0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

ATM c.5890A>G, p.Lys1964Glu

NM_000051.4:c.5890A>G NP_000042.3:p.(Lys1964Glu) Missense · exon 39 View identifiers
Classification
Uncertain significance

Variant description:

The ATM NM_000051.4:c.5890A>G (NP_000042.3:p.(Lys1964Glu)) missense variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV53747696, n = 3 times). Based on available guidelines, this variant is considered to be a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS).

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is uncertain. Select a step to read what it means.

Uncertain.The recorded classification is uncertain significance.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About ATM

ATM encodes a kinase that acts as a master controller of the cellular DNA damage response: it detects double-strand breaks and coordinates DNA repair, cell cycle arrest, or apoptosis through downstream targets including p53, BRCA1, and CHK2. Loss-of-function mutations in both copies of ATM cause ataxia telangiectasia, an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by neurological problems, immune deficiency, and cancer predisposition. ATM functions as a tumor suppressor: individuals with ataxia telangiectasia are prone to childhood lymphomas, leukemias, and breast cancer, while carriers of a single altered copy have increased risk of breast, pancreatic, prostate, and other cancers. Somatic ATM mutations also occur in lymphoid malignancies and solid tumors, and ATM-deficient cancers are often especially sensitive to DNA-damaging treatments.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is ClinGen ATM VCEP v1.6. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 0 Benign evidence criteria: 1
Pathogenic criteria applied · 0

No pathogenic criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.

Benign criteria applied · 1
BP4Supporting
BP4 · supporting

Met at Supporting: REVEL 0.207 is within the VCEP BP4 missense threshold of ≤0.249, with concordant SpliceAI maximum delta 0.021.

Recorded classification: Uncertain significance

VUS: BP4 (supporting) was met, but no ATM VCEP pathogenic or benign combination rule was satisfied.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1
Population frequency
122 / 1,613,438 alleles

gnomAD v4.1: 122 / 1,613,438 alleles. Recorded AF 7.56149e-05. Recorded homozygote count 1.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 9.20576e-05; MAF= 0.00921%, 26/282432 alleles, homozygotes = 1) and has highest observed frequency in the Remaining individuals population (AF= 0.000555247; MAF= 0.05552%, 4/7204 alleles, homozygotes = 1); grpmax FAF= 7.515e-05.

gnomAD-Canada

Not available in gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

No screenshot for this evidence
REVEL score
0.207 recorded score

Recorded REVEL score: 0.207. Refer to the recorded PP3/BP4 rationale for interpretation.

ClinVar submissions
20 reported laboratory submissions

11 Likely benign · 9 Uncertain significance. ClinVar API review status: criteria provided, conflicting classifications.

Context only ClinVar ↗
Functional evidence
Statement recorded

OncoKB did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant; gene-level curated context is available for reviewer follow-up. ATM, a kinase involved in the DNA damage response, is mutated in various solid and hematologic malignancies.

No listed criterion applied OncoKB ↗
COSMIC
Cancer Hotspots
Somatic evidence
3 recorded samples

This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV53747696, n = 3 times).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.

For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under ClinGen ATM VCEP v1.6, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 1 met · 4 not met · 7 not assessed · 16 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

For the requested consequence/length/repeat criteria, the ATM VCEP assigns no applicable evidence: PVS1 is limited to listed null variants, PM4 to stop-loss variants, and BP3 is explicitly not applicable.

Met · 1

BP4 SupportingVCEPMet at Supporting: REVEL 0.207 is within the VCEP BP4 missense threshold of ≤0.249, with concordant SpliceAI maximum delta 0.021. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The VCEP BP4 rule applies to this missense variant. REVEL is 0.207, meeting the missense threshold of ≤.249, so BP4 Supporting is met. SpliceAI maximum delta is also 0.021, meeting the VCEP no-predicted-impact threshold of ≤0.1; this is concordant support within the single BP4 criterion, not a second code. Sun et al. 2025 Table S1 contains the exact c.5890A>G row with REVEL 0.207 and a computational Functional prediction; because DeepATM_predicted=Yes and Confidence=Computational prediction, that table row is corroboration only, not a functional assay result.

VCEP rule
* Missense: REVEL score **≤.249** * Splicing: No predicted impact via splicing (SpliceAI **≤0.1**).
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.6 BP4 rule: missense REVEL ≤.249; splicing no predicted impact by SpliceAI ≤0.1.
  • Local REVEL lookup for NM_000051.4:c.5890A>G / p.(K1964E): REVEL score 0.207.
  • SpliceAI result for NM_000051.4:c.5890A>G: maximum delta score 0.021, which is ≤0.1.
  • Sun et al. 2025 Supplementary Table S1, row ATM c.5890A>G / K1964E: REVEL 0.207, Classification=Functional, Confidence=Computational prediction, DeepATM_predicted=Yes; this is computational corroboration and not an assayed functional result.
Sources

Not met · 4 · evaluated, threshold not reached

PM2 VCEPNot met: the highest gnomAD v4.1 subpopulation AF is 0.0822368%, above the VCEP PM2 threshold of ≤0.001%. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ATM VCEP permits PM2 at Supporting strength when frequency is ≤0.001% in the gnomAD subpopulation with the highest frequency, with an exception only when frequency is >0.001% but n=1 in a single subpopulation and absent from every other subpopulation. The highest all-comers subpopulation frequency is 0.0822368% in gnomAD v4.1 (Middle Eastern, 5/6,080 alleles), and gnomAD v2.1 is 0.0555247% (Remaining individuals, 4/7,204 alleles); neither meets the rarity threshold, and neither is the n=1 exception. The non-cancer v2.1 exome highest subpopulation frequency is 0.0299222% (2/6,684 alleles), also above the threshold. Therefore PM2 is not met.

VCEP rule
Frequency **≤.001%** in gnomAD subpopulation with the highest frequency ... Exception: If >0.001% but n=1 in a single subpopulation (not present in any other subpopulation), that is sufficiently rare and PM2\_supporting would apply.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.6 CSPEC PM2 rule: Frequency ≤.001% in gnomAD subpopulation with the highest frequency. Exception: If >0.001% but n=1 in a single subpopulation (not present in any other subpopulation), that is sufficiently rare and PM2_supporting would apply.
  • gnomAD v4.1 all-comers: highest subpopulation is Middle Eastern, AF 0.000822368 (0.0822368%), 5/6,080 alleles, homozygotes 0; the variant is also observed in other subpopulations.
  • gnomAD v2.1 all-comers: highest subpopulation is Remaining individuals, AF 0.000555247 (0.0555247%), 4/7,204 alleles, homozygotes 1; the variant is also observed in other subpopulations.
  • GNOMAD_V2_1_NON_CANCER exomes: highest subpopulation is Remaining individuals, AF 0.000299222 (0.0299222%), 2/6,684 alleles, homozygotes 1; this is above 0.001% and is not a single-observation-only occurrence.
Sources
PP3 VCEPNot met: REVEL 0.207 is below the VCEP PP3 cutoff >0.7333 and SpliceAI maximum delta 0.021 is below ≥0.2. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The VCEP PP3 rule applies to this missense variant through either the missense REVEL path or the splicing path. REVEL is 0.207, below the required >.7333 threshold, and SpliceAI maximum delta is 0.021, below the required ≥0.2 threshold for missense/in-frame variants. The governing Table S1 row for c.5890A>G reports REVEL 0.207 and classifies the DeepATM result as Functional with Confidence=Computational prediction and DeepATM_predicted=Yes; this is computational corroboration only and does not create an additional PP3 code.

VCEP rule
* Missense: REVEL **\>.7333** * Splicing: Predicted impact via splicing (SpliceAI **≥0.2**) for silent, missense/in-frame and for intronic variants outside of donor and acceptor 1,2 sites.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.6 PP3 rule: missense REVEL >.7333; splicing SpliceAI ≥0.2 for silent, missense/in-frame and intronic variants outside donor and acceptor 1,2 sites.
  • Local REVEL lookup for NM_000051.4:c.5890A>G / p.(K1964E): REVEL score 0.207.
  • SpliceAI result for NM_000051.4:c.5890A>G: DS_AG 0.021, DS_AL 0.0, DS_DG 0.0, DS_DL 0.001; maximum delta score 0.021.
  • Sun et al. 2025 Supplementary Table S1, row ATM c.5890A>G / K1964E: REVEL 0.207, Classification=Functional, Confidence=Computational prediction, DeepATM_predicted=Yes; the row is a prediction rather than an assayed result and is used only as corroboration here.
Sources
BA1 VCEPNot met: gnomAD v4.1 grpmax FAF is 0.032328%, below the VCEP BA1 threshold of >0.5%. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ATM VCEP BA1 rule requires grpmax filtering AF >0.5% in gnomAD. The default all-comers gnomAD v4.1 grpmax FAF is 0.00032328 (0.032328%), and gnomAD v2.1 is 0.00007515 (0.007515%); both are below 0.5%. The available gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exome data also have grpmax FAF 0.00007575 (0.007575%), below the threshold. Therefore BA1 is not met.

VCEP rule
Grpmax Filtering AF **>.5%** in gnomAD
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.6 CSPEC BA1 rule: Grpmax Filtering AF >.5% in gnomAD.
  • gnomAD v4.1 all-comers: grpmax FAF 0.00032328 (0.032328%); total AF 7.56149e-05 (122/1,613,438 alleles), homozygotes 1.
  • gnomAD v2.1 all-comers: grpmax FAF 7.515e-05 (0.007515%); total AF 9.20576e-05 (26/282,432 alleles), homozygotes 1.
  • GNOMAD_V2_1_NON_CANCER exomes: AF 9.72467e-05 (23/236,512 alleles), homozygotes 1; grpmax FAF 7.575e-05 (0.007575%).
Sources
BS1 VCEPNot met: gnomAD v4.1 grpmax FAF is 0.032328%, below the VCEP BS1 threshold of >0.05%. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ATM VCEP BS1 rule requires grpmax filtering AF >0.05% in gnomAD. The default all-comers gnomAD v4.1 grpmax FAF is 0.00032328 (0.032328%), and gnomAD v2.1 is 0.00007515 (0.007515%); both are below 0.05%. The available gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exome grpmax FAF is 0.00007575 (0.007575%), also below the threshold. Therefore BS1 is not met.

VCEP rule
Grpmax Filtering AF **>.05%** in gnomAD
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.6 CSPEC BS1 rule: Grpmax Filtering AF >.05% in gnomAD.
  • gnomAD v4.1 all-comers: grpmax FAF 0.00032328 (0.032328%); highest named subpopulation is Middle Eastern at AF 0.000822368 (0.0822368%).
  • gnomAD v2.1 all-comers: grpmax FAF 7.515e-05 (0.007515%); highest named subpopulation is Remaining individuals at AF 0.000555247 (0.0555247%).
  • GNOMAD_V2_1_NON_CANCER exomes: grpmax FAF 7.575e-05 (0.007575%); highest named subpopulation is Remaining individuals at AF 0.000299222 (0.0299222%).
Sources

Not assessed · 7 · no assessment recorded

PS1 VCEPNot assessed: no ATM_PS1_1.6 table entry or established pathogenic same-amino-acid comparator was found for p.Lys1964Glu. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ATM VCEP permits PS1 for a missense change only when the same amino-acid change has been established as pathogenic and splicing has been ruled out for both alterations. The case is a missense variant, but searching ATM_PS1_1.6.pdf.txt for c.5890A>G, p.Lys1964Glu, and p.K1964E found no governing PS1-table entry, and the available evidence does not identify a previously established pathogenic ATM variant with the same amino-acid change. Therefore PS1 cannot be assessed from the VCEP-governed evidence.

VCEP rule
Use for missense changes as long as splicing is ruled-out for both alterations.
Evidence considered
  • The VCEP case normalization identifies NM_000051.4:c.5890A>G as the missense substitution NP_000042.3:p.(Lys1964Glu) / p.(K1964E).
  • ATM_PS1_1.6.pdf.txt was searched for c.5890A>G, p.Lys1964Glu, and p.K1964E; no entry for this variant was found.
  • The VCEP PS1 guide requires a same-amino-acid pathogenic comparator and, for missense changes, splice defects ruled out for both alterations; neither comparator evidence nor a governing pre-assigned PS1 code is available here.
Still missing
  • No entry for c.5890A>G, p.Lys1964Glu, or p.K1964E was found in ATM_PS1_1.6.pdf.txt; a previously established pathogenic same-amino-acid comparator is not available in the consulted evidence.
Sources
PS3 VCEPNot assessed: the exact S1 row is a computational prediction (DeepATM_predicted=Yes), not a direct assay result, so PS3 cannot be assigned. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing ATM VCEP rule permits PS3 at Supporting when a variant fails to rescue an ATM-specific feature, but not for radiosensitivity alone. The exact variant was not found in the ClinGen HBOP ATM approved functional-assay supplementary tables. Sun et al. 2025 Supplementary Table S1 contains the exact c.5890A>G / K1964E row, but it is marked Classification=Functional, Confidence=Computational prediction, and DeepATM_predicted=Yes; under that file's governing policy, this is a model prediction rather than a direct prime-editing assay and cannot be used as PS3. No qualifying variant-specific ATM functional assay result is therefore available to assess PS3.

VCEP rule
Use when a variant fails to rescue an ATM specifc feature, only (e.g. phosphorylation of ATM-specific targets). Do not use for radiosensitivity-only as that is not a feature specific to ATM deficiency
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.6 PS3 rule: use Supporting when a variant fails to rescue an ATM-specific feature only, and do not use radiosensitivity-only evidence.
  • ClinGen HBOP ATM approved functional-assay supplementary tables: searched c.5890A>G, p.Lys1964Glu, p.K1964E, and K1964E; no exact variant entry was found.
  • Sun et al. 2025 Supplementary Table S1, exact row ATM c.5890A>G / K1964E: Classification=Functional; Confidence=Computational prediction; DeepATM_predicted=Yes. The row is explicitly a prediction and not a direct functional assay result.
Still missing
  • No entry for c.5890A>G, p.Lys1964Glu, p.K1964E, or K1964E was found in clingen_hbop_atm_supplementary_tables_1_and_2_v1.xlsx.txt.
  • The available S1 row is computationally predicted rather than directly assayed; a qualifying variant-specific ATM functional assay result is still needed.
Sources
PS4 VCEPNot assessed: available case-control papers lack variant-specific case/control counts or an effect estimate and p-value for ATM c.5890A>G. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ATM VCEP permits PS4 only for a case-control study with p-value ≤.05 and either an odds ratio, hazard ratio, or relative risk ≥2 or a lower 95% CI ≥1.5. The reviewed case-control papers evaluated ATM at the gene, variant-group, or different-variant level, but none of the available full-text extracts reports NM_000051.4:c.5890A>G (p.Lys1964Glu) in affected cases and controls with variant-specific counts, p-value, effect estimate, or confidence interval. Therefore the VCEP PS4 rule cannot be evaluated for this exact variant; no generic ATM or disease-level enrichment result was substituted.

VCEP rule
Case-control studies; p-value ≤.05 **and** (Odds ratio, hazard ratio, or relative risk ≥2 **or** lower 95% CI ≥1.5).
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.6 PS4 rule: case-control studies require p-value ≤.05 and (odds ratio, hazard ratio, or relative risk ≥2 or lower 95% CI ≥1.5).
  • Tavtigian et al. (PMID:19781682) pooled 1,544 cases and 1,224 controls from seven studies and screened an additional 987 cases and 1,021 controls, but the extracted full text does not mention c.5890A>G or p.K1964E; its evidence is for rare ATM missense subsets at gene level, not this variant.
  • Goldgar et al. (PMID:21787400) analyzed 76 rare ATM variants in 2,570 cases and 1,448 controls, but the extracted full text does not mention c.5890A>G or p.K1964E and reports no significant association for the analyzed variant groups.
  • Haiman et al. (PMID:23555315) analyzed 62 ATM coding variants in a multiethnic case-control study; the reported ATM OR=4.13, p=0.0065 was for a different variant, rs56009889 (p.Phe2307Leu), not c.5890A>G.
  • PMID:17508274 and PMID:26324357 were checked because literature_pass indexed them for PS4; their extracts do not mention ATM c.5890A>G or p.K1964E and provide no variant-specific case-control evidence.
Still missing
  • A case-control report specifically identifying ATM c.5890A>G or p.Lys1964Glu with affected-case and control counts, or a directly reported p-value and effect estimate with 95% CI, is required.
Sources
PM3 VCEPNot assessed: no governing-table entry or qualifying affected-proband, phase, or pathogenic-in-trans observation is available to assign PM3 points. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM3 requires evidence for this recessive ATM disorder that the variant is detected in trans with a pathogenic variant, with the ATM VCEP PM3/BP2 table assigning points according to affected-proband phenotype and phase. The governing table ATM_PM3_BP2_1.6.pdf contains no entry for c.5890A>G, p.Lys1964Glu, p.K1964E, or K1964E, and the available case evidence does not document an affected A-T proband, a pathogenic variant in trans, phase, or qualifying homozygosity. Therefore no PM3 points or strength can be assigned.

VCEP rule
For recessive disorders, detected in trans with a pathogenic variant
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.6 PM3 rule: For recessive disorders, detected in trans with a pathogenic variant.
  • ATM_PM3_BP2_1.6.pdf.txt was searched for c.5890A>G, p.Lys1964Glu, p.K1964E, and K1964E; no exact variant entry was found.
  • The ATM VCEP PM3/BP2 table assigns affected A-T proband points by phenotype confidence and zygosity/phase, but the available case evidence supplies no qualifying affected-proband observation, pathogenic variant in trans, phase result, or qualifying homozygous observation.
Still missing
  • No entry for c.5890A>G, p.Lys1964Glu, p.K1964E, or K1964E was found in ATM_PM3_BP2_1.6.pdf.txt.
  • A qualifying affected A-T proband observation with phenotype classification and the other ATM allele's pathogenicity and phase is still needed.
Sources
PP1 VCEPNot assessed: no affected-relative segregation count or qualifying autosomal-recessive phenotype is documented for the variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ATM VCEP provides PP1 only for an autosomal-recessive condition, with strength determined by segregation in affected relatives: supporting for 1, moderate for 2, and strong for at least 3 affected relatives. The available case evidence does not establish an autosomal-recessive ATM phenotype, identify affected relatives carrying the variant, or provide segregation results, so no PP1 strength can be assigned.

VCEP rule
AR Condition: Segregation in 1 affected relative; AR Condition: Segregation in 2 affected relatives; AR Condition: Segregation in ≥3 affected relatives
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.6 PP1 rules: AR condition; supporting for segregation in 1 affected relative, moderate for 2, and strong for at least 3 affected relatives.
  • Goldgar et al. 2011 (PMID:21787400) evaluated family-based ATM analyses, but the paper does not explicitly mention c.5890A>G or p.(K1964E), so it supplies no variant-specific segregation result for this case.
Still missing
  • Qualifying autosomal-recessive disease context is not documented.
  • No variant-positive affected relatives or segregation count is available.
Sources
BS3 VCEPNot assessed: the exact S1 row is a computational prediction (DeepATM_predicted=Yes), not a direct assay result, so BS3 cannot be assigned. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing ATM VCEP rule permits BS3 at Supporting when a variant rescues either an ATM-specific feature or radiosensitivity, with Moderate requiring rescue of both. The exact variant was not found in the ClinGen HBOP ATM approved functional-assay supplementary tables. Sun et al. 2025 Supplementary Table S1 contains the exact c.5890A>G / K1964E row, but it is marked Classification=Functional, Confidence=Computational prediction, and DeepATM_predicted=Yes; under that file's governing policy, this is a model prediction rather than a direct prime-editing assay and cannot be used as BS3. No qualifying variant-specific ATM functional assay result is therefore available to assess BS3.

VCEP rule
Use when a variant rescues EITHER an ATM specifc feature OR rescues radiosensitivity.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.6 BS3 rule: use Supporting when a variant rescues either an ATM-specific feature or radiosensitivity; Moderate requires rescue of both.
  • ClinGen HBOP ATM approved functional-assay supplementary tables: searched c.5890A>G, p.Lys1964Glu, p.K1964E, and K1964E; no exact variant entry was found.
  • Sun et al. 2025 Supplementary Table S1, exact row ATM c.5890A>G / K1964E: Classification=Functional; Confidence=Computational prediction; DeepATM_predicted=Yes. The row is explicitly a prediction and not a direct functional assay result.
Still missing
  • No entry for c.5890A>G, p.Lys1964Glu, p.K1964E, or K1964E was found in clingen_hbop_atm_supplementary_tables_1_and_2_v1.xlsx.txt.
  • The available S1 row is computationally predicted rather than directly assayed; a qualifying variant-specific ATM functional assay result is still needed.
Sources
BP2 VCEPNot assessed: no governing-table entry or qualifying unaffected-adult observation with a pathogenic variant and documented cis/trans phase is available for BP2. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP2 requires an observation in trans with a pathogenic variant for a fully penetrant dominant disorder or in cis with a pathogenic variant in any inheritance pattern; the ATM VCEP table then assigns benign points for qualifying unaffected non-A-T adults. The governing table ATM_PM3_BP2_1.6.pdf contains no entry for c.5890A>G, p.Lys1964Glu, p.K1964E, or K1964E, and the available case evidence does not document an unaffected adult, a pathogenic or likely pathogenic ATM variant, or cis/trans phase. Therefore no BP2 points or strength can be assigned.

VCEP rule
Observed in trans with a pathogenic variant for a fully penetrant dominant gene/disorder or observed in cis with a pathogenic variant in any inheritance pattern.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.6 BP2 rule: Observed in trans with a pathogenic variant for a fully penetrant dominant gene/disorder or observed in cis with a pathogenic variant in any inheritance pattern.
  • ATM_PM3_BP2_1.6.pdf.txt was searched for c.5890A>G, p.Lys1964Glu, p.K1964E, and K1964E; no exact variant entry was found.
  • The ATM VCEP BP2 table assigns points per unaffected non-A-T adult according to pathogenic/likely pathogenic co-occurrence and phase, but the available case evidence supplies no qualifying unaffected-adult observation, co-occurring pathogenic/likely pathogenic ATM variant, or cis/trans phase result.
Still missing
  • No entry for c.5890A>G, p.Lys1964Glu, p.K1964E, or K1964E was found in ATM_PM3_BP2_1.6.pdf.txt.
  • A qualifying unaffected adult observation, the co-occurring ATM variant's pathogenicity, and documented cis/trans phase are still needed.
Sources
Not applicable · 16· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PVS1 N/ANot applicable: c.5890A>G is a missense substitution, whereas the VCEP PVS1 rule is limited to listed null variant classes. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PVS1 is not applicable. The VCEP defines PVS1 for a null variant—nonsense, frameshift, canonical +/-1 or 2 splice-site, initiation-codon, or single/multi-exon deletion—in a gene where loss of function is a known disease mechanism. This variant is NM_000051.4:c.5890A>G (NP_000042.3:p.(Lys1964Glu)/p.(K1964E)), a missense substitution in exon 39, not one of the VCEP-listed null variant classes. The VCEP PVS1 decision-guide text was searched for c.5890A>G, p.Lys1964Glu, and p.K1964E; no variant-specific pre-assigned PVS1 code was found.

VCEP rule
Null variant (nonsense, frameshift, canonical +/-1 or 2 splice sites, initiation codon, single or multi-exon deletion) in a gene where loss of function (LOF) is a known mechanism of disease
Evidence considered
  • Case variant assessment: NM_000051.4:c.5890A>G; NP_000042.3:p.(Lys1964Glu)/p.(K1964E); exon 39; missense consequence.
  • ATM_PVS1_1.6.pdf, page 1: the PVS1 null-variant definition lists nonsense, frameshift, canonical +/-1 or 2 splice sites, initiation codon, and single/multi-exon deletion.
  • ATM_PVS1_1.6.pdf.txt was searched for c.5890A>G, p.Lys1964Glu, and p.K1964E; no variant-specific PVS1 entry was found.
Still missing
  • No entry for c.5890A>G, p.Lys1964Glu, or p.K1964E was found in ATM_PVS1_1.6.pdf.txt.
Sources
cspec ↗vcep_atm_pvs1_1_6 ↗pvs1_variant_assessment
PS2 VCEPNot applicable: the ATM VCEP specification explicitly marks PS2 as Not Applicable. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ATM VCEP specification marks PS2 as Not Applicable; therefore de novo evidence is not evaluated under this framework.

VCEP rule
Not Applicable
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.6 CSPEC entry for PS2: applicability = Not Applicable.
Sources
PM1 VCEPNot applicable: the ATM VCEP prohibits PM1 because benign and pathogenic variants occur in the same domains and hotspots are not well defined. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ATM VCEP marks PM1 not applicable and instructs curators not to use it because benign and pathogenic variants are known within the same domains and germline mutational hotspots are not well defined. The authoritative domain_tables entry for ATM is empty, so no domain-based route overrides the VCEP applicability decision.

VCEP rule
Do not use: Benign and pathogenic variants are known to occur within the same domains and germline mutational hotspots are not well defined at this time
Evidence considered
  • The ATM VCEP PM1 entry states: Do not use because benign and pathogenic variants are known to occur within the same domains and germline mutational hotspots are not well defined at this time.
  • vcep_materials.json has no ATM entry in domain_tables (domain_tables is empty).
Sources
PM4 N/ANot applicable: p.Lys1964Glu is a missense substitution and does not create the stop-loss protein-length change required by the VCEP. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM4 is not applicable. The ATM VCEP specifies PM4 for stop-loss variants only. c.5890A>G changes lysine 1964 to glutamate and does not remove a termination codon or change protein length; it is a missense substitution.

VCEP rule
Use for stop-loss variants.
Evidence considered
  • Case normalization: NP_000042.3:p.(Lys1964Glu)/p.(K1964E), a missense substitution with no protein-length change.
  • ATM VCEP CSPEC PM4 entry: PM4 is restricted to stop-loss variants.
Sources
PM5 N/ANot applicable: the ATM VCEP explicitly excludes missense changes from PM5 because same-residue substitutions may be pathogenic or benign. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ATM VCEP explicitly says not to use PM5 for missense changes because multiple amino-acid substitutions at one residue can be pathogenic or benign and current bioinformatic tools cannot reliably distinguish them. This variant is missense, so the VCEP PM5 rule does not apply.

VCEP rule
* Do not use for missense changes: Multiple amino acid substitutions at the same residue can be pathogenic or benign and bioinformatic tools cannot yet confidently distinguish them
Evidence considered
  • The ATM VCEP PM5 instructions state not to use PM5 for missense changes; the variant is annotated as a missense substitution at p.Lys1964Glu.
Sources
PM6 VCEPNot applicable: the ATM VCEP specification explicitly marks PM6 as Not Applicable. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ATM VCEP specification marks PM6 as Not Applicable; therefore assumed de novo evidence is not evaluated under this framework.

VCEP rule
Not Applicable
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.6 CSPEC entry for PM6: applicability = Not Applicable.
Sources
PP2 VCEPNot applicable: the ATM VCEP states that ATM lacks a defined low rate of benign missense variation. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ATM VCEP marks PP2 not applicable and instructs curators not to use it because ATM does not have a defined low rate of benign missense variation. The variant's missense consequence does not change that VCEP-level applicability decision.

VCEP rule
Do not use: ATM does not have a defined low rate of missense benign variation.
Evidence considered
  • The ATM VCEP PP2 entry states: Do not use: ATM does not have a defined low rate of missense benign variation.
Sources
PP4 VCEPNot applicable: the VCEP excludes PP4 for hereditary breast cancer and incorporates autosomal-recessive phenotype evidence into PM3/BP2. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The VCEP expressly excludes PP4 for this framework: for autosomal dominant disease, breast cancer has genetic heterogeneity and no readily distinguishing hereditary features; for autosomal recessive disease, phenotype evidence is incorporated into the ATM PM3/BP2 table rather than used as a separate PP4 line.

VCEP rule
Autosomal Dominant: do not use as breast cancer is a disease with multiple genetic etiology (genetic heterogeneity) and there are no features that can readily distinguish hereditary from sporadic causes. Autosomal Recessive: do not use as a separate line of evidence. Such evidence is built into the Ataxia Telangiectasia PM3|BP2 table
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.6 states that PP4 is not used for autosomal dominant breast cancer because hereditary and sporadic causes cannot be readily distinguished, and is not used separately for autosomal recessive disease because it is built into the PM3/BP2 table.
Sources
PP5 VCEPNot applicable: the ATM VCEP prohibits PP5 use, regardless of external reports of pathogenicity. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ATM VCEP marks PP5 not applicable and states that this criterion is not for use as recommended by the ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation VCEP Review Committee. No PP5 assertion was made.

VCEP rule
This criterion is not for use as recommended by the ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation VCEP Review Committee.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.6 marks PP5 as not applicable for this VCEP and instructs that the criterion is not for use.
Sources
BS2 VCEPNot applicable: the ATM VCEP excludes BS2 because ATM has incomplete penetrance. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ATM VCEP marks BS2 not applicable and states: Do not use: ATM has incomplete penetrance. The observed homozygotes in gnomAD therefore do not permit application of BS2 under this VCEP.

VCEP rule
Do not use: ATM has incomplete penetrance.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.6 CSPEC BS2 instructions: Do not use: ATM has incomplete penetrance.
  • gnomAD observations include one homozygote in v2.1 and one homozygote in v4.1, but these observations cannot be used for BS2 under the VCEP applicability rule.
Sources
BS4 VCEPNot applicable: the ATM VCEP specification explicitly marks BS4 as Not Applicable. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ATM VCEP specification marks BS4 as Not Applicable; therefore non-segregation evidence is not evaluated under this framework.

VCEP rule
Not Applicable
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.6 CSPEC entry for BS4: applicability = Not Applicable.
Sources
BP1 VCEPNot applicable: the ATM VCEP excludes BP1 because missense pathogenic variants are known for ATM. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ATM VCEP marks BP1 not applicable and instructs curators not to use it because missense pathogenic variants are known for ATM. The variant is missense, but BP1 is prohibited by the gene-specific VCEP rule.

VCEP rule
Do not use: Missense pathogenic variants are known for ATM
Evidence considered
  • The ATM VCEP BP1 entry states: Do not use: Missense pathogenic variants are known for ATM.
Sources
BP3 VCEPNot applicable: the ATM VCEP marks BP3 not applicable and instructs that it must not be used; this variant is missense. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP3 is not applicable under the ATM VCEP specification. The CSPEC entry explicitly marks BP3 as not applicable and instructs, "Do not use." The variant is also missense rather than an in-frame deletion or insertion in a repetitive region without a known function.

VCEP rule
Do not use.
Evidence considered
  • ATM VCEP CSPEC BP3 entry: applicability is Not applicable and the instruction is Do not use.
  • Case consequence: c.5890A>G produces p.Lys1964Glu/p.K1964E, a missense substitution rather than an in-frame insertion or deletion.
Sources
BP5 VCEPNot applicable: the ATM VCEP prohibits BP5 because multiple pathogenic variants can occur without a noticeable phenotype difference. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ATM VCEP marks BP5 not applicable and instructs that it should not be used because cases with multiple pathogenic variants have been observed without a noticeable phenotype difference and ATM's low penetrance makes additional pathogenic variants more frequent.

VCEP rule
Do not use: Cases with multiple pathogenic variants have been observed with no noticeable difference in phenotype (e.g. BRCA1 and BRCA2). In addition, ATM has low penetrance and will naturally occur with other pathogenic variants more frequently due to higher tolerance/presence in the general population.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.6 BP5 instruction: do not use BP5 for ATM because multiple pathogenic variants have been observed without a noticeable phenotype difference and ATM has low penetrance.
Sources
BP6 VCEPNot applicable: the ATM VCEP prohibits BP6 use, regardless of external reports of benignity. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ATM VCEP marks BP6 not applicable and states that this criterion is not for use as recommended by the ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation VCEP Review Committee. No BP6 assertion was made from ClinVar or other reputable-source classifications.

VCEP rule
This criterion is not for use as recommended by the ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation VCEP Review Committee.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.6 marks BP6 as not applicable for this VCEP and instructs that the criterion is not for use.
Sources
BP7 N/ANot applicable: c.5890A>G is a missense exon 39 variant, whereas the VCEP BP7 scope is synonymous or deep intronic variants. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP7 is limited by the VCEP to synonymous and deep intronic variants, including variants beyond but not including +7 at donor sites and -21 at acceptor sites. NM_000051.4:c.5890A>G is a missense variant in exon 39, so BP7 is outside its governing scope regardless of the SpliceAI result.

VCEP rule
* BP7: Use for synonymous and deep intronic variants defined as further than (but not including) +7 and further than (but not including) -21 at donor and acceptor sites, respectively. * BP7(RNA): Observed lack of aberrant RNA defect for silent substitutions and intronic variants. Variable weight applied depending on curator discretion of assay quality.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.6 BP7 scope: synonymous and deep intronic variants beyond (but not including) +7 at donor sites and -21 at acceptor sites; this variant is missense in exon 39.
Sources

Identifiers

Gene
ATM
Transcript
NM_000051.4
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_000051.4:c.5890A>G
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_000042.3:p.(Lys1964Glu)
GRCh38
chr11:108310287 A>G
GRCh37
chr11:108181014 A>G
Location and type
Exon 39 · missense
ClinVar
142126
COSMIC
COSV53747696

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in ATM, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_000051.4. Select a row to find it on the plot.

ATMNM_000051.4
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 122 / 1,613,438 alleles AF 7.56e-05 · 1 homozygotes · FAF 0.000323
gnomAD v2.1 26 / 282,432 alleles AF 9.21e-05 · 1 homozygotes · FAF 7.51e-05
gnomAD-Canada v1.0 Allele count data not recorded

By genetic ancestry

gnomAD v4.1

AF 7.6e-05 · 122 / 1,613,438 alleles · 1 hom · FAF 0.00032
Middle Eastern5 / 6,080 0.00082
Admixed American14 / 59,996 0.000231 hom
European (non-Finnish)96 / 1,179,704 8.1e-05
South Asian4 / 91,066 4.4e-05
African/African American2 / 74,920 2.7e-05
Remaining individuals1 / 62,460 1.6e-05
0 alternate alleles recorded in 4 other groups: European (Finnish), Amish, East Asian, Ashkenazi Jewish.

gnomAD v2.1

AF 9.2e-05 · 26 / 282,432 alleles · 1 hom · FAF 7.5e-05
Remaining individuals4 / 7,204 0.000561 hom
Admixed American6 / 35,390 0.00017
South Asian3 / 30,600 9.8e-05
European (non-Finnish)12 / 128,936 9.3e-05
African/African American1 / 24,952 4e-05
0 alternate alleles recorded in 3 other groups: Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European (Finnish).

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 7.56149e-05; MAF= 0.00756%, 122/1613438 alleles, homozygotes = 1) and has highest observed frequency in the Middle Eastern population (AF= 0.000822368; MAF= 0.08224%, 5/6080 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 0.00032328.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 9.20576e-05; MAF= 0.00921%, 26/282432 alleles, homozygotes = 1) and has highest observed frequency in the Remaining individuals population (AF= 0.000555247; MAF= 0.05552%, 4/7204 alleles, homozygotes = 1); grpmax FAF= 7.515e-05.

gnomAD-Canada

Not available in gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

SpliceAI and Pangolin

SpliceAI acceptor lossat +6 bp
0.000
SpliceAI acceptor gainat -29 bp
0.021
SpliceAI donor lossat -61 bp
0.001
SpliceAI donor gainat -270 bp
0.000
Pangolin splice lossmagnitude shown
-0.002
Pangolin splice gain
0.026

Other predictors

REVEL
0.207
BayesDel
-0.387

How the predictions were used

BP4 SupportingVCEPMet at Supporting: REVEL 0.207 is within the VCEP BP4 missense threshold of ≤0.249, with concordant SpliceAI maximum delta 0.021. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The VCEP BP4 rule applies to this missense variant. REVEL is 0.207, meeting the missense threshold of ≤.249, so BP4 Supporting is met. SpliceAI maximum delta is also 0.021, meeting the VCEP no-predicted-impact threshold of ≤0.1; this is concordant support within the single BP4 criterion, not a second code. Sun et al. 2025 Table S1 contains the exact c.5890A>G row with REVEL 0.207 and a computational Functional prediction; because DeepATM_predicted=Yes and Confidence=Computational prediction, that table row is corroboration only, not a functional assay result.

VCEP rule
* Missense: REVEL score **≤.249** * Splicing: No predicted impact via splicing (SpliceAI **≤0.1**).
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.6 BP4 rule: missense REVEL ≤.249; splicing no predicted impact by SpliceAI ≤0.1.
  • Local REVEL lookup for NM_000051.4:c.5890A>G / p.(K1964E): REVEL score 0.207.
  • SpliceAI result for NM_000051.4:c.5890A>G: maximum delta score 0.021, which is ≤0.1.
  • Sun et al. 2025 Supplementary Table S1, row ATM c.5890A>G / K1964E: REVEL 0.207, Classification=Functional, Confidence=Computational prediction, DeepATM_predicted=Yes; this is computational corroboration and not an assayed functional result.
Sources
PP3 VCEPNot met: REVEL 0.207 is below the VCEP PP3 cutoff >0.7333 and SpliceAI maximum delta 0.021 is below ≥0.2. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The VCEP PP3 rule applies to this missense variant through either the missense REVEL path or the splicing path. REVEL is 0.207, below the required >.7333 threshold, and SpliceAI maximum delta is 0.021, below the required ≥0.2 threshold for missense/in-frame variants. The governing Table S1 row for c.5890A>G reports REVEL 0.207 and classifies the DeepATM result as Functional with Confidence=Computational prediction and DeepATM_predicted=Yes; this is computational corroboration only and does not create an additional PP3 code.

VCEP rule
* Missense: REVEL **\>.7333** * Splicing: Predicted impact via splicing (SpliceAI **≥0.2**) for silent, missense/in-frame and for intronic variants outside of donor and acceptor 1,2 sites.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.6 PP3 rule: missense REVEL >.7333; splicing SpliceAI ≥0.2 for silent, missense/in-frame and intronic variants outside donor and acceptor 1,2 sites.
  • Local REVEL lookup for NM_000051.4:c.5890A>G / p.(K1964E): REVEL score 0.207.
  • SpliceAI result for NM_000051.4:c.5890A>G: DS_AG 0.021, DS_AL 0.0, DS_DG 0.0, DS_DL 0.001; maximum delta score 0.021.
  • Sun et al. 2025 Supplementary Table S1, row ATM c.5890A>G / K1964E: REVEL 0.207, Classification=Functional, Confidence=Computational prediction, DeepATM_predicted=Yes; the row is a prediction rather than an assayed result and is used only as corroboration here.
Sources
BP7 N/ANot applicable: c.5890A>G is a missense exon 39 variant, whereas the VCEP BP7 scope is synonymous or deep intronic variants. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP7 is limited by the VCEP to synonymous and deep intronic variants, including variants beyond but not including +7 at donor sites and -21 at acceptor sites. NM_000051.4:c.5890A>G is a missense variant in exon 39, so BP7 is outside its governing scope regardless of the SpliceAI result.

VCEP rule
* BP7: Use for synonymous and deep intronic variants defined as further than (but not including) +7 and further than (but not including) -21 at donor and acceptor sites, respectively. * BP7(RNA): Observed lack of aberrant RNA defect for silent substitutions and intronic variants. Variable weight applied depending on curator discretion of assay quality.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen HBOP ATM VCEP v1.6 BP7 scope: synonymous and deep intronic variants beyond (but not including) +7 at donor sites and -21 at acceptor sites; this variant is missense in exon 39.
Sources

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.02). REVEL score = 0.207. BayesDel score = -0.387454.

9 paper records listed. No publication is explicitly linked to an applied criterion in the recorded metadata. None of the listed paper records explicitly indicates that the variant is named.

Recorded publications

  • Contributions of ATM mutations to familial breast and ovarian cancer.
    Thorstenson YR et al. · 2003
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 12810666 ↗
  • Rare, evolutionarily unlikely missense substitutions in ATM confer increased risk of breast cancer.
    Tavtigian SV et al. · 2009
    The paper reports pooled ATM case-control analyses showing increased breast-cancer risk for subsets of rare, evolutionarily unlikely missense substitutions, but it does not mention ATM c.5890A>G or p.K1964E.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 19781682 ↗
    Quoted passage
    There was stronger evidence that a subset of rare, evolutionarily unlikely missense substitutions confer increased risk.

    Abstract

  • Rare variants in the ATM gene and risk of breast cancer.
    Goldgar DE et al. · 2011
    The paper does not explicitly mention ATM c.5890A>G or p.(K1964E). It reports family-based analyses of selected ATM variants, but the provided text contains no variant-specific segregation result for p.(K1964E).
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 21787400 ↗
    Quoted passage
    Of the 76 ATM variants that passed QC, 29 were observed one or more times in the analyzed set of 2,570 cases and 1,448 controls.

    Results, first paragraph; Penetrance analysis in families; Loss of heterozygosity analysis

  • Genome-wide testing of putative functional exonic variants in relationship with breast and prostate cancer risk in a multiethnic population.
    Haiman CA et al. · 2013
    The paper reports a breast-cancer association for a different ATM missense variant, rs56009889 (p.Phe2307Leu), but does not mention ATM c.5890A>G or p.K1964E.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 23555315 ↗
    Quoted passage
    The most significant associations in these genes (p<0.05) were noted with non-synonymous variants: rs56009889 in ATM (Phe2307Leu, OR=4.13, p=0.0065)

    Results, High-risk genes, breast cancer analysis

  • Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 25741868 ↗
  • Risk assessment and genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors.
    The paper does not mention ATM c.5890A>G or p.K1964E and provides no variant-specific or ATM-specific case-control evidence.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 17508274 ↗
    Quoted passage
    The BRCA1 and BRCA2 protein products are involved in the cellular response to DNA damage and double-stranded DNA repair.

    Clinical Overview

  • American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic and genomic testing for cancer susceptibility.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 20065170 ↗
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology Policy Statement Update: Genetic and Genomic Testing for Cancer Susceptibility.
    The paper mentions ATM only as an example of a gene linked to recessive disorders and does not mention c.5890A>G or p.K1964E.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 26324357 ↗
    Quoted passage
    Highlight potential reproductive implications to family of mutations in genes linked to recessive disorders (eg, ATM, Fanconi’s [BRCA2, PALB2], NBN, BLM)

    Table 1, Components of Informed Consent and Pretest Education in Clinical Cancer Genetics

  • Sherloc: a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG-AMP variant classification criteria.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 28492532 ↗

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 7.56149e-05; MAF= 0.00756%, 122/1613438 alleles, homozygotes = 1) and has highest observed frequency in the Middle Eastern population (AF= 0.000822368; MAF= 0.08224%, 5/6080 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 0.00032328.

gnomAD v2.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 9.20576e-05; MAF= 0.00921%, 26/282432 alleles, homozygotes = 1) and has highest observed frequency in the Remaining individuals population (AF= 0.000555247; MAF= 0.05552%, 4/7204 alleles, homozygotes = 1); grpmax FAF= 7.515e-05.

gnomAD-Canada

Not available in gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

ClinVar

This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (11 clinical laboratories) and as Uncertain significance (9 clinical laboratories). (ClinVarID = 142126)

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.02). REVEL score = 0.207. BayesDel score = -0.387454.

Functional

OncoKB did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant; gene-level curated context is available for reviewer follow-up. ATM, a kinase involved in the DNA damage response, is mutated in various solid and hematologic malignancies.

Somatic

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV53747696, n = 3 times).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.