Analysis in progress
Initialising…
0%
complete
This report is still being assembled — sections appear as each stage finishes. It isn't final yet.
STAG2
Final classification
VUS
STAG2 c.488T>A · p.Met163Lys
STAG2

NM_001042749.1:c.488T>A (p.Met163Lys) in STAG2 is a missense variant absent from population databases (PM2_Supporting).

Gene
STAG2
Transcript
NM_001042749.1
HGVS · transcript:coding
NM_001042749.1:c.488T>A
Consequence
N/A
GRCh38
chrX:124045189 T>A
GRCh37
chrX:123179039 T>A
Basis gene-specific framework lacked a usable explicit final combination framework, so generic ACMG/AMP 2015 final-combination rules were applied as fallback; applied criteria: PM2 supporting, BP4 supporting benign; combination = 1 supporting + 1 supporting benign, which maps to VUS.
gene-specific framework lacked a usable explicit final combination framework, so generic ACMG/AMP 2015 final-combination rules were applied as fallback; applied criteria: PM2 supporting, BP4 supporting benign; combination = 1 supporting + 1 supporting benign, which maps to VUS.
Classification rationale
PM2 BP4 VUS
STAG2 c.488T>A

NM_001042749.1:c.488T>A (p.Met163Lys) in STAG2 is a missense variant absent from population databases (PM2_Supporting).1 Multiple in silico predictors (BayesDel = -0.143, SpliceAI max delta = 0.01) suggest no significant impact on protein function or splicing (BP4_Supporting).2 This variant is absent from ClinVar, has no published functional data, and has not been reported in any disease cohort. The variant is not a null variant type (PVS1 not met) and does not reside in a mutational hotspot (PM1 not met).3 With one supporting pathogenic criterion (PM2) and one supporting benign criterion (BP4), the evidence is balanced and insufficient for classification beyond a variant of uncertain significance (VUS).4

PM2 + BP4 VUS
2 bayesdelspliceai ↗
4 generic_acmg_combination_rules
Gene diagram · NM_001042749.1 · variants mapped to exon structure
STAG2 NM_001042749.1
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
Applied criteria · 2 applied · 22 assessed
Applied · 2
Strength Supporting Moderate Strong Very strong
PM2 supporting Pathogenic
NM_001042749.1:c.488T>A is absent from gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada v1.0 (allele count = 0 in all datasets). The variant has not been observed in population reference databases, meeting the PM2 threshold for a rare variant (allele frequency <0.1%).
gnomAD v2.1: absent (AC=0)gnomAD v4.1: absent (AC=0)gnomAD-Canada v1.0: absent (AC=0
BP4 supporting Benign
Multiple lines of computational evidence predict no significant impact on the gene product. BayesDel score is -0.143023 (benign), and SpliceAI predicts no splicing effect (max delta score = 0.01). Two independent in silico predictors agree on a neutral/benign effect, meeting BP4 at supporting strength.
BayesDel: -0.143023 (benign prediction)SpliceAI: max delta 0.01 (no splice alteration predicted)
Assessed · not applied
Pathogenic
PVS1 NM_001042749.1:c.488T>A is a missense variant (p.Met163Lys) and does not fall into the ClinGen PVS1 null-variant categories of nonsense, frameshift, or canonical ±1,2 splice consensus variants.
PS1 No pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant with the same amino acid change (p.Met163Lys) has been reported in ClinVar or the literature.
PS2 No de novo data are available for this variant.
PS3 No functional studies have tested NM_001042749.1:c.488T>A or a systematically characterized range that includes p.Met163.
PS4 No case-control or patient cohort prevalence data are available for this variant.
PM1 The variant p.Met163Lys does not lie within a statistically significant mutational hotspot (cancerhotspots.org negative) and no literature establishes a well-characterized critical functional domain encompassing position 163.
PM5 No pathogenic or likely pathogenic missense variant at the same amino acid residue (p.Met163) with a different alteration has been identified.
PM6 No de novo data are available for this variant.
PP1 No cosegregation data are available.
PP2 HCI prior scores are not available for STAG2 (gene not supported in the HCI database).
PP3 Multiple in silico tools predict no significant impact.
PP4 No patient phenotype or clinical data are available for review.
PP5 NM_001042749.1:c.488T>A is absent from ClinVar.
Benign
BA1 NM_001042749.1:c.488T>A is absent from all population databases (gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, and Canada; allele count = 0).
BS1 NM_001042749.1:c.488T>A is absent from all population databases.
BS2 No data are available regarding observation of this variant in healthy adults.
BS3 No well-established functional studies demonstrate a neutral or benign effect for this variant.
BS4 No segregation data are available for this variant.
BP1 BP1 requires that the gene primarily causes disease through a truncating mechanism and that missense variants are an uncommon cause of disease.
BP2 No data are available on whether this variant has been observed in trans with a known pathogenic variant.
BP5 No data are available regarding an alternative molecular basis for disease in the proband.
BP6 NM_001042749.1:c.488T>A is absent from ClinVar.
N/A · 1 BP7
Research & evidence
Population frequency
gnomAD v4.1 screenshot
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1 screenshot
gnomAD v2.1
v4.1
Absent from gnomAD v4.1.
v2.1
Absent from gnomAD v2.1.
🇨🇦 CA
Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.
Allele frequency by ancestry
three datasets · side by side
gnomAD v4.1
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
gnomAD v2.1
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
gnomAD Canada 🇨🇦
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
ClinVar screenshot
ClinVar
This variant is absent from ClinVar.
SpliceAI screenshot
In silico
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.01). BayesDel score = -0.143023.
Functional / OncoKB screenshot
Functional Unknown Oncogenic Effect
OncoKB did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant; gene-level curated context is available for reviewer follow-up. STAG2, a component of the cohesin complex, is recurrently altered by mutation in various cancer types.
OncoKB ↗
COSMIC screenshot
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots screenshot
Cancer hotspots
Somatic evidence Not in COSMIC / hotspots
COSMIC
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).
Hotspots
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.
Sources & reference links
8Sources
ClinVar
gnomAD v2.1
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD-Canada
SpliceAI
OncoKB
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots