The APOL1 NM_003661.4:c.1164_1169del (NP_003652.2:p.(Asn388_Tyr389del)) in-frame deletion variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC). Experimental evidence: Deletion of N388/Y389 prevented SRA binding and enabled in-vitro lysis of T. b. rhodesiense in recombinant APOL1 assays. Based on available guidelines, this variant is considered to be a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS).
Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is uncertain. Select a step to read what it means.
This variantScenario
BenignPathogenic
Uncertain.The recorded classification is uncertain significance.
In plain language
Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.
Words with a dotted underline have a short definition. Hover or tap them.
About APOL1
APOL1 encodes apolipoprotein L1, a secreted HDL-associated protein involved in lipid transport and reverse cholesterol transport. Certain inherited APOL1 variants increase the risk of chronic kidney disease, including focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and HIV-associated nephropathy, particularly in people with recent African ancestry. APOL1 is not established as a cancer-predisposition gene or a central driver of cancer.
LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes.
Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a
confident-looking classification can still be wrong.
Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence
before relying on any call.
01The reasoning
How it was classified
The recorded framework is Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 with ClinGen SVI recommendations. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.
Recorded applied criteria
The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.
Met at supporting strength: deletion of N388/Y389 prevented SRA binding and enabled in-vitro lysis of T. b. rhodesiense in recombinant APOL1 assays.
PM4Supporting
PM4 · supporting
Met: the confirmed 6-bp in-frame deletion removes Asn388-Tyr389, producing a two-residue protein-length reduction outside an identified repeat region.
Benign criteria applied · 0
No benign criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.
Recorded classification: Uncertain significance
VUS: PS3 (supporting) plus PM4 (supporting) do not satisfy any generic ACMG/AMP pathogenic, likely pathogenic, benign, or likely benign combination rule.
02The sources
Evidence at a glance
Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1
Population frequency
11,305 / 1,612,914 alleles
gnomAD v4.1: 11,305 / 1,612,914 alleles. Recorded AF 0.00700905. Recorded homozygote count 748.
gnomAD v2.1
This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 0.0130731; MAF= 1.30731%, 3662/280118 alleles, homozygotes = 226) and has highest observed frequency in the African/African American population (AF= 0.140185; MAF= 14.01846%, 3402/24268 alleles, homozygotes = 224); grpmax FAF= 0.135632.
gnomAD-Canada
This variant is present in gnomAD-Canada v1.0 (AF= 0.007057546145494028, 130/18420 alleles, homozygotes = 8).
ACMG/AMP criteria under Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 with ClinGen SVI recommendations, with the data and sources behind each one.
28 criteria with recorded statuses: 2 met · 5 not met · 11 not assessed · 10 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.
No PS2, PM6, PP1, or BS4 evidence can be assigned because the available evidence contains cohort-level APOL1 risk-allele studies but no proband-level trio testing, family pedigree, informative meioses, or affected-relative segregation data.
The exact APOL1 G2 deletion shows case-control enrichment, but the computed exact-variant allele-frequency OR is approximately 1.69, below the generic PS4 threshold of >5.0.
No individual phenotype, alternate molecular diagnosis, or qualifying ClinVar expert-panel classification is documented for the remaining criteria.
PP3 and BP4 are both not applicable because this is an in-frame protein-length-changing deletion, not a missense, intronic, synonymous, or splice-region variant within the governing computational paths.
Population evidence demonstrates that APOL1 c.1164_1169del is a common African-ancestry G2 risk allele, not a rare disease allele: non-cancer grpmax FAF is 0.13536118 in gnomAD v2.1 and 0.13269198 in gnomAD v3.1, with numerous homozygotes.
The high frequency cannot be converted directly into BA1 or BS1 under the supplied generic defaults because published evidence supports a recessive, incomplete or low-penetrance APOL1 kidney-disease risk phenotype and the required maximum-credible-frequency inputs are unavailable.
PM2 is excluded by the observed population frequencies, while BS2 is not applicable because the full-penetrance early-age condition is not met.
No criteria match.
Met · 2
PS3SupportingACMG_2015Met at supporting strength: deletion of N388/Y389 prevented SRA binding and enabled in-vitro lysis of T. b. rhodesiense in recombinant APOL1 assays.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
PS3 is met at supporting strength. The exact APOL1 G2 allele corresponding to NM_003661.4:c.1164_1169del (p.Asn388_Tyr389del) was tested in recombinant-protein and plasma trypanolysis assays with comparator proteins and parasite controls. The study reports that deletion of N388/Y389 was necessary and sufficient to prevent SRA binding and confer in-vitro lysis of T. b. rhodesiense, while the protein did not lyse T. b. gambiense. This is a reproducible, biologically relevant alteration of APOL1 function, but the evidence is not a validated clinical diagnostic assay and does not directly establish kidney-disease mechanism for this individual variant, so full strong PS3 is not assigned.
Rule
PS3: Well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies supportive of a damaging effect on the gene or gene product.
Evidence considered
Genovese et al. 2010, Results, Figure 3C and Table 1: the exact APOL1 G2 allele (rs71785313; delN388/Y389, equivalent to p.(N388_Y389del)) was evaluated in association analyses and in-vitro functional assays.
Genovese et al. 2010, recombinant ApoL1 assay: deletion of N388/Y389 was necessary and sufficient to prevent SRA interaction and confer lysis of T. b. rhodesiense in vitro; T. b. gambiense was not lysed.
The assay context included recombinant APOL1 proteins and plasma trypanolysis testing against T. b. brucei, T. b. rhodesiense, and T. b. gambiense, providing biological controls and relevant comparator conditions.
Still missing
No validated clinical diagnostic-laboratory assay or independent replication specifically evaluating this exact deletion was identified.
The functional assay establishes altered trypanolytic activity but does not directly quantify the variant's kidney-disease mechanism.
PM4SupportingACMG_2015Met: the confirmed 6-bp in-frame deletion removes Asn388-Tyr389, producing a two-residue protein-length reduction outside an identified repeat region.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
NM_003661.4:c.1164_1169del is a confirmed 6-bp in-frame deletion in the relevant MANE transcript, producing NP_003652.2:p.(Asn388_Tyr389del) and removing two amino acids from the protein. The variant is in exon 6 and is not a stop-loss change. The available evidence characterizes the affected APOL1 G2 region and does not identify the deleted segment as a repetitive protein region; therefore the generic PM4 definition for an in-frame deletion in a non-repeat region is met at supporting strength.
Rule
PM4: Protein length changes due to in-frame deletions/insertions in a non-repeat region or stop-loss variants.
Evidence considered
VariantValidator normalization confirms NM_003661.4:c.1164_1169del in exon 6 with protein consequence NP_003652.2:p.(Asn388_Tyr389del).
PMID:21997394 describes G2 as a 6-base-pair in-frame deletion, N388del:Y389del, corresponding to this protein consequence.
PMID:20647424 describes deletion of N388/Y389 as the APOL1 G2 allele and reports functional effects of the deleted segment; no source identifies the segment as a repetitive region.
PS4ACMG_2015Not met: the exact G2 deletion had an approximate OR 1.69 (95% CI 1.17-2.45), below the PS4 OR >5.0 threshold.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
PS4 is not met. PMID:20647424 directly studied the exact APOL1 G2 deletion, c.1164_1169del/p.(N388_Y389del), in 205 African-American FSGS cases and 180 controls and reported G2 allele frequencies of 23% versus 15%. Treating these rounded allele frequencies as approximate counts gives a case-control OR of 1.69 with an approximate Wald 95% CI of 1.17-2.45; I computed this OR and CI from the reported frequencies and cohort sizes. The reported OR 10.5 (95% CI 6.0-18.4) was for two APOL1 risk alleles versus zero or one, not for this exact variant alone. The governing PS4 threshold is OR >5.0 with a confidence interval excluding 1.0, so the exact-variant estimate does not satisfy PS4. PMID:21997394 also supports recessive association of G2 in case-control cohorts but does not provide an exact-variant OR exceeding 5.0 for the single G2 allele.
Rule
The prevalence of the variant in affected individuals is significantly increased compared to the prevalence in controls. ... Note 1: Relative risk (RR) or odds ratio (OR), as obtained from case-control studies, is >5.0 and the confidence interval around the estimate of RR or OR does not include 1.0.
Evidence considered
Genovese et al. 2010 (PMID:20647424), Results paragraph and Table 1: exact G2 deletion rs71785313/c.1164_1169del was present at 23% in 205 FSGS cases and 15% in 180 African-American controls; the paper separately reports OR=10.5, 95% CI 6.0-18.4, for two APOL1 risk alleles versus zero or one.
Computed from the reported rounded allele frequencies and cohort sizes: approximate allele counts 94.3/410 in cases and 54/360 in controls, OR=1.6926 and approximate Wald 95% CI=1.1696-2.4495.
Kopp et al. 2011 (PMID:21997394), case-control analysis: G2 is the exact 6-bp N388del:Y389del variant; G2 was associated with disease in a recessive model, while a single G2 copy was not significantly associated.
Still missing
The extracted paper text reports rounded allele frequencies rather than exact G2 allele counts, so the calculated CI is approximate.
PM2ACMGNot met: gnomAD non-cancer AF is 0.95% in v2.1 exomes and 3.96% in v3.1 genomes, both above the 0.01% PM2 threshold.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
The variant is not absent or extremely rare in controls. The governing non-cancer sources report AF 0.00952617 with 131 homozygotes in gnomAD v2.1 exomes and AF 0.03957584 with 405 homozygotes in gnomAD v3.1 genomes. Both frequencies are far above the generic PM2 supporting threshold of 0.0001, so PM2 is not met.
Rule
PM2 (supporting): <= 0.0001 — SVI recommendation to downgrade PM2 to Supporting (ClinGen SVI 2020) (PMID:25741868).
Evidence considered
gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes report AF 0.00952617 (2232/234302 alleles) and 131 homozygotes.
gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes report AF 0.03957584 (5852/147868 alleles) and 405 homozygotes.
The supplied generic PM2 calibration is <= 0.0001; both observed non-cancer allele frequencies exceed it by orders of magnitude.
PP5ACMG_2015Not met: ClinVar shows no exact-variant expert-panel Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic classification, only conflicting non-expert submissions.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
PP5 is not met. ClinVar record 6081 has no expert-panel submissions and instead contains conflicting laboratory and aggregate assertions, including risk factor, Pathogenic, Likely benign, and Benign classifications. Under the supplied generic rule, ordinary laboratory submissions, aggregate labels, and non-expert assertions cannot trigger PP5.
Rule
Reputable source recently reports variant as pathogenic, but the evidence is not available to the laboratory to perform an independent evaluation.
Evidence considered
ClinVar variation 6081: expert_panels is empty; review status is criteria provided, conflicting classifications; submissions include Pathogenic from two laboratories but no expert-panel classification.
BP3ACMG_2015Not met: the 6-bp deletion removes Asn388-Tyr389, a functionally characterized APOL1 G2 segment rather than an established repeat without known function.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
The variant is an in-frame deletion, but BP3 requires an in-frame deletion in a repetitive region without a known function. The deleted APOL1 G2 segment, Asn388-Tyr389, has been directly characterized in association and functional studies, including effects on SRA interaction and parasite lysis, so the required absence of known function is not satisfied.
Rule
BP3: In frame-deletions/insertions in a repetitive region without a known function.
Evidence considered
VariantValidator normalization confirms the exact in-frame deletion NM_003661.4:c.1164_1169del, producing NP_003652.2:p.(Asn388_Tyr389del).
PMID:20647424 reports that deletion of N388/Y389 was necessary and sufficient to prevent SRA interaction and confer in-vitro lysis of Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense, establishing known functional relevance.
PMID:21997394 identifies the same 6-bp deletion as the APOL1 G2 risk allele; the evidence does not establish the deleted segment as a repetitive region without known function.
BP6ACMG_2015Not met: ClinVar has no exact-variant expert-panel Benign or Likely benign classification, despite individual laboratory submissions.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
BP6 is not met. ClinVar record 6081 has no expert-panel submissions. Although individual laboratories submitted Benign and Likely benign classifications, the supplied generic rule restricts BP6 to an exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel benign or likely benign classification; ordinary laboratory submissions and aggregate labels cannot trigger BP6.
Rule
Reputable source recently reports variant as benign, but the evidence is not available to the laboratory to perform an independent evaluation.
Evidence considered
ClinVar variation 6081: expert_panels is empty; review status is criteria provided, conflicting classifications; Benign and Likely benign are reported only as individual-laboratory submissions.
PS2ACMG_2015Not assessed: no proband-level de novo observation, confirmed maternity and paternity, or family-history information is documented.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
No case-level evidence documents that the APOL1 c.1164_1169del variant is de novo, confirms both maternity and paternity, establishes the proband's disease phenotype, or excludes a family history. The available literature concerns cohort-level APOL1 G2 risk-allele associations and does not provide parental testing for this proband.
Rule
De novo (both maternity and paternity confirmed) in a patient with the disease and no family history.
Evidence considered
PMID:21997394 reports APOL1 G2 association in case-control cohorts and describes the c.1164_1169del-equivalent deletion, but does not report de novo status or parental testing for this proband.
PMID:25993319 evaluates APOL1 coding variants in a 1,437-person sequencing cohort and does not provide a proband-specific de novo trio or maternity/paternity confirmation.
No source in the reviewed case evidence documents both parental genotypes, confirmed maternity and paternity, or absence of family history for this case.
Still missing
Proband-level clinical phenotype and disease diagnosis
Molecular testing results for both biological parents
PM3ACMG_2015Not assessed: recessive APOL1 disease is reported, but no affected-proband observation demonstrates this variant in trans with a pathogenic variant or confirms phase.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
PM3 is applicable because APOL1-associated kidney disease is described as recessive and the variant is an in-frame coding deletion, but the available evidence does not document an affected proband carrying this variant in trans with a pathogenic APOL1 variant. The literature describes G2-associated disease primarily with two APOL1 risk alleles or with G1, and population data show homozygotes, but neither establishes the required pathogenic-variant trans relationship or parental testing/phase for this case.
Rule
For recessive disorders, detected in trans with a pathogenic variant ... This requires testing of parents (or offspring) to determine phase.
Evidence considered
PMID:21997394 reports the exact APOL1 G2 in-frame deletion (N388del:Y389del) and describes disease association when present in two copies or with G1; it does not provide case-specific parental testing or a documented trans phase for this case.
PMID:20647424 reports the exact G2 deletion and greater renal-disease risk with two risk alleles, but does not establish a pathogenic APOL1 variant in trans with this variant in an affected proband.
gnomAD v2.1 reports 226 homozygotes and gnomAD v4.1 reports 748 homozygotes for the variant; homozygote counts do not establish the required trans relationship with a pathogenic variant.
The governing PM3 definition requires a recessive-disorder observation in trans with a pathogenic variant and phase determination by parental or offspring testing.
Still missing
Affected-proband observations with this variant and a pathogenic APOL1 variant are not documented.
Parental or offspring testing establishing trans phase is not documented.
The pathogenicity of any proposed partner APOL1 variant is not documented in an eligible trans observation.
PM6ACMG_2015Not assessed: no proband-specific assumed de novo observation is reported, even though parental maternity and paternity confirmation is absent.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
No case-level evidence documents an assumed de novo occurrence of APOL1 c.1164_1169del in a patient with the disease. The available publications are cohort studies without a proband-specific de novo observation or parental testing information, so PM6 cannot be applied.
Rule
Assumed de novo, but without confirmation of paternity and maternity.
Evidence considered
PMID:21997394 reports cohort-level association of the APOL1 G2 deletion with kidney disease but does not identify a proband-specific assumed de novo event.
PMID:25993319 reports cohort sequencing and risk-genotype analyses but does not document a de novo case for this variant.
No source in the reviewed case evidence reports the variant as de novo in an individual patient.
Still missing
Proband-level clinical phenotype and disease diagnosis
PP1ACMG_2015Not assessed: no family pedigree or segregation data show the variant co-segregating with disease in multiple affected relatives.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
No family pedigree or genotype-phenotype segregation data are provided for APOL1 c.1164_1169del. The reviewed APOL1 publications are case-control or cohort studies and do not report multiple affected family members carrying the variant, so no segregation strength can be assigned.
Rule
Co-segregation with disease in multiple affected family members in a gene definitively known to cause the disease. Note: May be used as stronger evidence with increasing segregation data.
Evidence considered
PMID:21997394 uses case-control cohorts of African American cases and controls and does not report family co-segregation across multiple affected relatives.
PMID:25993319 uses a large sequencing cohort of cases and controls and does not provide a family pedigree, informative meioses, or variant segregation analysis for this deletion.
No source in the reviewed case evidence supplies affected-relative genotypes linked to documented disease phenotypes.
Still missing
Family pedigree and phenotypic status of relatives
Genotypes of affected and unaffected relatives
Number of informative meioses
Confirmation that relatives have the relevant disease phenotype
PP4ACMG_2015Not assessed: no individual patient phenotype or family history is provided to establish a highly specific single-etiology disease presentation.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
PP4 cannot be assessed because the case materials do not provide an individual patient's phenotype or family history showing a highly specific disease presentation. Literature describing APOL1-associated FSGS or HIV-associated nephropathy is population-level evidence and cannot substitute for the patient's phenotype.
Rule
Patient’s phenotype or family history is highly specific for a disease with a single genetic etiology.
Still missing
Individual clinical phenotype and family history are not available.
BA1Not assessed: grpmax FAF 13.54% exceeds 5%, but APOL1 G2 is a documented low-penetrance recessive risk allele with conflicting pathogenicity evidence.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
The required filtering frequencies exceed the generic BA1 threshold: gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes report grpmax FAF 0.13536118 and gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes report grpmax FAF 0.13269198, both based on populations with more than 2,000 observed alleles. However, this exact APOL1 G2 deletion is a documented African-ancestry kidney-disease risk allele with a recessive, incomplete or low-penetrance phenotype, and ClinVar classifications are conflicting, including risk factor and pathogenic, low penetrance. Because BA1 is stand-alone and a pathogenic disease association conflicts with a benign frequency conclusion, the generic 5% threshold alone is insufficient to apply BA1; an APOL1-specific maximum-credible-frequency analysis with prevalence, penetrance, and allelic-heterogeneity inputs is unavailable.
Evidence considered
gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes: AF 0.00952617 (2232/234302 alleles), 131 homozygotes, and filtering grpmax FAF 0.13536118 in African/African American ancestry with 22928 observed alleles.
gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes: AF 0.03957584 (5852/147868 alleles), 405 homozygotes, and filtering grpmax FAF 0.13269198; the HGDP:Mandenka point estimate of 0.190476 is based on only 42 alleles and is not used.
ClinVar variation 6081 reports conflicting classifications, including risk factor, Pathogenic, Pathogenic low penetrance, Likely benign, and Benign; no expert-panel submission is present.
PMID:20647424 identifies the exact G2 deletion as a common APOL1 risk allele and reports 23% frequency in FSGS cases versus 15% in controls, with substantially greater risk in individuals carrying two risk alleles.
PMID:21997394 reports the exact G2 deletion at approximately 13% in African-American controls and states that APOL1-associated kidney disease follows a recessive model; a single G2 copy was not significantly associated with disease.
The supplied maximum-credible-frequency guidance cites Whiffin et al. 2017 (PMID:28518168), but the required APOL1-specific prevalence, penetrance, and allelic-heterogeneity inputs are unavailable.
Still missing
An APOL1-specific maximum credible allele-frequency model incorporating disease prevalence, penetrance, and allelic heterogeneity is not available in the supplied evidence.
BS1Not assessed: grpmax FAF 13.54% exceeds 1%, but APOL1 G2 has recessive low-penetrance risk and no maximum-credible-frequency inputs are supplied.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
The required filtering frequencies exceed the generic BS1 default: gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes grpmax FAF is 0.13536118 and gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes grpmax FAF is 0.13269198, both from populations with more than 2,000 observed alleles. Nevertheless, the exact APOL1 G2 allele is an African-ancestry risk allele with a recessive, incomplete or low-penetrance kidney-disease association and substantial allelic heterogeneity. The supplied evidence lacks the disease prevalence, penetrance, inheritance-specific contribution, and allelic-heterogeneity inputs required for a Whiffin maximum-credible-frequency calculation, so the generic 1% default cannot establish BS1.
Evidence considered
gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes: filtering grpmax FAF 0.13536118, based on African/African American data with 22928 observed alleles; the 14.01% point estimate is not substituted for FAF.
gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes: filtering grpmax FAF 0.13269198; the 19.05% HGDP:Mandenka point estimate is based on 42 alleles and is excluded under the 2,000-observed-allele requirement.
The supplied maximum-credible-frequency guidance cites Whiffin et al. 2017 (PMID:28518168); the case evidence lacks the prevalence, penetrance, and allelic-heterogeneity inputs required to calculate that threshold for APOL1 G2.
PMID:20647424 reports G2 association with FSGS and hypertension-attributed ESKD and greater risk for two risk alleles, supporting a recessive risk model rather than a fully penetrant dominant disorder.
PMID:21997394 reports a recessive APOL1 disease model and approximately 13% G2 frequency in African-American controls.
Still missing
Disease prevalence, penetrance, inheritance-specific contribution, and allelic heterogeneity are not sufficiently quantified for a maximum credible allele-frequency calculation.
BS3ACMG_2015Not assessed: available assays show altered APOL1 trypanolytic function, not preserved protein function or splicing.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
BS3 is not assessed because the available functional evidence does not show no damaging effect on APOL1 protein function or splicing. The reviewed study instead reports an altered trypanolytic phenotype for the exact N388/Y389 deletion, and no suitable benign functional assay with validated controls was identified.
Rule
BS3: Well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies show no damaging effect on protein function or splicing.
Evidence considered
Genovese et al. 2010, Figure 3C and surrounding Results: the exact N388/Y389 deletion altered SRA binding and trypanolytic activity rather than demonstrating preserved function.
No reviewed source provided a validated no-damaging-effect assay for NM_003661.4:c.1164_1169del.
Still missing
No well-established benign functional assay demonstrating preserved APOL1 protein function or splicing for this exact deletion was identified.
BS4ACMG_2015Not assessed: no informative affected relatives or family genotypes demonstrate lack of segregation with disease.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
No affected family members, pedigree, or family genotyping results are documented. The available cohort studies do not establish that APOL1 c.1164_1169del fails to segregate with disease in an informative family, so lack of segregation cannot be assessed.
Rule
Lack of segregation in affected members of a family.
Evidence considered
PMID:21997394 reports case-control associations rather than non-segregation within an affected family.
PMID:25993319 reports cohort-level genotype and disease-risk analyses rather than an informative family with affected non-carriers.
No source in the reviewed case evidence documents affected relatives who lack the variant.
Still missing
An informative family with affected members
Phenotype assessment of affected relatives
Genotypes for affected and unaffected relatives
Evaluation for phenocopies or more than one pathogenic variant
BP2ACMG_2015Not assessed: no affected-proband or family data establish this variant in trans with a pathogenic variant or in cis with a pathogenic variant.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
BP2 is applicable to the observed coding variant, but the available evidence does not document either required allelic configuration: this variant in trans with a pathogenic variant in a fully penetrant dominant gene/disorder, or this variant in cis with a pathogenic variant in any inheritance pattern. The reported APOL1 risk-allele observations and population homozygote counts do not establish cis/trans phase with a pathogenic variant.
Rule
Observed in trans with a pathogenic variant for a fully penetrant dominant gene/disorder or observed in cis with a pathogenic variant in any inheritance pattern.
Evidence considered
PMID:21997394 and PMID:20647424 describe APOL1 G2 risk-allele associations, including two-risk-allele observations, but do not document cis or trans phase with a pathogenic variant for this case.
gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1 report homozygotes for the variant, but population homozygote counts do not establish cis or trans phase with a pathogenic variant.
The governing BP2 definition requires either trans observation with a pathogenic variant for a fully penetrant dominant gene/disorder or cis observation with a pathogenic variant in any inheritance pattern.
Still missing
No documented trans observation with a pathogenic variant in a fully penetrant dominant disorder.
No documented cis observation with a pathogenic variant.
Parental or offspring testing establishing phase is not documented.
BP5ACMG_2015Not assessed: no alternate molecular diagnosis is documented for the individual carrying this variant.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
BP5 cannot be assessed because the case materials do not identify an alternate molecular basis for disease in the individual carrying this variant. Population and literature associations do not establish an alternate molecular diagnosis in this case.
Rule
Variant found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease.
Still missing
No patient-level alternate molecular diagnosis or competing pathogenic variant is provided.
Not applicable · 10· recorded as not applicableShow reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴PVS1N/ANot applicable: PVS1 requires a null variant (nonsense, frameshift, canonical splice, start-loss or stop-loss), and this is an in-frame indel.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
PVS1 (ClinGen SVI PVS1 recommendations, PMC6185798, pvs1_generic_framework) applies only to null variant classes — nonsense, frameshift, canonical ±1/2 splice-consensus, translation-initiation-codon loss, and stop-loss variants — each expected to trigger nonsense-mediated decay or otherwise abolish normal protein function. NM_003661.4:c.1164_1169del in APOL1 is an in-frame insertion/deletion of undetermined repeat-region status predicted to produce NP_003652.2:p.(Asn388_Tyr389del). As a result, no null-variant mechanism (nonsense-mediated decay, truncation, or canonical splice disruption) is triggered by this variant class, so PVS1's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. No VCEP criteria specification covers PVS1 for APOL1, so the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 definition applies. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication.
PS1N/ANot applicable: PS1 requires a missense variant, and this is an in-frame indel.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
PS1 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) requires the same amino acid change as a previously established pathogenic variant, evaluated regardless of the underlying nucleotide change. NM_003661.4:c.1164_1169del in APOL1 is an in-frame insertion/deletion of undetermined repeat-region status predicted to produce NP_003652.2:p.(Asn388_Tyr389del). As a result, no altered amino acid exists at this position to compare against any previously established pathogenic missense variant, so PS1's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. No VCEP criteria specification covers PS1 for APOL1, so the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 definition applies. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication.
Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_missense
Evidence considered
Deterministic consequence classification: in_frame_indel_unknown (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
VCEP criterion policy: absent
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules
PM1N/ANot applicable: PM1 requires a missense variant, and this is an in-frame indel.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
PM1 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to a missense variant located in a mutational hot spot and/or a critical, well-established functional domain without benign variation. NM_003661.4:c.1164_1169del in APOL1 is an in-frame insertion/deletion of undetermined repeat-region status predicted to produce NP_003652.2:p.(Asn388_Tyr389del). As a result, no altered residue exists to evaluate for mutational hot-spot or critical-domain membership, so PM1's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. No VCEP criteria specification covers PM1 for APOL1, so the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 definition applies. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication.
Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_missense
Evidence considered
Deterministic consequence classification: in_frame_indel_unknown (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
VCEP criterion policy: absent
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules
PM5N/ANot applicable: PM5 requires a missense variant, and this is an in-frame indel.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
PM5 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) requires a novel missense change at an amino acid residue where a different missense change has previously been determined to be pathogenic. NM_003661.4:c.1164_1169del in APOL1 is an in-frame insertion/deletion of undetermined repeat-region status predicted to produce NP_003652.2:p.(Asn388_Tyr389del). As a result, no missense change exists at this residue to compare against a different pathogenic missense change at the same position, so PM5's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. No VCEP criteria specification covers PM5 for APOL1, so the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 definition applies. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication.
Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_missense
Evidence considered
Deterministic consequence classification: in_frame_indel_unknown (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
VCEP criterion policy: absent
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules
PP2N/ANot applicable: PP2 requires a missense variant, and this is an in-frame indel.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
PP2 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to a missense variant in a gene with a low rate of benign missense variation, where missense variants are a common mechanism of disease. NM_003661.4:c.1164_1169del in APOL1 is an in-frame insertion/deletion of undetermined repeat-region status predicted to produce NP_003652.2:p.(Asn388_Tyr389del). As a result, the gene's missense-constraint properties are irrelevant because no missense change is present to evaluate, so PP2's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. No VCEP criteria specification covers PP2 for APOL1, so the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 definition applies. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication.
Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_missense
Evidence considered
Deterministic consequence classification: in_frame_indel_unknown (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
VCEP criterion policy: absent
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules
PP3N/ANot applicable: this 6-bp in-frame deletion is outside the PP3 missense and intronic, synonymous, or splice-region scope, regardless of SpliceAI max delta 0.001.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
PP3 is not applicable because the variant is a 6-bp in-frame deletion, NM_003661.4:c.1164_1169del, predicted to produce NP_003652.2:p.(Asn388_Tyr389del). The governing generic scope limits PP3/BP4 to missense variants using REVEL or intronic, synonymous, or splice-region variants using SpliceAI; this in-frame protein-length-changing variant is outside both permitted paths. Therefore the available SpliceAI max delta score of 0.001 is not evaluated as PP3 evidence, and no REVEL or SpliceAI result can establish PP3 for this variant.
Rule
PP3: Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect on the gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc.). ... PP3/BP4 apply only to a missense variant, or to a splice-region/intronic variant via the SpliceAI path - never to a frameshift, nonsense, or other truncating/protein-length-changing variant.
Evidence considered
Variant consequence: NM_003661.4:c.1164_1169del is a 6-bp in-frame deletion predicted to produce NP_003652.2:p.(Asn388_Tyr389del).
Generic computational path: PP3/BP4 use REVEL only for missense variants and SpliceAI only for intronic, synonymous, or splice-region variants; an in-frame protein-length-changing variant is outside these paths.
SpliceAI result recorded for the variant: max delta score 0.001, but it is not criterion evidence because the variant is outside PP3 scope.
BS2N/ANot applicable: 131 and 405 homozygotes are observed, but APOL1 G2 lacks full early-age penetrance required for BS2.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
The variant is observed in homozygotes, including 131 homozygotes in gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes and 405 in gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes. However, BS2 applies only when a healthy adult observation is relevant to a recessive disorder with full penetrance expected at an early age. APOL1 G2 is associated with a recessive kidney-disease risk phenotype with incomplete, age-dependent, or stress-dependent expression, so population homozygotes do not satisfy BS2's applicability condition.
Rule
Observed in a healthy adult individual for a recessive (homozygous), dominant (heterozygous), or X-linked (hemizygous) disorder, with full penetrance expected at an early age.
PMID:21997394 describes APOL1-associated kidney disease as a recessive model and reports that a single G2 copy was not significantly associated with disease.
PMID:20647424 reports substantially greater renal-disease risk with two APOL1 risk alleles than with zero or one allele, consistent with a genotype-dependent risk phenotype rather than full early-age penetrance.
ClinVar contains risk-factor and pathogenic-low-penetrance descriptions for this variant, so unaffected population homozygotes cannot be treated as healthy adults in a fully penetrant early-onset disorder.
BP1N/ANot applicable: BP1 requires a missense variant, and this is an in-frame indel.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
BP1 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to a missense variant in a gene for which primarily truncating variants are known to cause disease. NM_003661.4:c.1164_1169del in APOL1 is an in-frame insertion/deletion of undetermined repeat-region status predicted to produce NP_003652.2:p.(Asn388_Tyr389del). As a result, the gene's truncating-variant mechanism is irrelevant because no missense change is present to evaluate, so BP1's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. No VCEP criteria specification covers BP1 for APOL1, so the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 definition applies. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication.
Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_missense
Evidence considered
Deterministic consequence classification: in_frame_indel_unknown (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
VCEP criterion policy: absent
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules
BP4N/ANot applicable: this 6-bp in-frame deletion is outside the BP4 missense and intronic, synonymous, or splice-region scope, despite SpliceAI max delta 0.001.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
BP4 is not applicable because the variant is a 6-bp in-frame deletion, NM_003661.4:c.1164_1169del, predicted to produce NP_003652.2:p.(Asn388_Tyr389del). The governing generic scope limits PP3/BP4 to missense variants using REVEL or intronic, synonymous, or splice-region variants using SpliceAI; this in-frame protein-length-changing variant is outside both permitted paths. A SpliceAI max delta score of 0.001 therefore cannot support BP4 for this variant, even though it is below the generic SpliceAI BP4 supporting threshold of 0.1.
Rule
BP4: Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc) ... PP3/BP4 apply only to a missense variant, or to a splice-region/intronic variant via the SpliceAI path - never to a frameshift, nonsense, or other truncating/protein-length-changing variant.
Evidence considered
Variant consequence: NM_003661.4:c.1164_1169del is a 6-bp in-frame deletion predicted to produce NP_003652.2:p.(Asn388_Tyr389del).
Generic computational path: PP3/BP4 use REVEL only for missense variants and SpliceAI only for intronic, synonymous, or splice-region variants; an in-frame protein-length-changing variant is outside these paths.
SpliceAI max delta score 0.001 is below the generic BP4 supporting threshold of <=0.1 (Jaganathan et al. 2019, PMID:30661751), but the score is not applicable because this variant is outside BP4 scope.
BP7N/ANot applicable: BP7 requires a synonymous variant, and this is an in-frame indel.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
BP7 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) is defined for a synonymous (silent) variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence and the nucleotide is not highly conserved. NM_003661.4:c.1164_1169del in APOL1 is an in-frame insertion/deletion of undetermined repeat-region status predicted to produce NP_003652.2:p.(Asn388_Tyr389del). As a result, the encoded protein sequence is altered, so the criterion's silent-variant premise does not hold regardless of any splicing prediction, so BP7's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. No VCEP criteria specification covers BP7 for APOL1, so the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 definition applies. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication.
Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_synonymous
Evidence considered
Deterministic consequence classification: in_frame_indel_unknown (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
VCEP criterion policy: absent
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules
Identifiers
Gene
APOL1
Transcript
NM_003661.4
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_003661.4:c.1164_1169del
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_003652.2:p.(Asn388_Tyr389del)
GRCh38
chr22:36265995 AATAATT>A
GRCh37
chr22:36662041 AATAATT>A
Location and type
Exon 6 · in frame indel unknown
ClinVar
6081, 1120175
Gene diagram
Every interpreted variant in APOL1, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_003661.4. Select a row to find it on the plot.
APOL1NM_003661.4
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
Exons
—
Transcript span
—
Strand
—
Variants mapped
—
Source
UCSC ncbiRefSeqCurated
All variants in APOL1—Select a row to find it on the plot; use the link to open its page.
AF 0.007 · 11305 / 1,612,914 alleles · 748 hom · FAF 0.13
African/African American10174 / 74,912
0.14724 hom
Remaining individuals535 / 62,448
0.008617 hom
Admixed American501 / 59,898
0.00847 hom
Middle Eastern16 / 6,056
0.0026
South Asian25 / 90,892
0.00028
European (non-Finnish)54 / 1,179,462
4.6e-05
0 alternate alleles recorded in 4 other groups: European (Finnish), Amish, East Asian, Ashkenazi Jewish.
gnomAD v2.1
AF 0.013 · 3662 / 280,118 alleles · 226 hom · FAF 0.14
African/African American3402 / 24,268
0.14224 hom
Admixed American202 / 35,278
0.00571 hom
Remaining individuals36 / 7,140
0.0051 hom
South Asian10 / 30,358
0.00033
Ashkenazi Jewish1 / 10,206
9.8e-05
European (non-Finnish)11 / 127,950
8.6e-05
0 alternate alleles recorded in 2 other groups: East Asian, European (Finnish).
gnomAD-Canada
AF not recorded · ? / ? alleles
Statements
gnomAD v4.1
This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 0.00700905; MAF= 0.70091%, 11305/1612914 alleles, homozygotes = 748) and has highest observed frequency in the African/African American population (AF= 0.135813; MAF= 13.58127%, 10174/74912 alleles, homozygotes = 724); grpmax FAF= 0.133605.
gnomAD v2.1
This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 0.0130731; MAF= 1.30731%, 3662/280118 alleles, homozygotes = 226) and has highest observed frequency in the African/African American population (AF= 0.140185; MAF= 14.01846%, 3402/24268 alleles, homozygotes = 224); grpmax FAF= 0.135632.
gnomAD-Canada
This variant is present in gnomAD-Canada v1.0 (AF= 0.007057546145494028, 130/18420 alleles, homozygotes = 8).
PP3N/ANot applicable: this 6-bp in-frame deletion is outside the PP3 missense and intronic, synonymous, or splice-region scope, regardless of SpliceAI max delta 0.001.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
PP3 is not applicable because the variant is a 6-bp in-frame deletion, NM_003661.4:c.1164_1169del, predicted to produce NP_003652.2:p.(Asn388_Tyr389del). The governing generic scope limits PP3/BP4 to missense variants using REVEL or intronic, synonymous, or splice-region variants using SpliceAI; this in-frame protein-length-changing variant is outside both permitted paths. Therefore the available SpliceAI max delta score of 0.001 is not evaluated as PP3 evidence, and no REVEL or SpliceAI result can establish PP3 for this variant.
Rule
PP3: Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect on the gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc.). ... PP3/BP4 apply only to a missense variant, or to a splice-region/intronic variant via the SpliceAI path - never to a frameshift, nonsense, or other truncating/protein-length-changing variant.
Evidence considered
Variant consequence: NM_003661.4:c.1164_1169del is a 6-bp in-frame deletion predicted to produce NP_003652.2:p.(Asn388_Tyr389del).
Generic computational path: PP3/BP4 use REVEL only for missense variants and SpliceAI only for intronic, synonymous, or splice-region variants; an in-frame protein-length-changing variant is outside these paths.
SpliceAI result recorded for the variant: max delta score 0.001, but it is not criterion evidence because the variant is outside PP3 scope.
BP4N/ANot applicable: this 6-bp in-frame deletion is outside the BP4 missense and intronic, synonymous, or splice-region scope, despite SpliceAI max delta 0.001.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
BP4 is not applicable because the variant is a 6-bp in-frame deletion, NM_003661.4:c.1164_1169del, predicted to produce NP_003652.2:p.(Asn388_Tyr389del). The governing generic scope limits PP3/BP4 to missense variants using REVEL or intronic, synonymous, or splice-region variants using SpliceAI; this in-frame protein-length-changing variant is outside both permitted paths. A SpliceAI max delta score of 0.001 therefore cannot support BP4 for this variant, even though it is below the generic SpliceAI BP4 supporting threshold of 0.1.
Rule
BP4: Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc) ... PP3/BP4 apply only to a missense variant, or to a splice-region/intronic variant via the SpliceAI path - never to a frameshift, nonsense, or other truncating/protein-length-changing variant.
Evidence considered
Variant consequence: NM_003661.4:c.1164_1169del is a 6-bp in-frame deletion predicted to produce NP_003652.2:p.(Asn388_Tyr389del).
Generic computational path: PP3/BP4 use REVEL only for missense variants and SpliceAI only for intronic, synonymous, or splice-region variants; an in-frame protein-length-changing variant is outside these paths.
SpliceAI max delta score 0.001 is below the generic BP4 supporting threshold of <=0.1 (Jaganathan et al. 2019, PMID:30661751), but the score is not applicable because this variant is outside BP4 scope.
BP7N/ANot applicable: BP7 requires a synonymous variant, and this is an in-frame indel.
Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning
BP7 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) is defined for a synonymous (silent) variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence and the nucleotide is not highly conserved. NM_003661.4:c.1164_1169del in APOL1 is an in-frame insertion/deletion of undetermined repeat-region status predicted to produce NP_003652.2:p.(Asn388_Tyr389del). As a result, the encoded protein sequence is altered, so the criterion's silent-variant premise does not hold regardless of any splicing prediction, so BP7's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. No VCEP criteria specification covers BP7 for APOL1, so the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 definition applies. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication.
Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_synonymous
Evidence considered
Deterministic consequence classification: in_frame_indel_unknown (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
VCEP criterion policy: absent
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules
Statement
In silico
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00).
9 paper records listed. 2 cited in the classification.
Cited in the classification
Association of trypanolytic ApoL1 variants with kidney disease in African Americans.
Genovese G et al. · 2010 Aug 13
The paper explicitly identifies the variant as the APOL1 G2 allele, a 6-bp in-frame deletion removing N388 and Y389. Recombinant delN388/Y389 ApoL1 showed loss of SRA binding and acquisition of in-vitro lysis of T. b. rhodesiense, while it did not lyse T. b. gambiense.
→ PS3 · supporting→ PM4 · supportingNames this variant
Deletion of N388/Y389 was necessary and sufficient to prevent interaction with SRA and to confer on ApoL1 the ability to lyse T.b. rhodesiense in vitro.
Location Results, functional ApoL1 assays; Figure 3C and Table 1
Context Association analyses in African-American cohorts plus in-vitro lysis assays using human plasma and recombinant ApoL1 proteins against T. b. brucei, T. b. rhodesiense, and T. b. gambiense.
APOL1 genetic variants in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and HIV-associated nephropathy.
Kopp JB et al. · 2011 Nov
The paper explicitly describes this variant as the APOL1 G2 risk allele, a 6-bp in-frame deletion denoted N388del:Y389del, corresponding to NP_003652.2:p.(N388_Y389del) and c.1164_1169del. In African American cohorts, G2 was associated with primary FSGS and HIV-associated collapsing glomerulopathy when present in two copies or with G1; a single G2 copy was not significantly associated with disease. The study is a case-control analysis and does not provide family-level segregation or de novo parental testing for this variant.
G2, which has a 6 base pair (bp) in-frame deletion (N388del:Y389del)
Location Introduction, paragraph 1; Results, Table 2 and surrounding text; Discussion, final paragraph
Context Case-control analysis of 217 African American primary FSGS cases, 54 biopsy-proven HIV-associated collapsing glomerulopathy cases, and African American control groups; APOL1 variants were genotyped using TaqMan assays, including the G2 indel rs71785313.
Other recorded publications
Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
Sequencing rare and common APOL1 coding variants to determine kidney disease risk.
Limou S et al. · 2015
The paper identifies this variant as the APOL1 G2 in-frame deletion (rs71785313). In the 1,437-person U.S. sequencing cohort, G2 was one of the two APOL1 renal-risk alleles associated with FSGS/HIVAN when present in a two-risk-allele genotype. The cohort study does not provide a family pedigree, informative meioses, affected-relative genotypes, or proband-specific de novo parental testing.
When testing the T.b. rhodesiense SRA+ resistant clones, only APOL1 G1 and G2 isoforms could lyse the parasite, indicating that G0, G3, p.K150, and p.K264 isoforms could not overcome the SRA-driven APOL1 restriction.
Results, Association of common and rare APOL1 variants with FSGS/HIVAN; Results, Population genetics of APOL1 variants and haplotypes; Results, Trypanolytic potential of APOL1 isoforms
Transgenic expression of human APOL1 risk variants in podocytes induces kidney disease in mice.
The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.
gnomAD v4.1
This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 0.00700905; MAF= 0.70091%, 11305/1612914 alleles, homozygotes = 748) and has highest observed frequency in the African/African American population (AF= 0.135813; MAF= 13.58127%, 10174/74912 alleles, homozygotes = 724); grpmax FAF= 0.133605.
gnomAD v2.1
This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 0.0130731; MAF= 1.30731%, 3662/280118 alleles, homozygotes = 226) and has highest observed frequency in the African/African American population (AF= 0.140185; MAF= 14.01846%, 3402/24268 alleles, homozygotes = 224); grpmax FAF= 0.135632.
gnomAD-Canada
This variant is present in gnomAD-Canada v1.0 (AF= 0.007057546145494028, 130/18420 alleles, homozygotes = 8).
ClinVar
This variant has been reported in ClinVar as risk factor (2 clinical laboratories) and as Pathogenic (2 clinical laboratories) and as Likely benign (1 clinical laboratory) and as Benign (1 clinical laboratory) and as Likely risk allele (1 clinical laboratory) and as Pathogenic, low penetrance (1 clinical laboratory). (ClinVarID = 6081)
In silico
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00).
Somatic
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).
Cancer Hotspots
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.