0%
Print report
Variant interpretation report

MAP2K1 c.607G>A, p.Glu203Lys

NM_002755.4:c.607G>A NP_002746.1:p.(Glu203Lys) Missense · exon 6 View identifiers
Classification
Uncertain significance

Variant description:

The MAP2K1 NM_002755.4:c.607G>A (NP_002746.1:p.(Glu203Lys)) missense variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV61068654, n = 40 times), and lies in a statistically significant hotspot (cancerhotspots.org). Experimental evidence: Variant-specific studies showed increased ERK phosphorylation or kinase activity, while the VCEP table preassigns PS3_Supporting for MAP2K1 approved MEK and ERK assays. Based on available guidelines, this variant is considered to be a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS).

Five-step scale from benign to pathogenic. This variant is uncertain. Select a step to read what it means.

Uncertain.The recorded classification is uncertain significance.

In plain language

Gene-level background from the recorded interpretation.

About MAP2K1

MAP2K1 encodes MEK1, a kinase that relays signals in the MAPK pathway to help regulate cell growth, division, differentiation, development, and survival. Abnormal MAP2K1 signaling is associated with cancer, particularly through activation of the MAPK pathway in cancers such as melanoma, colorectal cancer, and lung cancer, although activating MAP2K1 mutations are uncommon in primary tumors. MAP2K1 alterations can also contribute to resistance to some targeted cancer treatments.

LYFE Sciences is an AI system, and it can make mistakes. Criteria may be applied incorrectly, sources may be misread, and a confident-looking classification can still be wrong. Double-check every criterion and its underlying evidence before relying on any call.
01The reasoning

How it was classified

The recorded framework is ClinGen MAP2K1 VCEP v2.3. The criteria and strengths shown below come from the saved assessment; this page does not recalculate the classification.

Recorded applied criteria

The applied criteria and their strengths are shown as assessed under the stated framework.

Pathogenic evidence criteria: 3 Benign evidence criteria: 0
Pathogenic criteria applied · 3
PS3Supporting
PS3 · supporting

Met at Supporting: variant-specific studies showed increased ERK phosphorylation or kinase activity, while the VCEP table preassigns PS3_Supporting for MAP2K1 approved MEK and ERK assays.

PM2Supporting
PM2 · supporting

Met at supporting: the variant was absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1, satisfying the VCEP requirement that it be absent from gnomAD controls.

PM5Moderate
PM5 · moderate

Met at Moderate: PMID:22197931 reports the alternate missense change p.Glu203Gln at the same codon in an individual with cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome.

Benign criteria applied · 0

No benign criterion marked as applied in the recorded assessment.

Recorded classification: Uncertain significance

VUS: PS3 (supporting), PM2 (supporting), and PM5 (moderate) do not satisfy any MAP2K1 VCEP pathogenic or benign combination rule.

02The sources

Evidence at a glance

Evidence summaries and captured source records, where available. Missing entries should not be interpreted as negative findings.

No screenshot for this evidence
REVEL score
0.621 recorded score

Recorded REVEL score: 0.621. Refer to the recorded PP3/BP4 rationale for interpretation.

No listed criterion applied
ClinVar submissions
2 reported laboratory submissions

2 Likely pathogenic. ClinVar API review status: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts.

Context only ClinVar ↗
Functional evidence
Statement recorded

OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Gain-of-function; curated oncogenicity label: Oncogenic.

COSMIC
Cancer Hotspots
Somatic evidence
40 recorded samples

This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV61068654, n = 40 times).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant lies in a statistically significant hotspot.

For specialists

Technical detail

ACMG/AMP criteria under ClinGen MAP2K1 VCEP v2.3, with the data and sources behind each one.

28 criteria with recorded statuses: 3 met · 6 not met · 9 not assessed · 10 not applicable. Open any row for the full reasoning, the rule and the evidence behind it.

Met Not met Not assessed Not applicable

None of PS2, PM6, PP1, or BS4 is assessed because the available evidence lacks auditable proband-parent testing, family segregation, informative meioses, and non-segregation data.

Functional evidence supports PS3 at Supporting strength under the VCEP's pre-assigned MAP2K1 assay code.

BS3 is not applicable under the MAP2K1 VCEP specification.

Within the requested group, PP4, PP5, and BP6 are excluded by the VCEP; PS4 lacks qualifying germline RASopathy case-control or point-scored evidence; BP5 lacks an alternative molecular cause and point assignment.

Somatic melanoma and tumor studies reporting E203K were reviewed but were not substituted for the VCEP's germline RASopathy phenotype and case-control requirements.

The VCEP computational criteria are evaluated on their own named paths without substituting other predictors or double-counting splice and protein predictions.

PP3 and BP4 are not met because the VCEP-specified REVEL score is 0.621, while BP7 is not applicable to this missense variant.

Met · 3

PS3 SupportingVCEPMet at Supporting: variant-specific studies showed increased ERK phosphorylation or kinase activity, while the VCEP table preassigns PS3_Supporting for MAP2K1 approved MEK and ERK assays. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

PS3 is met at Supporting strength. The governing VCEP functional-studies table lists MEK Activation Assay and ERK Activation Assay as approved assay classes for MAP2K1, with the pre-assigned proposed strength "PS3_Supporting; BS3_NA". Variant-specific functional publications report increased MEK1 kinase activity or ERK phosphorylation for p.E203K: PMID:25351745 observed increased ERK phosphorylation in transiently transfected 293H cells; PMID:29483135 observed higher p-ERK than wild-type MEK1 in 293H cells; PMID:32641410 validated E203K as ERK-activating; PMID:18456719 summarizes increased basal kinase activity and increased ERK1/2 phosphorylation; and PMID:22197931 reports constitutive ERK1/2 phosphorylation and transformation activity. The VCEP's pre-assigned Supporting code governs over independently upgrading strength from the number of reports or assay types. The requested c.607G>A notation was not found in the named VCEP spreadsheet, nor were p.Glu203Lys or p.E203K; the evidence therefore supports the approved assay-class designation but is not a variant-specific pre-assignment in that spreadsheet.

VCEP rule
One approved assay.
Evidence considered
  • SVI-RASopathy-VCEP-V2-Approved-Functional-Studies.xlsx, MEK Activation Assay sheet, MAP2K1 row: approved assay; proposed strength PS3_Supporting; BS3_NA.
  • SVI-RASopathy-VCEP-V2-Approved-Functional-Studies.xlsx, ERK Activation Assay sheet, MAP2K1 row: approved assay; proposed strength PS3_Supporting; BS3_NA.
  • PMID:25351745: transiently transfected 293H cells expressing MEK1 E203K showed increased kinase activity measured by ERK phosphorylation compared with wild-type MEK1.
  • PMID:29483135: MEK1 E203K induced higher ERK phosphorylation than wild-type MEK1 in 293H cells; the paper states, "Some mutants induced p-ERK more profoundly than pMEK (C121S, L177M, E203K, F53L, ΔF53–Q58, Q56P, K57E, K57N and ΔE51–Q58) (Fig. 1B)."
  • PMID:32641410: MEK1 E203K was validated as ERK-activating in HEK-cell western-blot functional analysis.
  • PMID:18456719: cited prior studies reported increased basal MEK1 E203K kinase activity and increased ERK1/2 phosphorylation after transient expression.
  • PMID:22197931: MAP2K1 E203K was tested in HEK293T ERK1/2 phosphorylation and NIH3T3 transformation assays; the extraction reports constitutive ERK1/2 phosphorylation and activation comparable to BRAF V600E in the phosphorylation assay.
Still missing
  • No entry for c.607G>A, p.Glu203Lys, or p.E203K was found in SVI-RASopathy-VCEP-V2-Approved-Functional-Studies.xlsx; the spreadsheet was searched in fulltext form.
  • The variant-specific studies were not listed as exact variant rows in the governing functional-studies spreadsheet, so no variant-specific table pre-assignment beyond the MAP2K1 assay-class code was available.
Sources
PM2 SupportingVCEPMet at supporting: the variant was absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1, satisfying the VCEP requirement that it be absent from gnomAD controls. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing MAP2K1 VCEP rule assigns PM2 at supporting strength when the variant is absent from controls in gnomAD. NM_002755.4:c.607G>A (p.Glu203Lys) was absent from the default all-comers gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1 records, satisfying the VCEP's absence requirement. The available gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer and gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer records were also absent; the VCEP does not specify a non-cancer-only source for PM2.

VCEP rule
The variant must be absent from controls (gnomAD).
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel MAP2K1 specification v2.3, PM2 rule: The variant must be absent from controls (gnomAD).
  • gnomAD v2.1 all-comers record for NM_002755.4:c.607G>A: absent from controls.
  • gnomAD v4.1 all-comers record for NM_002755.4:c.607G>A: absent from controls.
  • gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer subset: absent; gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer subset: absent. These subsets are concordant but are not required because the VCEP does not specify a non-cancer-only PM2 source.
Sources
PM5 ModerateVCEPMet at Moderate: PMID:22197931 reports the alternate missense change p.Glu203Gln at the same codon in an individual with cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The VCEP assigns PM5 Moderate for one likely pathogenic residue change at the same codon. PMID:22197931 reports p.Glu203Gln at MAP2K1 codon 203 in an individual with cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome, a RAS/MAPK disorder caused by germline mutations. This is a different missense change from p.Glu203Lys and is the available same-codon clinical comparator; the paper does not independently label E203Q as likely pathogenic, so human review is retained.

VCEP rule
1 [likely] pathogenic residue change at the same codon.
Evidence considered
  • PMID:22197931, Results paragraph: p.Glu203Gln was observed at the same MAP2K1 codon in an individual with cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome, described as a disorder caused by germline mutations in RAS-MAPK pathway genes.
  • The comparator p.Glu203Gln is a different residue change at codon 203 from the case variant p.Glu203Lys.
Still missing
  • PMID:22197931 reports p.Glu203Gln in a cardiofaciocutaneous-syndrome individual but does not explicitly assign that variant a likely-pathogenic classification.
Sources

Not met · 6 · evaluated, threshold not reached

PS1 VCEPNot met: the reviewed evidence identifies only the requested p.Glu203Lys change, not a distinct nucleotide change producing the same amino acid. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The VCEP requires the same amino acid change as a previously established pathogenic variant regardless of nucleotide change. The reviewed literature reports the requested p.Glu203Lys variant itself (also written c.610G>A in PMID:22197931), but no distinct nucleotide change producing p.Glu203Lys was identified; p.Glu203Gln is a different amino acid change and belongs under PM5, not PS1.

VCEP rule
Same amino acid change as a previously established pathogenic variant regardless of nucleotide change. Applicable for observed analogous residue positions in _MAP2K1_ and _MAP2K2_.
Evidence considered
  • PMID:22197931 reports MAP2K1 p.Glu203Lys and describes it as c.610G>A, while the case normalization is NM_002755.4:c.607G>A; this is a notation discrepancy for the same amino acid change, not a distinct same-amino-acid nucleotide variant.
  • PMID:22197931 separately reports p.Glu203Gln at the same codon, which is an alternate amino acid change and therefore not PS1 evidence.
Still missing
  • No alternate-nucleotide p.Glu203Lys record was identified in the reviewed case evidence or PMID:22197931.
Sources
PM1 VCEPNot met: residue 203 lies outside the VCEP-approved PM1 domains, AA 43-61 and AA 124-134. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The VCEP limits PM1 to critical and well-established functional domains in AA 43-61 and AA 124-134, and excludes specific amino acid residues covered by PM5. The variant is p.Glu203Lys (residue 203), outside both approved ranges. vcep_materials.json has no domain_tables entry for MAP2K1. The governing MAP2K-Alignment.xlsx text was searched for c.607G>A, p.Glu203Lys, and p.E203K with no matching entry.

VCEP rule
Applicable only to critical and well-established functional domains available in the supplementary table (AA 43-61, AA 124-134). Not applicable to specific amino acid residues (see PM5).
Evidence considered
  • CSPEC PM1 rule: applicable only to critical and well-established functional domains in AA 43-61 and AA 124-134; residue 203 is outside both ranges.
  • MAP2K-Alignment.xlsx, sheet MAP2K Alignment, was searched for c.607G>A, p.Glu203Lys, and p.E203K; no matching variant entry was found.
Still missing
  • No entry for c.607G>A, p.Glu203Lys, or p.E203K was found in MAP2K-Alignment.xlsx.txt.
  • vcep_materials.json domain_tables contains no MAP2K1 entry; the CSPEC supplementary ranges therefore govern.
Sources
PP3 VCEPNot met: REVEL score 0.621 is below the VCEP PP3 missense threshold of 0.7. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The VCEP applies PP3 to missense variants using REVEL >= 0.7, or to splicing impact when the predicted outcome matches the disease mechanism. This is a missense variant, NM_002755.4:c.607G>A (p.Glu203Lys), and the governing missense predictor is REVEL; the available REVEL score is 0.621, below the VCEP cutoff. SpliceAI predicts a low maximum delta score of 0.023, but that predictor is not the named predictor for the VCEP missense path and is not used to establish PP3 here.

VCEP rule
For missense variants: REVEL ≥ 0.7. For splicing impact, predicted outcome must match disease mechanism.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen RASopathy VCEP MAP2K1 v2.3 criterion rule: the missense path requires REVEL >= 0.7.
  • Variant normalization identifies NM_002755.4:c.607G>A as the missense variant NP_002746.1:p.(Glu203Lys) in exon 6.
  • Local REVEL predictor lookup: REVEL score 0.621 for NC_000015.10:g.66481793G>A, below the VCEP cutoff of 0.7.
Sources
BA1 VCEPNot met: the variant was absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1, rather than reaching the BA1 threshold of at least 0.05%. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing MAP2K1 VCEP rule requires a gnomAD filtering allele frequency of at least 0.05% for BA1. NM_002755.4:c.607G>A (p.Glu203Lys) was absent from the default all-comers gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1 records, so no observed allele frequency reaches 0.05%. The available gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer and gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer records were also absent, but the VCEP does not specify a non-cancer-only source for BA1.

VCEP rule
GnomAD filtering allele frequency ≥0.05%.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel MAP2K1 specification v2.3, BA1 rule: GnomAD filtering allele frequency ≥0.05%.
  • gnomAD v2.1 all-comers record for NM_002755.4:c.607G>A: absent; therefore no filtering allele frequency was observed.
  • gnomAD v4.1 all-comers record for NM_002755.4:c.607G>A: absent; therefore no filtering allele frequency was observed.
  • gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer subset: absent; gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer subset: absent. These subsets are not the governing source because the VCEP does not specify a non-cancer-only BA1 source.
Sources
BS1 VCEPNot met: the variant was absent from gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1, rather than reaching the BS1 threshold of at least 0.025%. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing MAP2K1 VCEP rule requires a gnomAD filtering allele frequency of at least 0.025% for BS1. NM_002755.4:c.607G>A (p.Glu203Lys) was absent from the default all-comers gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v4.1 records, so no observed allele frequency reaches 0.025%. The available gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer and gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer records were also absent, but the VCEP does not specify a non-cancer-only source for BS1.

VCEP rule
GnomAD filtering allele frequency ≥0.025%.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel MAP2K1 specification v2.3, BS1 rule: GnomAD filtering allele frequency ≥0.025%.
  • gnomAD v2.1 all-comers record for NM_002755.4:c.607G>A: absent; therefore no filtering allele frequency was observed.
  • gnomAD v4.1 all-comers record for NM_002755.4:c.607G>A: absent; therefore no filtering allele frequency was observed.
  • gnomAD v2.1 non-cancer subset: absent; gnomAD v3.1 non-cancer subset: absent. These subsets are not the governing source because the VCEP does not specify a non-cancer-only BS1 source.
Sources
BP4 VCEPNot met: REVEL score 0.621 exceeds the VCEP BP4 missense threshold of 0.3. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The VCEP's BP4 missense path requires REVEL <= 0.3. This variant is missense, NM_002755.4:c.607G>A (p.Glu203Lys), and its REVEL score is 0.621, which is above the VCEP cutoff; therefore BP4 is applicable but not met. The low SpliceAI score is not used for this missense path because the VCEP names REVEL for missense variants.

VCEP rule
For missense variants: REVEL ≤0.3.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen RASopathy VCEP MAP2K1 v2.3 criterion rule: the missense path requires REVEL <= 0.3.
  • Variant normalization identifies NM_002755.4:c.607G>A as the missense variant NP_002746.1:p.(Glu203Lys) in exon 6.
  • Local REVEL predictor lookup: REVEL score 0.621 for NC_000015.10:g.66481793G>A, above the VCEP cutoff of 0.3.
Sources

Not assessed · 9 · no assessment recorded

PS2 VCEPNot assessed: ClinVar records a de novo origin, but no proband-level parental testing or de novo point assignment is documented. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The VCEP assigns PS2 by de novo evidence points (1, 2, or 4 points), but the available record does not document a proband-level de novo observation with parental testing, phenotype details, or an auditable point assignment. ClinVar records the variant origin as de novo, but this is a submission-level origin field without the underlying parental-testing evidence needed to apply the VCEP point scale.

VCEP rule
4 Points. 2 Points. 1 Point.
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar variation 375982 records NM_002755.4:c.607G>A (p.Glu203Lys) with one submission listing origin as de novo, but the record does not provide proband-level parental-testing results or a VCEP point assignment.
  • The VCEP PS2 entries available for this case assign Very Strong at 4 points, Strong at 2 points, and Moderate at 1 point; the available evidence does not establish any of these point totals.
Still missing
  • Proband-level clinical record and phenotype consistent with a MAP2K1 RASopathy
  • Testing results for both biological parents demonstrating whether the variant is absent or present
  • An auditable VCEP PS2 point assignment
Sources
PS4 VCEPNot assessed: no qualifying germline RASopathy case-control counts or VCEP PS4 point assignment were available for this variant. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The VCEP makes PS4 applicable and requires point-based scoring for autosomal-dominant RASopathy cases, with Supporting at ≥1 point, Moderate at ≥3 points, and Strong at ≥5 points. The reviewed literature does not provide qualifying germline RASopathy case-control counts, a matched-control comparison, or VCEP PS4 point assignments for NM_002755.4:c.607G>A (p.Glu203Lys). PMID:18456719 discusses E203K only as prior functional work and reports a different patient variant, E203Q; PMID:22197931 and PMID:32641410 report somatic cancer observations rather than RASopathy case-control evidence; PMID:23652378 is unrelated to MAP2K1, and PMID:24121147 was not available as readable full text. Therefore the VCEP PS4 score cannot be evaluated without substituting non-VCEP evidence or assumptions.

VCEP rule
Strength adjustment using point-based scoring for autosomal dominant cases with phenotypic specifications: full points awarded with RASopathy phenotypes, reduced points applicable to cases with minimal phenotypic information (i.e. prenatal cases, cases with a clinical order of a RASopathy panel without clinical information, and cases with limited clinical information in other global tests (such as WES)). ... ≥5 points. ... ≥3 points. ... ≥1 point.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen RASopathy VCEP MAP2K1 v2.3: PS4 is applicable and uses point-based scoring for autosomal-dominant RASopathy cases; Supporting requires ≥1 point, Moderate ≥3 points, and Strong ≥5 points.
  • PMID:18456719, full text Discussion: E203K is cited as a prior functional finding, while the patient described in the paper carried E203Q; this is not a qualifying E203K RASopathy case-control observation.
  • PMID:22197931, Results/Table 1: E203K was observed in melanoma tumors, including metastases, and was evaluated in somatic cancer samples; no germline RASopathy case-control comparison is reported.
  • PMID:32641410, Results: MEK1 E203K was reported in 26 tumors; this is somatic tumor prevalence, not a germline RASopathy case-control dataset.
  • PMID:23652378 full-text extraction: the paper concerns European neonatal screening policy and does not discuss MAP2K1, E203K, or relevant case-control evidence.
  • PMID:24121147 was listed as a PS4/PP5 candidate, but only an image artifact was present and no readable full-text extraction was available; it cannot supply auditable PS4 counts.
Still missing
  • A qualifying RASopathy case-control dataset or unrelated affected-proband count with appropriate controls is needed.
  • The VCEP PS4 point score for this variant is not available.
Sources
PM6 VCEPNot assessed: a ClinVar de novo origin is recorded, but case-level parental testing and the required PM6 point assignment are unavailable. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The VCEP provides PM6 point thresholds of 0.5, 1, or 2 points, but the available record does not document an assumed de novo event with parental testing, a proband phenotype, or sufficient case-level details to assign any PM6 points. The ClinVar origin field alone is not enough to determine the VCEP strength.

VCEP rule
2 Points. 1 Point. 0.5 Points.
Evidence considered
  • ClinVar variation 375982 includes a submission-level origin value of de novo, but provides no underlying case report, parental testing results, or point-based evidence assessment.
  • The VCEP PM6 entries available for this case assign Strong at 2 points, Moderate at 1 point, and Supporting at 0.5 points; none can be selected from the documented evidence.
Still missing
  • Case-level evidence that the variant was assumed de novo rather than confirmed de novo
  • Parental testing and clinical details for the proband
  • An auditable VCEP PM6 point assignment
Sources
PP1 VCEPNot assessed: no informative meioses or variant-positive affected relatives are documented. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The VCEP requires at least 3 informative meioses for Supporting, at least 5 for Moderate, or at least 7 for Strong PP1. No variant-positive affected relatives, family structure, segregation results, or informative meioses are documented for this case.

VCEP rule
≥7 informative meioses. ≥5 informative meioses. ≥3 informative meioses.
Evidence considered
  • No family segregation data or informative-meiosis count is present in the available case evidence.
  • The VCEP PP1 thresholds are Supporting at at least 3 informative meioses, Moderate at at least 5, and Strong at at least 7; none can be evaluated without family data.
Still missing
  • Family pedigree and affected-relative phenotypes
  • Genotype results for relevant relatives
  • Count of informative meioses
Sources
PP2 VCEPNot assessed: the required MAP2K1 gnomAD missense z score is unavailable, so comparison with the >3.09 threshold cannot be made. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The VCEP requires a gnomAD missense z score greater than 3.09. The available case evidence provides no MAP2K1 missense z score, so this criterion cannot be evaluated under the VCEP rule.

VCEP rule
Missense z score is >3.09 in gnomAD.
Evidence considered
  • The VCEP PP2 rule requires the gene-level missense z score; the available gnomAD v2.1 and v4.1 case records contain variant-level frequency absence but no MAP2K1 missense z score.
Still missing
  • MAP2K1 gnomAD missense z score is not available in the reviewed case evidence.
Sources
BS2 VCEPNot assessed: no qualifying healthy individual observation with zygosity, age, penetrance, and phenotype data was available for BS2 point scoring. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The governing MAP2K1 VCEP makes BS2 applicable through point-based scoring based on healthy homozygote or heterozygote individuals, with reduced points for apparently unaffected heterozygous individuals and application to parent or sibling samples during clinical family evaluations. The available evidence contains no qualifying healthy individual observation with genotype, zygosity, age, penetrance, and phenotype information, so neither the −4-point strong path nor the −1-point supporting path can be evaluated.

VCEP rule
Strength adjustment using point-based scoring based on phenotypic specifications. Phenotypic specifications: based on healthy homozygote or heterozygote individuals, reduced points for apparently unaffected heterozygous individuals, applicable to parent or sibling samples during clinical family evaluations.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel MAP2K1 specification v2.3, BS2 instructions: point-based scoring based on healthy homozygote or heterozygote individuals, with reduced points for apparently unaffected heterozygous individuals and applicability to parent or sibling samples during clinical family evaluations.
  • No qualifying healthy control, parent, or sibling observation with the required genotype and phenotype information was available.
Still missing
  • Qualifying healthy individual observations with genotype, zygosity, age, penetrance, and phenotype information are unavailable.
Sources
BS4 VCEPNot assessed: no informative meiosis or affected-relative non-segregation evidence is documented. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The VCEP permits BS4 at Strong strength when there is one informative meiosis. No affected relative who lacks the variant, informative meiosis, or other non-segregation result is documented, so the criterion cannot be evaluated.

VCEP rule
Requires only one informative meiosis.
Evidence considered
  • No non-segregation result or informative meiosis is present in the available case evidence.
  • The VCEP BS4 rule requires only one informative meiosis, but no such meiosis is documented.
Still missing
  • Affected relatives evaluated for the variant
  • Reliable genotype and phenotype results for those relatives
  • At least one informative non-segregating meiosis
Sources
BP2 VCEPNot assessed: no second pathogenic MAP2K1 variant with documented cis/trans phase and phenotype-compatible alternative cause is available. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The MAP2K1 VCEP allows BP2 when there is an alternative molecular cause of a RASopathy in the same gene and the phenotype is consistent with the expected severity of the RASopathy, with strength determined by the VCEP point thresholds. The available case evidence does not document a second pathogenic or likely pathogenic MAP2K1 variant, its phase in cis or trans with NM_002755.4:c.607G>A, or an alternative same-gene molecular cause; therefore BP2 cannot be evaluated.

VCEP rule
Points are awarded for an alternative molecular cause of a RASopathy in the same gene (and/or in conjunction with BP5) and the phenotype is consistent with expected severity of the RASopathy.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel MAP2K1 Version 2.3 CSPEC entry for BP2: points require an alternative molecular cause of a RASopathy in the same gene and a phenotype consistent with expected severity; the applicable thresholds are >= (-1) point for Supporting, >= (-2) points for Moderate, and >= (-4) points for Strong.
  • ClinVar variation 375982 contains submissions for NM_002755.4:c.607G>A (p.Glu203Lys), including one submission with origin reported as de novo and one as germline, but it does not provide a second pathogenic MAP2K1 variant with cis/trans phase for this case.
  • The reviewed variant-specific papers report functional or somatic observations and do not provide a qualifying same-gene alternative molecular cause with cis/trans phase for this case.
Still missing
  • A documented alternative pathogenic or likely pathogenic MAP2K1 variant in the same individual.
  • Phasing of that variant relative to NM_002755.4:c.607G>A (cis or trans).
  • Phenotypic information sufficient to establish consistency with the expected severity of the RASopathy.
Sources
BP5 VCEPNot assessed: no alternative causative variant or VCEP BP5 point score was documented for this case. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP5 is applicable under the VCEP only when an alternative molecular cause of a RASopathy in a different gene, or a different fully explanatory cause for an inconsistent phenotype, is documented and assigned VCEP points. The available case evidence contains no documented alternative causative variant or VCEP BP5 point score for this patient. The applicable thresholds are ≥(-4) points for Strong, ≥(-2) points for Moderate, and ≥(-1) point for Supporting, but no point value is available to evaluate.

VCEP rule
Points are awarded for an alternative molecular cause of a RASopathy in a different gene (and/or in conjunction with BP2) and the phenotype is consistent with expected severity of the RASopathy. Points are also awarded for phenotypes inconsistent with a RASopathy and fully explained by a different causative variant (e.g. WES testing). ... ≥ (-4) Points. ... ≥ (-2) Points. ... ≥ (-1) Point.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen RASopathy VCEP MAP2K1 v2.3: BP5 applies to an alternative molecular cause of RASopathy in a different gene, or a different cause fully explaining a phenotype inconsistent with RASopathy, with point-based strength thresholds.
  • No case-level alternative causative variant or BP5 point assignment is present in the reviewed evidence.
Still missing
  • Documented alternative molecular cause and phenotype relationship are needed.
  • A VCEP BP5 point assignment is needed.
Sources
Not applicable · 10· recorded as not applicable Show reasons ▾Hide reasons ▴
PVS1 VCEPNot applicable: the VCEP marks PVS1 not applicable, and c.607G>A is missense p.(Glu203Lys), not a listed null-variant class. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

Not applicable under the MAP2K1 RASopathy VCEP specification. The VCEP entry explicitly marks PVS1 as not applicable, and the variant is a missense substitution, NM_002755.4:c.607G>A (NP_002746.1:p.(Glu203Lys)), rather than one of the null variant classes listed in the VCEP's original ACMG summary: nonsense, frameshift, canonical splice-site, initiation-codon, or single/multi-exon deletion. Therefore, no PVS1 strength is assigned; NMD, exon importance, and protein-length-loss considerations do not create a PVS1 path under this VCEP rule.

VCEP rule
Not applicable.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen RASopathy VCEP MAP2K1 v2.3 marks PVS1 as not applicable.
  • Variant-level assessment identifies NM_002755.4:c.607G>A as a missense variant in exon 6, encoding NP_002746.1:p.(Glu203Lys); canonical splice consensus is false.
  • The VCEP's PVS1 original ACMG summary names null variants as nonsense, frameshift, canonical +/−1 or 2 splice sites, initiation codon, or single/multi-exon deletion; this missense variant is none of those classes.
Sources
cspec ↗pvs1_variant_assessment
PM3 VCEPNot applicable: the MAP2K1 VCEP explicitly marks PM3 not applicable for this autosomal-dominant RASopathy framework. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The MAP2K1 VCEP specifies PM3 as not applicable. The VCEP describes the underlying ACMG/AMP concept as evidence for a recessive disorder when the variant is detected in trans with a pathogenic variant, but MAP2K1 RASopathy is governed here as an autosomal dominant disorder and the VCEP explicitly marks PM3 not applicable.

VCEP rule
Not applicable.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel MAP2K1 Version 2.3 CSPEC entry for PM3: applicability is "Not applicable".
  • The same VCEP framework identifies the disease inheritance as autosomal dominant inheritance.
Sources
PM4 N/ANot applicable: PM4 requires an in-frame indel or stop-loss protein-length change, whereas c.607G>A produces missense p.(Glu203Lys). Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

Not applicable to this variant under the VCEP PM4 rule. PM4 is restricted to protein-length changes caused by in-frame deletions/insertions in a non-repeat region or by stop-loss variants. NM_002755.4:c.607G>A is a missense substitution producing p.(Glu203Lys), with no in-frame insertion, in-frame deletion, stop-loss event, or protein-length change. The VCEP also specifies that PM4 at moderate strength requires no known repetitive areas in the gene, but that condition cannot convert this missense substitution into a qualifying PM4 variant type.

VCEP rule
Protein length changes due to in-frame deletions/insertions in a non-repeat region or stop-loss variants.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen RASopathy VCEP MAP2K1 v2.3 defines PM4 as protein-length changes due to in-frame deletions/insertions in a non-repeat region or stop-loss variants.
  • Variant-level assessment identifies NM_002755.4:c.607G>A as a missense variant, NP_002746.1:p.(Glu203Lys), in exon 6; the evidence does not identify an insertion, deletion, stop-loss event, or protein-length change.
  • The VCEP PM4 strength rule states: No known repetitive areas in gene. Use as described.
Sources
cspec ↗pvs1_variant_assessment
PP4 VCEPNot applicable: the MAP2K1 VCEP explicitly excludes PP4 and directs phenotype evidence to PS4. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The MAP2K1 VCEP explicitly marks PP4 as not applicable and directs evaluators to PS4 instead. No independent PP4 assertion is permitted under this VCEP specification.

VCEP rule
Not applicable, see PS4.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen RASopathy VCEP MAP2K1 v2.3 criterion entry: PP4 instructions state, "Not applicable, see PS4."
Sources
PP5 VCEPNot applicable: the MAP2K1 VCEP states that PP5 is not for use. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The MAP2K1 VCEP explicitly marks PP5 as not applicable for this VCEP and states that the criterion is not for use. Literature or ClinVar pathogenic classifications therefore cannot be converted into PP5 under the governing specification.

VCEP rule
This criterion is not for use as recommended by the ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation VCEP Review Committee.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen RASopathy VCEP MAP2K1 v2.3 criterion entry: PP5 is "Not Applicable for this VCEP" and is not for use as recommended by the ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation VCEP Review Committee.
Sources
BS3 VCEPNot applicable: the VCEP marks BS3 not applicable for MAP2K1, and available functional studies report increased rather than normal MEK1 or ERK activity. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BS3 is not applicable under the MAP2K1 VCEP specification. The CSPEC entry explicitly marks BS3 as "Not applicable", and the governing functional-studies table assigns BS3_NA for the approved MAP2K1 MEK and ERK assay classes. The available variant-specific functional evidence is concordantly activating or damaging rather than evidence of normal protein function or splicing.

VCEP rule
Well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies show no damaging effect on protein function or splicing.
Evidence considered
  • MAP2K1 CSPEC v2.3 BS3 entry: applicability is Not applicable.
  • SVI-RASopathy-VCEP-V2-Approved-Functional-Studies.xlsx, MAP2K1 MEK Activation Assay and ERK Activation Assay rows: proposed strength PS3_Supporting; BS3_NA.
  • Variant-specific functional publications reviewed for PS3 reported increased kinase activity or ERK phosphorylation, not a normal-function result.
Sources
BP1 N/ANot applicable: c.607G>A is a missense variant, whereas the VCEP BP1 rule is restricted to truncating variant classes. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The VCEP limits BP1 to truncating variants, including nonsense, frameshift, canonical splice-site, initiation-codon, whole-gene, or multi-exon deletion variants in genes without established loss-of-function correlation. NM_002755.4:c.607G>A is a missense variant producing p.Glu203Lys, so BP1 does not apply.

VCEP rule
This rule has contraindications for use with RASopathies. Given the disease mechanism is gain-of-function for RASopathies, BP1 should be used for any truncating variant (nonsense, frameshift, affects canonical splice sites, initiation codon, entire gene or multi exon deletion) in genes without established LOF correlation to disease. See the supplemental material regarding dosage sensitivity information for each individual gene and potential association to disorders associated with LOF variants.
Evidence considered
  • Case normalization identifies NM_002755.4:c.607G>A as the missense substitution NP_002746.1:p.(Glu203Lys).
Sources
BP3 VCEPNot applicable: the VCEP excludes BP3 because no known benign repetitive areas exist in RASopathy genes, and this variant is missense. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

Not applicable under the MAP2K1 RASopathy VCEP specification. The VCEP explicitly marks BP3 as not applicable and states that there are no known benign repetitive areas in RASopathy genes. In addition, this variant is a missense substitution, c.607G>A (p.(Glu203Lys)), not an in-frame deletion or insertion in a repetitive region without a known function, which is the original ACMG/AMP variant context quoted by the VCEP.

VCEP rule
No known benign repetitive areas in RASopathy genes.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen RASopathy VCEP MAP2K1 v2.3 marks BP3 as not applicable.
  • The VCEP BP3 instruction states: No known benign repetitive areas in RASopathy genes.
  • The VCEP's original ACMG summary describes BP3 for in-frame deletions/insertions in a repetitive region without a known function; this variant is the missense substitution NP_002746.1:p.(Glu203Lys).
Sources
cspec ↗pvs1_variant_assessment
BP6 VCEPNot applicable: the MAP2K1 VCEP states that BP6 is not for use. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The MAP2K1 VCEP explicitly marks BP6 as not applicable for this VCEP and states that the criterion is not for use. A benign report from a reputable source therefore cannot be converted into BP6 under this governing specification.

VCEP rule
This criterion is not for use as recommended by the ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation VCEP Review Committee.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen RASopathy VCEP MAP2K1 v2.3 criterion entry: BP6 is "Not Applicable for this VCEP" and is not for use as recommended by the ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation VCEP Review Committee.
Sources
BP7 N/ANot applicable: c.607G>A is a missense variant, whereas BP7 covers synonymous, intronic, or non-coding variants. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP7 covers synonymous variants and, under the VCEP's extension, intronic positions except canonical splice sites or non-coding variants, with no predicted splice impact and a non-highly-conserved nucleotide. This variant is a missense coding substitution, NM_002755.4:c.607G>A (p.Glu203Lys), so it lies outside BP7 scope regardless of the available low SpliceAI score.

VCEP rule
A synonymous (silent) variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence nor the creation of a new splice site AND the nucleotide is not highly conserved. This rule is also applicable for intronic positions (except canonical splice sites) or non-coding variants and should be used in conjunction with BP4.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen RASopathy VCEP MAP2K1 v2.3 BP7 rule covers synonymous variants and also intronic positions except canonical splice sites or non-coding variants.
  • Variant normalization identifies NM_002755.4:c.607G>A as the missense variant NP_002746.1:p.(Glu203Lys) in exon 6.
Sources

Identifiers

Gene
MAP2K1
Transcript
NM_002755.4
Coding (HGVS c.)
NM_002755.4:c.607G>A
Protein (HGVS p.)
NP_002746.1:p.(Glu203Lys)
GRCh38
chr15:66481793 G>A
GRCh37
chr15:66774131 G>A
Location and type
Exon 6 · missense
ClinVar
375982
COSMIC
COSV61068654

Gene diagram

Every interpreted variant in MAP2K1, mapped onto the exon structure of NM_002755.4. Select a row to find it on the plot.

MAP2K1NM_002755.4
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
gnomAD v4.1 Allele count data not recorded
gnomAD v2.1 Allele count data not recorded
gnomAD-Canada v1.0 Allele count data not recorded

Statements

gnomAD v4.1

Absent from gnomAD v4.1.

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

gnomAD-Canada

Not available in gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

SpliceAI and Pangolin

SpliceAI acceptor lossat -407 bp
0.002
SpliceAI acceptor gainat -38 bp
0.002
SpliceAI donor lossat -76 bp
0.000
SpliceAI donor gainat +82 bp
0.023
Pangolin splice lossmagnitude shown
-0.002
Pangolin splice gain
0.005

Other predictors

REVEL
0.621
BayesDel
0.228

How the predictions were used

PP3 VCEPNot met: REVEL score 0.621 is below the VCEP PP3 missense threshold of 0.7. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The VCEP applies PP3 to missense variants using REVEL >= 0.7, or to splicing impact when the predicted outcome matches the disease mechanism. This is a missense variant, NM_002755.4:c.607G>A (p.Glu203Lys), and the governing missense predictor is REVEL; the available REVEL score is 0.621, below the VCEP cutoff. SpliceAI predicts a low maximum delta score of 0.023, but that predictor is not the named predictor for the VCEP missense path and is not used to establish PP3 here.

VCEP rule
For missense variants: REVEL ≥ 0.7. For splicing impact, predicted outcome must match disease mechanism.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen RASopathy VCEP MAP2K1 v2.3 criterion rule: the missense path requires REVEL >= 0.7.
  • Variant normalization identifies NM_002755.4:c.607G>A as the missense variant NP_002746.1:p.(Glu203Lys) in exon 6.
  • Local REVEL predictor lookup: REVEL score 0.621 for NC_000015.10:g.66481793G>A, below the VCEP cutoff of 0.7.
Sources
BP4 VCEPNot met: REVEL score 0.621 exceeds the VCEP BP4 missense threshold of 0.3. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

The VCEP's BP4 missense path requires REVEL <= 0.3. This variant is missense, NM_002755.4:c.607G>A (p.Glu203Lys), and its REVEL score is 0.621, which is above the VCEP cutoff; therefore BP4 is applicable but not met. The low SpliceAI score is not used for this missense path because the VCEP names REVEL for missense variants.

VCEP rule
For missense variants: REVEL ≤0.3.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen RASopathy VCEP MAP2K1 v2.3 criterion rule: the missense path requires REVEL <= 0.3.
  • Variant normalization identifies NM_002755.4:c.607G>A as the missense variant NP_002746.1:p.(Glu203Lys) in exon 6.
  • Local REVEL predictor lookup: REVEL score 0.621 for NC_000015.10:g.66481793G>A, above the VCEP cutoff of 0.3.
Sources
BP7 N/ANot applicable: c.607G>A is a missense variant, whereas BP7 covers synonymous, intronic, or non-coding variants. Details ▾Hide ▴
Reasoning

BP7 covers synonymous variants and, under the VCEP's extension, intronic positions except canonical splice sites or non-coding variants, with no predicted splice impact and a non-highly-conserved nucleotide. This variant is a missense coding substitution, NM_002755.4:c.607G>A (p.Glu203Lys), so it lies outside BP7 scope regardless of the available low SpliceAI score.

VCEP rule
A synonymous (silent) variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence nor the creation of a new splice site AND the nucleotide is not highly conserved. This rule is also applicable for intronic positions (except canonical splice sites) or non-coding variants and should be used in conjunction with BP4.
Evidence considered
  • ClinGen RASopathy VCEP MAP2K1 v2.3 BP7 rule covers synonymous variants and also intronic positions except canonical splice sites or non-coding variants.
  • Variant normalization identifies NM_002755.4:c.607G>A as the missense variant NP_002746.1:p.(Glu203Lys) in exon 6.
Sources

Statement

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.02). REVEL score = 0.621. BayesDel score = 0.227552.

7 paper records listed. 5 cited in the classification.

Cited in the classification

  • Noonan and cardio-facio-cutaneous syndromes: two clinically and genetically overlapping disorders.
    Nyström AM et al. · 2008 Aug
    The paper reports a novel MEK1 E203Q mutation in a patient with cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome and discusses prior functional studies of MEK1 E203K; it does not report a distinct nucleotide change producing E203K.
    → PS3 · supporting → PM5 · moderate Names this variant
    PMID 18456719 ↗
    Source detail
    Two mutations were novel: MEK1 E203Q and MEK2 F57L.

    Location Abstract, Results

    Context Comprehensive mutation analysis of BRAF, KRAS, MEK1, MEK2, and SOS1 in 31 unrelated patients without PTPN11 mutations, including patients with cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome.

  • Exome sequencing identifies recurrent somatic MAP2K1 and MAP2K2 mutations in melanoma.
    Nikolaev SI et al. · 2011 Dec 25
    The paper reports MAP2K1 p.Glu203Lys in melanoma and separately reports p.Glu203Gln at the same MAP2K1 codon in an individual with cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome. The paper uses c.610G>A for p.Glu203Lys, while the case uses c.607G>A.
    → PS3 · supporting → PM5 · moderate Names this variant
    PMID 22197931 ↗
    Source detail
    Of note, a mutation affecting the same codon (p.Glu203Gln) of MAP2K1 was observed in an individual with cardiofaciocutaneous (CFC) syndrome, a rare genetic disorder caused by germline mutations in genes encoding components of the RAS-MAPK pathway13.

    Location Results, paragraph beginning 'In addition, the BRAF mutations coexisted'

    Context Exome sequencing and Sanger sequencing of melanoma samples, with functional ERK phosphorylation and transformation assays; the same-codon E203Q observation is a clinical report cited in the discussion of MAP2K1 mutations.

  • MAP2K1 (MEK1) Mutations Define a Distinct Subset of Lung Adenocarcinoma Associat
    The paper explicitly evaluated MAP2K1 E203K in a functional assay. In transiently transfected 293H cells, E203K was among the MEK1 mutants that showed increased kinase activity, assessed by ERK phosphorylation, compared with wild-type MEK1.
    → PS3 · supporting Names this variant
    PMID 25351745 ↗
    Source detail
    Western blot analysis demonstrated increased kinase activity in all mutants, except for the D67N. ERK phosphorylation levels in the D67N mutant did not vary significantly from the wild-type (Figure 3A&B).

    Location Results, ‘Functional characterization of MEK1 mutants,’ paragraph 1; Figure 3A&B

    Context In-vitro functional assay using transiently transfected human embryonic kidney 293H cells; MEK1 mutant kinase activity was assessed by Western blot analysis of phosphorylated ERK and p90RSK.

  • Allele-Specific Mechanisms of Activation of MEK1 Mutants Determine Their Propert
    The paper explicitly mentions MAP2K1 E203K as one of 17 recurrent cancer-associated MEK1 mutants tested functionally. When expressed in 293H cells, E203K induced higher ERK phosphorylation than wild-type MEK1, with p-ERK induction more pronounced than p-MEK induction.
    → PS3 · supporting Names this variant
    PMID 29483135 ↗
    Source detail
    Some mutants induced p-ERK more profoundly than pMEK (C121S, L177M, E203K, F53L, ΔF53–Q58, Q56P, K57E, K57N and ΔE51–Q58) (Fig. 1B).

    Location Results, paragraph 1; Fig. 1B and Fig. 1D

    Context Functional characterization of 17 recurrent tumor-associated MEK1 mutants expressed in 293H cells, including p-ERK/p-MEK immunoblot assays and S218A/S222A phosphorylation-site substitution experiments.

  • Leveraging Systematic Functional Analysis to Benchmark an In Silico Framework Di
    The paper explicitly studied MAP2K1/MEK1 E203K and reported it in 26 tumors. E203K was the lone hotspot peak in the distal kinase domain and was validated as ERK-activating in the functional assay.
    → PS3 · supporting Names this variant
    PMID 32641410 ↗
    Source detail
    MEK1 E203K (n=26), the lone hotspot peak in the distal kinase domain, also validated as ERK-activating, consistent with prior studies.

    Location Results, ‘Pan-cancer landscape of MAP2K1 mutations,’ paragraph 3; MD simulation paragraph

    Context Somatic mutation analysis of 42,434 tumors; MEK1 mutant expression in HEK cells with ERK phosphorylation measured by western blot; 100-ns molecular-dynamics simulation of MEK1 structure and T-loop conformation.

Other recorded publications

  • A framework to start the debate on neonatal screening policies in the EU: an Exp
    The paper is about European neonatal screening policy, governance, consent, laboratory procedures, and decision-making. It does not discuss MAP2K1, c.607G>A, p.(E203K), or relevant case-control or phenotype evidence.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 23652378 ↗
  • Appropriateness of newborn screening for α1-antitrypsin deficiency.
    Teckman J et al. · 2014
    This source was listed as a PS4/PP5 literature lead, but the case materials contained only an image artifact and no readable full-text extraction; no auditable variant-specific finding could be established.
    Does not name this variant
    PMID 24121147 ↗

Screenshots represent source records captured during evidence collection. Select one to view the recorded source content.

All source links

Statements for reports

The evidence statements recorded by the interpretation pipeline. They have not been reinterpreted by the page.

gnomAD v4.1

Absent from gnomAD v4.1.

gnomAD v2.1

Absent from gnomAD v2.1.

gnomAD-Canada

Not available in gnomAD-Canada v1.0.

ClinVar

This variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (2 clinical laboratories). (ClinVarID = 375982)

In silico

SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.02). REVEL score = 0.621. BayesDel score = 0.227552.

Functional

OncoKB identified variant-specific curated literature and context relevant to functional review; biological-effect context: Gain-of-function; curated oncogenicity label: Oncogenic.

Somatic

This variant lies in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC; COSV61068654, n = 40 times).

Cancer Hotspots

This variant lies in a statistically significant hotspot.