Analysis in progress
Initialising…
0%
complete
This report is still being assembled — sections appear as each stage finishes. It isn't final yet.
TSC1
Final classification
Likely Benign
TSC1 c.1022C>T · p.Pro341Leu
TSC1

PM2 (supporting): This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and present in gnomAD v4.1 at extremely low frequency (AF=0.000062%, 10/1,610,852 alleles, 0 homozygotes), well below the PM2 threshold of less than 0.1%.

Gene
TSC1
Transcript
NM_000368.4
HGVS · transcript:coding
NM_000368.4:c.1022C>T
Consequence
N/A
GRCh38
chr9:132911460 G>A
GRCh37
chr9:135786847 G>A
Basis gene-specific framework lacked a usable explicit final combination framework, so generic ACMG/AMP 2015 final-combination rules were applied as fallback; applied criteria: PM2 supporting, BS2 supporting, BP4 supporting; combination = 1 supporting + 2 supporting benign, which maps to Likely Benign.
gene-specific framework lacked a usable explicit final combination framework, so generic ACMG/AMP 2015 final-combination rules were applied as fallback; applied criteria: PM2 supporting, BS2 supporting, BP4 supporting; combination = 1 supporting + 2 supporting benign, which maps to Likely Benign.
Classification rationale
PM2 BS2BP4 Likely Benign
TSC1 c.1022C>T

PM2 (supporting): This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and present in gnomAD v4.1 at extremely low frequency (AF=0.000062%, 10/1,610,852 alleles, 0 homozygotes), well below the PM2 threshold of less than 0.1%.1 BS2 (supporting): This variant is observed in 10 heterozygous individuals in gnomAD v4.1. TSC is a dominant disorder with near-complete penetrance and early childhood onset; observation in a population database of presumably healthy adults is inconsistent with a fully penetrant pathogenic variant.2 BP4 (supporting): BayesDel score 0.161 is in the benign range. REVEL score 0.496 is borderline (just below 0.5 pathogenic threshold). SpliceAI max delta 0.02 predicts no splicing impact. Multiple computational lines of evidence suggest no deleterious effect.3 PVS1 not applicable: Variant is a missense substitution (p.Pro341Leu), not a null variant eligible for PVS1 assessment.4 PM1 not met: This variant does not lie in a statistically significant mutational hotspot per cancerhotspots.org. PM5 not met: No same-residue pathogenic missense comparator variants were identified.5 PS3 not met: No functional studies have been reported for this variant. OncoKB reports Unknown Oncogenic Effect.6 PP3 not met: REVEL 0.496 is borderline; BayesDel 0.161 is benign; SpliceAI max delta 0.02 shows no splice impact. In silico tools do not converge on a damaging prediction.7 PP5 not met: ClinVar review status is 1-star (criteria provided, single submitter), not 3-star expert panel. Classification is Uncertain significance with mixed submitters.8 BP6 not met: ClinVar review status is 1-star, not 3-star expert panel. A single submitter classifies as Benign, insufficient for BP6.9 No publications reviewed contained variant-specific evidence for NM_000368.4:c.1022C>T. All PMIDs are guideline/review papers that do not mention this variant.10

PM2 + BS2 + BP4 Likely Benign
Gene diagram · NM_000368.4 · variants mapped to exon structure
TSC1 NM_000368.4
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
Applied criteria · 3 applied · 19 assessed
Applied · 3
Strength Supporting Moderate Strong Very strong
PM2 supporting Pathogenic
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and present in gnomAD v4.1 at extremely low frequency (AF=0.000062%, 10/1,610,852 alleles, 0 homozygotes), well below the PM2 threshold of less than 0.1%.
gnomAD v2.1: absent. gnomAD v4.1: AF=6.2e-06 (0.00062%)10/1610
BS2 supporting Benign
This variant is observed in 10 heterozygous individuals in gnomAD v4.1 (0 homozygotes). TSC is a dominant disorder with near-complete penetrance and early childhood onset. Observation in a population database of presumably healthy adults is inconsistent with a fully penetrant pathogenic variant, supporting a benign interpretation.
gnomAD v4.1: 10 heterozygous carriers0 homozygotesall in European (non-Finnish) population. Total AN=1
BP4 supporting Benign
BayesDel score 0.161 is in the benign range (threshold greater than 0.27 for pathogenic). REVEL score 0.496 is borderline, just below the 0.5 pathogenic threshold. SpliceAI max delta 0.02 predicts no splicing impact. Multiple computational lines of evidence suggest no deleterious effect.
BayesDel 0.161 (benignbelow 0.27 pathogenic threshold). REVEL 0.496 (borderline-benignbelow 0.5 threshold). SpliceAI max delta 0.02 (no splicing impact).
Assessed · not applied
Pathogenic
PS2 No de novo occurrence (maternity and paternity confirmed) has been reported for this variant.
PS3 No functional studies have been reported for this variant.
PS4 No case-control or cohort data demonstrate enrichment of this variant in affected individuals.
PM1 This variant does not lie in a statistically significant mutational hotspot per cancerhotspots.org.
PM5 No same-residue pathogenic missense comparator variants were identified in automated PM5 candidate harvesting.
PM6 No de novo observation (maternity and paternity unconfirmed) has been reported for this variant.
PP1 No co-segregation data available.
PP2 No missense constraint data (z-score) was available to confirm TSC1 has a low rate of benign missense variation where missense is a common disease mechanism.
PP3 REVEL score 0.496 is borderline/equivocal, BayesDel score 0.161 is in the benign range, and SpliceAI max delta is 0.02 (no splice impact).
PP4 No patient phenotype or family history information was provided for assessment of phenotypic specificity.
PP5 ClinVar review status is 'criteria provided, single submitter' (1-star), not 3-star expert panel.
Benign
BA1 gnomAD v4.1 allele frequency is 0.000062%, far below the BA1 threshold of greater than 1%.
BS1 gnomAD v4.1 allele frequency is 0.000062%, below the BS1 threshold of greater than 0.3%.
BS3 No functional studies demonstrating no deleterious effect have been reported for this variant.
BS4 No non-segregation data available for this variant.
BP1 Although TSC1 loss of function is a known disease mechanism, both truncating and missense pathogenic variants are well-documented in TSC1.
BP2 No observation in trans with a pathogenic variant has been reported for this dominant disorder.
BP5 No alternative molecular basis for disease has been identified that would explain the phenotype independent of this variant.
BP6 ClinVar review status is 'criteria provided, single submitter' (1-star), not 3-star expert panel.
N/A · 3 PVS1 · PS1 · BP7
Research & evidence
Population frequency · supports benign
gnomAD v4.1 screenshot
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1 screenshot
gnomAD v2.1
v4.1
This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 6.20789e-06; MAF= 0.00062%, 10/1610852 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population (AF= 8.49495e-06; MAF= 0.00085%, 10/1177170 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 4.3e-06.
v2.1
Absent from gnomAD v2.1.
🇨🇦 CA
Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.
Allele frequency by ancestry
three datasets · side by side
gnomAD v4.1
0.00062% · 10 / 1,610,852
0 hom · FAF 0.00043%
European (non-Finnish)
10 / 1,177,170
0.00085%
+ 9 not observed (Remaining individuals, Admixed American, European (Finnish), Amish, East Asian, Middle Eastern, South Asian, Ashkenazi Jewish, African/African American)
gnomAD v2.1
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
gnomAD Canada 🇨🇦
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
ClinVar screenshot
ClinVar
This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (3 clinical laboratories) and as Benign (1 clinical laboratory). (ClinVarID = 659997)
SpliceAI screenshot
In silico
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.02). REVEL score = 0.496. BayesDel score = 0.161359.
Functional / OncoKB screenshot
Functional Unknown Oncogenic Effect
OncoKB did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant; gene-level curated context is available for reviewer follow-up. TSC1, a scaffold protein, is frequently altered by mutation in bladder cancer.
OncoKB ↗
COSMIC screenshot
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots screenshot
Cancer hotspots
Somatic evidence Not in COSMIC / hotspots
COSMIC
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).
Hotspots
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.
Sources & reference links
8Sources
ClinVar
gnomAD v2.1
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD-Canada
SpliceAI
OncoKB
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots
Triaged references · 7 PMIDs not cited in assessment
25741868 ↗ Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. CLINVAR
20301399 ↗ Tuberous Sclerosis Complex. CLINVAR
23519317 ↗ Clinical genetics evaluation in identifying the etiology of autism spectrum disorders: 2013 guideline revisions. CLINVAR
23788249 ↗ ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. CLINVAR
25394175 ↗ A practice guideline from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the National Society of Genetic Counselors: referral indications for cancer predisposition assessment. CLINVAR
27854360 ↗ Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. CLINVAR
28492532 ↗ Sherloc: a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG-AMP variant classification criteria. CLINVAR