Analysis in progress
Initialising…
0%
complete
This report is still being assembled — sections appear as each stage finishes. It isn't final yet.
PPARG
Final classification
VUS
PM2PP3
PPARG
c.338C>T
p.Pro113Leu
This variant

NM_015869.4:c.338C>T (p.Pro113Leu) in PPARG is a missense variant absent from ClinVar and present at an extremely low allele frequency of 1.24×10⁻⁶ (2/1,613,144 alleles, 0 homozygotes) in gnomAD v4.1, meeting PM2 at supporting strength (well below 0.1% threshold).

Transcript
NM_015869.4
HGVS · transcript:coding
NM_015869.4:c.338C>T
GRCh38
chr3:12381349 C>T
GRCh37
chr3:12422848 C>T
Basis gene-specific framework lacked a usable explicit final combination framework, so generic ACMG/AMP 2015 final-combination rules were applied as fallback; applied criteria: PM2 supporting, PP3 supporting; combination = 2 supporting, which maps to VUS.
gene-specific framework lacked a usable explicit final combination framework, so generic ACMG/AMP 2015 final-combination rules were applied as fallback; applied criteria: PM2 supporting, PP3 supporting; combination = 2 supporting, which maps to VUS.
Classification rationale
PM2PP3 VUS
PPARG c.338C>T

NM_015869.4:c.338C>T (p.Pro113Leu) in PPARG is a missense variant absent from ClinVar and present at an extremely low allele frequency of 1.24×10⁻⁶ (2/1,613,144 alleles, 0 homozygotes) in gnomAD v4.1, meeting PM2 at supporting strength (well below 0.1% threshold).1 REVEL in silico prediction yields a score of 0.74, exceeding the 0.5 threshold for a deleterious call, meeting PP3 at supporting strength. SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta score 0.00) and BayesDel (0.293) is borderline.2 No functional studies, de novo reports, segregation data, or disease-specific cohort data were identified for this variant. PVS1 is not applicable as this is a missense variant (ClinGen SVI PVS1 framework, PMC6185798). All remaining assessed pathogenic and benign criteria were not met.3 With only PM2 (supporting) and PP3 (supporting) met, the evidence is insufficient to reach a Likely Pathogenic or Likely Benign classification under generic ACMG/AMP 2015 combination rules (PMID:25741868). This variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS).4

PM2 + PP3 VUS
2 revelbayesdelspliceai ↗
3 pvs1_generic_framework ↗pvs1_variant_assessmentoncokb ↗
4 generic_acmg_combination_rules
Gene diagram · NM_015869.4 · variants mapped to exon structure
PPARG NM_015869.4
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
Applied criteria · 2 applied · 20 assessed
MetEvidence satisfies this criterion.
Not metEvaluated against available evidence; threshold not reached.
Not assessedApplies in principle, but no evidence was found to evaluate it.
N/ADoesn't apply to this variant type.
Applied · 2
Strength Supporting Moderate Strong Very strong
PM2 supporting Pathogenic
NM_015869.4:c.338C>T is extremely rare in population databases: absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD-Canada, and present at an allele frequency of 1.24×10⁻⁶ (0.00012%, 2/1,613,144 alleles) in gnomAD v4.1 with no homozygotes. This frequency is well below the 0.1% threshold for PM2.
gnomAD v2.1: absentgnomAD v4.1: AF=1.24×10⁻⁶ (2/1613
PP3 supporting Pathogenic
REVEL in silico predictor assigns a score of 0.74, which is above the commonly accepted threshold for deleterious prediction (>0.5). BayesDel score of 0.293 is borderline. SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta=0.00). Taken together, the REVEL score provides a single line of computational evidence supporting a deleterious effect.
REVEL score: 0.74 (deleteriousabove 0.5 threshold)BayesDel score: 0.293 (borderline
Assessed · not applied · 18 not met · 2 not assessed
Pathogenic
PS1 No prior report of the same amino acid change (p.Pro113Leu) as a pathogenic variant exists in ClinVar or the literature; this variant is absent from all ClinVar records.
PS2 No de novo occurrence data are available for this variant in any database or published literature.
PS3 No well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies were identified for NM_015869.4:c.338C>T (p.Pro113Leu).
PS4 No case-control or cohort data are available to assess whether the prevalence of this variant is significantly increased in affected individuals; the variant is absent from ClinVar.
PM1 This variant does not lie in a statistically significant mutational hotspot per cancerhotspots.org.
PM6 No assumed or confirmed de novo occurrence has been reported for this variant.
PP1 No cosegregation data are available for this variant; no family studies have been reported.
PP2 PPARG missense constraint metrics are not available in the evidence packet (HCI prior score not available for PPARG).
PP4 No patient phenotype or family history data were provided for this case; the specificity of the patient's presentation cannot be assessed.
PP5 No reputable source has reported this variant as pathogenic.
Benign
BA1 The population allele frequency of 1.24×10⁻⁶ (0.00012%) in gnomAD v4.1 is far below the 1% threshold for BA1.
BS1 The population allele frequency of 1.24×10⁻⁶ (0.00012%) in gnomAD v4.1 is far below the 0.3% threshold for BS1.
BS2 Although 2 alleles are observed in gnomAD v4.1, the phenotype of those individuals is unknown.
BS3 No well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies demonstrating no damaging effect were identified for this variant.
BS4 No segregation data are available to assess lack of segregation in affected family members.
BP1 PPARG is known to harbor disease-causing missense variants (e.g., familial partial lipodystrophy type 3 is caused by PPARG missense mutations such as p.Arg212Trp).
BP2 No observation of this variant in trans with a pathogenic variant has been reported for a fully penetrant dominant disorder.
BP4 REVEL in silico predictor assigns a score of 0.74, which predicts a deleterious effect.
BP5 No data are available indicating this variant was observed in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease.
BP6 No reputable source has reported this variant as benign.
N/A · 6 PVS1 · PM3 · PM4 · PM5 · BP3 · BP7
Research & evidence
Population frequency
gnomAD v4.1 screenshot
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1 screenshot
gnomAD v2.1
v4.1
This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 1.23981e-06; MAF= 0.00012%, 2/1613144 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the African/African American population (AF= 1.33579e-05; MAF= 0.00134%, 1/74862 alleles, homozygotes = 0).
v2.1
Absent from gnomAD v2.1.
🇨🇦 CA
Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.
Allele frequency by ancestry
three datasets · side by side
gnomAD v4.1
0.00012% · 2 / 1,613,144
0 hom
African/African American
1 / 74,862
0.0013%
European (non-Finnish)
1 / 1,179,658
8.5e-05%
+ 8 not observed (Remaining individuals, Admixed American, European (Finnish), Amish, East Asian, Middle Eastern, South Asian, Ashkenazi Jewish)
gnomAD v2.1
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
gnomAD Canada 🇨🇦
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
ClinVar screenshot
ClinVar
This variant is absent from ClinVar.
SpliceAI screenshot
In silico
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00). REVEL score = 0.74. BayesDel score = 0.293355.
Functional / OncoKB screenshot
Functional Unknown Oncogenic Effect
OncoKB did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant; gene-level curated context is available for reviewer follow-up. PPARG, a nuclear receptor, is known to behave as an oncoprotein when fused with with PAX8 in thyroid cancer.
OncoKB ↗
COSMIC screenshot
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots screenshot
Cancer hotspots
Somatic evidence Not in COSMIC / hotspots
COSMIC
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).
Hotspots
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.
Sources & reference links
8Sources
ClinVar
gnomAD v2.1
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD-Canada
SpliceAI
OncoKB
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots