0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

MAP2K1 c.370C>T, p.Pro124Ser

NM_002755.4:c.370C>T NP_002746.1:p.(Pro124Ser) Missense · exon 3 View identifiers
Classification
Uncertain significance

Variant description:

The MAP2K1 NM_002755.4:c.370C>T (NP_002746.1:p.(Pro124Ser)) missense variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV61068297, n = 59 times), and lies in a statistically significant hotspot (cancerhotspots.org). Experimental evidence: Approved MAP2K1 functional assays and variant-specific ERK/MEK phosphorylation results support a damaging effect. Based on available guidelines, this variant is considered to be a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS). This variant is considered to be Pathogenic by the VCEP (ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel; ClinVar ID 375981).

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is uncertain. Select a step to read what it means.

Uncertain.The recorded classification is uncertain significance.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About MAP2K1

MAP2K1 encodes MEK1, a kinase that relays signals in the MAPK pathway to help regulate cell growth, division, differentiation, development, and survival. Abnormal MAP2K1 signaling is associated with cancer, particularly through activation of the MAPK pathway in cancers such as melanoma, colorectal cancer, and lung cancer, although activating MAP2K1 mutations are uncommon in primary tumors. MAP2K1 alterations can also contribute to resistance to some targeted cancer treatments.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is ClinGen MAP2K1 VCEP v2.3. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 5 Benign evidence criteria: 0
Pathogenic criteria applied · 5
PS3Supporting
PS3 · supporting

Met at Supporting: approved MAP2K1 functional assays and variant-specific ERK/MEK phosphorylation results support a damaging effect.

PM1Moderate
PM1 · moderate

Met, moderate: residue 124 falls within the VCEP-approved critical domain AA 124-134 specified for PM1.

PM2Supporting
PM2 · supporting

Met at Supporting: NM_002755.4:c.370C>T is absent from both gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1, satisfying the VCEP requirement for absence from controls.

PP3Supporting
PP3 · supporting

Met: REVEL 0.855 meets the VCEP missense threshold of ≥0.7 for PP3 Supporting evidence.

PP5Supporting
PP5 · supporting

Not applicable: the MAP2K1 VCEP prohibits PP5 use for this VCEP.

Benign criteria applied · 0

No benign criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.

Recorded classification: Uncertain significance

VUS: PS3, PM1, PM2, and PP3 are applied, but one moderate plus three supporting criteria do not satisfy a MAP2K1 VCEP pathogenic rule.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

No screenshot for this evidence
REVEL score
0.855 recorded score

Recorded REVEL score: 0.855. Refer to the recorded PP3/BP4 rationale for interpretation.

ClinVar submissions
5 reported laboratory submissions

3 Pathogenic · 2 Likely pathogenic. ClinVar API review status: reviewed by expert panel.

Functional evidence
Statement recorded

OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Gain-of-function; curated oncogenicity label: Oncogenic.

COSMIC
Cancer Hotspots
Somatic evidence
59 recorded samples

This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV61068297, n = 59 times).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant lies in a statistically significant hotspot.

For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under ClinGen MAP2K1 VCEP v2.3, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 5 met · 5 not met · 10 not assessed · 8 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

For the three requested consequence/length/repeat criteria, the VCEP makes PVS1 and BP3 not applicable; PM4 is not met because the variant is missense and does not change protein length.

PS2, PM6, PP1, and BS4 are not assessed because the available evidence contains no qualifying parental testing, de novo RASopathy case data, informative meioses, affected-relative segregation, or non-segregation observation.

PS3 is met at Supporting strength because the VCEP-approved MAP2K1 functional assay classes are pre-assigned PS3_Supporting and variant-specific studies report abnormal MEK/ERK pathway behavior for p.Pro124Ser.

BS3 is not applicable under the MAP2K1 VCEP specification and is pre-assigned BS3_NA in the governing functional-studies table.

Only PS4, PP4, PP5, BP5, and BP6 were adjudicated.

PS4 was not assessed because the available evidence does not provide VCEP-qualified RASopathy phenotype-specific case/control data or a VCEP point assignment.

PP4, PP5, and BP6 are not applicable under the MAP2K1 VCEP; BP5 is not assessed because no alternative molecular cause or point assignment is documented.

PP3 is met at Supporting strength because the VCEP's named missense predictor, REVEL, is 0.855 and meets the ≥0.7 threshold.

BP4 is not met because the VCEP's missense REVEL threshold is ≤0.3 and the observed score is 0.855.

BP7 is not applicable because the variant is missense, outside BP7's synonymous, intronic, and non-coding scope.

Population evidence supports PM2 at Supporting strength because the variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1.

BA1 and BS1 are not met because no gnomAD allele frequency reaches their VCEP thresholds.

BS2 is not assessed because absence from gnomAD does not provide the healthy-genotype observations or VCEP point score required for that criterion.

Met · 5

PS3 SupportingVCEPMet at Supporting: approved MAP2K1 functional assays and variant-specific ERK/MEK phosphorylation results support a damaging effect. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing MAP2K1 VCEP functional-studies table approves MEK activation and ERK activation assays for MAP2K1 and pre-assigns each approved assay type to PS3_Supporting, with BS3_NA. Variant-specific functional evidence is present: p.Pro124Ser caused ERK1/2 phosphorylation without serum and showed transformation activity in transfected-cell assays (PMID:22197931); p.P124S induced ERK phosphorylation in a pan-cancer functional assay (PMID:32641410); and p.P124S was experimentally characterized through MEK and ERK phosphorylation assays, although signaling was RAF- and phosphorylation-dependent (PMID:29483135). The VCEP CSPEC rule states, "One approved assay." These variant-specific results support PS3 at Supporting strength, but the governing table contains no variant-specific row assigning a higher strength and the pre-assigned assay classification outranks any independent assay count.

VCEP rule
One approved assay.
Evidence considered
  • SVI-RASopathy-VCEP-V2-Approved-Functional-Studies.xlsx, sheet MEK Activation Assay, MAP2K1 column: approved assay (Y); proposed strength PS3_Supporting; BS3_NA; readout is the pMEK/MEK ratio and abnormality is increased or prolonged phosphorylation.
  • SVI-RASopathy-VCEP-V2-Approved-Functional-Studies.xlsx, sheet ERK Activation Assay, MAP2K1 column: approved assay (Y); proposed strength PS3_Supporting; BS3_NA; readout is the pERK/ERK ratio and abnormality is constitutive, increased, or prolonged phosphorylation.
  • PMID:22197931: MAP2K1 p.Pro124Ser caused ERK1/2 phosphorylation without serum and showed transformation activity in NIH3T3 cells; the study used transfected HEK293T ERK phosphorylation and NIH3T3 transformation assays.
  • PMID:29483135: P124S weakly induced MEK and ERK phosphorylation in 293H cells; phosphorylation-site mutation abolished activation, and RAF depletion reduced MEK and ERK phosphorylation to trace levels.
  • PMID:32641410: P124S was included among functionally evaluated MAP2K1 mutants and induced ERK phosphorylation; the study used expression in HEK-293 cells and ERK-phosphorylation readout.
Still missing
  • No exact c.370C>T, p.Pro124Ser, or p.P124S entry was found in SVI-RASopathy-VCEP-V2-Approved-Functional-Studies.xlsx; the file provides assay-level classifications rather than a variant-specific row.
Sources
PM1 ModerateVCEPMet, moderate: residue 124 falls within the VCEP-approved critical domain AA 124-134 specified for PM1. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The variant encodes p.Pro124Ser, placing residue 124 within the VCEP-defined critical functional domain AA 124-134. The VCEP limits PM1 to critical, well-established domains in the supplementary table and excludes specific amino-acid-residue use under PM1; residue 124 meets the listed domain interval. The required MAP2K-Alignment.xlsx file was searched for c.370C>T, p.Pro124Ser, and p.P124S, but contains no entry for this variant; the CSPEC domain rule is sufficient for the domain assessment.

VCEP rule
Applicable only to critical and well-established functional domains available in the supplementary table (AA 43-61, AA 124-134). Not applicable to specific amino acid residues (see PM5).
Evidence considered
  • CSPEC PM1 rule: applicable only to critical and well-established functional domains in the supplementary table, specifically AA 43-61 and AA 124-134; the variant is p.Pro124Ser at residue 124.
  • MAP2K-Alignment.xlsx, sheet 'MAP2K Alignment': searched for c.370C>T, p.Pro124Ser, and p.P124S; no matching variant entry was present.
Still missing
  • MAP2K-Alignment.xlsx was searched for c.370C>T, p.Pro124Ser, and p.P124S; no entry for this variant was found.
Sources
PM2 SupportingVCEPMet at Supporting: NM_002755.4:c.370C>T is absent from both gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1, satisfying the VCEP requirement for absence from controls. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PM2 is met at Supporting strength. The governing MAP2K1 VCEP rule requires that the variant be absent from controls in gnomAD. NM_002755.4:c.370C>T (NP_002746.1:p.Pro124Ser) is reported absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1. The governing rule does not specify a non-cancer or exome-only subset, so the all-comers gnomAD results are the applicable default; the available non-cancer queries are also absent.

VCEP rule
The variant must be absent from controls (gnomAD).
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel MAP2K1 Version 2.3, PM2 rule: The variant must be absent from controls (gnomAD).
  • gnomAD v2.1: NM_002755.4:c.370C>T / GRCh37 15-66729162-C-T absent.
  • gnomAD v4.1: GRCh38 15-66436824-C-T absent.
  • gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer: variant absent. gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer: variant absent.
Sources
PP3 SupportingVCEPMet: REVEL 0.855 meets the VCEP missense threshold of ≥0.7 for PP3 Supporting evidence. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

NM_002755.4:c.370C>T produces the missense variant NP_002746.1:p.(Pro124Ser). The governing MAP2K1 VCEP rule specifies the missense pathway as REVEL ≥ 0.7. The local REVEL lookup reports 0.855, which meets that threshold; this supports PP3 at Supporting strength. The available SpliceAI result is not used for PP3 because the VCEP's missense pathway is satisfied by the named REVEL predictor, and the same prediction is not double-counted across criteria.

VCEP rule
For missense variants: REVEL ≥ 0.7. For splicing impact, predicted outcome must match disease mechanism.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel MAP2K1 Version 2.3 PP3 rule: for missense variants, REVEL ≥ 0.7 supports PP3.
  • Local REVEL predictor lookup for NM_002755.4:c.370C>T / NP_002746.1:p.(Pro124Ser): REVEL score 0.855, meeting the VCEP threshold of ≥0.7.
Sources
PP5 SupportingVCEPNot applicable: the MAP2K1 VCEP prohibits PP5 use for this VCEP. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

Expert panel ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel classified as Pathogenic.

VCEP rule
This criterion is not for use as recommended by the ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation VCEP Review Committee.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen RASopathy MAP2K1 VCEP v2.3 CSPEC entry for PP5 marks it Not Applicable for this VCEP.
  • ClinVar expert panel classification
Sources

Not met · 5 · evaluated, threshold not reached

PS1 VCEPNot met: available reports describe the exact p.Pro124Ser variant, with no distinct nucleotide substitution producing the same amino-acid change established as pathogenic. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The reviewed literature reports the exact MAP2K1 p.Pro124Ser/c.370 variant, but no distinct nucleotide substitution producing the same amino-acid change was identified as a previously established pathogenic variant. The VCEP PS1 rule requires the same amino-acid change as a previously established pathogenic variant regardless of nucleotide change; the available reports do not provide that qualifying distinct-nucleotide comparator.

VCEP rule
Same amino acid change as a previously established pathogenic variant regardless of nucleotide change. Applicable for observed analogous residue positions in _MAP2K1_ and _MAP2K2_.
Evidence considered
  • PMID:22197931 reports MAP2K1 p.Pro124Ser as a c.370>T transition; this is the exact observed amino-acid and nucleotide event, not a distinct nucleotide substitution producing p.Pro124Ser.
  • PMID:32641410 reports P124S as an activating MAP2K1 hotspot variant, again describing the same P124S variant rather than a distinct nucleotide comparator.
  • No qualifying distinct-nucleotide p.Pro124Ser comparator was identified in the reviewed case evidence.
Sources
PM4 VCEPNot met: c.370C>T is missense p.(Pro124Ser) with no protein length change, whereas PM4 requires an in-frame indel or stop-loss variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The VCEP applies PM4 to protein length changes caused by in-frame deletions or insertions in a non-repeat region or by stop-loss variants. NM_002755.4:c.370C>T is a missense substitution producing p.(Pro124Ser), with no protein length change; therefore PM4 is not met. The VCEP also states there are no known repetitive areas in the gene, but that does not convert a missense substitution into a PM4-eligible length-changing variant.

VCEP rule
Protein length changes due to in-frame deletions/insertions in a non-repeat region or stop-loss variants. ... No known repetitive areas in gene. Use as described.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen RASopathy MAP2K1 VCEP PM4 instruction: protein length changes due to in-frame deletions/insertions in a non-repeat region or stop-loss variants.
  • ClinGen RASopathy MAP2K1 VCEP PM4 rule: No known repetitive areas in gene. Use as described.
  • Case variant assessment: NM_002755.4:c.370C>T is a missense variant producing NP_002746.1:p.(Pro124Ser), so it does not alter protein length.
Sources
BA1 VCEPNot met: the variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1, rather than meeting the VCEP BA1 threshold of ≥0.05% filtering allele frequency. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BA1 is not met. The governing MAP2K1 VCEP rule requires a gnomAD filtering allele frequency ≥0.05%. The variant NM_002755.4:c.370C>T (NP_002746.1:p.Pro124Ser) is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, so no allele frequency reaches the VCEP threshold. The governing rule does not require use of a non-cancer subset, and the available non-cancer queries are likewise reported absent.

VCEP rule
GnomAD filtering allele frequency ≥0.05%.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel MAP2K1 Version 2.3, BA1 rule: GnomAD filtering allele frequency ≥0.05%.
  • gnomAD v2.1: NM_002755.4:c.370C>T / GRCh37 15-66729162-C-T absent; no allele frequency reported.
  • gnomAD v4.1: GRCh38 15-66436824-C-T absent; no allele frequency reported.
  • gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer: variant absent; no allele frequency reported. gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer: variant absent; no allele frequency reported.
Sources
BS1 VCEPNot met: the variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1, rather than meeting the VCEP BS1 threshold of ≥0.025% filtering allele frequency. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BS1 is not met. The governing MAP2K1 VCEP rule requires a gnomAD filtering allele frequency ≥0.025%. The variant NM_002755.4:c.370C>T (NP_002746.1:p.Pro124Ser) is absent from gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1, so no allele frequency reaches the VCEP threshold. The governing rule does not require use of a non-cancer subset, and the available non-cancer queries are likewise reported absent.

VCEP rule
GnomAD filtering allele frequency ≥0.025%.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel MAP2K1 Version 2.3, BS1 rule: GnomAD filtering allele frequency ≥0.025%.
  • gnomAD v2.1: NM_002755.4:c.370C>T / GRCh37 15-66729162-C-T absent; no allele frequency reported.
  • gnomAD v4.1: GRCh38 15-66436824-C-T absent; no allele frequency reported.
  • gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer: variant absent; no allele frequency reported. gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer: variant absent; no allele frequency reported.
Sources
BP4 VCEPNot met: REVEL 0.855 exceeds the VCEP missense BP4 threshold of ≤0.3. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

NM_002755.4:c.370C>T is a missense variant, NP_002746.1:p.(Pro124Ser), so the VCEP's missense BP4 pathway applies. That pathway requires REVEL ≤ 0.3. The local REVEL lookup reports 0.855, which is above the benign threshold; therefore BP4 is not met. The available SpliceAI result is not used for BP4 because the governing missense rule names REVEL, and the same prediction is not double-counted across criteria.

VCEP rule
For missense variants: REVEL ≤0.3.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel MAP2K1 Version 2.3 BP4 rule: for missense variants, REVEL ≤ 0.3 supports BP4.
  • Local REVEL predictor lookup for NM_002755.4:c.370C>T / NP_002746.1:p.(Pro124Ser): REVEL score 0.855, above the VCEP threshold of ≤0.3.
Sources

Not assessed · 10 · no assessment recorded

PS2 VCEPNot assessed: no documented parental testing, de novo confirmation, or disease-specific point score is available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No case-specific documentation establishes that MAP2K1 c.370C>T (p.Pro124Ser) is de novo in a proband with confirmed maternity and paternity, and no VCEP point score can be assigned from the available evidence. The available variant-specific publications describe somatic melanoma findings and functional studies, not germline parental testing or a RASopathy proband de novo observation.

VCEP rule
4 Points; 2 Points; 1 Point.
Evidence considered
  • The VCEP CSPEC lists PS2 as applicable and assigns 4, 2, or 1 points, but the case materials contain no qualifying parental-testing or proband de novo evidence for this variant.
  • PMID:22197931, PMID:24265153, PMID:25370473, PMID:29483135, and PMID:32641410 report MAP2K1 p.Pro124Ser in somatic melanoma or functional contexts; they do not document germline parental testing for a RASopathy proband.
Still missing
  • Documented testing of both biological parents for MAP2K1 c.370C>T is unavailable.
  • A qualifying RASopathy phenotype and no-family-history assessment for a proband are unavailable.
  • The VCEP de novo point score cannot be assigned without qualifying case data.
Sources
PS4 VCEPNot assessed: no VCEP-qualified RASopathy case-control counts, control frequency, or PS4 point assignment are available for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The MAP2K1 VCEP applies PS4 by point-based scoring for autosomal-dominant cases with phenotypic specifications, with full points for RASopathy phenotypes and reduced points for minimal phenotype information; strength thresholds are >=5 points for Strong, >=3 for Moderate, and >=1 for Supporting. The available variant-specific papers report somatic melanoma cohorts or functional studies, not affected RASopathy patients versus unaffected or population controls, and no PS4 point assignments or qualifying RASopathy phenotype cohort are available. The literature_pass.json packet has no ai_classified_papers to verify. Therefore PS4 cannot be evaluated from the available VCEP-qualified evidence; no odds ratio or confidence interval was computed because no qualifying case/control counts or matched-ancestry control frequency were reported.

VCEP rule
The prevalence of the variant in affected individuals is significantly increased compared to the prevalence in controls. ... Note 1: Relative risk (RR) or odds ratio (OR), as obtained from case-control studies, is >5.0 and the confidence interval around the estimate of RR or OR does not include 1.0. See manuscript for detailed guidance. ... Note 2: In instances of very rare variants where case-control studies may not reach statistical significance, the prior observation of the variant in multiple unrelated patients with the same phenotype, and its absence in controls, may be used as moderate level of evidence. ... ≥5 points. ... ≥3 points. ... ≥1 point.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen RASopathy MAP2K1 VCEP v2.3 PS4 rule: strength adjustment uses point-based scoring for autosomal-dominant cases with phenotypic specifications; full points are awarded with RASopathy phenotypes and reduced points with minimal phenotype information.
  • ClinGen RASopathy MAP2K1 VCEP v2.3 PS4 strength rows: Strong >=5 points, Moderate >=3 points, Supporting >=1 point.
  • PMID:22197931 reports MAP2K1 p.Pro124Ser in four melanomas among 121 affected individuals and functional assays; this is a somatic melanoma cohort, not a RASopathy case-control comparison.
  • PMID:24265153 reports MEK1P124S in a pretreatment metastatic melanoma tumor and examines treatment resistance; it does not provide a RASopathy case-control comparison.
  • PMID:25370473 reports P124S/P124Q in melanoma cohorts and pooled treatment-response comparisons, without a P124S-specific RASopathy case-control analysis.
  • PMID:32641410 reports P124S in a pan-cancer functional analysis; it is not a RASopathy case-control study.
  • literature_pass.json has an empty ai_classified_papers list; no already-classified PS4 paper was available for abstract/full-text verification.
Still missing
  • A VCEP-compatible PS4 point assignment based on affected RASopathy cases and phenotype specificity is unavailable.
  • No qualifying unaffected/population control counts or matched-ancestry control frequency are available, so an OR and 95% CI cannot be computed.
Sources
PM5 VCEPNot assessed: p.Pro124Gln is reported at codon 124, but its required likely-pathogenic status is not established in the available evidence. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PMID:22197931 reports p.Pro124Gln at the same codon in cardio-faciocutaneous syndrome, providing a same-codon alternate residue lead. However, the available evidence does not establish p.Pro124Gln as a likely pathogenic variant under the VCEP rule, and the PM5 candidate collection contains no qualifying same-residue candidates. Therefore the required pathogenicity of the comparator cannot be evaluated from the allowed evidence.

VCEP rule
≥2 different [likely] pathogenic residues changes at the same codon observed in ≥5 probands. ... 1 [likely] pathogenic residue change at the same codon.
Evidence considered
  • PMID:22197931 states that p.Pro124Gln at the same codon was described in cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome, but does not provide a VCEP-qualifying likely-pathogenic classification for that comparator.
  • pm5_candidates.json reports zero same-residue candidates, zero expert-panel pathogenic/likely pathogenic candidates, and zero non-expert-majority pathogenic/likely pathogenic candidates.
Still missing
  • A qualifying likely pathogenic alternate missense change at codon 124 was not established from the available VCEP-governed evidence.
Sources
PM6 VCEPNot assessed: no RASopathy case documents assumed de novo status without confirmed maternity and paternity or provides a VCEP point score. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No case-specific evidence establishes an assumed de novo MAP2K1 c.370C>T (p.Pro124Ser) occurrence without confirmed maternity and paternity. The available variant-specific publications describe somatic melanoma observations and functional studies, not an assumed de novo RASopathy case, so the VCEP point score cannot be assigned.

VCEP rule
2 Points; 1 Point; 0.5 Points.
Evidence considered
  • The VCEP CSPEC lists PM6 as applicable with strengths corresponding to 2, 1, or 0.5 points, but no qualifying case-level de novo evidence is present.
  • The reviewed variant-specific publications concern somatic melanoma or functional studies and do not provide a RASopathy family evaluation supporting PM6.
Still missing
  • A qualifying RASopathy case with an assumed de novo occurrence is unavailable.
  • The parental testing status and phenotype-specific point adjustment are unavailable.
  • The VCEP PM6 point score cannot be assigned from the available evidence.
Sources
PP1 VCEPNot assessed: zero informative meioses are documented, so the VCEP thresholds of at least 3, 5, or 7 cannot be evaluated. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No affected relatives, family genotype-phenotype data, or informative meioses are documented for MAP2K1 c.370C>T (p.Pro124Ser). Therefore, the VCEP thresholds of at least 3, 5, or 7 informative meioses cannot be evaluated.

VCEP rule
≥7 informative meioses; ≥5 informative meioses; ≥3 informative meioses.
Evidence considered
  • The VCEP CSPEC specifies PP1 at supporting strength for at least 3 informative meioses, moderate strength for at least 5, and strong strength for at least 7; no informative meioses are documented in the case materials.
  • The reviewed variant-specific publications do not report familial segregation of MAP2K1 c.370C>T in RASopathy families.
Still missing
  • Family-level genotype and phenotype data are unavailable.
  • The number of informative meioses is unavailable.
  • Segregation across affected relatives and, preferably, more than one family is unavailable.
Sources
PP2 VCEPNot assessed: the VCEP requires a gnomAD missense z score >3.09, but no MAP2K1 missense z score is available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The VCEP requires a gnomAD missense z score greater than 3.09 for PP2. No MAP2K1 gnomAD missense z score is present in the available case evidence, so the criterion cannot be evaluated without substituting an unapproved value or threshold.

VCEP rule
Missense z score is >3.09 in gnomAD.
Evidence considered
  • The available gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1 evidence reports variant-level population observations only and does not provide the gene-level MAP2K1 missense z score required by PP2.
Still missing
  • MAP2K1 gnomAD missense z score is unavailable in the case evidence.
Sources
BS2 VCEPNot assessed: gnomAD reports absence but provides no healthy homozygote or heterozygote observation from which the VCEP’s -4 or -1 point score can be assigned. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BS2 cannot be assessed from the available evidence. The governing MAP2K1 VCEP rule assigns strength using healthy homozygote or heterozygote observations: -4 points for the strong level or -1 point for the supporting level. The population records report the variant as absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1, but provide no healthy-carrier, homozygote, or heterozygote observations and therefore do not establish the point score required by the VCEP.

VCEP rule
Strength adjustment using point-based scoring based on phenotypic specifications. Phenotypic specifications: based on healthy homozygote or heterozygote individuals, reduced points for apparently unaffected heterozygous individuals, applicable to parent or sibling samples during clinical family evaluations. ... -4 Points. ... -1 Point.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel MAP2K1 Version 2.3, BS2 instructions: strength adjustment uses point-based scoring based on phenotypic specifications and is based on healthy homozygote or heterozygote individuals.
  • ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel MAP2K1 Version 2.3, BS2 strong rule: -4 Points.
  • ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel MAP2K1 Version 2.3, BS2 supporting rule: -1 Point.
  • gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1 report the variant absent, with empty source data and no healthy-genotype observations or point-score inputs.
Still missing
  • A VCEP-compatible point score requires documented healthy homozygote or heterozygote observations and the applicable phenotypic context; these are not available.
Sources
BS4 VCEPNot assessed: no affected-relative testing or non-segregation observation provides the one informative meiosis required by the VCEP. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

No affected family members have been evaluated for MAP2K1 c.370C>T (p.Pro124Ser), and no non-segregation observation or informative meiosis is documented. Consequently, the VCEP's single-informative-meiosis requirement for BS4 cannot be evaluated.

VCEP rule
Requires only one informative meiosis.
Evidence considered
  • The VCEP CSPEC specifies that BS4 requires only one informative meiosis; no informative meiosis or affected-relative non-segregation is documented in the case materials.
  • The reviewed variant-specific publications do not report familial non-segregation of MAP2K1 c.370C>T in RASopathy families.
Still missing
  • Testing results for affected relatives are unavailable.
  • A documented non-segregation event is unavailable.
  • The presence of at least one informative meiosis is unavailable.
Sources
BP2 VCEPNot assessed: no documented germline phase or cis/trans pathogenic-variant observation is available to assign the VCEP's BP2 point threshold. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The VCEP provides BP2 point thresholds of ≥ (-4), ≥ (-2), and ≥ (-1) points, but the available evidence contains no documented phase, affected-proband observation, or pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant in cis or trans from which a BP2 point value can be assigned. Somatic tumor reports do not establish germline allelic phase or inheritance.

VCEP rule
≥ (-4) Points. ... ≥ (-2) Points. ... ≥ (-1) Point.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel MAP2K1 Version 2.3 CSPEC criterion entry for BP2: Strong ≥ (-4) points, Moderate ≥ (-2) points, Supporting ≥ (-1) point.
  • The available case evidence reports somatic tumor observations for MAP2K1 p.Pro124Ser but does not document germline phase, cis/trans status, or an affected-proband allelic observation relevant to BP2.
Still missing
  • Documented germline phase with a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in cis or trans is unavailable.
  • Affected-proband allelic observations and an applicable BP2 point assignment are unavailable.
Sources
BP5 VCEPNot assessed: no alternative causative variant or BP5 point value is documented for this case under the VCEP rule. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The MAP2K1 VCEP permits BP5 when an alternative molecular cause of RASopathy is present in a different gene, with a phenotype consistent with the expected RASopathy severity, or when a phenotype inconsistent with RASopathy is fully explained by a different causative variant. No case-level evidence documents an alternative causative variant or such a fully explained alternative phenotype for this sample. The available melanoma papers describe somatic tumor findings and do not establish the BP5 alternative molecular cause for this case. The VCEP's own strength thresholds are >=(-4) points for Strong, >=(-2) for Moderate, and >=(-1) for Supporting, but no BP5 point value is available; applying any other threshold or inferring a point score would violate the VCEP-only rule.

VCEP rule
Points are awarded for an alternative molecular cause of a RASopathy in a different gene (and/or in conjunction with BP2) and the phenotype is consistent with expected severity of the RASopathy. Points are also awarded for phenotypes inconsistent with a RASopathy and fully explained by a different causative variant (e.g. WES testing). ... ≥ (-4) Points. ... ≥ (-2) Points. ... ≥ (-1) Point.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen RASopathy MAP2K1 VCEP v2.3 BP5 rule requires an alternative molecular cause of RASopathy in a different gene, with phenotype consistent with expected severity, or an inconsistent phenotype fully explained by a different causative variant.
  • ClinGen RASopathy MAP2K1 VCEP v2.3 BP5 strength rows state >=(-4) points for Strong, >=(-2) points for Moderate, and >=(-1) point for Supporting.
  • No case evidence documents a second causative variant or an alternative molecular explanation for the patient's phenotype.
Still missing
  • Case-level evidence for an alternative molecular cause in a different gene, or a fully explained non-RASopathy phenotype, is unavailable.
  • No VCEP BP5 point assignment is available.
Sources
Not applicable · 8· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PVS1 VCEPNot applicable: the VCEP marks PVS1 not applicable, and c.370C>T is missense p.(Pro124Ser), not a defined null variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ClinGen RASopathy MAP2K1 VCEP marks PVS1 as not applicable. NM_002755.4:c.370C>T is a missense variant, NP_002746.1:p.(Pro124Ser), in exon 3, rather than a VCEP-defined null variant such as a nonsense, frameshift, canonical splice, initiation-codon, or exon-deletion variant.

VCEP rule
Not applicable.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen RASopathy MAP2K1 VCEP specification v2.3: PVS1 applicability is Not applicable and instructions state Not applicable.
  • Case variant assessment: NM_002755.4:c.370C>T produces NP_002746.1:p.(Pro124Ser), is classified as missense, and lies in exon 3.
Sources
PM3 VCEPNot applicable: the MAP2K1 VCEP explicitly marks PM3 as not applicable. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel MAP2K1 Version 2.3 specification explicitly marks PM3 as not applicable. No PM3 evidence is therefore evaluated.

VCEP rule
Not Applicable
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel MAP2K1 Version 2.3 CSPEC criterion entry: PM3 applicability = Not Applicable.
Sources
PP4 VCEPNot applicable: the MAP2K1 VCEP explicitly marks PP4 as not applicable and directs phenotype evidence to PS4. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The MAP2K1 VCEP explicitly marks PP4 as not applicable and directs users to PS4 instead.

VCEP rule
Not applicable, see PS4.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen RASopathy MAP2K1 VCEP v2.3 CSPEC entry for PP4 states: Not applicable, see PS4.
Sources
BS3 VCEPNot applicable: the MAP2K1 VCEP explicitly marks BS3 not applicable and pre-assigns BS3_NA for approved functional assays. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The MAP2K1 VCEP CSPEC marks BS3 as not applicable. The governing functional-studies table likewise pre-assigns BS3_NA for the approved MAP2K1 MEK-activation and ERK-activation assay classes. Therefore normal functional results cannot be used to apply BS3 under this VCEP framework.

VCEP rule
Not applicable
Evidence considered
  • vcep_materials.json / prefetch.json CSPEC entry for BS3: applicability is Not applicable.
  • SVI-RASopathy-VCEP-V2-Approved-Functional-Studies.xlsx, sheet MEK Activation Assay, MAP2K1 column: approved assay (Y); proposed strength PS3_Supporting; BS3_NA.
  • SVI-RASopathy-VCEP-V2-Approved-Functional-Studies.xlsx, sheet ERK Activation Assay, MAP2K1 column: approved assay (Y); proposed strength PS3_Supporting; BS3_NA.
Still missing
  • No exact c.370C>T, p.Pro124Ser, or p.P124S entry was found in SVI-RASopathy-VCEP-V2-Approved-Functional-Studies.xlsx; the file provides assay-level classifications rather than a variant-specific row.
Sources
BP1 N/ANot applicable: BP1 is restricted to truncating variants, whereas this variant is the missense substitution p.Pro124Ser. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP1 is limited by the VCEP to truncating variants, including nonsense, frameshift, canonical splice-site, initiation-codon, whole-gene, or multi-exon deletions in genes without established loss-of-function correlation. This variant is a missense substitution, p.Pro124Ser, so it is outside the rule's named variant types.

VCEP rule
This rule has contraindications for use with RASopathies. Given the disease mechanism is gain-of-function for RASopathies, BP1 should be used for any truncating variant (nonsense, frameshift, affects canonical splice sites, initiation codon, entire gene or multi exon deletion) in genes without established LOF correlation to disease. See the supplemental material regarding dosage sensitivity information for each individual gene and potential association to disorders associated with LOF variants.
Evidence considered
  • Case variant consequence: NM_002755.4:c.370C>T produces NP_002746.1:p.(Pro124Ser), a missense substitution.
Sources
BP3 VCEPNot applicable: the VCEP marks BP3 not applicable and identifies no known benign repetitive areas in RASopathy genes. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The ClinGen RASopathy MAP2K1 VCEP marks BP3 as not applicable and states that there are no known benign repetitive areas in RASopathy genes. This missense substitution is not an in-frame deletion or insertion in a repetitive region without known function.

VCEP rule
No known benign repetitive areas in RASopathy genes.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen RASopathy MAP2K1 VCEP BP3 applicability: Not applicable.
  • ClinGen RASopathy MAP2K1 VCEP BP3 instruction: No known benign repetitive areas in RASopathy genes.
  • The original ACMG/AMP BP3 description concerns in-frame deletions/insertions in a repetitive region without known function; this variant is a missense substitution.
Sources
BP6 VCEPNot applicable: the MAP2K1 VCEP prohibits BP6 use for this VCEP. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The MAP2K1 VCEP marks BP6 as not applicable for this VCEP and states that the criterion is not for use as recommended by the ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation VCEP Review Committee.

VCEP rule
This criterion is not for use as recommended by the ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation VCEP Review Committee.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen RASopathy MAP2K1 VCEP v2.3 CSPEC entry for BP6 marks it Not Applicable for this VCEP.
Sources
BP7 N/ANot applicable: c.370C>T is missense p.Pro124Ser, whereas BP7 is limited to synonymous, intronic, or non-coding variants. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

NM_002755.4:c.370C>T is a missense variant, NP_002746.1:p.(Pro124Ser). The governing MAP2K1 VCEP BP7 rule covers synonymous variants and additionally intronic positions other than canonical splice sites or non-coding variants. A missense coding variant is outside those named variant types, so BP7 is not_applicable before splice-prediction evidence is considered.

VCEP rule
A synonymous (silent) variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence nor the creation of a new splice site AND the nucleotide is not highly conserved. This rule is also applicable for intronic positions (except canonical splice sites) or non-coding variants and should be used in conjunction with BP4.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel MAP2K1 Version 2.3 BP7 rule: applies to synonymous variants and also to intronic positions except canonical splice sites or non-coding variants.
  • Variant consequence record: NM_002755.4:c.370C>T is a missense variant producing NP_002746.1:p.(Pro124Ser), not a synonymous, intronic, or non-coding variant.
Sources
cspec ↗pvs1_variant_assessment

Identifiers

Gene
MAP2K1
Transcript
NM_002755.4
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_002755.4:c.370C>T
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_002746.1:p.(Pro124Ser)
GRCh38
chr15:66436824 C>T
GRCh37
chr15:66729162 C>T
Location and type
Exon 3 · missense
ClinVar
375981
COSMIC
COSV61068297

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in MAP2K1, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_002755.4. Select a row to find it on the plot.

MAP2K1NM_002755.4
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 Allele count data not recorded
gnomAD v2.1 Allele count data not recorded
gnomAD-Canada v1.0 Allele count data not recorded

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

Absent from gnomAD v4.1.

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

gnomAD-Canada

Not available in gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

SpliceAI and Pangolin

SpliceAI acceptor lossat -299 bp
0.000
SpliceAI acceptor gainat +35 bp
0.000
SpliceAI donor lossat -208 bp
0.000
SpliceAI donor gainat +21 bp
0.008
Pangolin splice lossmagnitude shown
-0.001
Pangolin splice gain
0.002

Other predictors

REVEL
0.855
BayesDel
0.224

How the predictions were used

PP3 SupportingVCEPMet: REVEL 0.855 meets the VCEP missense threshold of ≥0.7 for PP3 Supporting evidence. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

NM_002755.4:c.370C>T produces the missense variant NP_002746.1:p.(Pro124Ser). The governing MAP2K1 VCEP rule specifies the missense pathway as REVEL ≥ 0.7. The local REVEL lookup reports 0.855, which meets that threshold; this supports PP3 at Supporting strength. The available SpliceAI result is not used for PP3 because the VCEP's missense pathway is satisfied by the named REVEL predictor, and the same prediction is not double-counted across criteria.

VCEP rule
For missense variants: REVEL ≥ 0.7. For splicing impact, predicted outcome must match disease mechanism.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel MAP2K1 Version 2.3 PP3 rule: for missense variants, REVEL ≥ 0.7 supports PP3.
  • Local REVEL predictor lookup for NM_002755.4:c.370C>T / NP_002746.1:p.(Pro124Ser): REVEL score 0.855, meeting the VCEP threshold of ≥0.7.
Sources
BP4 VCEPNot met: REVEL 0.855 exceeds the VCEP missense BP4 threshold of ≤0.3. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

NM_002755.4:c.370C>T is a missense variant, NP_002746.1:p.(Pro124Ser), so the VCEP's missense BP4 pathway applies. That pathway requires REVEL ≤ 0.3. The local REVEL lookup reports 0.855, which is above the benign threshold; therefore BP4 is not met. The available SpliceAI result is not used for BP4 because the governing missense rule names REVEL, and the same prediction is not double-counted across criteria.

VCEP rule
For missense variants: REVEL ≤0.3.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel MAP2K1 Version 2.3 BP4 rule: for missense variants, REVEL ≤ 0.3 supports BP4.
  • Local REVEL predictor lookup for NM_002755.4:c.370C>T / NP_002746.1:p.(Pro124Ser): REVEL score 0.855, above the VCEP threshold of ≤0.3.
Sources
BP7 N/ANot applicable: c.370C>T is missense p.Pro124Ser, whereas BP7 is limited to synonymous, intronic, or non-coding variants. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

NM_002755.4:c.370C>T is a missense variant, NP_002746.1:p.(Pro124Ser). The governing MAP2K1 VCEP BP7 rule covers synonymous variants and additionally intronic positions other than canonical splice sites or non-coding variants. A missense coding variant is outside those named variant types, so BP7 is not_applicable before splice-prediction evidence is considered.

VCEP rule
A synonymous (silent) variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence nor the creation of a new splice site AND the nucleotide is not highly conserved. This rule is also applicable for intronic positions (except canonical splice sites) or non-coding variants and should be used in conjunction with BP4.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel MAP2K1 Version 2.3 BP7 rule: applies to synonymous variants and also to intronic positions except canonical splice sites or non-coding variants.
  • Variant consequence record: NM_002755.4:c.370C>T is a missense variant producing NP_002746.1:p.(Pro124Ser), not a synonymous, intronic, or non-coding variant.
Sources
cspec ↗pvs1_variant_assessment

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.01). REVEL score = 0.855. BayesDel score = 0.223852.

5 paper records listed. 4 cited in the classification.

Cited in the classification

  • Exome sequencing identifies recurrent somatic MAP2K1 and MAP2K2 mutations in melanoma.
    Nikolaev SI et al. · 2011 Dec 25
    The paper reports MAP2K1 p.Pro124Ser in four melanomas and notes p.Pro124Gln at the same codon in cardio-faciocutaneous syndrome; the p.Pro124Gln mention supplies a same-codon alternate-residue lead for PM5 but does not itself establish the comparator's VCEP-required likely-pathogenic status.
    → PS3 · supporting Names this variant
    PMID 22197931 ↗
    Source detail
    The paper also notes that MAP2K1 p.Pro124Ser was previously reported in the context of MEK-inhibitor resistance, while p.Pro124Gln at the same codon was described in cardio-faciocutaneous syndrome.

    Location Results, “Functional and structural implications of MAP2K1 mutations”

    Context Sanger sequencing of MAP2K1, MAP2K2, BRAF, and NRAS in melanoma samples; ERK phosphorylation and NIH3T3 transformation assays; melanoma-cell drug-response assays.

  • Preexisting MEK1P124 mutations diminish response to BRAF inhibitors in metastati
    The paper describes MEK1P124S in melanoma cohorts and reports pooled P124Q/S treatment-response associations plus engineered-cell evidence of RAF-independent ERK phosphorylation and slightly elevated kinase activity, without separating all results for P124S alone.
    → PS3 · supporting Names this variant
    PMID 25370473 ↗
    Source detail
    MEK1P124S and MEK1P124Q have slightly elevated kinase activity and cause a significant, albeit slight decrease in dabrafenib sensitivity.

    Location Table 1; Results sections on positive selection of MEK1 Pro124 mutations, clinical response, and RAF-independent kinase activity; Figure 3

    Context Four published melanoma cohorts; engineered BRAF-mutant SKMel28 cell assays measuring ERK phosphorylation and clonogenic survival; endogenous-mutant melanoma cell-line comparisons.

  • Allele-Specific Mechanisms of Activation of MEK1 Mutants Determine Their Propert
    The paper characterizes P124S as a RAF-dependent MEK1 mutant that weakly induces MEK and ERK phosphorylation in 293H cells; phosphorylation-site mutation abolishes activation and RAF depletion reduces signaling to trace levels.
    → PS3 · supporting Names this variant
    PMID 29483135 ↗
    Source detail
    RAF-dependent MEK1 mutants (D67N, P124L and P124S), both MEK and ERK phosphorylation were decreased to trace levels in RAF-less cells.

    Location Results, paragraphs describing Fig. 1B–C and Fig. 2E; Table 1 classification

    Context Expression assays in 293H cells, in vitro kinase assays, and conditional RAF-knockout/RAF-less MEF cells.

  • Leveraging Systematic Functional Analysis to Benchmark an In Silico Framework Di
    The paper reports P124S as an activating MAP2K1 variant, with ERK phosphorylation in functional testing and a predicted T-loop conformational disruption consistent with kinase activation.
    → PS3 · supporting Names this variant
    PMID 32641410 ↗
    Source detail
    Among the hotspot sites, we confirmed that MEK1 point mutants predicted to disrupt helix-A in the negative regulatory domain (F53L, Q56P, K57E/N and D67N) or distort the position of helix-C in the kinase domain (C121S, P124S/L, G128D/V, and Y130C) (Fig. 2A) were activating, consistent with the literature (2,3,25–32).

    Location Results, “Pan-cancer landscape of MAP2K1 mutations,” paragraphs 2–4

    Context Pan-cancer analysis of 42,434 tumors; 115 MEK1 mutants functionally evaluated by expression in HEK-293 cells and ERK-phosphorylation measurement; molecular-dynamics simulations.

Other recorded publications

  • The genetic landscape of clinical resistance to RAF inhibition in metastatic mel
    The paper reports MEK1P124S in a pretreatment melanoma tumor associated with rapid progression during RAF inhibition; it does not provide a separately reported variant-specific functional result for P124S.
    Names this variant
    PMID 24265153 ↗
    Quoted passage
    Five MAP2K1 gene mutations (encodes the MEK1 kinase) were detected in either drug-resistance specimens (3 mutations; MEK1V60E, MEK1G128V, and MEK1V154I in Patients 41, 32, and 28, respectively) or pre-treatment tumors that progressed rapidly in the face of clinical RAF inhibition (2 mutations; MEK1P124S and MEK1P124L in Patients 4 and 15, respectively) (Fig. 1B).

    Results, subsection “MEK1 mutations confer resistance to RAF and MEK inhibitors when expressed inducibly”

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

Absent from gnomAD v4.1.

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

gnomAD-Canada

Not available in gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

ClinVar

This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (3 clinical laboratories) and as Likely pathogenic (2 clinical laboratories) and as Pathogenic by ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel (expert panel). (ClinVarID = 375981)

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.01). REVEL score = 0.855. BayesDel score = 0.223852.

Functional

OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Gain-of-function; curated oncogenicity label: Oncogenic.

Somatic

This variant lies in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV61068297, n = 59 times).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant lies in a statistically significant hotspot.