Back
NM_001354609.1:c.1799T>G
p.Val600Gly · BRAF
0%
complete
Final classification
Likely Pathogenic
PS3PM1PM2PM5PP3PP5
BRAF
c.1799T>G
p.Val600Gly
This variant

The BRAF c.1799T>G (p.Val600Gly, p.V600G) variant has been observed in somatic cancers, including 27 occurrences in COSMIC, and has been reported in ClinVar with a Pathogenic expert-panel classification from the ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel.

Transcript
NM_001354609.1
HGVS · transcript:coding
NM_001354609.1:c.1799T>G
GRCh38
chr7:140753336 A>C
GRCh37
chr7:140453136 A>C
ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel Specifications to the ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines for BRAF Version 2.3.0 v2.3.0 criteria-combination framework: matched Rule14 (2 Pathogenic.Moderate + Pathogenic.Supporting >=2) with applied criteria: PS3 supporting, PM1 moderate, PM2 supporting, PM5 moderate, PP3 supporting, PP5 supporting; maps to Likely Pathogenic.
Classification rationale
PS3PM1PM2PM5PP3PP5 Likely Pathogenic
BRAF c.1799T>G

The BRAF c.1799T>G (p.Val600Gly, p.V600G) variant has been observed in somatic cancers, including 27 occurrences in COSMIC, and has been reported in ClinVar with a Pathogenic expert-panel classification from the ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel.1 This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and absent from gnomAD v4.1, supporting rarity in population reference datasets.2 In a published functional study, p.Val600Gly increased ERK and ELK phosphorylation relative to wild type, consistent with an activating effect; the BRAF RASopathy functional-study framework supports PS3 at supporting strength when one approved assay is available.3 Computational evidence supports a damaging missense effect, with REVEL 0.925 above the BRAF RASopathy PP3 threshold of 0.7, BayesDel 0.357299, and SpliceAI showing no major splice effect with a maximum delta score of 0.11.4

PS3 + PM1 + PM2 + PM5 + PP3 + PP5 Likely Pathogenic
3 PMID:20735442 ↗cspec ↗vcep_svi_rasopathy_vcep_v2_approved_functional_studies
4 cspec ↗revelbayesdelspliceai ↗
LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
Gene diagram · NM_001354609.1 · variants mapped to exon structure
BRAF NM_001354609.1
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
Applied criteria · 6 applied · 12 assessed
MetEvidence satisfies this criterion.
Not metEvaluated against available evidence; threshold not reached.
Not assessedApplies in principle, but no evidence was found to evaluate it.
N/ADoesn't apply to this variant type.
Applied · 6
Strength Supporting Moderate Strong Very strong
PS3 supporting Pathogenic
In a published functional study, this variant increased ERK and ELK phosphorylation compared with wild type, consistent with an activating effect. Under the BRAF RASopathy specification, one approved functional assay supports PS3 at supporting strength.
PMID 20735442 functional analysis showed increased ERK and ELK phosphorylation versus wild typeRASopathy approved functional assay framework
PM1 moderate Pathogenic
This missense change affects codon 600 within the BRAF CR3 activation segment (amino acids 594-627), a critical functional domain specified by the RASopathy framework. Published structural-functional data also support the importance of the activation segment in BRAF activation.
Codon 600 lies within the CSPEC-listed CR3 activation segment AA 594-627Published BRAF activation-segment mechanism data
PM2 supporting Pathogenic
This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and absent from gnomAD v4.1, meeting the RASopathy PM2 requirement that the variant be absent from controls.
Absent from gnomAD v2.1Absent from gnomAD v4.1
PM5 moderate Pathogenic
Other missense substitutions affecting the same codon have been reported in ClinVar as likely pathogenic or pathogenic, including p.Val600Leu and p.Val600Met. This satisfies the BRAF same-residue comparator rule for PM5 at moderate strength.
ClinVar same-codon pathogenic/likely pathogenic comparators at Val600CSPEC PM5 same-residue rule
PP3 supporting Pathogenic
Computational evidence supports a damaging missense effect. REVEL is 0.925, which is above the RASopathy PP3 threshold of 0.7; BayesDel is 0.357299; and SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact with a maximum delta score of 0.11, which is consistent with this being primarily a missense effect rather than a splice-altering variant.
REVEL 0.925BayesDel 0.357299SpliceAI max delta 0.11
PP5 supporting Pathogenic
Expert panel ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel classified as Pathogenic.
CSPEC marks PP5 not applicableClinVar expert panel classification
Assessed · not applied · 3 not met · 9 not assessed
Pathogenic
PS2 A published report describes this variant as de novo in a patient with cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome, but the retrieved evidence does not document the parental confirmation details needed to assign PS2 points.
PS4 This variant has been observed in at least one published germline case and in somatic cancer databases, but the retrieved evidence does not provide the RASopathy point total or a case-control enrichment analysis needed to assign PS4.
PM6 A published de novo case was identified, but the retrieved evidence does not provide enough detail to determine whether the report should be scored as assumed de novo under the RASopathy PM6 point system.
PP1 No segregation data were identified for this variant, so PP1 cannot be applied.
PP2 This is a missense variant in a gene where missense disease is relevant, but the retrieved evidence did not provide the BRAF missense z score needed to determine whether the >3.09 threshold is met.
Benign
BA1 This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1 and does not meet the BA1 threshold of at least 0.05%.
BS1 This variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1 and does not meet the BS1 threshold of at least 0.025%.
BS2 No observations in unaffected individuals were identified, so BS2 cannot be assessed.
BS4 No non-segregation data were identified for this variant, so BS4 cannot be applied.
BP2 No phase data or alternate molecular explanation in the same gene were identified, so BP2 cannot be assessed.
BP4 Available computational evidence does not support BP4.
BP5 No alternate molecular diagnosis or phenotype inconsistency evidence was identified, so BP5 cannot be assessed.
N/A · 10 PVS1 · PS1 · PM3 · PM4 · PP4 · BS3 · BP1 · BP3 · BP6 · BP7
Research & evidence
Population frequency · supports pathogenic
gnomAD v4.1 screenshot
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1 screenshot
gnomAD v2.1
v4.1
Absent from gnomAD v4.1.
v2.1
Absent from gnomAD v2.1.
Allele frequency by ancestry
three datasets · side by side
gnomAD v4.1
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
gnomAD v2.1
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
ClinVar screenshot
ClinVar
This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (1 clinical laboratory) and as Pathogenic (1 clinical laboratory) and as Pathogenic by ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel (expert panel). (ClinVarID = 40389)
SpliceAI screenshot
In silico
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.11). REVEL score = 0.925. BayesDel score = 0.357299.
Functional / OncoKB screenshot
Functional Likely Oncogenic
OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Gain-of-function; curated oncogenicity label: Likely Oncogenic.
OncoKB ↗
COSMIC screenshot
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots screenshot
Cancer hotspots
Somatic evidence Not in COSMIC / hotspots
COSMIC
This variant lies in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV56080151, n = 27 times).
Hotspots
This variant lies in a statistically significant hotspot.
Literature · how each cited paper was used
2papers cited
Each card is an audit: what was searched, what was found, whether it names the variant, which criteria it fed, and why. 6 further PMIDs triaged but not cited — see Sources & references.
Mechanism of activation of the RAF-ERK signaling pathway by oncogenic mutations of B-RAF.
Found
Structured finding pending for this record — see source link.
Applied to
PM1 moderate
Germline mutation in BRAF codon 600 is compatible with human development: de novo p.V600G mutation identified in a patient with CFC syndrome.
Found
Structured finding pending for this record — see source link.
Applied to
PS3 supporting
Sources & reference links
8Sources
CSpec VCEP
ClinVar
gnomAD v2.1
gnomAD v4.1
SpliceAI
OncoKB
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots
Triaged references · 6 PMIDs not cited in assessment
12068308 ↗ Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. ONCOKB
16273091 ↗ BRAF mutation predicts sensitivity to MEK inhibition. ONCOKB
26287849 ↗ Vemurafenib in Multiple Nonmelanoma Cancers with BRAF V600 Mutations. ONCOKB
28783719 ↗ Tumours with class 3 BRAF mutants are sensitive to the inhibition of activated RAS. ONCOKB
31275557 ↗ Pan-cancer repository of validated natural and cryptic mRNA splicing mutations. CLINVAR
28492532 ↗ Sherloc: a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG-AMP variant classification criteria. CLINVAR