0%
complete
Final classification
VUS
BP4
POLE
c.6658-19C>G
p.?
unknown · exon 47i

POLE encodes the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase epsilon, the enzyme that replicates the leading strand of DNA during cell division and participates in DNA repair. It contains a proofreading domain that corrects replication errors, keeping the accumulation of mutations in check. Germline mutations in POLE cause polyposis and predispose to colorectal cancer, and are also linked to a rare syndrome of facial dysmorphism, immunodeficiency, livedo, and short stature. Somatic mutations, particularly in the proofreading domain, occur in colorectal and endometrial cancers, where they drive an ultra-mutated tumor phenotype and are associated with better responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

This variant

POLE-related disease is driven by missense changes in the exonuclease proofreading domain, whereas this deep intronic variant alters no amino acid and is predicted to have no effect on splicing, so it does not engage the gene's established disease mechanism. The VUS classification reflects the absence of pathogenic evidence for this variant, supported only by a single benign-supporting signal (BP4).

Transcript
NM_006231.4
HGVS · transcript:coding
NM_006231.4:c.6658-19C>G
GRCh38
chr12:132625013 G>C
GRCh37
chr12:133201599 G>C
Only BP4 (supporting) is met: SpliceAI max delta 0.075 < 0.1; no pathogenic criterion is met, and this single supporting benign criterion satisfies neither the Likely Benign nor the Benign rules, yielding VUS.
Classification rationale
BP4 VUS
POLE c.6658-19C>G unknown · exon 47i

BP4 (Supporting): SpliceAI max delta 0.075 falls below the <0.1 threshold, indicating no predicted splice impact. Overall: VUS - with BP4 the only criterion met, no benign or pathogenic combination rule is satisfied, so the residual 'all other combinations' rule applies.

BP4 VUS
Gene diagram · NM_006231.4 · variants mapped to exon structure
POLE NM_006231.4
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
Applied criteria · 1 applied · 19 assessed
MetEvidence satisfies this criterion.
Not metEvaluated against available evidence; threshold not reached.
Not assessedApplies in principle, but no evidence was found to evaluate it.
N/ADoesn't apply to this variant type.
Applied · 1
Strength Supporting Moderate Strong Very strong
BP4 supporting Benign
Met (supporting): SpliceAI max delta 0.075 is below the <0.1 threshold, indicating no predicted splice impact.
SpliceAI Lookup result for NM_006231.4:c.6658-19C>G: DS_AG=0.0 (acceptor gain), DS_AL=0.075 (acceptor loss), DS_DG=0.009 (donor gain), DS_DL=0.001 (donor loss), max delta score = 0.075; tool evidence_sentence: 'SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.07).' All four delta scores are far below any published/operating threshold for predicted splice alteration (source: spliceai).Generic ACMG/AMP in-silico calibration (output/generic_acmg_classification_rules.md, registered as generic_acmg_combination_rules, source basis PMID:25741868; SVI-recommended SpliceAI thresholds as reflected in the document, per Walker et al. 2023 referenced therein): SpliceAI max delta <0.1 -> BP4 supporting for intronic/synonymous/non-canonical-splice-position variants; max delta 0.075 satisfies this.POLE local custom framework BP4 rule (REVEL class 'Likely benign' with >=4 benign in silico results for exact missense variants in Supplementary Tables S2/S3) does not apply: c.6658-19C>G is intronic and absent from the missense-only tables, so the framework's generic fallback governs (see vcep_materials.json final_classification_framework and index_guidance).
Assessed · not applied · 2 not met · 17 not assessed
Pathogenic
PVS1 Not met: the variant is not a nonsense, frameshift, or canonical splice-site change, and SpliceAI max delta 0.075 predicts no splicing effect.
PS2 Not assessed: no proband description, parental genotypes, or de novo observations were available.
PS3 Not assessed: no functional study of this exact variant - RNA analysis, minigene assay, or other - was available.
PS4 Not assessed: insufficient evidence was available.
PM2 Not assessed: insufficient evidence was available.
PM3 Not assessed: no affected-proband or allele-phase data was available, and this POLE disorder is autosomal dominant rather than recessive.
PM6 Not assessed: no proband genotype, family testing, or assumed-de-novo observation was available.
PP1 Not assessed: no segregation data - affected-family genotypes or informative meioses - was available.
PP3 Not met: SpliceAI max delta 0.075 is below the >0.2 supporting threshold, indicating no predicted splice impact.
PP4 Not assessed: insufficient evidence was available.
PP5 Not assessed: insufficient evidence was available.
Benign
BA1 Not assessed: insufficient evidence was available.
BS1 Not assessed: insufficient evidence was available.
BS2 Not assessed: insufficient evidence was available.
BS3 Not assessed: no well-established functional study of this exact variant was available to show an absence of damaging effect.
BS4 Not assessed: no affected-family genotypes or non-segregation observations were available.
BP2 Not assessed: no co-occurrence or allele-phase observation with a pathogenic POLE allele was available.
BP5 Not assessed: insufficient evidence was available.
BP6 Not assessed: insufficient evidence was available.
N/A · 8 PS1 · PM1 · PM4 · PM5 · PP2 · BP1 · BP3 · BP7
Research & evidence
Population frequency
gnomAD v4.1 screenshot
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1 screenshot
gnomAD v2.1
v4.1
This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 7.4264e-05; MAF= 0.00743%, 119/1602392 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the East Asian population (AF= 0.00142819; MAF= 0.14282%, 64/44812 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 0.0011474.
v2.1
This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 0.000233588; MAF= 0.02336%, 65/278268 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the East Asian population (AF= 0.00297229; MAF= 0.29723%, 59/19850 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 0.00227514.
🇨🇦 CA
This variant is present in gnomAD-Canada v1.0 (AF= 0.0007057546145494029, 13/18420 alleles, homozygotes = 0).
Allele frequency by ancestry
three datasets · side by side
gnomAD v4.1
0.0074% · 119 / 1,602,392
0 hom · FAF 0.11%
East Asian
64 / 44,812
0.14%
Remaining individuals
43 / 62,104
0.069%
Admixed American
7 / 59,918
0.012%
African/African American
2 / 74,814
0.0027%
South Asian
1 / 90,750
0.0011%
European (non-Finnish)
2 / 1,170,258
0.00017%
+ 4 not observed (European (Finnish), Amish, Middle Eastern, Ashkenazi Jewish)
gnomAD v2.1
0.023% · 65 / 278,268
0 hom · FAF 0.23%
East Asian
59 / 19,850
0.3%
Remaining individuals
1 / 7,110
0.014%
Admixed American
3 / 35,166
0.0085%
African/African American
1 / 24,638
0.0041%
South Asian
1 / 30,364
0.0033%
+ 3 not observed (Ashkenazi Jewish, European (Finnish), European (non-Finnish))
gnomAD Canada 🇨🇦
0.071% · 13 / 18,420
0 hom · FAF 0.46%
indel · split
East Asian
11 / 1,338
0.82%
Remaining individuals
2 / 1,138
0.18%
+ 7 not observed (African/African American, Latino/Admixed American, Ashkenazi Jewish, European (Finnish), Middle Eastern, European (non-Finnish), South Asian)
ClinVar screenshot
ClinVar
This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (5 clinical laboratories) and as Benign (1 clinical laboratory). (ClinVarID = 246255)
SpliceAI screenshot
In silico
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.07).
Functional No data
No calibrated functional assay or RNA evidence was identified for this variant.
OncoKB ↗
COSMIC screenshot
COSMIC
Somatic evidence
COSMIC
This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).
Hotspots
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant cancer hotspot.
COSMIC ↗
Literature · how each cited paper was used
1papers cited
Each card is an audit: what was searched, what was found, whether it names the variant, which criteria it fed, and why. 1 further PMID triaged but not cited — see Sources & references.
Rule & framework references · cited for criterion definitions, not variant evidence
25741868 ↗ Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
Sources & reference links
7Sources
ClinVar
gnomAD v2.1
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD-Canada
SpliceAI
OncoKB
COSMIC
Triaged references · 1 PMID not cited in assessment
28492532 ↗ Sherloc: a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG-AMP variant classification criteria. CLINVAR