Back
NM_012433.2:c.1876A>G
p.Asn626Asp · SF3B1
ACMG/AMP
0%
complete
Final classification
VUS
PM2
SF3B1
c.1876A>G
p.Asn626Asp
This variant

The SF3B1 c.1876A>G (p.Asn626Asp; p.N626D) variant has been curated as a somatic cancer variant in OncoKB and has not been reported in ClinVar.

Transcript
NM_012433.2
HGVS · transcript:coding
NM_012433.2:c.1876A>G
GRCh38
chr2:197402757 T>C
GRCh37
chr2:198267481 T>C
gene-specific framework lacked a usable explicit final combination framework, so generic ACMG/AMP 2015 final-combination rules were applied as fallback; applied criteria: PM2 supporting; combination = 1 supporting, which maps to VUS.
Classification rationale
PM2 VUS
SF3B1 c.1876A>G

The SF3B1 c.1876A>G (p.Asn626Asp; p.N626D) variant has been curated as a somatic cancer variant in OncoKB and has not been reported in ClinVar.1 This variant is rare in population databases, with gnomAD v2.1 showing 1/251158 alleles (0.00040%) and gnomAD v4.1 showing 8/1613994 alleles (0.00050%; grpmax FAF 0.000124%), which is below the 0.1% PM2 threshold.2 In silico results are mixed: SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact (maximum delta score 0.08), while REVEL is 0.60 and BayesDel is -0.0733292, so computational evidence does not independently support PP3 or BP4.3

PM2 VUS
LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
Gene diagram · NM_012433.2 · variants mapped to exon structure
SF3B1 NM_012433.2
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
Applied criteria · 1 applied · 23 assessed
MetEvidence satisfies this criterion.
Not metEvaluated against available evidence; threshold not reached.
Not assessedApplies in principle, but no evidence was found to evaluate it.
N/ADoesn't apply to this variant type.
Applied · 1
Strength Supporting Moderate Strong Very strong
PM2 supporting review Pathogenic
Population frequency is below the non-VCEP PM2 threshold of 0.1% in gnomAD v2.1 (0.00040%, 1/251158 alleles) and gnomAD v4.1 (0.00050%, 8/1613994 alleles; grpmax FAF 0.000124%), supporting rarity in population databases.
gnomAD v2.1 AF 3.98156e-06gnomAD v4.1 AF 4.95665e-06gnomAD v4.1 grpmax FAF 1.24e-06
Assessed · not applied · 4 not met · 19 not assessed
Pathogenic
PS1 No evidence was identified showing that a different nucleotide change produces the same amino acid substitution with an established pathogenic interpretation.
PS2 No confirmed de novo occurrence with verified maternity and paternity was identified.
PS3 No published functional study specific to p.(Asn626Asp) was identified that demonstrates a damaging effect using a validated assay.
PS4 Somatic database curation suggests this variant has been observed in cancers, but no germline case-control or affected-versus-control enrichment data were identified for this variant.
PM1 A hotspot signal was suggested, but the reviewed hotspot evidence for codon 626 was marked uncertain and did not confirm that this exact residue is an established mutational hotspot or critical benign-variant-depleted region.
PM3 No evidence was identified showing this variant in trans with a pathogenic variant for a recessive disorder.
PM5 No evidence was identified showing a different pathogenic missense change at the same codon that would support PM5.
PM6 No presumed de novo occurrence without confirmed parentage was identified.
PP1 No segregation data were identified to show co-segregation with disease in affected family members.
PP2 Available evidence shows SF3B1 missense variation can be clinically relevant, but no gene-specific missense-rate framework was identified to support applying PP2 in this case.
PP3 Computational evidence is mixed.
PP4 No phenotype information was provided that would allow assessment of whether the clinical presentation is highly specific for an SF3B1-related disorder.
PP5 No qualifying pathogenic classification from a germline clinical database or other accepted external clinical source was identified for this variant.
Benign
BA1 Population frequency does not meet the benign stand-alone BA1 threshold of greater than 1%.
BS1 Population frequency does not meet the benign BS1 threshold of greater than 0.3%.
BS2 The variant is very rare in population databases and no evidence was identified showing observation in healthy adults at a frequency sufficient to support BS2.
BS3 No published functional study specific to p.(Asn626Asp) was identified showing normal protein function or a benign effect.
BS4 No family data were identified showing lack of segregation between this variant and disease.
BP2 No case-level phase information was identified to determine whether this variant occurs in trans with a pathogenic variant or in cis with another variant.
BP3 No evidence was identified showing that this missense change is located in a repetitive region without known function.
BP4 Computational evidence does not consistently support a benign effect.
BP5 No alternate molecular diagnosis or variant explanation was provided that would account for the phenotype independently of this variant.
BP6 No qualifying benign classification from a germline clinical database or other accepted external clinical source was identified for this variant.
N/A · 4 PVS1 · PM4 · BP1 · BP7
Research & evidence
Population frequency
gnomAD v4.1 screenshot
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1 screenshot
gnomAD v2.1
v4.1
This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 4.95665e-06; MAF= 0.00050%, 8/1613994 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the Remaining individuals population (AF= 3.20092e-05; MAF= 0.00320%, 2/62482 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 1.24e-06.
v2.1
This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 3.98156e-06; MAF= 0.00040%, 1/251158 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the Admixed American population (AF= 2.89385e-05; MAF= 0.00289%, 1/34556 alleles, homozygotes = 0).
Allele frequency by ancestry
three datasets · side by side
gnomAD v4.1
0.0005% · 8 / 1,613,994
0 hom · FAF 0.00012%
Remaining individuals
2 / 62,482
0.0032%
Admixed American
1 / 60,000
0.0017%
European (non-Finnish)
5 / 1,179,978
0.00042%
+ 7 not observed (European (Finnish), Amish, East Asian, Middle Eastern, South Asian, Ashkenazi Jewish, African/African American)
gnomAD v2.1
0.0004% · 1 / 251,158
0 hom
Admixed American
1 / 34,556
0.0029%
+ 7 not observed (African/African American, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European (Finnish), European (non-Finnish), Remaining individuals, South Asian)
ClinVar screenshot
ClinVar
This variant is absent from ClinVar.
SpliceAI screenshot
In silico
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.08). REVEL score = 0.6. BayesDel score = -0.0733292.
Functional / OncoKB screenshot
Functional Likely Oncogenic
OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; curated oncogenicity label: Likely Oncogenic.
OncoKB ↗
COSMIC screenshot
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots screenshot
Cancer hotspots
Somatic evidence Not in COSMIC / hotspots
COSMIC
This variant lies in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV59206442, n = 12 times).
Hotspots
This variant lies in a statistically significant hotspot.
Sources & reference links
7Sources
ClinVar
gnomAD v2.1
gnomAD v4.1
SpliceAI
OncoKB
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots