Analysis in progress
Initialising…
0%
complete
This report is still being assembled — sections appear as each stage finishes. It isn't final yet.
RAD51B
Final classification
VUS
RAD51B c.428C>T · p.Thr143Ile
RAD51B

RAD51B c.428C>T (p.Thr143Ile) is observed at very low frequency in population databases (gnomAD v2.1: AF=0.0091%, 25/274,618 alleles; v4.1: AF=0.0039%, 63/1,602,290 alleles; no homozygotes), meeting PM2 at moderate strength.

Gene
RAD51B
Transcript
NM_133509.4
HGVS · transcript:coding
NM_133509.4:c.428C>T
Consequence
N/A
GRCh38
chr14:67865115 C>T
GRCh37
chr14:68331832 C>T
Basis gene-specific framework lacked a usable explicit final combination framework, so generic ACMG/AMP 2015 final-combination rules were applied as fallback; applied criteria: PM2 moderate; combination = 1 moderate, which maps to VUS.
gene-specific framework lacked a usable explicit final combination framework, so generic ACMG/AMP 2015 final-combination rules were applied as fallback; applied criteria: PM2 moderate; combination = 1 moderate, which maps to VUS.
Classification rationale
PM2 VUS
RAD51B c.428C>T

RAD51B c.428C>T (p.Thr143Ile) is observed at very low frequency in population databases (gnomAD v2.1: AF=0.0091%, 25/274,618 alleles; v4.1: AF=0.0039%, 63/1,602,290 alleles; no homozygotes), meeting PM2 at moderate strength.1 This is a missense variant and does not qualify for PVS1 under the ClinGen SVI framework (PMC6185798), as it is not a nonsense, frameshift, or canonical splice site variant.2 No variant-specific functional data, case-control studies, de novo observations, co-segregation data, or same-residue comparator variants were identified. In silico predictions are conflicting (REVEL 0.603, BayesDel 0.189, SpliceAI 0.01) and do not meet PP3 or BP4 thresholds.3 ClinVar reports this variant as Uncertain significance (1★, single submitter: Ambry Genetics). No 3★ expert panel classification exists to support PP5 or BP6.4 With only PM2 (moderate) met and all other criteria not met or not applicable, there is insufficient evidence to classify this variant beyond Uncertain Significance under ACMG/AMP 2015 rules (PMID:25741868). This is consistent with the ClinVar classification.5

PM2 VUS
2 pvs1_generic_framework ↗pvs1_variant_assessment
3 revelbayesdelspliceai ↗oncokb ↗
5 generic_acmg_combination_rules
Gene diagram · NM_133509.4 · variants mapped to exon structure
RAD51B NM_133509.4
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
Applied criteria · 1 applied · 23 assessed
Applied · 1
Strength Supporting Moderate Strong Very strong
PM2 moderate Pathogenic
This variant is present in gnomAD at very low frequency (v2.1: AF=0.0091%, 25/274,618 alleles; v4.1: AF=0.0039%, 63/1,602,290 alleles; highest subpopulation AF=0.062% in South Asian, v2.1), well below the 0.1% threshold for PM2 in non-VCEP context. No homozygotes observed.
gnomAD v2.1 total AF = 0.0091% (< 0.1% threshold)gnomAD v4.1 total AF = 0.0039% (< 0.1% threshold)Highest subpopulation AF = 0.062% (South Asian
Assessed · not applied
Pathogenic
PVS1 This missense variant (p.Thr143Ile) does not fall into the ClinGen SVI PVS1 null-variant buckets (nonsense, frameshift, or canonical ±1,2 splice consensus).
PS1 No alternative nucleotide change at codon 143 producing the same amino acid substitution (Thr143Ile) was identified as pathogenic in ClinVar or the literature.
PS2 No de novo observation with confirmed parentage reported for this variant.
PS3 No variant-specific functional data identified.
PS4 The variant has been observed in general population databases (gnomAD, 25–63 alleles) without case-control comparison showing enrichment in affected individuals.
PM1 Residue 143 does not fall within a statistically significant cancer hotspot (cancerhotspots.org) and no gene-specific literature establishes this position as a critical functional domain enriched for pathogenic missense variants.
PM5 No pathogenic missense comparator variant at the same codon (position 143) was identified in ClinVar.
PM6 No de novo observation reported for this variant (with or without confirmed parentage).
PP1 No co-segregation data available for this variant in affected families.
PP2 Insufficient evidence that RAD51B has a low rate of benign missense variation and that missense is a common mechanism of disease.
PP3 In silico predictions show conflicting results: REVEL score of 0.603 is moderately above the damaging threshold (0.5), but BayesDel score of 0.189 falls in the benign range (<0.27), and SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta=0.01).
PP4 No proband phenotype or family history data are available to assess specificity for a RAD51B-associated disorder.
PP5 ClinVar classification for this variant is Uncertain significance (1★, criteria provided, single submitter).
Benign
BA1 Maximum population allele frequency (0.062% South Asian, gnomAD v2.1) is well below the 1% BA1 threshold.
BS1 Maximum population allele frequency (0.062% South Asian, gnomAD v2.1) is below the 0.3% BS1 threshold.
BS2 No evidence that this variant has been observed in healthy adult individuals in a context permitting BS2 application (e.g., homozygous state or comprehensive healthy cohort data).
BS3 No well-established functional studies demonstrating no damaging effect of this variant on protein function or splicing.
BS4 No family segregation data available to demonstrate lack of co-segregation with disease.
BP1 RAD51B is a homologous recombination repair gene where both truncating and missense variants are reported in the literature.
BP2 No evidence that this variant has been observed in trans with a known pathogenic variant in RAD51B or another gene for a fully penetrant dominant disorder.
BP4 Multiple lines of computational evidence do not consistently support a benign effect.
BP5 No alternate molecular basis for disease has been identified in an individual carrying this variant.
BP6 ClinVar classification for this variant is Uncertain significance (1★), not benign or likely benign.
N/A · 2 BP3 · BP7
Research & evidence
Population frequency
gnomAD v4.1 screenshot
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1 screenshot
gnomAD v2.1
v4.1
This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 3.93187e-05; MAF= 0.00393%, 63/1602290 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the South Asian population (AF= 0.00055164; MAF= 0.05516%, 49/88826 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 0.00042809.
v2.1
This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 9.10355e-05; MAF= 0.00910%, 25/274618 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the South Asian population (AF= 0.000621547; MAF= 0.06215%, 18/28960 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 0.00040121.
🇨🇦 CA
Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.
Allele frequency by ancestry
three datasets · side by side
gnomAD v4.1
0.0039% · 63 / 1,602,290
0 hom · FAF 0.043%
South Asian
49 / 88,826
0.055%
Remaining individuals
3 / 61,940
0.0048%
African/African American
2 / 74,286
0.0027%
European (non-Finnish)
9 / 1,174,820
0.00077%
+ 6 not observed (Admixed American, European (Finnish), Amish, East Asian, Middle Eastern, Ashkenazi Jewish)
gnomAD v2.1
0.0091% · 25 / 274,618
0 hom · FAF 0.04%
South Asian
18 / 28,960
0.062%
European (non-Finnish)
6 / 126,106
0.0048%
African/African American
1 / 24,678
0.0041%
+ 5 not observed (Admixed American, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European (Finnish), Remaining individuals)
gnomAD Canada 🇨🇦
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
ClinVar screenshot
ClinVar
This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (1 clinical laboratory). (ClinVarID = 3786390)
SpliceAI screenshot
In silico
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.01). REVEL score = 0.603. BayesDel score = 0.189466.
Functional / OncoKB screenshot
Functional Unknown Oncogenic Effect
OncoKB did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant; gene-level curated context is available for reviewer follow-up. RAD51B, a DNA repair protein involved in homologous recombination, is altered by mutation in various cancer types.
OncoKB ↗
COSMIC screenshot
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots screenshot
Cancer hotspots
Somatic evidence Not in COSMIC / hotspots
COSMIC
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV108918756, n = 1 times).
Hotspots
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.
Sources & reference links
8Sources
ClinVar
gnomAD v2.1
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD-Canada
SpliceAI
OncoKB
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots