Back
NM_001127208.2:c.2926C>T
p.Gln976Ter · TET2
ACMG/AMP
0%
complete
Final classification
Likely Pathogenic
PVS1PM2
TET2
c.2926C>T
p.Gln976Ter
This variant

The TET2 c.2926C>T (p.Gln976Ter; p.Q976*) variant has been reported in curated somatic cancer resources and has not been reported in ClinVar.

Transcript
NM_001127208.2
HGVS · transcript:coding
NM_001127208.2:c.2926C>T
GRCh38
chr4:105236868 C>T
GRCh37
chr4:106158025 C>T
gene-specific framework lacked a usable explicit final combination framework, so generic ACMG/AMP 2015 final-combination rules were applied as fallback; applied criteria: PVS1 very strong, PM2 supporting; combination = 1 very strong + 1 supporting, which maps to Likely Pathogenic.
Classification rationale
PVS1PM2 Likely Pathogenic
TET2 c.2926C>T

The TET2 c.2926C>T (p.Gln976Ter; p.Q976*) variant has been reported in curated somatic cancer resources and has not been reported in ClinVar.1 This variant is present at very low frequency in population databases, with allele frequency 7.96388e-06 in gnomAD v2.1 and 2.47815e-06 in gnomAD v4.1, both below the PM2 threshold.2 Available gene-level studies support TET2 loss-of-function biology and structural importance of the C-terminal catalytic region, but no variant-specific functional assay for p.(Gln976Ter) was identified.3 Computational review showed no significant predicted splice effect by SpliceAI, with a maximum delta score of 0.01; REVEL was unavailable, and BayesDel score 0.294732 did not provide sufficient support for PP3 or BP4 for this nonsense variant.4

PVS1 + PM2 Likely Pathogenic
LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
Gene diagram · NM_001127208.2 · variants mapped to exon structure
TET2 NM_001127208.2
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
Applied criteria · 2 applied · 19 assessed
MetEvidence satisfies this criterion.
Not metEvaluated against available evidence; threshold not reached.
Not assessedApplies in principle, but no evidence was found to evaluate it.
N/ADoesn't apply to this variant type.
Applied · 2
Strength Supporting Moderate Strong Very strong
PVS1 very strong Pathogenic
This variant is a nonsense change, p.(Gln976Ter), in TET2. Available gene-level evidence supports loss of function as a germline disease mechanism for TET2, and the generic PVS1 framework is eligible. The premature stop occurs well upstream of the terminal exon structure for this transcript, supporting a loss-of-function effect rather than a tolerated distal truncation.
Nonsense variant p.(Gln976Ter) / p.(Q976*)Generic PVS1 fallback was marked applicableTET2 loss of function was supported as a germline disease mechanism
PM2 supporting Pathogenic
This variant is present at very low frequency in population databases. The gnomAD v2.1 allele frequency is 7.96388e-06 (2/251134 alleles), and the gnomAD v4.1 allele frequency is 2.47815e-06 (4/1614108 alleles), both below the 0.1% PM2 threshold.
gnomAD v2.1 AF 7.96388e-06gnomAD v4.1 AF 2.47815e-06No homozygotes observed
Assessed · not applied · 4 not met · 15 not assessed
Pathogenic
PS1 No evidence was identified for a different nucleotide change producing the same amino acid consequence with an established pathogenic classification, so PS1 could not be assessed.
PS2 No confirmed de novo occurrence with parental confirmation was identified for this variant, so PS2 was not met.
PS3 Published TET2 studies describe gene-level functional and structural effects relevant to loss of function, but no variant-specific well-established functional assay result for p.(Gln976Ter) was identified.
PS4 This variant has not been reported in ClinVar, and no affected-case enrichment data for germline disease were identified.
PM3 No data were identified showing this variant in trans with another pathogenic variant in a recessive disease context, so PM3 could not be assessed.
PM6 No assumed de novo occurrence without full parental confirmation was identified for this variant, so PM6 was not met.
PP1 No segregation data were identified for this variant, so PP1 could not be applied.
PP3 SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant, with a maximum delta score of 0.01.
PP4 No phenotype-specific clinical data were provided that would establish a highly specific TET2-related presentation for this individual, so PP4 could not be assessed.
PP5 This variant is absent from ClinVar, and no germline reputable-source pathogenic assertion suitable for PP5 was identified.
Benign
BA1 Population frequency does not meet BA1.
BS1 Population frequency does not meet BS1.
BS2 No evidence was identified showing this variant in healthy adult individuals at a level sufficient to apply BS2.
BS3 Available studies provide gene-level functional and structural context for TET2, but no well-established variant-specific assay showing normal function for p.(Gln976Ter) was identified.
BS4 No non-segregation data were identified for this variant, so BS4 could not be assessed.
BP2 No phase data were identified showing this variant in cis with a pathogenic variant or in trans with a pathogenic variant in a dominant condition, so BP2 could not be assessed.
BP4 Computational evidence does not support a benign interpretation.
BP5 No alternate molecular cause explaining the phenotype was identified, so BP5 could not be assessed.
BP6 This variant is absent from ClinVar, and no germline reputable-source benign assertion suitable for BP6 was identified.
N/A · 7 PM1 · PM4 · PM5 · PP2 · BP1 · BP3 · BP7
Research & evidence
Population frequency · supports pathogenic
gnomAD v4.1 screenshot
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1 screenshot
gnomAD v2.1
v4.1
This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 2.47815e-06; MAF= 0.00025%, 4/1614108 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (Finnish) population (AF= 1.56172e-05; MAF= 0.00156%, 1/64032 alleles, homozygotes = 0); grpmax FAF= 6.8e-07.
v2.1
This variant is present in gnomAD v2.1 (AF= 7.96388e-06; MAF= 0.00080%, 2/251134 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the European (Finnish) population (AF= 4.62022e-05; MAF= 0.00462%, 1/21644 alleles, homozygotes = 0).
Allele frequency by ancestry
three datasets · side by side
gnomAD v4.1
0.00025% · 4 / 1,614,108
0 hom · FAF 6.8e-05%
European (Finnish)
1 / 64,032
0.0016%
European (non-Finnish)
3 / 1,180,002
0.00025%
+ 8 not observed (Remaining individuals, Admixed American, Amish, East Asian, Middle Eastern, South Asian, Ashkenazi Jewish, African/African American)
gnomAD v2.1
0.0008% · 2 / 251,134
0 hom
European (Finnish)
1 / 21,644
0.0046%
European (non-Finnish)
1 / 113,524
0.00088%
+ 6 not observed (African/African American, Admixed American, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Remaining individuals, South Asian)
ClinVar screenshot
ClinVar
This variant is absent from ClinVar.
SpliceAI screenshot
In silico
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.01). BayesDel score = 0.294732.
Functional / OncoKB screenshot
Functional Likely Oncogenic
OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Likely Loss-of-function; curated oncogenicity label: Likely Oncogenic.
OncoKB ↗
COSMIC screenshot
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots screenshot
Cancer hotspots
Somatic evidence Not in COSMIC / hotspots
COSMIC
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV105020525, n = 16 times).
Hotspots
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.
Sources & reference links
7Sources
ClinVar
gnomAD v2.1
gnomAD v4.1
SpliceAI
OncoKB
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots
Triaged references · 2 PMIDs not cited in assessment
21057493 ↗ Impaired hydroxylation of 5-methylcytosine in myeloid cancers with mutant TET2. ONCOKB
24315485 ↗ Crystal structure of TET2-DNA complex: insight into TET-mediated 5mC oxidation. ONCOKB