0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

NPM1 c.860_863dup, p.Trp288CysfsTer12

NM_002520.7:c.860_863dup NP_002511.1:p.(Trp288CysfsTer12) Frameshift · exon 11 View identifiers
Classification
Uncertain significance

Variant description:

The NPM1 NM_002520.7:c.860_863dup (NP_002511.1:p.(Trp288CysfsTer12)) frameshift variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV51542664, n = 3293 times). Based on available guidelines, this variant is considered to be a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS).

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is uncertain. Select a step to read what it means.

Uncertain.The recorded classification is uncertain significance.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About NPM1

NPM1 encodes nucleophosmin, a protein that helps regulate ribosome production, cell growth, DNA repair, and the movement and stability of other cellular proteins. It also helps control the tumor-suppressor pathways involving ARF and TP53. NPM1 is strongly associated with acute myeloid leukemia and can act as both a tumor suppressor and an oncogene in blood cancers.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 with ClinGen SVI recommendations. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 2 Benign evidence criteria: 0
Pathogenic criteria applied · 2
PVS1Supporting
PVS1 · supporting

Met at supporting strength: the exon 11 frameshift creates p.(W288Cfs*12) and a stop in the terminal exon, triggering the named NMD-escape downgrade.

PM2Supporting
PM2 · supporting

Met at supporting: gnomAD v4.1 AF is 6.445940475607272e-7, below the <=0.0001 PM2 threshold, with no homozygotes.

Benign criteria applied · 0

No benign criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.

Recorded classification: Uncertain significance

VUS: PVS1 (supporting) plus PM2 (supporting) do not satisfy any generic ACMG/AMP 2015 pathogenic, likely pathogenic, benign, or likely benign combination.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

SpliceAI score
0.002 maximum delta

Recorded SpliceAI maximum delta score: 0.002. Refer to the recorded PP3/BP4 rationale for interpretation.

No listed criterion applied SpliceAI ↗
ClinVar submissions
3 reported laboratory submissions

3 Pathogenic. ClinVar API review status: criteria provided, single submitter.

Context only ClinVar ↗
Functional evidence
Statement recorded

OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; curated oncogenicity label: Oncogenic.

No listed criterion applied OncoKB ↗
COSMIC
Cancer Hotspots
Somatic evidence
3293 recorded samples

This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV51542664, n = 3293 times).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.

For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under Generic ACMG/AMP 2015 with ClinGen SVI recommendations, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 2 met · 7 not met · 8 not assessed · 11 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

No segregation, non-segregation, or proband-level parental-testing evidence was identified for PS2, PM6, PP1, or BS4; all four criteria are not assessed.

No VCEP covers NPM1, so generic ACMG/AMP 2015 rules govern.

The exact variant is documented in an AML cohort, but the available report is not a valid case-control study for PS4.

The exact ClinVar record has no expert-panel submission; non-expert Pathogenic assertions do not trigger PP5 or BP6 under the specified rule.

Population evidence supports PM2 at supporting strength because the variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and non-cancer subsets and has gnomAD v4.1 AF=6.445940475607272e-7, while BA1, BS1, and BS2 are not met.

Met · 2

PVS1 SupportingACMG_2015Met at supporting strength: the exon 11 frameshift creates p.(W288Cfs*12) and a stop in the terminal exon, triggering the named NMD-escape downgrade. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

NM_002520.7:c.860_863dup is a frameshift variant in the relevant MANE transcript NM_002520.7, producing NP_002511.1:p.(Trp288CysfsTer12). The gene-level PVS1 gate is eligible in the generic framework. The variant is in exon 11, the terminal exon of this transcript, and the predicted stop occurs within that terminal exon; this is a named NMD-escape downgrade from the default very-strong level. The altered C-terminal protein sequence is not an in-frame repeat-region indel, and no non-critical-exon downgrade was applied. PVS1 is therefore met at supporting strength rather than very strong strength.

Rule
PVS1: Null variant (nonsense, frameshift, canonical +/−1 or 2 splice sites, initiation codon, single or multi-exon deletion) in a gene where loss of function (LOF) is a known mechanism of disease.
Evidence considered
  • VariantValidator and normalization identify NM_002520.7:c.860_863dup as a frameshift in exon 11 of the MANE transcript, with predicted consequence NP_002511.1:p.(Trp288CysfsTer12).
  • The gene-level PVS1 context marks NPM1 loss of function as eligible for generic PVS1 assessment.
  • The ClinGen SVI generic PVS1 framework identifies NMD escape as a downgrade consideration; because exon 11 is the terminal exon and contains the predicted stop, the default very-strong level is downgraded to supporting.
  • Becker et al. 2010 reports the exact c.860_863dup TCTG duplication as the NPM1 type A mutation: most frequent, present in 67 of 83 NPM1-mutated patients (81%).
Sources
pvs1_generic_framework ↗pvs1_gene_contextpvs1_variant_assessmentPMID:20026798 ↗
PM2 SupportingACMGMet at supporting: gnomAD v4.1 AF is 6.445940475607272e-7, below the <=0.0001 PM2 threshold, with no homozygotes. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM2 at supporting strength is met. The variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and the gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exome subset, and is absent from gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes (0/146,260 alleles). In gnomAD v4.1 all-comers it is observed once among 1,551,364 alleles (AF=6.445940475607272e-7), which is below the generic PM2 supporting threshold of <=0.0001; no homozygotes are observed. The indel-calling caveat applies, but concordant rarity across the available datasets supports PM2.

Rule
PM2 (supporting): <= 0.0001 — SVI recommendation to downgrade PM2 to Supporting (ClinGen SVI 2020) (PMID:25741868)
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v2.1: absent; gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes: absent; gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes: 0/146,260 alleles, AF=0, homozygotes=0.
  • gnomAD v4.1 all-comers: 1/1,551,364 alleles, AF=6.445940475607272e-7, homozygotes=0; highest reported population AF=1.6566165264064674e-5.
  • Applied the published generic PM2 supporting calibration: <=0.0001 — SVI recommendation to downgrade PM2 to Supporting (ClinGen SVI 2020; PMID:25741868).
Sources

Not met · 7 · evaluated, threshold not reached

PS4 ACMG_2015Not met: the exact variant was reported in 67 of 148 AML patients, but no valid unaffected-control comparison, odds ratio, or 95% confidence interval was reported. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No qualifying case-control enrichment study was identified for the exact variant NM_002520.7:c.860_863dup. PMID:20026798 reports the exact duplication in 67 of 83 NPM1-mutated patients and 67 of 148 older adults with cytogenetically normal AML, but provides no unaffected or population control count and does not establish a germline case-control comparison. The available gnomAD frequency is 1/1,551,364 alleles, but comparison of a somatic AML frequency with a germline population frequency is not a valid matched case-control estimate for this criterion; therefore no valid OR and 95% CI were calculated. The PS4-indexed PMIDs 20963938, 23970018, 32171751, and 33226740 are not relevant exact-variant case-control reports in the reviewed literature packet.

Rule
The prevalence of the variant in affected individuals is significantly increased compared to the prevalence in controls. ... Relative risk (RR) or odds ratio (OR), as obtained from case-control studies, is >5.0 and the confidence interval around the estimate of RR or OR does not include 1.0.
Evidence considered
  • Becker et al. 2010 (PMID:20026798): the exact type A duplication c.860_863dup was present in 67 of 83 NPM1-mutated patients (81%) within a cohort of 148 adults with de novo cytogenetically normal AML; no unaffected or population control count was supplied.
  • gnomAD v4.1: 1 carrier among 1,551,364 alleles (AF 6.44594e-07), a germline population frequency that is not a valid matched control for the somatic AML cohort.
  • The literature_pass PS4 index listed PMID 20963938, PMID 23970018, PMID 32171751, and PMID 33226740; these were not exact-variant case-control reports in the supplied abstracts/metadata.
Still missing
  • A matched case-control study for the exact variant with affected and unaffected or population control counts is absent.
  • The available cohort is somatic AML and cannot be validly compared with germline gnomAD frequency for PS4.
Sources
PP4 ACMG_2015Not met: AML is clinically compatible with NPM1 mutation but is not a highly specific phenotype for a single genetic etiology. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The documented phenotype is acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome progressed to acute myeloid leukemia. This phenotype is not highly specific for a single genetic etiology because AML has many molecular causes, and the supplied evidence does not establish a distinctive phenotype that specifically identifies NPM1-related disease for this variant.

Rule
Patient’s phenotype or family history is highly specific for a disease with a single genetic etiology.
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar condition labels for the exact variant include acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome progressed to acute myeloid leukemia, and NPM1-related disorder; these labels do not demonstrate phenotype specificity for a single genetic etiology.
Sources
PP5 ACMG_2015Not met: ClinVar labels the exact variant Pathogenic, but there is no exact-variant expert-panel classification. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The exact ClinVar record is classified Pathogenic, but it has no expert-panel submission. The available assertions are ordinary laboratory, research, or literature-only submissions, including single-submitter clinical-testing assertions, so the required exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel classification is absent and PP5 is not applied.

Rule
Reputable source recently reports variant as pathogenic, but the evidence is not available to the laboratory to perform an independent evaluation.
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar variation 13998 exactly matches NM_002520.7:c.860_863dup and is Pathogenic, but the submission audit reports 0 expert-panel submissions; the available assertions are non-expert submissions.
Still missing
  • An exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Pathogenic or Likely pathogenic classification is absent.
Sources
BA1 ACMGNot met: gnomAD v4.1 allele frequency is 6.445940475607272e-7, far below the >=0.05 BA1 threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BA1 is not met. The variant's highest reported all-comers frequency is 6.445940475607272e-7 (1/1,551,364 alleles) in gnomAD v4.1, with 0 homozygotes; this is far below the generic BA1 stand-alone threshold of >=0.05. The gnomAD v2.1 and v2.1 non-cancer exome datasets report the variant as absent, and gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes report 0/146,260 alleles. The variant is an indel, so the ACMG/AMP caveat about potentially poor indel calling applies, but the available multi-dataset observations do not support BA1.

Rule
BA1 (stand-alone): >= 0.05 — ACMG/AMP 2015 stand-alone benign allele frequency (PMID:25741868)
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 all-comers: 1/1,551,364 alleles, AF=6.445940475607272e-7, homozygotes=0; highest reported population AF=1.6566165264064674e-5 in Remaining individuals.
  • gnomAD v2.1: absent; gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes: absent; gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes: 0/146,260 alleles, AF=0, homozygotes=0.
  • Applied published generic calibration threshold: BA1 (stand-alone) >= 0.05 — ACMG/AMP 2015 stand-alone benign allele frequency (PMID:25741868).
Sources
BS1 ACMGNot met: the highest reported gnomAD v4.1 population AF is 1.6566165264064674e-5, below the generic 0.01 BS1 default. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BS1 is not met. The observed all-comers gnomAD v4.1 AF is 6.445940475607272e-7 and the highest reported population AF is 1.6566165264064674e-5, both far below the generic 0.01 default. The variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes, and has AF=0 in gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes. These frequencies are not greater than expected for a disorder; no maximum-credible-frequency calculation is needed because the observed frequency is orders of magnitude below the default threshold.

Rule
BS1: Allele frequency is greater than expected for the disorder.
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1 all-comers: total AF=6.445940475607272e-7 and highest reported population AF=1.6566165264064674e-5 (1/60,364 alleles), with 0 homozygotes.
  • gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes: absent; gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes: AF=0 (0/146,260 alleles), homozygotes=0.
  • Applied the generic BS1 definition and default threshold: allele frequency greater than expected for the disorder; >=0.01 is the generic SVI default, with per-gene derivation preferred (Whiffin et al. 2017, PMID:28518168).
Sources
BS2 ACMG_2015Not met: gnomAD v4.1 reports 0 homozygotes, and no documented healthy-adult observation is available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BS2 is not met. No homozygous individuals were observed in gnomAD v4.1 (0 homozygotes), gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes (0 homozygotes), or the available gnomAD v2.1 datasets, and no healthy adult observation of this variant is documented in the population evidence. Therefore the required observation in a healthy adult individual is not present.

Rule
Observed in a healthy adult individual for a recessive (homozygous), dominant (heterozygous), or X-linked (hemizygous) disorder, with full penetrance expected at an early age.
Evidence considered
  • gnomAD v4.1: 0 homozygotes among 1,551,364 alleles; gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer genomes: 0 homozygotes among 146,260 alleles.
  • gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer exomes report the variant as absent; no healthy-adult carrier observation is supplied by the population evidence.
Sources
BP6 ACMG_2015Not met: the exact variant has no expert-panel benign classification and is instead labeled Pathogenic by non-expert submissions. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

ClinVar does not provide an exact-variant expert-panel benign or likely benign classification. Instead, the exact record is classified Pathogenic by non-expert submissions, so the required evidence for BP6 is absent and the contradictory pathogenic label cannot trigger BP6.

Rule
Reputable source recently reports variant as benign, but the evidence is not available to the laboratory to perform an independent evaluation.
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar variation 13998 exactly matches NM_002520.7:c.860_863dup, reports Pathogenic, and has 0 expert-panel submissions; no expert-panel benign assertion is present.
Still missing
  • An exact-variant ClinVar expert-panel Benign or Likely benign classification is absent.
Sources

Not assessed · 8 · no assessment recorded

PS2 ACMG_2015Not assessed: no proband-level evidence confirms both maternity and paternity, absence of family history, and a de novo germline variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The available evidence identifies the variant in AML cohorts, including a study of de novo AML, but does not provide a proband-level germline case with confirmed maternity and paternity, absence of family history, and phenotype documentation. The phrase de novo AML describes disease presentation and is not evidence that the variant arose de novo. Therefore PS2 cannot be assessed.

Rule
De novo (both maternity and paternity confirmed) in a patient with the disease and no family history.
Evidence considered
  • The available variant-specific study reports NPM1 c.860_863dup in 67 of 83 NPM1-mutated patients (81%) within a cohort of 148 adults with de novo cytogenetically normal AML, but it does not report parental testing, maternity or paternity confirmation, family history, or a germline de novo event.
  • The term de novo in the study refers to AML disease presentation, not de novo inheritance of the variant.
Still missing
  • A proband-level germline case is needed.
  • Parental testing confirming both maternity and paternity is not documented.
  • Family-history and phenotype-consistency details are not documented.
Sources
PS3 ACMG_2015Not assessed: the exact c.860_863dup was reported clinically, but no validated variant-specific functional assay was identified. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The exact variant is reported as the NPM1 type A c.860_863dup in PMID:20026798, but that study reports cohort detection and clinical outcomes rather than a functional assay. Functional studies in PMID:15659725 and PMID:16455950 evaluated NPM1 exon-12 mutant constructs or related mutations and showed abnormal cytoplasmic localization, but the supplied extractions do not establish that the exact c.860_863dup construct was tested. Therefore, the available evidence does not establish a well-established, variant-specific in vitro or in vivo assay supportive of a damaging effect, and PS3 cannot be assigned.

Rule
Well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies supportive of a damaging effect on the gene or gene product.
Evidence considered
  • PMID:20026798, Results, Clinical Characteristics and Molecular Markers at Diagnosis: the NPM1 type A mutation was reported as duplication of TCTG at c.860_863 and occurred in 67 of 83 NPM1-mutated patients (81%), but the study assessed clinical outcomes and did not report a functional assay for this variant.
  • PMID:15659725, Results, Mutations in NPM exon 12 in NPMc+ AML, and Figure 4: NPM1 exon-12 mutant proteins were studied with EGFP transfection and confocal microscopy, but the extraction does not explicitly identify c.860_863dup/p.(W288Cfs*12) as the tested construct.
  • PMID:16455950, Abstract and functional localization results: NPM exon-12 mutant constructs showed cytoplasmic localization and altered nuclear export, but the exact submitted variant was not explicitly mentioned or established as tested.
  • PMID:12450141, Results and Figure 3C: GFP-fusion NPM/B23.1 point-mutant constructs were evaluated for nucleolar localization, but the reported frameshift variant was not tested.
Still missing
  • A validated functional assay directly testing NPM1 c.860_863dup/p.(W288Cfs*12), with appropriate controls and biologically relevant readout, is not documented.
Sources
PM6 ACMG_2015Not assessed: no proband-level evidence supports assumed de novo occurrence without confirmed parental testing. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The available evidence does not document an assumed de novo variant in a specific proband. No parental testing, family-history information, or proband-level germline inheritance assessment is provided. The reported de novo AML cohort does not establish de novo occurrence of this variant. Therefore PM6 cannot be assessed.

Rule
Assumed de novo, but without confirmation of paternity and maternity.
Evidence considered
  • The available study reports this variant among patients with de novo AML but does not establish that the variant was de novo in any patient or provide parental testing results.
Still missing
  • A proband-level germline case is needed.
  • Evidence supporting assumed de novo occurrence is not documented.
  • Parental testing and family-history information are not documented.
Sources
PP1 ACMG_2015Not assessed: no affected relatives, informative meioses, or family-level variant testing are reported for co-segregation. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No family pedigree, affected relatives, variant testing in relatives, or meioses are reported for this variant. The available cohort evidence is not segregation evidence and does not establish co-segregation in affected family members. Therefore PP1 cannot be assessed.

Rule
Co-segregation with disease in multiple affected family members in a gene definitively known to cause the disease. ... Note: May be used as stronger evidence with increasing segregation data.
Evidence considered
  • The available literature describes unrelated AML cohorts and does not report family-level segregation of NPM1 c.860_863dup.
Still missing
  • Family pedigree and affected-relative data are not documented.
  • Variant results for relatives are not documented.
  • The number of informative meioses is not documented.
Sources
BS3 ACMG_2015Not assessed: no assay directly tested c.860_863dup and demonstrated preserved NPM1 protein function or splicing. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No well-established functional study in the supplied evidence demonstrates that NPM1 c.860_863dup/p.(W288Cfs*12) has no damaging effect on protein function or splicing. The exact variant is clinically reported in PMID:20026798 without a normal-function assay, while the available NPM1 localization studies concern other or incompletely matched mutant constructs and show abnormal localization rather than preserved function. Thus BS3 cannot be assigned.

Rule
Well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies show no damaging effect on protein function or splicing.
Evidence considered
  • PMID:20026798, Results, Clinical Characteristics and Molecular Markers at Diagnosis: the exact c.860_863dup variant was identified in AML, but no protein-function or splicing assay was reported.
  • PMID:15659725, Results and Figure 4: NPM1 mutant proteins showed cytoplasmic localization in transfected NIH-3T3 cells, which is not evidence of preserved function and was not explicitly tied to the exact submitted variant.
  • PMID:16455950, Functional localization results: tested NPM exon-12 mutant constructs showed abnormal cytoplasmic export/localization rather than normal function, and the exact submitted variant was not explicitly mentioned.
  • PMID:12450141, Results and Figure 3C: NPM/B23.1 localization constructs were not the submitted frameshift variant and did not establish normal function of c.860_863dup.
Still missing
  • A validated assay directly testing NPM1 c.860_863dup/p.(W288Cfs*12) and demonstrating no damaging effect on function or splicing is not documented.
Sources
BS4 ACMG_2015Not assessed: no affected relatives or family-level testing is available to demonstrate lack of segregation. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No affected family members, tested relatives, non-segregating relatives, or family pedigree are documented. Consequently, there is no evidence of lack of segregation and no basis to evaluate the phenocopy or multiple-pathogenic-variant caveat. Therefore BS4 cannot be assessed.

Rule
Lack of segregation in affected members of a family. ... Caveat: The presence of phenocopies for common phenotypes (i.e. cancer, epilepsy) can mimic lack of segregation among affected individuals.
Evidence considered
  • The available evidence contains no family pedigree or testing results for affected or unaffected relatives.
Still missing
  • Affected-relative status is not documented.
  • Relative genotypes and segregation results are not documented.
  • Family structure and possible phenocopies are not documented.
BP2 ACMG_2015Not assessed: no parental testing, offspring testing, or documented cis/trans relationship with a pathogenic variant is available for c.860_863dup. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The BP2 rule requires observation in trans with a pathogenic variant for a fully penetrant dominant disorder or in cis with a pathogenic variant in any inheritance pattern. The available evidence does not document parental or offspring testing, cis/trans phase, or a second pathogenic variant in the same individual. The exact-variant AML report provides no segregation or phase data, and the other reviewed AML report describes heterozygosity in the malignant clone without identifying a pathogenic partner allele.

Rule
Observed in trans with a pathogenic variant for a fully penetrant dominant gene/disorder or observed in cis with a pathogenic variant in any inheritance pattern.
Evidence considered
  • Becker et al. (PMID:20026798) explicitly report c.860_863dup in 67 of 83 NPM1-mutated AML patients (81%), but report no segregation, parental testing, offspring testing, or cis/trans phase for the variant.
  • Falini et al. (PMID:15659725) report NPM1 mutations as heterozygous and restricted to the malignant clone, but do not identify a pathogenic second allele or establish cis/trans phase for c.860_863dup.
Still missing
  • Documented phase with a pathogenic variant is unavailable.
  • Parental or offspring testing is unavailable.
  • The inheritance model and penetrance required for the trans path are not established for this case.
Sources
BP5 ACMG_2015Not assessed: no alternate molecular basis for the patient’s disease is documented in the available evidence. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The supplied evidence documents AML and the exact NPM1 variant, but does not document an alternate molecular basis for disease in the same case. No second pathogenic variant, established alternate diagnosis, or other alternate molecular etiology is available to assess BP5.

Rule
Variant found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease.
Still missing
  • The case lacks a documented alternate pathogenic molecular diagnosis or other alternate molecular basis.
Not applicable · 11· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PS1 N/ANot applicable: PS1 requires a missense variant, and this is a frameshift variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PS1 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) requires the same amino acid change as a previously established pathogenic variant, evaluated regardless of the underlying nucleotide change. NM_002520.7:c.860_863dup in NPM1 is a frameshift variant predicted to produce NP_002511.1:p.(Trp288CysfsTer12). As a result, no altered amino acid exists at this position to compare against any previously established pathogenic missense variant, so PS1's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. No VCEP criteria specification covers PS1 for NPM1, so the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 definition applies. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_missense
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: frameshift (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
  • VCEP criterion policy: absent
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules
PM1 N/ANot applicable: PM1 requires a missense variant, and this is a frameshift variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM1 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to a missense variant located in a mutational hot spot and/or a critical, well-established functional domain without benign variation. NM_002520.7:c.860_863dup in NPM1 is a frameshift variant predicted to produce NP_002511.1:p.(Trp288CysfsTer12). As a result, no altered residue exists to evaluate for mutational hot-spot or critical-domain membership, so PM1's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. No VCEP criteria specification covers PM1 for NPM1, so the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 definition applies. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_missense
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: frameshift (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
  • VCEP criterion policy: absent
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules
PM3 N/ANot applicable: PM3 requires a recessive disorder, but this case provides no evidence that NPM1 c.860_863dup belongs to a recessive disorder context. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM3 is limited to recessive disorders and requires the variant to be detected in trans with a pathogenic variant. The available case evidence describes NPM1 c.860_863dup in somatic AML and does not establish a recessive NPM1 disorder; therefore PM3 is not applicable.

Rule
For recessive disorders, detected in trans with a pathogenic variant ... This requires testing of parents (or offspring) to determine phase.
Evidence considered
  • Falini et al. (PMID:15659725) describe NPM1 exon-12 mutations as heterozygous and restricted to the malignant clone in AML, without establishing a recessive inherited disorder or trans phase.
  • Becker et al. (PMID:20026798) report the exact c.860_863dup variant as an NPM1 type A mutation in de novo cytogenetically normal AML, not as a recessive inherited condition.
Sources
PM4 N/ANot applicable: PM4 requires a protein-length change, and this is a frameshift variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM4 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to protein length changes: in-frame insertions/deletions in a non-repetitive region, or stop-loss variants that extend the protein past the reference stop codon. NM_002520.7:c.860_863dup in NPM1 is a frameshift variant predicted to produce NP_002511.1:p.(Trp288CysfsTer12). As a result, no change in protein length occurs, so there is nothing for this criterion to evaluate, so PM4's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. No VCEP criteria specification covers PM4 for NPM1, so the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 definition applies. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_stop_loss_or_nonrepeat_indel
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: frameshift (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
  • VCEP criterion policy: absent
Sources
pvs1_generic_framework ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules
PM5 N/ANot applicable: PM5 requires a missense variant, and this is a frameshift variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM5 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) requires a novel missense change at an amino acid residue where a different missense change has previously been determined to be pathogenic. NM_002520.7:c.860_863dup in NPM1 is a frameshift variant predicted to produce NP_002511.1:p.(Trp288CysfsTer12). As a result, no missense change exists at this residue to compare against a different pathogenic missense change at the same position, so PM5's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. No VCEP criteria specification covers PM5 for NPM1, so the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 definition applies. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_missense
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: frameshift (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
  • VCEP criterion policy: absent
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules
PP2 N/ANot applicable: PP2 requires a missense variant, and this is a frameshift variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PP2 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to a missense variant in a gene with a low rate of benign missense variation, where missense variants are a common mechanism of disease. NM_002520.7:c.860_863dup in NPM1 is a frameshift variant predicted to produce NP_002511.1:p.(Trp288CysfsTer12). As a result, the gene's missense-constraint properties are irrelevant because no missense change is present to evaluate, so PP2's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. No VCEP criteria specification covers PP2 for NPM1, so the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 definition applies. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_missense
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: frameshift (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
  • VCEP criterion policy: absent
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules
PP3 N/ANot applicable: c.860_863dup is a frameshift, outside PP3's generic computational-evidence scope. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PP3 is not applicable because NM_002520.7:c.860_863dup is an exonic frameshift variant, predicted to produce NP_002511.1:p.(Trp288CysfsTer12). The generic PP3 computational path applies to missense variants through REVEL or intronic, synonymous, and splice-region variants through SpliceAI; it does not apply to frameshift or other truncating/protein-length-changing variants. The available SpliceAI max delta of 0.002 is therefore not used for PP3.

Rule
Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect on the gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc.).
Evidence considered
  • Case normalization identifies NM_002520.7:c.860_863dup as an exonic frameshift producing NP_002511.1:p.(Trp288CysfsTer12).
  • SpliceAI max delta 0.002 was not used because this truncating variant is outside PP3 scope.
BP1 N/ANot applicable: BP1 requires a missense variant, and this is a frameshift variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP1 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to a missense variant in a gene for which primarily truncating variants are known to cause disease. NM_002520.7:c.860_863dup in NPM1 is a frameshift variant predicted to produce NP_002511.1:p.(Trp288CysfsTer12). As a result, the gene's truncating-variant mechanism is irrelevant because no missense change is present to evaluate, so BP1's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. No VCEP criteria specification covers BP1 for NPM1, so the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 definition applies. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_missense
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: frameshift (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
  • VCEP criterion policy: absent
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules
BP3 N/ANot applicable: BP3 requires an in-frame indel in a repeat region, and this is a frameshift variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP3 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) applies to in-frame insertions/deletions located in a repetitive region without a known function. NM_002520.7:c.860_863dup in NPM1 is a frameshift variant predicted to produce NP_002511.1:p.(Trp288CysfsTer12). As a result, the variant does not alter protein length within a repeat region, so there is nothing for this criterion to evaluate, so BP3's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. No VCEP criteria specification covers BP3 for NPM1, so the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 definition applies. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_repeat_region_indel
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: frameshift (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
  • VCEP criterion policy: absent
Sources
pvs1_generic_framework ↗generic_acmg_combination_rules
BP4 N/ANot applicable: c.860_863dup is a frameshift, outside BP4's generic computational-evidence scope. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP4 is not applicable because NM_002520.7:c.860_863dup is an exonic frameshift variant, predicted to produce NP_002511.1:p.(Trp288CysfsTer12). A no-impact splice prediction cannot negate the truncating protein effect, and the generic BP4 computational path does not apply to frameshift or other truncating/protein-length-changing variants. The available SpliceAI max delta of 0.002 is therefore not used for BP4.

Rule
Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc.)
Evidence considered
  • Case normalization identifies NM_002520.7:c.860_863dup as an exonic frameshift producing NP_002511.1:p.(Trp288CysfsTer12).
  • SpliceAI max delta 0.002 was not used because a no-impact splice result cannot support BP4 for a truncating variant.
BP7 N/ANot applicable: BP7 requires a synonymous variant, and this is a frameshift variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP7 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) is defined for a synonymous (silent) variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence and the nucleotide is not highly conserved. NM_002520.7:c.860_863dup in NPM1 is a frameshift variant predicted to produce NP_002511.1:p.(Trp288CysfsTer12). As a result, the encoded protein sequence is altered, so the criterion's silent-variant premise does not hold regardless of any splicing prediction, so BP7's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. No VCEP criteria specification covers BP7 for NPM1, so the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 definition applies. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_synonymous
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: frameshift (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
  • VCEP criterion policy: absent
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules

Identifiers

Gene
NPM1
Transcript
NM_002520.7
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_002520.7:c.860_863dup
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_002511.1:p.(Trp288CysfsTer12)
GRCh38
chr5:171410539 C>CTCTG
GRCh37
chr5:170837543 C>CTCTG
Location and type
Exon 11 · frameshift
ClinVar
13998
COSMIC
COSV51542664

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in NPM1, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_002520.7. Select a row to find it on the plot.

NPM1NM_002520.7
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 1 / 1,551,364 alleles AF 6.45e-07 · 0 homozygotes
gnomAD v2.1 Allele count data not recorded
gnomAD-Canada v1.0 Allele count data not recorded

By genetic ancestry

gnomAD v4.1

AF 6.4e-07 · 1 / 1,551,364 alleles · 0 hom
Remaining individuals1 / 60,364 1.7e-05
0 alternate alleles recorded in 9 other groups: Admixed American, European (Finnish), Amish, East Asian, Middle Eastern, South Asian, Ashkenazi Jewish, African/African American, European (non-Finnish).

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 6.44594e-07; MAF= 0.00006%, 1/1551364 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the Remaining individuals population (AF= 1.65662e-05; MAF= 0.00166%, 1/60364 alleles, homozygotes = 0).

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

SpliceAI and Pangolin

SpliceAI acceptor lossat -2 bp
0.001
SpliceAI acceptor gainat -12 bp
0.002
SpliceAI donor lossat +235 bp
0.000
SpliceAI donor gainat -257 bp
0.000
Pangolin splice lossmagnitude shown
-0.009
Pangolin splice gain
0.031

Other predictors

REVEL
Not available
BayesDel
Not available

How the predictions were used

PP3 N/ANot applicable: c.860_863dup is a frameshift, outside PP3's generic computational-evidence scope. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PP3 is not applicable because NM_002520.7:c.860_863dup is an exonic frameshift variant, predicted to produce NP_002511.1:p.(Trp288CysfsTer12). The generic PP3 computational path applies to missense variants through REVEL or intronic, synonymous, and splice-region variants through SpliceAI; it does not apply to frameshift or other truncating/protein-length-changing variants. The available SpliceAI max delta of 0.002 is therefore not used for PP3.

Rule
Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect on the gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc.).
Evidence considered
  • Case normalization identifies NM_002520.7:c.860_863dup as an exonic frameshift producing NP_002511.1:p.(Trp288CysfsTer12).
  • SpliceAI max delta 0.002 was not used because this truncating variant is outside PP3 scope.
BP4 N/ANot applicable: c.860_863dup is a frameshift, outside BP4's generic computational-evidence scope. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP4 is not applicable because NM_002520.7:c.860_863dup is an exonic frameshift variant, predicted to produce NP_002511.1:p.(Trp288CysfsTer12). A no-impact splice prediction cannot negate the truncating protein effect, and the generic BP4 computational path does not apply to frameshift or other truncating/protein-length-changing variants. The available SpliceAI max delta of 0.002 is therefore not used for BP4.

Rule
Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc.)
Evidence considered
  • Case normalization identifies NM_002520.7:c.860_863dup as an exonic frameshift producing NP_002511.1:p.(Trp288CysfsTer12).
  • SpliceAI max delta 0.002 was not used because a no-impact splice result cannot support BP4 for a truncating variant.
BP7 N/ANot applicable: BP7 requires a synonymous variant, and this is a frameshift variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP7 (Richards et al. 2015, PMID:25741868) is defined for a synonymous (silent) variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence and the nucleotide is not highly conserved. NM_002520.7:c.860_863dup in NPM1 is a frameshift variant predicted to produce NP_002511.1:p.(Trp288CysfsTer12). As a result, the encoded protein sequence is altered, so the criterion's silent-variant premise does not hold regardless of any splicing prediction, so BP7's structural prerequisite is not met by this variant class. No VCEP criteria specification covers BP7 for NPM1, so the generic ACMG/AMP 2015 definition applies. This determination was made deterministically from the variant's consequence class, prior to LLM adjudication.

Rule
deterministic_prefilter: requires_synonymous
Evidence considered
  • Deterministic consequence classification: frameshift (prefetch.json normalized protein consequence)
  • VCEP criterion policy: absent
Sources
generic_acmg_combination_rules

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00).

7 paper records listed. 1 cited in the classification.

Cited in the classification

  • Favorable prognostic impact of NPM1 mutations in older patients with cytogenetically normal de novo acute myeloid leukemia and associated gene- and microRNA-expression signatures: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study.
    Becker H et al. · 2010 Feb 1
    The paper explicitly reports the NPM1 type A mutation as a duplication of TCTG at c.860_863, corresponding to the assessed coding variant. It was the most frequent NPM1 mutation in the cohort, present in 67 of 83 NPM1-mutated patients (81%).
    → PVS1 · supporting Names this variant
    PMID 20026798 ↗
    Source detail
    The most frequent was a type A mutation (n = 67 [81%]), that is, the duplication of TCTG at position c.860_863.

    Location Results, "Clinical Characteristics and Molecular Markers at Diagnosis"

    Context Pretreatment bone marrow samples from 148 adults aged 60 years or older with de novo cytogenetically normal AML; NPM1 exon 12 was PCR-amplified and directly sequenced using reference sequences NM_002520.5 and NP_002511.1.

Other recorded publications

  • Cytoplasmic nucleophosmin in acute myelogenous leukemia with a normal karyotype.
    Falini B et al. · 2005
    The study reports NPM1 exon-12 mutations causing C-terminal frameshifts and abnormal cytoplasmic localization of mutant NPM in transfected NIH-3T3 cells, but the supplied extraction does not explicitly identify the submitted c.860_863dup/p.(W288Cfs*12) as the tested variant.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 15659725 ↗
    Quoted passage
    Six sequence variants were observed, all leading to a frame shift in the region encoding the C-terminal of the NPM protein.

    Results, "Mutations in NPM exon 12 in NPMc+ AML," pp. 261–263; Figure 4

  • Tryptophans 286 and 288 in the C-terminal region of protein B23.1 are important for its nucleolar localization.
    The study uses GFP-fusion point-mutant constructs in rat B23.1/NPM1 and finds that C-terminal tryptophans 286 and 288 contribute to nucleolar localization, but it does not test the submitted frameshift variant.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 12450141 ↗
    Quoted passage
    These results suggest that tryptophans 288 and 286 in protein B23.1 were important for its nucleolar localization.

    Results, p. 2242; Fig. 3C

  • Nucleophosmin gene mutations are predictors of favorable prognosis in acute myelogenous leukemia with a normal karyotype.
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 16076867 ↗
  • Both carboxy-terminus NES motif and mutated tryptophan(s) are crucial for aberrant nuclear export of nucleophosmin leukemic mutants in NPMc+ AML.
    The study evaluates NPM exon-12 mutant constructs and reports abnormal cytoplasmic localization and NES-dependent export involving altered tryptophan residues, but the submitted c.860_863dup/p.(W288Cfs*12) is not explicitly mentioned or established as the tested construct.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 16455950 ↗
    Quoted passage
    All 29 AML-associated mutated NPM alleles so far identified encode abnormal proteins which have acquired at the C-terminus a nuclear export signal (NES) motif and lost both tryptophan residues 288 and 290 (or only the residue 290) which determine nucleolar localization. We show for the first time that both alterations are crucial for NPM mutant export from nucleus to cytoplasm.

    Abstract; Results, "Export of NPM leukemic mutants is NES dependent" and "Role of tryptophans 288 and 290 in nucleolar binding and nuclear export of NPM leukemic mutants"; Table 1

  • Prevalence and prognostic impact of NPM1 mutations in 1485 adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 16455956 ↗
  • NCCN Task Force report: Evaluating the clinical utility of tumor markers in oncology.
    Febbo PG et al. · 2011
    No paper-specific finding is recorded.
    PMID 22138009 ↗

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

This variant is present in gnomAD v4.1 (AF= 6.44594e-07; MAF= 0.00006%, 1/1551364 alleles, homozygotes = 0) and has highest observed frequency in the Remaining individuals population (AF= 1.65662e-05; MAF= 0.00166%, 1/60364 alleles, homozygotes = 0).

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

gnomAD-Canada

Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

ClinVar

This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (3 clinical laboratories). (ClinVarID = 13998)

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.00).

Functional

OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; curated oncogenicity label: Oncogenic.

Somatic

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV51542664, n = 3293 times).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.