0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

BCL2 c.302G>T, p.Gly101Val

NM_000633.3:c.302G>T NP_000624.2:p.(Gly101Val) Missense · exon 2 View identifiers
Classification
Uncertain significance

Variant description:

The BCL2 NM_000633.3:c.302G>T (NP_000624.2:p.(Gly101Val)) missense variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC). Experimental evidence: Independent biochemical, structural, cell-line, and patient-cell assays showed approximately 180-fold reduced venetoclax affinity for BCL2 Gly101Val. Based on available guidelines, this variant is considered to be a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS).

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is uncertain. Select a step to read what it means.

Uncertain.The recorded classification is uncertain significance.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About BCL2

BCL2 encodes a protein on the outer membrane of mitochondria that helps cells survive by blocking programmed cell death. Abnormally high BCL2 activity is strongly associated with follicular lymphoma and is also seen in other blood cancers, where it can help malignant cells evade death. BCL2 is therefore an important cancer-promoting gene, particularly in hematologic malignancies.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 with ClinGen SVI recommendations. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 2 Benign evidence criteria: 0
Pathogenic criteria applied · 2
PS3Supporting
PS3 · supporting

Met at supporting: independent biochemical, structural, cell-line, and patient-cell assays showed approximately 180-fold reduced venetoclax affinity for BCL2 Gly101Val.

PM2Supporting
PM2 · supporting

Met at supporting strength: the variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1, below the <=0.0001 PM2 threshold.

Benign criteria applied · 0

No benign criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.

Recorded classification: Uncertain significance

VUS: PS3 supporting plus PM2 supporting are the only applied criteria; two supporting criteria do not satisfy a generic ACMG pathogenic or benign rule.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

No screenshot for this evidence
REVEL score
0.492 recorded score

Recorded REVEL score: 0.492. Refer to the recorded PP3/BP4 rationale for interpretation.

No listed criterion applied
No screenshot for this evidence
ClinVar submissions
Not recorded

A ClinVar laboratory submission summary was not recorded.

Context only ClinVar ↗
Functional evidence
Statement recorded

OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Likely Gain-of-function; curated oncogenicity label: Likely Oncogenic.

COSMIC
Cancer Hotspots
Somatic evidence
No matching record reported

This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.

For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 with ClinGen SVI recommendations, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 2 met · 9 not met · 13 not assessed · 4 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

Only the requested codon, residue, domain, and gene-mechanism criteria were adjudicated.

PM1 was not assessed because structural evidence supports a drug-binding region, but critical germline-domain status and absence of benign variation across the region were not established.

PS1 was not met because the same amino-acid change was reported for acquired treatment resistance rather than as a previously established pathogenic variant; PM5, PP2, and BP1 lacked the required gene- or comparator-level evidence.

No VCEP covers BCL2 in this case; the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 definitions govern.

The two full-text variant-specific papers were reviewed for PS4, PP4, and BP5; both concern acquired venetoclax resistance in CLL rather than a germline phenotype case-control comparison, a phenotype-specific diagnosis, or an alternate molecular basis for this case.

PP5 and BP6 were restricted to exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel classifications; ClinVar returned no exact-variant record.

Both criteria are evaluated on the missense REVEL path only under the supplied generic rules; REVEL 0.492 is neither deleterious nor tolerated at the supplied supporting thresholds.

Met · 2

PS3 SupportingACMG_2015Met at supporting: independent biochemical, structural, cell-line, and patient-cell assays showed approximately 180-fold reduced venetoclax affinity for BCL2 Gly101Val. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PS3 is met at supporting strength. Two independent, variant-specific studies evaluated BCL2 Gly101Val (NM_000633.3:c.302G>T; p.Gly101Val) using complementary functional approaches. PMID:30514704 reports reduced venetoclax sensitivity in primary patient CLL cells and engineered cell lines, approximately 180-fold reduced venetoclax binding in surface plasmon resonance assays, impaired venetoclax-mediated displacement of BAX and BAK, and a selective growth advantage during venetoclax exposure. PMID:31160589 independently reports structural and surface-plasmon-resonance evidence that G101V reduces venetoclax affinity from 0.018 nM for wild-type BCL-2 to 3.2 nM, approximately 180-fold, while largely preserving binding to BIM and BAX BH3 peptides; the E152A double mutant largely restored affinity, providing a mechanistic control. These concordant biochemical, structural, cellular, and patient-cell results support an altered damaging drug-response function for the BCL2 gene product. The evidence is not calibrated above supporting because the provided records do not establish reproducibility and robustness in a clinical diagnostic laboratory setting, and the assays primarily establish venetoclax resistance rather than a general disease mechanism.

Rule
Well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies supportive of a damaging effect on the gene or gene product.
Evidence considered
  • PMID:30514704, Abstract; Results sections on genomic assessment and functional characterization: the exact Gly101Val variant was acquired in seven patients with CLL progression, reduced venetoclax sensitivity in primary patient CLL cells and engineered cell lines, reduced venetoclax affinity by approximately 180-fold in surface plasmon resonance assays, impaired displacement of BAX and BAK, and conferred a selective growth advantage during venetoclax exposure.
  • PMID:31160589, Results sections on structures of BCL-2 mutants and the role of E152: G101V reduced venetoclax affinity from 0.018 nM for wild-type BCL-2 to 3.2 nM, approximately 180-fold, while largely preserving BIM and BAX BH3-peptide binding; E152A largely restored affinity in the G101V background.
  • The two papers provide concordant, variant-specific biochemical, structural, cell-line, and patient-cell evidence for altered BCL2 drug-response function, but the supplied evidence does not document clinical-diagnostic-laboratory validation.
Still missing
  • No evidence was provided that these functional assays were validated and shown to be reproducible and robust in a clinical diagnostic laboratory setting.
  • The studies establish venetoclax resistance and altered drug binding, but do not directly establish the variant's effect in a germline disease model.
Sources
PM2 SupportingACMGMet at supporting strength: the variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1, below the <=0.0001 PM2 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM2 is met at supporting strength. NM_000633.3:c.302G>T (BCL2 p.Gly101Val) is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, with separate reported absence from the gnomAD v2.1 and v3.1 non-cancer subsets. The variant is therefore below the supplied generic PM2 supporting threshold of <=0.0001.

Rule
Absent from controls (or at extremely low frequency if recessive) in Exome Sequencing Project, 1000 Genomes or Exome Aggregation Consortium.
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v2.1 reports the variant as absent.
  • gnomAD v4.1 reports the variant as absent.
  • The evidence reports absence from GNOMAD_V2_1_NON_CANCER using exomes-only figures and GNOMAD_V3_1_NON_CANCER using genomes-only figures; no non-cancer source-specific governing rule is present, but both corroborate the all-comers absence.
  • The supplied generic PM2 supporting threshold is <=0.0001, identified with the ClinGen SVI recommendation to downgrade PM2 to supporting (PMID:25741868).
Sources

Not met · 9 · evaluated, threshold not reached

PS1 ACMG_2015Not met: p.Gly101Val is reported as an acquired venetoclax-resistance mutation, but no previously established pathogenic same-amino-acid variant is documented. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The variant is BCL2 p.Gly101Val (c.302G>T). The two directly relevant publications report this same amino-acid change as an acquired venetoclax-resistance mutation in treated CLL, not as a previously established pathogenic variant. ClinVar has no record for the queried variant, so the evidence does not satisfy PS1's requirement for a previously established pathogenic same-amino-acid variant.

Rule
Same amino acid change as a previously established pathogenic variant regardless of nucleotide change. ... Caveat: Beware of changes that impact splicing rather than at the amino acid/protein level.
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar search for BCL2 NM_000633.3:c.302G>T returned no result.
  • Roberts et al. (PMID:30514704) reported Gly101Val emerging during venetoclax treatment in seven patients with CLL progression and characterized drug resistance, not germline pathogenicity.
  • Labrijn et al. (PMID:31160589) studied G101V in venetoclax-treated CLL patients and structural binding assays, describing acquired treatment resistance rather than an established pathogenic variant classification.
Sources
PS4 ACMG_2015Not met: the reported 7 progression cases concern acquired venetoclax resistance, not a qualifying germline case-control comparison with OR/RR >5.0 and confidence interval excluding 1.0. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing ACMG/AMP PS4 definition requires a significantly increased prevalence in affected individuals compared with controls; its note specifies OR or RR >5.0 with a confidence interval excluding 1.0. The two variant-specific papers report acquired BCL2 Gly101Val in venetoclax-treated CLL patients with treatment resistance or progression, not a germline disease case-control study establishing phenotype prevalence. PMID:30514704 reports 7 patients with the mutation at progression and no mutation at paired treatment entry, plus absence in 96 venetoclax-naive CLL patients and 301 patients with other B-cell malignancies; these treatment cohorts do not provide a validated affected-versus-unaffected case-control comparison for a BCL2-associated germline disease, and no OR/RR with a qualifying confidence interval can be established for the PS4 disease context. Therefore PS4 is not met.

Rule
The prevalence of the variant in affected individuals is significantly increased compared to the prevalence in controls. ... Relative risk (RR) or odds ratio (OR), as obtained from case-control studies, is >5.0 and the confidence interval around the estimate of RR or OR does not include 1.0.
Evidence considered
  • PMID:30514704 reports Gly101Val acquired at progression in 7 venetoclax-treated CLL patients, absent at study entry, and describes absence in 96 venetoclax-naive CLL patients and 301 patients with other B-cell malignancies; this is a treatment-resistance observation rather than a germline disease case-control study.
  • PMID:31160589 confirms G101V in venetoclax-treated CLL patients who initially responded and later developed CLL-type progression after 19-42 months; it provides clinical treatment-response context, not a qualifying PS4 affected-versus-unaffected disease comparison.
  • The exact-variant ClinVar search returned no result, and gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1 reported the variant absent; neither supplies an affected-case prevalence or a qualifying OR/RR confidence interval.
Sources
PP3 ACMG_2015Not met: missense REVEL 0.492 is below the generic PP3 supporting threshold of 0.644. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The variant is a missense substitution, so the governing generic rule selects the REVEL path only; SpliceAI is not used for PP3 in this situation. REVEL is 0.492, below the generic PP3 supporting threshold of >= 0.644, so PP3 is not met. BayesDel is not used because no generic ACMG-strength calibration is established for it. The threshold is the supplied ClinGen SVI REVEL calibration from Pejaver et al. 2022 (PMID:36413997).

Rule
Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect on the gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc.).
Evidence considered
  • NM_000633.3:c.302G>T is a missense variant, p.(Gly101Val), so REVEL is the sole applicable PP3 predictor path; SpliceAI is not counted.
  • Local REVEL lookup reports 0.492; this is below the supplied generic PP3 supporting cutoff of >=0.644 from the ClinGen SVI REVEL calibration (Pejaver et al. 2022, PMID:36413997).
  • BayesDel score 0.0732744 was not used because the governing generic guidance states that no generic ACMG-strength calibration is established for BayesDel.
Sources
revel
PP5 ACMG_2015Not met: ClinVar has no exact-variant expert-panel pathogenic or likely pathogenic classification, and the OncoKB oncology label is not an eligible PP5 assertion. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PP5 requires a reputable source to recently report the variant as pathogenic when the evidence is unavailable for independent evaluation. The exact-variant ClinVar search found no record, no expert-panel classification, and no pathogenic or likely pathogenic expert-panel assertion. The OncoKB label is Likely Oncogenic and cites functional oncology papers, but it is not an exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel classification and cannot trigger PP5 under the specified generic rule. Therefore PP5 is not met.

Rule
Reputable source recently reports variant as pathogenic, but the evidence is not available to the laboratory to perform an independent evaluation.
Evidence considered
  • The exact-variant ClinVar search returned no result, so there is no ClinVar expert-panel Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic assertion.
  • OncoKB reports Likely Oncogenic for BCL2 G101V, but this is not an exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel classification and is therefore excluded from PP5.
Sources
BA1 ACMG_2015Not met: the variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1, with no grpmax FAF reaching the >=0.05 BA1 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BA1 is not met. NM_000633.3:c.302G>T (BCL2 p.Gly101Val) is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, with corroborating absence in the reported non-cancer subsets. No filtering allele frequency or grpmax FAF is reported, so there is no evidence that the allele frequency reaches the generic stand-alone threshold of >=0.05. The absence of a frequency also avoids a threshold artifact from a small ancestry-specific popmax point estimate.

Rule
Allele frequency is above 5% in Exome Sequencing Project, 1000 Genomes or Exome Aggregation Consortium.
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v2.1 reports the variant as absent; no allele count, allele number, population AF, popmax AF, or grpmax FAF is reported.
  • gnomAD v4.1 reports the variant as absent; no allele count, allele number, population AF, popmax AF, or grpmax FAF is reported.
  • The evidence also reports absence from GNOMAD_V2_1_NON_CANCER and GNOMAD_V3_1_NON_CANCER; no governing VCEP requires a different source because generic ACMG/AMP rules govern this case.
  • The supplied generic BA1 threshold is >=0.05, identified as the ACMG/AMP 2015 stand-alone benign allele-frequency threshold (PMID:25741868).
Sources
BS1 ACMGNot met: the variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1, so no grpmax FAF reaches the generic BS1 threshold of >=0.01. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BS1 is not met. The variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1, with corroborating absence in the reported non-cancer subsets, so no filtering allele frequency or grpmax FAF exceeds the supplied generic default of >=0.01. Because no elevated frequency is present, a maximum-credible-allele-frequency calculation based on prevalence, penetrance, and allelic heterogeneity is not triggered.

Rule
Allele frequency is greater than expected for the disorder.
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v2.1 reports the variant as absent, with no filtering AF or grpmax FAF available.
  • gnomAD v4.1 reports the variant as absent, with no filtering AF or grpmax FAF available.
  • The evidence reports absence from GNOMAD_V2_1_NON_CANCER and GNOMAD_V3_1_NON_CANCER; no source-specific VCEP rule changes the generic default in this case.
  • The supplied generic BS1 default is >=0.01; Whiffin et al. 2017 (PMID:28518168) advises considering maximum credible allele frequency from prevalence, penetrance, and allelic heterogeneity before applying BS1.
Sources
BS3 ACMG_2015Not met: studies showed approximately 180-fold reduced venetoclax affinity and acquired resistance rather than no damaging effect on BCL2 function or splicing. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BS3 is not met. The available variant-specific functional studies do not show no damaging effect on protein function or splicing; instead, they consistently show altered BCL2 function in the venetoclax-response context, including approximately 180-fold reduced venetoclax affinity, reduced drug sensitivity, impaired displacement of pro-apoptotic BAX and BAK, and acquired resistance. No well-established benign functional or splicing result for Gly101Val was identified in the reviewed evidence.

Rule
Well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies show no damaging effect on protein function or splicing.
Evidence considered
  • PMID:30514704, Abstract; Results sections on functional characterization: Gly101Val reduced venetoclax sensitivity in primary patient CLL cells and engineered cell lines, reduced venetoclax binding by approximately 180-fold, impaired displacement of BAX and BAK, and conferred acquired resistance.
  • PMID:31160589, Results sections on structural and binding analyses: G101V reduced venetoclax affinity from 0.018 nM to 3.2 nM, approximately 180-fold, with a mechanistic E152A rescue experiment; this is not evidence of no damaging effect.
Still missing
  • No well-established benign functional or splicing study for BCL2 Gly101Val was provided.
Sources
BP4 ACMG_2015Not met: missense REVEL 0.492 is above the generic BP4 supporting threshold of 0.29. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The variant is a missense substitution, so the governing generic rule selects the REVEL path only; the SpliceAI result cannot substitute for a gray-zone REVEL result. REVEL is 0.492, which is above the generic BP4 supporting cutoff of <= 0.29 and therefore does not support BP4. BayesDel is not used because no generic ACMG-strength calibration is established for it. The threshold is the supplied ClinGen SVI REVEL calibration from Pejaver et al. 2022 (PMID:36413997).

Rule
Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc)
Evidence considered
  • NM_000633.3:c.302G>T is a missense variant, p.(Gly101Val), so REVEL is the sole applicable BP4 predictor path; SpliceAI is not counted.
  • Local REVEL lookup reports 0.492; this is above the supplied generic BP4 supporting cutoff of <=0.29 from the ClinGen SVI REVEL calibration (Pejaver et al. 2022, PMID:36413997), so the gray-zone result does not meet BP4.
  • SpliceAI max delta 0.002 was not used for BP4 because the governing path for a missense variant is REVEL only.
  • BayesDel score 0.0732744 was not used because the governing generic guidance states that no generic ACMG-strength calibration is established for BayesDel.
Sources
revel
BP6 ACMG_2015Not met: ClinVar has no exact-variant expert-panel benign or likely benign classification, and available oncology evidence is not a benign assertion. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP6 requires a reputable source to recently report the variant as benign when the evidence is unavailable for independent evaluation. The exact-variant ClinVar search found no record, no expert-panel classification, and no benign or likely benign expert-panel assertion. The available OncoKB result is Likely Oncogenic rather than benign and is not an eligible ClinVar expert-panel assertion. Therefore BP6 is not met.

Rule
Reputable source recently reports variant as benign, but the evidence is not available to the laboratory to perform an independent evaluation.
Evidence considered
  • The exact-variant ClinVar search returned no result, so there is no ClinVar expert-panel Benign or Likely benign assertion.
  • OncoKB reports Likely Oncogenic, not benign, and is not an exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel classification eligible for BP6.
Sources

Not assessed · 13 · no assessment recorded

PS2 ACMG_2015Not assessed: no documented disease phenotype, family-history assessment, or confirmed maternity and paternity is available to establish a de novo occurrence. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

Not assessed: the available case evidence does not provide a proband disease description, documented absence of family history, or parental testing establishing both maternity and paternity. Therefore, the required evidence for a confirmed de novo occurrence cannot be evaluated.

Still missing
  • Proband disease phenotype and diagnostic evidence
  • Family-history assessment
  • Parental testing confirming both maternity and paternity
  • Variant status in both biological parents
PM1 ACMG_2015Not assessed: Gly101 has strong drug-binding evidence, including approximately 180-fold reduced affinity, but critical germline-domain status and regional benign variation are unestablished. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BCL2 p.Gly101Val lies in the structurally characterized venetoclax-binding pocket of BCL-2. PMID:31160589 directly evaluated the G101V structural change in the P2 pocket and showed approximately 180-fold reduced venetoclax affinity; PMID:30514704 independently demonstrated the same residue's functional effect in patient cells and engineered cell lines. However, the available evidence does not establish that this drug-binding pocket is a critical germline disease domain or demonstrate absence of benign variation across the relevant region. The variant's absence from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1 alone is insufficient for the full generic PM1 requirement.

Rule
Located in a mutational hot spot and/or critical and well-established functional domain (e.g. active site of an enzyme) without benign variation.
Evidence considered
  • PMID:31160589 structurally characterized G101V in the venetoclax-binding P2 pocket and reported venetoclax affinity decreasing from 0.018 nM for wild-type BCL-2 to 3.2 nM for G101V, approximately 180-fold.
  • PMID:30514704 demonstrated reduced venetoclax sensitivity and impaired drug-mediated displacement of BAX and BAK in patient CLL cells and engineered cell lines carrying Gly101Val.
  • The variant was absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1; no benign population observation was available for this variant.
  • vcep_materials.json reported no BCL2 VCEP materials and an empty domain_tables object, so no gene-specific domain list supersedes the generic rule.
Still missing
  • No VCEP-defined BCL2 domain table or gene-specific PM1 specification is available.
  • Evidence establishing the relevant region as a critical germline disease domain and documenting absence of benign variation across that region is unavailable.
Sources
PM3 ACMG_2015Not assessed: no germline parental testing or documented pathogenic variant in trans is available to establish the required phase for a recessive disorder. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No germline affected-proband, parental/offspring testing, phase information, or pathogenic allele in trans was identified for NM_000633.3:c.302G>T (BCL2 p.Gly101Val). The available variant-specific publications describe an acquired somatic mutation in venetoclax-treated CLL, not a germline recessive disorder or a tested trans configuration. Therefore, PM3 cannot be assessed under the required recessive-disorder rule.

Rule
PM3: For recessive disorders, detected in trans with a pathogenic variant...Note: This requires testing of parents (or offspring) to determine phase.
Evidence considered
  • The case evidence identifies BCL2 c.302G>T as a missense variant and provides no germline proband, parent, offspring, segregation, or phase observation.
  • The available variant-specific literature concerns an acquired mutation in venetoclax-treated CLL patients and does not establish germline trans phase or a recessive disorder for this variant.
Still missing
  • A germline recessive disease context for BCL2 is not established in the available evidence.
  • Parental or offspring testing and phase information are unavailable.
  • No pathogenic variant documented in trans with NM_000633.3:c.302G>T.
PM5 ACMG_2015Not assessed: no verified different missense substitution at BCL2 Gly101 determined to be pathogenic is documented in the available evidence. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The available case evidence does not document a different missense substitution at BCL2 residue Gly101 that was determined to be pathogenic. The two extracted papers concern the queried Gly101Val substitution itself and do not establish a pathogenic alternate missense comparator at the same residue. A verified same-residue pathogenic comparator is therefore missing.

Rule
Novel missense change at an amino acid residue where a different missense change determined to be pathogenic has been seen before. ... Caveat: Beware of changes that impact splicing rather than at the amino acid/protein level.
Evidence considered
  • The case evidence identifies BCL2 p.Gly101Val but does not provide a pathogenic alternate missense comparator at residue 101.
  • The extracted PMID:30514704 and PMID:31160589 findings address Gly101Val itself and do not establish PM5 evidence.
Still missing
  • A comprehensive review of ClinVar and primary literature for alternate missense substitutions at BCL2 Gly101 with an established pathogenic determination is still required.
Sources
PM6 ACMG_2015Not assessed: no proband disease evidence or parental-testing record supports an assumed de novo variant without confirmed maternity and paternity. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

Not assessed: the available case evidence does not document an assumed de novo variant in a patient with the disease, nor does it provide parental testing information showing that maternity and paternity were unconfirmed. The criterion cannot be evaluated without a proband and family-testing record.

Still missing
  • Proband disease phenotype and diagnostic evidence
  • Evidence that the variant is de novo or assumed de novo
  • Parental testing results and confirmation status for maternity and paternity
PP1 ACMG_2015Not assessed: no affected relatives, variant testing results, pedigree, or meioses are documented to evaluate co-segregation. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

Not assessed: no affected relatives, family pedigree, variant testing results, or meioses are documented. Consequently, co-segregation with disease in multiple affected family members cannot be evaluated.

Still missing
  • Pedigree identifying affected family members
  • Phenotype confirmation for affected relatives
  • Variant testing results for relatives
  • Number of informative meioses
PP2 ACMG_2015Not assessed: the available evidence does not establish both PP2 requirements—low benign missense variation and a common missense disease mechanism—for BCL2. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The case evidence establishes that the variant is missense, but it does not establish both gene-level requirements for PP2: a low rate of benign missense variation and missense variants as a common mechanism of disease for BCL2. Absence of this single variant from gnomAD is insufficient to establish either gene-level condition.

Rule
Missense variant in a gene that has a low rate of benign missense variation and where missense variants are a common mechanism of disease.
Evidence considered
  • The normalized consequence is missense, but no gene-level missense constraint or disease-mechanism dataset meeting PP2's two requirements is provided.
  • The queried variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1, but a single-variant absence does not establish a low gene-level rate of benign missense variation.
Still missing
  • Gene-level benign missense constraint and the prevalence of missense disease alleles in an established BCL2 disease context are not documented.
PP4 ACMG_2015Not assessed: no case-level phenotype or family-history information is available to determine whether the presentation is highly specific for a single-gene disease. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No patient phenotype or family-history description for the case is provided in the available evidence. The two available variant-specific publications concern acquired venetoclax resistance in CLL and do not establish that this case has a phenotype highly specific for a disease with a single genetic etiology. The criterion cannot be assessed without case-level phenotype and family-history information.

Rule
Patient’s phenotype or family history is highly specific for a disease with a single genetic etiology.
Evidence considered
  • The available papers describe venetoclax-treated CLL progression and acquired drug resistance, not the phenotype or family history of this case.
  • No case-level phenotype or family-history field supporting PP4 is present in the reviewed case evidence.
Still missing
  • Case-level phenotype, diagnosis, and family-history details are required to assess PP4.
Sources
BS2 ACMG_2015Not assessed: no healthy-adult observation or evidence of full early-age penetrance is available for the BS2 requirement. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BS2 is not assessed. The available evidence reports population-database absence but does not document this variant in a healthy adult as a heterozygote, homozygote, or hemizygote. It also does not establish that full penetrance is expected at an early age for the relevant BCL2 disorder, so the BS2 observation requirement cannot be evaluated.

Rule
Observed in a healthy adult individual for a recessive (homozygous), dominant (heterozygous), or X-linked (hemizygous) disorder, with full penetrance expected at an early age.
Evidence considered
  • The available gnomAD records report the variant as absent; database absence is not an observation of the variant in a healthy adult and cannot satisfy BS2.
Still missing
  • A documented healthy adult carrying the variant in the relevant zygosity is unavailable.
  • The expected inheritance model and early-age full penetrance of the relevant BCL2 disorder are not established in the available case evidence.
BS4 ACMG_2015Not assessed: no affected relatives lacking the variant or other family segregation data are documented to establish lack of segregation. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

Not assessed: no affected relatives with documented absence of the variant are identified, and no family segregation data are available. Lack of segregation therefore cannot be distinguished from missing family information or phenocopy-related findings.

Still missing
  • Affected relatives tested for the variant
  • Reliable phenotype assessments in those relatives
  • Family pedigree and segregation results
  • Assessment of possible phenocopies or multiple pathogenic variants
BP1 ACMG_2015Not assessed: the available evidence does not show that primarily truncating BCL2 variants are the known disease-causing variant class. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The variant is missense, but the available evidence does not establish that BCL2 is a gene for which primarily truncating variants are known to cause disease. No sufficiently documented disease-variant spectrum or established gene-level truncating predominance is supplied for this generic assessment.

Rule
Missense variant in a gene for which primarily truncating variants are known to cause disease.
Evidence considered
  • The normalized consequence is missense, but no established BCL2 disease-variant spectrum demonstrating primarily truncating disease-causing variants is provided.
Still missing
  • A documented BCL2 disease-variant spectrum demonstrating predominantly truncating pathogenic variants is unavailable.
BP2 ACMG_2015Not assessed: no germline cis or trans observation with a pathogenic variant is documented for this BCL2 variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No germline observation documents NM_000633.3:c.302G>T (BCL2 p.Gly101Val) in trans with a pathogenic variant in a fully penetrant dominant disorder or in cis with a pathogenic variant. The available variant-specific publications describe an acquired somatic mutation in venetoclax-treated CLL, which does not provide the required germline allelic relationship. Therefore, BP2 cannot be assessed.

Rule
BP2: Observed in trans with a pathogenic variant for a fully penetrant dominant gene/disorder or observed in cis with a pathogenic variant in any inheritance pattern.
Evidence considered
  • The case evidence contains no germline affected-proband, family, parental, offspring, or phase data showing a pathogenic variant in cis or trans.
  • The available variant-specific literature concerns an acquired somatic mutation in venetoclax-treated CLL patients and cannot establish the germline allelic relationship required for BP2.
Still missing
  • No germline fully penetrant dominant disease context is established in the available evidence.
  • No germline phase result documents a pathogenic variant in trans or cis.
BP5 ACMG_2015Not assessed: no case-level alternate molecular diagnosis is documented to show that another molecular basis explains the disease. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP5 requires the variant to be found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease. The available case evidence does not provide a case-level diagnosis with an independently established alternate molecular cause. The papers describe acquired resistance during venetoclax treatment, but do not document an alternate molecular basis for the disease in this case. BP5 cannot be assessed from the available evidence.

Rule
Variant found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease.
Evidence considered
  • The reviewed papers report acquired G101V-associated venetoclax resistance in CLL, not an alternate molecular basis for disease in this case.
  • No case-level molecular diagnosis identifying an alternate cause is present in the available evidence.
Still missing
  • A case-level diagnosis and documented alternate molecular basis are required to assess BP5.
Sources
Not applicable · 4· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PVS1 N/ANot applicable: PVS1 requires a null variant (nonsense, frameshift, canonical splice, start-loss or stop-loss), and this is a missense variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PVS1 (ClinGen SVI PVS1 recommendations, PMC6185798, pvs1_generic_framework) applies only to null variant classes — nonsense, frameshift, canonical ±1/2 splice-consensus, translation-initiation-codon loss, and stop-loss variants — each expected to trigger nonsense-mediated decay or otherwise abolish normal protein function. NM_000633.3:c.302G>T in BCL2 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_000624.2:p.(Gly101Val). As a result, no null-variant mechanism (nonsense-mediated decay, truncation, or canonical splice disruption) is triggered by this variant class, so PVS1's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. No VCEP criteria specification covers PVS1 for BCL2, so the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 definition applies. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_null_variant_class
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
  • VCEP criterion policy: absent
Sources
pvs1_generic_framework ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules
PM4 N/ANot applicable: PM4 requires a protein-length change, and this is a missense variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM4 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to protein length changes: in-frame insertions/deletions in a non-repetitive region, or stop-loss variants that extend the protein past the reference stop codon. NM_000633.3:c.302G>T in BCL2 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_000624.2:p.(Gly101Val). As a result, no change in protein length occurs, so there is nothing for this criterion to evaluate, so PM4's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. No VCEP criteria specification covers PM4 for BCL2, so the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 definition applies. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_stop_loss_or_nonrepeat_indel
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
  • VCEP criterion policy: absent
Sources
pvs1_generic_framework ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules
BP3 N/ANot applicable: BP3 requires an in-frame indel in a repeat region, and this is a missense variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP3 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to in-frame insertions/deletions located in a repetitive region without a known function. NM_000633.3:c.302G>T in BCL2 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_000624.2:p.(Gly101Val). As a result, the variant does not alter protein length within a repeat region, so there is nothing for this criterion to evaluate, so BP3's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. No VCEP criteria specification covers BP3 for BCL2, so the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 definition applies. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_repeat_region_indel
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
  • VCEP criterion policy: absent
Sources
pvs1_generic_framework ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules
BP7 N/ANot applicable: BP7 requires a synonymous variant, and this is a missense variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP7 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) is defined for a synonymous (silent) variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence and the nucleotide is not highly conserved. NM_000633.3:c.302G>T in BCL2 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_000624.2:p.(Gly101Val). As a result, the encoded protein sequence is altered, so the criterion's silent-variant premise does not hold regardless of any splicing prediction, so BP7's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. No VCEP criteria specification covers BP7 for BCL2, so the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 definition applies. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_synonymous
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
  • VCEP criterion policy: absent
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules

Identifiers

Gene
BCL2
Transcript
NM_000633.3
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_000633.3:c.302G>T
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_000624.2:p.(Gly101Val)
GRCh38
chr18:63318365 C>A
GRCh37
chr18:60985598 C>A
Location and type
Exon 2 · missense

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in BCL2, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_000633.3. Select a row to find it on the plot.

BCL2NM_000633.3
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 Allele count data not recorded
gnomAD v2.1 Allele count data not recorded
gnomAD-Canada v1.0 Allele count data not recorded

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

Absent from gnomAD v4.1.

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

gnomAD-Canada

Not available in gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

SpliceAI and Pangolin

SpliceAI acceptor lossat +279 bp
0.000
SpliceAI acceptor gainat +4 bp
0.002
SpliceAI donor lossat -301 bp
0.000
SpliceAI donor gainat -283 bp
0.000
Pangolin splice lossmagnitude shown
-0.001
Pangolin splice gain
0.012

Other predictors

REVEL
0.492
BayesDel
0.073

How the predictions were used

PP3 ACMG_2015Not met: missense REVEL 0.492 is below the generic PP3 supporting threshold of 0.644. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The variant is a missense substitution, so the governing generic rule selects the REVEL path only; SpliceAI is not used for PP3 in this situation. REVEL is 0.492, below the generic PP3 supporting threshold of >= 0.644, so PP3 is not met. BayesDel is not used because no generic ACMG-strength calibration is established for it. The threshold is the supplied ClinGen SVI REVEL calibration from Pejaver et al. 2022 (PMID:36413997).

Rule
Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect on the gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc.).
Evidence considered
  • NM_000633.3:c.302G>T is a missense variant, p.(Gly101Val), so REVEL is the sole applicable PP3 predictor path; SpliceAI is not counted.
  • Local REVEL lookup reports 0.492; this is below the supplied generic PP3 supporting cutoff of >=0.644 from the ClinGen SVI REVEL calibration (Pejaver et al. 2022, PMID:36413997).
  • BayesDel score 0.0732744 was not used because the governing generic guidance states that no generic ACMG-strength calibration is established for BayesDel.
Sources
revel
BP4 ACMG_2015Not met: missense REVEL 0.492 is above the generic BP4 supporting threshold of 0.29. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The variant is a missense substitution, so the governing generic rule selects the REVEL path only; the SpliceAI result cannot substitute for a gray-zone REVEL result. REVEL is 0.492, which is above the generic BP4 supporting cutoff of <= 0.29 and therefore does not support BP4. BayesDel is not used because no generic ACMG-strength calibration is established for it. The threshold is the supplied ClinGen SVI REVEL calibration from Pejaver et al. 2022 (PMID:36413997).

Rule
Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc)
Evidence considered
  • NM_000633.3:c.302G>T is a missense variant, p.(Gly101Val), so REVEL is the sole applicable BP4 predictor path; SpliceAI is not counted.
  • Local REVEL lookup reports 0.492; this is above the supplied generic BP4 supporting cutoff of <=0.29 from the ClinGen SVI REVEL calibration (Pejaver et al. 2022, PMID:36413997), so the gray-zone result does not meet BP4.
  • SpliceAI max delta 0.002 was not used for BP4 because the governing path for a missense variant is REVEL only.
  • BayesDel score 0.0732744 was not used because the governing generic guidance states that no generic ACMG-strength calibration is established for BayesDel.
Sources
revel
BP7 N/ANot applicable: BP7 requires a synonymous variant, and this is a missense variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP7 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) is defined for a synonymous (silent) variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence and the nucleotide is not highly conserved. NM_000633.3:c.302G>T in BCL2 is a missense substitution predicted to produce NP_000624.2:p.(Gly101Val). As a result, the encoded protein sequence is altered, so the criterion's silent-variant premise does not hold regardless of any splicing prediction, so BP7's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. No VCEP criteria specification covers BP7 for BCL2, so the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 definition applies. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_synonymous
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: missense (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
  • VCEP criterion policy: absent
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00). REVEL score = 0.492. BayesDel score = 0.0732744.

2 paper records listed. 2 cited in the classification.

Cited in the classification

  • Acquisition of the Recurrent Gly101Val Mutation in BCL2 Confers Resistance to Venetoclax in Patients with Progressive Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.
    The paper reports BCL2 Gly101Val emerging during venetoclax treatment in seven patients with CLL progression and demonstrates reduced venetoclax sensitivity, impaired displacement of pro-apoptotic proteins, and acquired resistance in patient cells and engineered cell lines.
    → PS3 · supporting Names this variant
    PMID 30514704 ↗
    Source detail
    The novel Gly101Val mutation in BCL2 was identified at progression in seven patients, but not at study entry. It was first detectable after 19-42 months of therapy, and its emergence anticipated clinical disease progression by many months. Gly101Val reduces the affinity of BCL2 for venetoclax by ~180-fold in surface plasmon resonance assays, thereby preventing the drug from displacing pro-apoptotic mediators from BCL2 in cells and conferring acquired resistance in cell lines and primary patient cells.

    Location Abstract; Results, sections on genomic assessment of patient samples and functional characterization; Discussion

    Context Paired pre-venetoclax and progression samples from patients with relapsed CLL; targeted amplicon sequencing, digital droplet PCR, RNA sequencing, engineered human B-lineage cell lines, cell-viability and cytotoxicity assays, surface plasmon resonance, co-immunoprecipitation, and competition cultures under venetoclax exposure.

  • Structures of BCL-2 in complex with venetoclax reveal the molecular basis of resistance mutations.
    The paper directly characterizes BCL-2 G101V in venetoclax-treated CLL patients and by crystallography and binding assays, showing that the substitution lies in the venetoclax-binding P2 pocket and reduces venetoclax affinity approximately 180-fold while largely preserving BH3-peptide binding.
    → PS3 · supporting Names this variant
    PMID 31160589 ↗
    Source detail
    This mutant, G101V, was found in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) patients from the clinical trials who had initially responded to treatment but developed CLL-type clinical progression after 19-42 months.

    Location Introduction, paragraph describing the clinically identified G101V mutation; Results, ‘Structures of BCL-2 mutants bound to venetoclax’; Table 2; ‘The role of E152 in venetoclax affinity’

    Context Clinical observations in venetoclax-treated CLL patients; X-ray crystallography of wild-type, G101V, G101A, and other BCL-2 complexes; surface plasmon resonance competition assays for venetoclax and BH3-peptide binding; mutational analysis of the G101V/E152A double mutant.

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

Absent from gnomAD v4.1.

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

gnomAD-Canada

Not available in gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

ClinVar

This variant is absent from ClinVar.

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00). REVEL score = 0.492. BayesDel score = 0.0732744.

Functional

OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Likely Gain-of-function; curated oncogenicity label: Likely Oncogenic.

Somatic

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.