Analysis in progress
Initialising…
0%
complete
This report is still being assembled — sections appear as each stage finishes. It isn't final yet.
ROS1
Final classification
VUS
ROS1 c.6100C>T · p.Leu2034Phe
ROS1

NM_002944.2:c.6100C>T (p.Leu2034Phe) is a missense variant in exon 38 of ROS1, encoding a residue within the kinase domain of this receptor tyrosine kinase.

Gene
ROS1
Transcript
NM_002944.2
HGVS · transcript:coding
NM_002944.2:c.6100C>T
Consequence
N/A
GRCh38
chr6:117317178 G>A
GRCh37
chr6:117638341 G>A
Basis gene-specific framework lacked a usable explicit final combination framework, so generic ACMG/AMP 2015 final-combination rules were applied as fallback; applied criteria: PM2 supporting, PP3 supporting; combination = 2 supporting, which maps to VUS.
gene-specific framework lacked a usable explicit final combination framework, so generic ACMG/AMP 2015 final-combination rules were applied as fallback; applied criteria: PM2 supporting, PP3 supporting; combination = 2 supporting, which maps to VUS.
Classification rationale
PM2PP3 VUS
ROS1 c.6100C>T

NM_002944.2:c.6100C>T (p.Leu2034Phe) is a missense variant in exon 38 of ROS1, encoding a residue within the kinase domain of this receptor tyrosine kinase.1 The variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada v1.0, meeting PM2 at supporting strength.2 REVEL score of 0.918 predicts a deleterious effect, and BayesDel score of 0.34143 exceeds the threshold for pathogenicity, meeting PP3 at supporting strength.3 The variant is absent from ClinVar and has not been reported in the published literature. No functional studies, de novo reports, cosegregation data, or case-control analyses are available.4 With only two supporting criteria (PM2_Supporting + PP3_Supporting), the evidence is insufficient for classification as likely pathogenic or likely benign under the ACMG/AMP 2015 framework. This variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS).5

PM2 + PP3 VUS
1 pvs1_variant_assessment
3 revelbayesdel
5 generic_acmg_combination_rules
Gene diagram · NM_002944.2 · variants mapped to exon structure
ROS1 NM_002944.2
Fetching transcript structure from UCSC…
Applied criteria · 2 applied · 21 assessed
Applied · 2
Strength Supporting Moderate Strong Very strong
PM2 supporting Pathogenic
Variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1, gnomAD v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada v1.0, consistent with a rare variant (allele frequency <0.1% in all populations).
Absent from gnomAD v2.1 (exomes).Absent from gnomAD v4.1 (exomes).Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0 (genomes).
PP3 supporting Pathogenic
REVEL score of 0.918 predicts a deleterious effect (threshold >0.75). BayesDel score of 0.34143 also exceeds the pathogenicity threshold (>0.27). Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect on the protein.
REVEL: 0.918 (deleterious).BayesDel: 0.34143 (deleterious).
Assessed · not applied
Pathogenic
PS1 No previously established pathogenic variant with the same amino acid change (p.Leu2034Phe) at this codon has been reported in ClinVar or the literature.
PS2 No de novo occurrence data with confirmed maternity and paternity available for this variant in ClinVar or the literature.
PS3 No variant-specific functional studies identified.
PS4 No case-control studies or statistical enrichment data available.
PM1 This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot per cancerhotspots.org.
PM5 No pathogenic missense variants at the same amino acid residue (Leu2034) identified in ClinVar.
PM6 No de novo occurrence data (without confirmed maternity and paternity) available in ClinVar or the literature.
PP1 No cosegregation data with disease in multiple affected family members available.
PP2 HCI prior not available for ROS1.
PP4 No patient phenotype or family history information is available to assess specificity for a disease with a single genetic etiology.
PP5 Variant is absent from ClinVar; no reputable source has reported this variant as pathogenic.
Benign
BA1 Variant is absent from gnomAD v2.1, v4.1, and gnomAD-Canada.
BS1 Variant is absent from gnomAD.
BS2 No data on healthy adult carriers.
BS3 No in vitro or in vivo functional studies demonstrating no damaging effect on protein function or splicing have been identified for this variant.
BS4 No segregation data in affected family members available; no evidence of lack of segregation.
BP1 Insufficient evidence to determine that only truncating variants cause ROS1-related disease.
BP2 No data on observations in trans with a pathogenic variant or in cis with a pathogenic variant.
BP4 REVEL score of 0.918 predicts a deleterious effect, and BayesDel (0.34143) also exceeds the pathogenicity threshold.
BP5 No alternate molecular basis for disease has been identified in cases harboring this variant.
BP6 Variant is absent from ClinVar; no reputable source has reported this variant as benign.
N/A · 2 PVS1 · BP7
Research & evidence
Population frequency
gnomAD v4.1 screenshot
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD v2.1 screenshot
gnomAD v2.1
v4.1
Absent from gnomAD v4.1.
v2.1
Absent from gnomAD v2.1.
🇨🇦 CA
Absent from gnomAD-Canada v1.0.
Allele frequency by ancestry
three datasets · side by side
gnomAD v4.1
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
gnomAD v2.1
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
gnomAD Canada 🇨🇦
Absent · 0 / ?
0 hom
Not observed in any ancestry group.
ClinVar screenshot
ClinVar
This variant is absent from ClinVar.
SpliceAI screenshot
In silico
SpliceAI predicts no significant splice impact for this variant (max delta score = 0.10). REVEL score = 0.918. BayesDel score = 0.34143.
Functional / OncoKB screenshot
Functional Unknown Oncogenic Effect
OncoKB did not identify variant-specific reviewed functional evidence for this variant; gene-level curated context is available for reviewer follow-up. ROS1, a receptor tyrosine kinase, is altered by mutation or chromosomal rearrangement in a diverse range of cancers, including lung cancer.
OncoKB ↗
COSMIC screenshot
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots screenshot
Cancer hotspots
Somatic evidence Not in COSMIC / hotspots
COSMIC
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot. This variant has not previously been reported in somatic cancers (COSMIC).
Hotspots
This variant does not lie in a statistically significant hotspot.
Sources & reference links
8Sources
ClinVar
gnomAD v2.1
gnomAD v4.1
gnomAD-Canada
SpliceAI
OncoKB
COSMIC
Cancer hotspots