1 screenshot
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1 screenshot
gnomAD v2.1
v4.1
This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 5.26663e-05; MAF= 0.00527%, 85/1613934 alleles, homozygotes = 1) and has highest observed frequency in the East Asian population (AF= 0.000869526; MAF= 0.08695%, 39/44852 alleles, homozygotes = 1); grpmax FAF= 0.00065305.
v2.1
This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 0.000127304; MAF= 0.01273%, 36/282788 alleles, homozygotes = 1) and has highest observed frequency in the East Asian population (AF= 0.00125326; MAF= 0.12533%, 25/19948 alleles, homozygotes = 1); grpmax FAF= 0.00089902.
🇨🇦 CA
This variant is absent from gnomAD-Canada.
Allele frequency by ancestry
three datasets · side by side
gnomAD v4.1
0.0053% · 85 / 1,613,934
1 hom · FAF 0.065%
East Asian
39 / 44,852
0.087%
1 hom
South Asian
12 / 91,072
0.013%
African/African American
7 / 75,008
0.0093%
Admixed American
4 / 59,984
0.0067%
Remaining individuals
3 / 62,504
0.0048%
European (non-Finnish)
20 / 1,179,918
0.0017%
+ 4 not observed (European (Finnish), Amish, Middle Eastern, Ashkenazi Jewish)
gnomAD v2.1
0.013% · 36 / 282,788
1 hom · FAF 0.09%
East Asian
25 / 19,948
0.13%
1 hom
South Asian
4 / 30,612
0.013%
African/African American
2 / 24,960
0.008%
European (non-Finnish)
4 / 129,118
0.0031%
Admixed American
1 / 35,436
0.0028%
+ 3 not observed (Ashkenazi Jewish, European (Finnish), Remaining individuals)
gnomAD Canada 🇨🇦
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
ClinVar screenshot
ClinVar
This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (9 clinical laboratories) and as Uncertain significance (8 clinical laboratories) and as likely benign (1 clinical laboratory) and as Benign (1 clinical laboratory). (ClinVarID = 5598)
SpliceAI screenshot
In silico
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00). REVEL score = 0.46. BayesDel score = -0.0318827.
Functional / OncoKB screenshot
Functional Unknown Oncogenic Effect
OncoKB did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant; gene-level curated context is available for reviewer follow-up. CHEK2, an intracellular kinase involved in control of the cell cycle, is altered in various cancer types.
OncoKB ↗
COSMIC screenshot
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots screenshot
Cancer hotspots
Somatic evidence Not in COSMIC / hotspots
COSMIC
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).
Hotspots
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.
Literature · how each cited paper was used
1papers cited
Each card is an audit: what was searched, what was found, whether it names the variant, which criteria it fed, and why. 6 further PMIDs triaged but not cited — see Sources & References.
Identification of deleterious germline CHEK2 mutations and their association with breast and ovarian cancer.
Found
Structured finding pending for this record — see source link.
Applied to
BS3 supports · met
Sources & reference links
8Sources
CSpec VCEP
ClinVar
gnomAD v2.1
gnomAD v4.1
SpliceAI
OncoKB
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots
Triaged references · 6 PMIDs not cited in assessment
22419737 ↗ Response to DNA damage of CHEK2 missense mutations in familial breast cancer. ONCOKB
12533788 ↗ Mutations in CHEK2 associated with prostate cancer risk. CLINVAR
15095295 ↗ Limited relevance of the CHEK2 gene in hereditary breast cancer. CLINVAR
16835864 ↗ Characterization of CHEK2 mutations in prostate cancer. CLINVAR
16982735 ↗ Rare germ line CHEK2 variants identified in breast cancer families encode proteins that show impaired activation. CLINVAR
28492532 ↗ Sherloc: a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG-AMP variant classification criteria. CLINVAR