Reasoning
The PTEN VCEP permits PS4 from a sufficiently powered case-control study with odds ratio >2 for a PHTS component phenotype, p<0.05, and a 95% confidence-interval lower limit >1.5, or from summed Cleveland Clinic or pediatric phenotype specificity scores. No case-control odds ratio, p value, confidence interval, Cleveland Clinic score, pediatric phenotype score, or independent-proband tally for NM_000314.8:c.562T>G is available. The reviewed papers describe PTEN/PHTS phenotype associations but do not mention this variant, so they cannot establish PS4 for it. The VCEP also states that PS4 may not be applied with PP4, and this variant has no applicable PP4 path because PP4 is not applicable under this VCEP.
VCEP rule
**PTEN EP Commentary:** This criterion is unlikely to be used in this manner for a condition as rare as PHTS. However, if sufficiently powered, a case-control study finding an odds ratio >2 for a PHTS component phenotype with p\<0.05 and 95% confidence interval with lower limit >1.5, this criteria may be applied. However, this criterion may _not_ be applied in combination with PP4.
* Use 2: Patient’s phenotype or family history is highly specific for a disease with a single genetic etiology.
**PTEN EP Specifications:** This criterion may not be applied if BS1 applies. Phenotype specificity scores are added across independent probands and calculated as follows:
Adults:
* 1 point per proband with Cleveland Clinic (CC) score ≥ 30 (Tan 2011)
* 0.5 points per proband with CC score of 25-29.
Children:
* 1 point per proband with pediatric phenotype score ≥ 5 (please see supplementary information in manuscript for scoring rubric).
* 0.5 points per proband with pediatric phenotype score of 4, but autism/developmental delay/intellectual disability may not contribute to the score.
PS4\_Very Strong: Probands with specificity score ≥16.
PS4: Probands with specificity score of 4-15.5.
PS4\_Moderate: Probands with specificity score of 2-3.5.
PS4\_Supporting: Proband(s) with specificity score of 1-1.5.
Evidence considered
- The case evidence identifies NM_000314.8:c.562T>G as a PTEN missense variant, p.(Tyr188Asp).
- No case-control enrichment statistics or variant-specific phenotype specificity scores were provided.
- PMID:23519317 reports 15 of 318 individuals with autism spectrum disorders had pathogenic PTEN mutations and macrocephaly was present in all positive cases, but the paper does not mention c.562T>G or p.(Y188D); this is gene/disease-level context, not variant-specific PS4 evidence.
- PMID:25190698 describes PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome and approximately 80% penetrance, but does not mention c.562T>G or p.(Y188D); this is not variant-specific PS4 evidence.
- PMID:27854360 lists PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome among secondary-finding conditions, but does not mention c.562T>G or p.(Y188D); this is not variant-specific PS4 evidence.
- PMID:28492532 does not mention PTEN or c.562T>G and provides no variant-specific case or phenotype evidence.
Still missing
- Variant-specific case-control odds ratio, p value, and 95% confidence interval are unavailable.
- Cleveland Clinic scores or pediatric phenotype scores for independent probands carrying this variant are unavailable.
Sources