BP4
supporting
review
Benign
Met (Supporting): SpliceAI predicts no splicing impact (max delta 0.00), satisfying BP4's no-impact clause. Flagged for human review: MaxEntScan was not available, so SpliceAI was used for the BP4 splicing sub-path.
GJB2 ClinGen Hearing Loss VCEP specification (cspec v2.0) BP4 rule: 'Computational evidence suggests no impact; REVEL score <=0.15 or no impact to splicing in MaxEntScan.'Local REVEL v1.3 lookup (source_registry key 'revel') for chr13:20189137 C>T returned REVEL score = 0.499, above the 0.15 BP4 threshold, so this sub-path alone does not support BP4.SpliceAI Lookup (source_registry key 'spliceai') for NM_004004.6:c.445G>A returned max_delta_score = 0.00 (pangolin_SG 0.003, pangolin_SL -0.002), indicating no predicted native splice-site disruption or cryptic splice-site creation, used here in place of the VCEP-named MaxEntScan tool (not present in the case evidence files) to satisfy the BP4 'no impact to splicing' clause.